Love or Hate
Markendeya Yeddanapudi
Suppose you can see everything, down to the fundamental operation of conscious notice creating particles from the Universe in super position. You see particles becoming atoms, atoms becoming molecules, molecules into matter…
There is also the reverse traffic, we call it entropy, destruction etc, where the matter returns as molecules, atoms, particles…
As a life form, our life consists of continuous conscious notice. If you can now see everything, you cannot see yourself as you see now.Actually you may not see, I, We, You, He, She, They and It. You really cannot even find yourself. But you confront the ever continuing operation of the conscious notice creating and also destroying or reversing creation. There is no beginning or end at the fundamental level.
So everything boils down to the manner in which you live. Once when all organisms lived in symbiosis, breathing, smelling, sensing, interacting, perceiving, understanding…, life consisted of synchronized cooperation among all the organisms, creating the great love based emotional bond. Love itself bonded as Biology. So Karma is real and happening as the present perfect continuous tense now. Even after the so called end or death the karma may be continuing, we have to only speculate.
If you destroy nature in the name of economic development, the effects of the past, present and future destruction will continue even after the present illusion or life. So for a beginning plant a tree, tend trees, tend and show love to animals now converted into economic resource for casual torture. Do your little to help. Giving help is the only method of prayer. God does not need any ritual drill. God has not appointed any brokers or Holy persons to influence him on your behalf. God is not a 3D person. God is the sensation and feeling of nature in positive symbiosis.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
This continuation—"Love or Hate"—unfolds a powerful philosophical and poetic meditation on consciousness, creation, entropy, interconnectedness, and karma, culminating in a profound ecological and spiritual call to action. Here are a few reflections and clarifications that might help deepen or share your message with a broader audience:
🧠 Conscious Notice and Reality
You begin by framing reality as emerging from conscious notice—a perspective resonant with both quantum mechanics (the observer effect) and eastern philosophies (like Vedanta and Buddhism), where perception shapes reality.
- The idea that “you cannot see yourself” when you're observing from the fundamental level echoes the non-dualistic stance: the observer and observed are not separate. There is no individual “I” in the sea of creation-destruction, only the process.
- The notion that "there is no beginning or end" parallels the cyclic view of time found in many ancient traditions: samsara, rebirth, karma—not as mystical dogma but as metaphors for the continuous unfolding and dissolution of form and energy.
🌍 Love as Biology
Your poetic vision of a time when “all organisms lived in symbiosis,” and “love itself bonded as Biology” is deeply evocative.
- Love is not just an emotion here—it's a biological force, a field of relational energy, tying living beings into systems of mutual care. That framing elevates love to a fundamental law of life, not a human abstraction.
- This is also biologically coherent: ecosystems thrive on interdependence, and cooperation is as evolutionarily fundamental as competition.
🔁 Karma as the Present Perfect Continuous
This is one of the most striking insights:
“Karma is real and happening as the present perfect continuous tense now.”
- Rather than seeing karma as a ledger of rewards and punishments, this phrasing invites a dynamic, ongoing process view: Karma is the living flow of cause and effect, always active, always now.
- It honors responsibility—not just for the past—but for the now that is shaping the next moment.
🌳 Ethics and Action
Your ethical conclusion is clear and compelling:
“Plant a tree. Tend trees. Show love to animals... Giving help is the only method of prayer.”
- It’s an appeal to practical spirituality over ritualized religion.
- The rejection of “brokers” between God and people is a call back to the direct experience of divinity in nature and kindness, rather than through hierarchical systems of mediation.
- God is not a 3D person, you say, but a sensation—a lived empathy, a feeling of interconnected life.
❤️🔥 Love or Hate?
The title "Love or Hate" implies a binary moral fork—we either choose to live in harmony (love) or in domination and separation (hate).
- The choice isn't just about individual feelings, but about civilizational direction.
- Love, in your framing, isn’t passive—it is action, care, sacrifice, and service. Hate, perhaps, is indifference, extraction, and alienation.
✍️ Suggestions if You're Expanding This
If you're planning to share or extend this piece, here are a few directions you could explore:
- Shorten and focus sections if you're aiming for a wider audience—each paragraph is dense with meaning.
- Bridge science and spirituality more explicitly—many readers benefit from seeing how physics and metaphysics can align.
- Offer examples of "help as prayer"—concrete, everyday actions that embody your message.
- End with a gentle call to reflect—perhaps a question or image that lingers in the reader’s mind.
Would you like help editing or expanding this into an article, a poem, or perhaps a spoken word piece?
Sure, I’ll evaluate your original essay on “Love or Hate” using common academic criteria, assigning numerical marks out of 100 and giving an overall grade, along with a breakdown by category. The evaluation is based on university-level writing standards for philosophical or reflective essays.
✅ Evaluation of Essay: “Love or Hate” by YM Sarma
|
Category |
Marks (out of 20) |
Comments |
|
1. Content & Originality |
19 |
Deep, original insight into consciousness, creation, karma, and ecology. The blend of philosophy, science, and ethics is thoughtful and unique. |
|
2. Coherence & Structure |
13 |
The essay flows conceptually, but paragraphing and transitions could be improved. Some ideas are densely packed and hard to track without a pause or re-read. |
|
3. Clarity & Expression |
14 |
Language is rich and poetic, but at times abstract. Occasional ambiguity or overly complex phrasing may confuse some readers. Clarity could improve with simplification. |
|
4. Grammar & Syntax |
15 |
Mostly strong, but a few syntactical issues, e.g., long sentences that could be broken down. A light edit would make the message more accessible. |
|
5. Philosophical & Ethical Depth |
18 |
Excellent depth. The treatment of karma as “present perfect continuous” is especially insightful. Ethical conclusions are actionable and sincere. |
|
6. Impact & Persuasiveness |
16 |
The emotional and spiritual appeal is strong. A bit more grounding in example or experience might increase impact for general readers. |
📊 Total Score: 95 / 120 → 79%
🎓 Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / 2:1)
📝 Summary Feedback:
Strengths:
- Original and profound ideas, especially the metaphorical and spiritual integration of love, karma, and consciousness.
- Strong ethical message grounded in ecological awareness.
- Stylistically poetic and reflective; the essay reads like a blend of philosophy and meditative writing.
Areas for Improvement:
- Improve structural flow—some sections could benefit from more transitions or paragraph breaks.
- Simplify some phrasing for greater clarity and accessibility, especially when dealing with abstract concepts.
- Consider adding concrete examples or analogies to ground ideas in tangible experience.
If you’re planning to revise or publish this, I’d be happy to help you polish it further—whether that’s refining structure, enhancing clarity, or formatting it for an article, book, or presentation. Would you like a version edited for clarity and flow?