From Anil Nauriya : 25 February 2026 : 28 May 2011 : Socialist Party : Draft Foundation Document

[Anil Nauriya]

Dear friends

Some years ago I had ben requested by Shri Surendra Mohan and Shri Rajinder Sachar and my friend Shri Prem Singh to draft the foundation document of the Socialist Party which it was proposed  shortly to revive.. If memory serves, Shri Surendra Mohan, who had devoted the last few years of his life to help attain this objective,  had already passed away by the time the Hyderabad convention, for which the attached  paper was ultimately prepared, was held.

The paper was a development of an article I had written for Janata a little earlier proposing the re-eestablishment.

As I was not present at Hyderabad I do not recall what shape the document ultimately took. 

One important aspect of this paper to which I might draw attention, was a critique not simply of the Congress but  also introspection about the Janata formations and their own compromises with sectarian politics.

Earlier this month I was at the Yusuf Meherally Centre at Tara  on 7 February 2026, where the Socialist Party (India) National Executive meet was being held and   where Sandeepbhai had kindly requested me to speak on Dadabhai Naoroji, whose 200th birth anniversary year  is currently being observed. I do not know if there is a recording but I may recall the  following points  I had  stressed  [except point (e) which I am not sure I mentioned, but am inserting in this mail for the record]

(a) that an ideological understanding  was essential for any political formation; 

(b) that India  was facing economic and political  challenges similar to the kind to which Dadabhai Naoroji had initially drawn attention during our national struggle; 

(c)  that the understanding of the notion of India that Naoroji and his colleagues and disciples like Gandhi and Nehru  fostered was the proper understanding of our nationhood; 

(d) That the focus on Poverty Studies that Dadabhai Naoroji pioneered was in effect imbibed by  the Socialist movement and needs to be a central and continual focus of our attention and activities;

(e) That the wide understanding of  working people offered by Dadabhai Naoroji at the Amsterdam International Socialist Conference in 1904, where he said that the bulk of the people of India comprised working people, needs to be reflected on and cherished  by the Socialist movement as it often usefully trascends many subsequent ideological  positions on the Left and has much potential for political consolidation;. 

 (f) That the considered view taken in the  Draft Platform of 1972 (after the SSP and PSP rd)united to form the Socialist Party)  that  Socialists did not envisage  cooperation with the Jana