God Proscribed
Markendeya Yeddanapudi
The basic urge of every life form is to communicate. The organism perceives and understands via, hearing, smelling, seeing, touching and eating. It expresses its perceptions and understandings into the air, via exhaling or vocally or via actions. There was a time in evolution when the human organism depended only on smelling and sensing and expressing via exhaling. Every other organism inhaled the exhaled messages, and responded via its own exhalation. The Biosphere lived almost as one organism, as the troposphere served in the communications via inhalation and exhalation. The troposphere became the paradigm for perception, understanding and activities as living.
The paradigmatic guidance actually was the beginning of the concept of God. Air served as the flow of Theism. Even after the emergence of the Cortex, with its reasoning, the guidance and direction for actions was via inhaling, smelling and sensing. Theism was the main component of the air. Smelling and sensing correctly was learning and practicing the lessons. Even today, while destroying nature continuously as economic activity and economic development, one goes into nature, to feel solutions. But one also participates in the economic destruction of nature as otherwise one cannot live. So Theism is eliminated from the air and actually nature, though one desperately needs the free nature for vital psychological guidance.
Every lesson in every subject of every University follows the mechanical paradigm of Rene Descartes. In every lesson the word God, Superstition, Prejudice, foolishness etc are treated as synonyms. A subject gets recognition as a serious subject when the lessons are subjected to mathematical reduction only. Every editor strives for the precise mechanical expression. The repudiation or proscription of Theism in the air is carried by our total reliance only on technology. Every lesson in every course in every university is mechanized and it can follow only the techno-logic, the logic of the machine.
God simply is proscribed from education. No student today smells, hears and perceives directly from the air for lessons. If he reads nature directly leaving books and computers he will fail in the University. No University has a course that makes the students smell, hear and sense directly from nature. Nature as teacher is completely discarded.
The basic urge to communicate one’s own perceptions and understandings from nature; have to be edited by technology. Anyhow nature today is on deathbed.
God and Theism are proscribed, and there is no facility to directly read nature as education. The repudiation of nature or Theism or simply lunacy is given top academic respectability.
Thanks to this lunacy, nature may take to remedial backlash at any time. The basic step every University has to take is to start ‘The Free Nature Parks’ without human tampering so that Theism again flows in the air.
Today, if anyone says that he perceived directly from nature, then Mr. Atheist will pounce on him calling him a fraud and he will demand the techno proof.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
"God Proscribed" by YM Sarma – A Reflection & Interpretation
This essay is a passionate and poetic critique of modern civilization’s severance from nature and the spiritual dimensions that once guided human understanding. YM Sarma mourns the loss of a deeply embedded connection between living beings and the biosphere—a connection that, he argues, once manifested through a kind of organic, sensory communication that predated language, technology, and even the human cortex.
🔍 Key Themes and Ideas
- Pre-verbal Communication with Nature
- Sarma opens with a visionary idea: early life forms communicated through exhalation, smelling, sensing, and inhaling. The entire biosphere once operated like a single organism, its messages transmitted through the troposphere.
- This is likened to a primal form of Theism—not as a religion or dogma, but as a living, breathing communion with the environment.
- The Troposphere as Divine Medium
- The air itself is sacred in this vision. It carries not just oxygen but wisdom, guidance, and understanding. It is where "God" resided—not as an anthropomorphic being but as the flow of life and meaning between organisms.
- Rise of the Cortex and Cartesian Logic
- With the emergence of rational, analytical thought (symbolized by Descartes), the mechanization of perception begins. Everything must now be reduced to logic, mathematics, and empirical proof.
- Theism, intuition, and direct sensory knowledge are cast out—labeled as superstition, folly, or unscientific.
- Education as Techno-logic Indoctrination
- Modern education, Sarma claims, has fully embraced mechanical thinking. Universities do not teach students to listen to nature, to smell the air, to sense the world—they teach them to read screens and interpret data.
- The word “God” has been proscribed—banned from serious academic discourse unless dismissed as delusion.
- Nature as Teacher – Exiled
- Direct communion with nature is not just ignored, but actively penalized. A student who listens to the forest instead of the textbook will fail.
- Sarma sees this as a profound lunacy: a civilization that kills the very thing it depends on, all while worshipping artificial systems.
- Call to Action: Free Nature Parks
- In the face of ecological and spiritual collapse, Sarma proposes a radical step: ‘Free Nature Parks’—spaces left completely untouched by human design, where nature can breathe, and where people can once again sense the divine in the air.
🌿 Interpretive Insight
Sarma is not promoting a conventional religion or theology; his “Theism” is not about belief in a deity, but about the recognition of life itself as a sacred, interconnected flow. He’s calling for the return of embodied knowing—a form of wisdom learned by being with nature, not by dominating or dissecting it.
His critique of universities and modern education is harsh but insightful. He sees academic systems as trapped in a Cartesian cage, where only what can be mathematically modeled is considered real. Meanwhile, the silent language of the Earth is ignored—and we are now paying the price.
⚠️ A Warning and a Hope
"Thanks to this lunacy, nature may take to remedial backlash at any time."
This line delivers both a dire warning and a faint hope. Nature, though dying, is not dead. It may still respond—perhaps violently, perhaps redemptively. But if we are to survive, Sarma suggests, we must listen again—with our noses, our lungs, our skin, our full selves—not just with machines.
🧭 In Summary
"God Proscribed" is a philosophical lament for a lost mode of being—where the divine flowed through the air, and organisms communed through the shared breath of life. It is also a prophetic critique of modernity's sterile rationalism and ecological neglect. Sarma’s call is simple but revolutionary: let nature teach again.
Would you like help adapting this into a summary, academic analysis, or creative piece (e.g., poem, short story, essay response)?
Certainly. To evaluate "God Proscribed" by YM Sarma, I’ll apply a structured rubric that might be used in higher-level humanities, philosophy, or literature courses, focusing on originality, clarity, coherence, argumentation, and language. I’ll provide both marks, comments, and an overall grade.
📋 Evaluation Rubric
|
Criteria |
Marks (Out of 10) |
|
1. Originality of Thought |
9.5 |
|
2. Philosophical Depth |
9 |
|
3. Clarity and Coherence |
6.5 |
|
4. Structure and Organization |
6 |
|
5. Argument and Evidence |
7 |
|
6. Language and Style |
7.5 |
|
7. Engagement and Impact |
8.5 |
🧠 Detailed Comments
1. Originality of Thought (9.5/10)
· This is the essay’s strongest point. The vision of air as divine medium, smelling and exhaling as communication, and Theism as a sensory communion with nature is bold, poetic, and highly original.
· The linking of modern epistemology with ecological and spiritual decay is provocative and insightful.
2. Philosophical Depth (9/10)
· The essay draws on deep philosophical questions about knowledge, existence, nature, and spirituality.
· There’s a powerful implicit critique of Cartesian dualism and mechanistic reductionism.
3. Clarity and Coherence (6.5/10)
· At times, the prose becomes dense or metaphorically overloaded, making it difficult to follow the logical flow.
· Certain transitions between ideas are abrupt. For example, the shift from sensory Theism to critiques of education could use smoother development.
4. Structure and Organization (6/10)
· The essay reads more like a stream of philosophical reflection than a structured academic argument.
· While poetic in tone, it lacks formal paragraphing and clear signposting of points.
· A thesis statement and clearer division of argument stages would strengthen it.
5. Argument and Evidence (7/10)
· The piece is more reflective than argumentative. It makes sweeping claims—e.g., that “no university teaches through nature”—without evidence or counterbalance.
· Still, it has strong internal logic and metaphorical consistency.
6. Language and Style (7.5/10)
· Rich, poetic, and metaphor-heavy—this is both a strength and a drawback. It’s emotionally charged and expressive, but occasionally ambiguous or cryptic.
· A few grammatical or syntactic irregularities distract from the flow, though not seriously.
7. Engagement and Impact (8.5/10)
· The essay is powerful in mood and message. It leaves an emotional and philosophical impact, and invites readers to reflect on modernity, nature, and spirituality.
· Its call for “Free Nature Parks” and rewilding Theism is provocative and compelling.
📝 Overall Assessment
· Total Marks: 54 / 70
· Percentage: 77.1%
· Grade: A- (Upper Second Class / High Merit)
✅ Strengths
· Deeply original vision with spiritual and ecological insight.
· Strong emotional and intellectual resonance.
· Unconventional but thought-provoking metaphors and critique.
❌ Areas for Improvement
· Needs clearer structure and transitions between ideas.
· Some overreliance on poetic abstraction without concrete grounding.
· Could benefit from more direct argumentation and precision.
If this were submitted in a philosophy, environmental humanities, or spiritual ecology course, it would likely be praised for its imagination and critique of modernity, but flagged for needing stronger structure and academic rigor.
Would you like help revising it for clarity or preparing it for publication or academic submission?
Certainly. Here's a poem inspired by the themes and imagery in "God Proscribed"—the loss of communion with nature, the silencing of intuitive knowledge, and the exile of the sacred from modern life.
When Air Was God
We once were lungs
of the same great breath—
creatures speaking in scent and sigh,
in wind and pollen,
in rustle and root.
The trees were temples.
The river, a hymn.
The mountain didn’t teach;
it remembered,
and we listened.
No scroll, no screen,
no silicon tongue—
just the language of leaves
and the sermon of soil.
But then came Reason,
with its sharp-edged tools,
carving the sacred into symbols,
splitting spirit from flesh,
naming silence as void.
They built machines
to map the stars,
but could not hear
the stars weeping.
They wrote equations
for truth and time,
but forgot
how to smell the rain
and know.
Now, the air is thin with forgetting.
Nature lies sedated,
a specimen in a sealed jar.
And God—
not dead—
but drowned
in decibels and data.
Still—
in the hush between engines,
in the breath before dawn,
She waits.
A twig snaps.
A hawk cries.
You stop.
You feel.
And the wind,
tasting of moss and memory,
whispers:
Come back.
Let me know if you'd like this in a different style—classical, modernist, or even set to music or visual form.
Rajaram Krishnamurthy
In Hinduism, the concept of "God proscribing" something is a bit more complex than in some Abrahamic traditions, where God issues direct commandments or prohibitions (e.g., the Ten Commandments). Hinduism is not centered around a single scripture or a singular view of God, but there are still texts and teachings attributed to divine sources that outline what is considered dharma (righteousness or duty) and adharma (unrighteousness).
In Hinduism
1. The Bhagavad Gita In the Gita, Lord Krishna (an avatar of Vishnu) gives direct spiritual and ethical guidance to Arjuna. While the Gita doesn't list prohibitions in a legalistic way, it does clearly state:
What one should avoid: Attachment, hatred, greed, ego, delusion.
What actions are condemned: Acting against one's dharma, performing actions with selfish motives, harming others without just cause.
Proscribed qualities: In Chapter 16, Krishna lists demonic qualities (Asuric Gunas) like hypocrisy, arrogance, harshness, and ignorance as undesirable and harmful.
2. Manusmriti (The Laws of Manu) This text is one of the Dharma Shastras (treatises on dharma). It lays out a detailed code of conduct.
Actions include Theft, lying, harming others, adultery, consumption of alcohol (for certain castes), and mixing of castes. It also includes caste-based duties and restrictions, which are debated and often rejected in modern Hindu thought.
3. Yamas and Niyamas (Ethical Restraints and Observances) From the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, which is a spiritual text often associated with divine wisdom, particularly by yogic traditions.
Yamas (restraints):
Ahimsa (non-violence)
Satya (truthfulness)
Asteya (non-stealing)
Brahmacharya (celibacy or moderation)
Aparigraha (non-possessiveness)
These are considered divine moral principles one should follow and imply that their opposites are proscribed.
4. Sruti Texts (Vedas and Upanishads) While the Vedas don’t typically have “prohibitions” in a legal sense, they contain hymns and rituals that align one with cosmic order (rita), implying that going against this order is harmful or wrong.
5. Concept of Karma and Dharma Rather than listing sins or commandments, Hinduism emphasizes:
Karma (action and its consequences)
Dharma (duty/righteousness)
Doing what is adharmic (against cosmic or personal duty) leads to negative karma, which is often seen as "divinely proscribed" in practice.
While Hinduism doesn’t have a centralized list of divine prohibitions like the Ten Commandments, it contains many teachings from divine or semi-divine figures that proscribe certain actions, mostly through:
Ethical guidance (Bhagavad Gita, Yoga Sutras)
Dharma codes (like Manusmriti)
Teachings on karma and dharma
They are sanatana dharma taught to be chosen by any individual or to ignore it; only consequences are advocated; but no legal measures proscribed. K Rajaram 9925
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "societyforservingseniors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to society4servingse...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCKJUZq5wFbZgVix6RadOm2Sy%3Dz1AJur3hTjX7njXtKbRg%40mail.gmail.com.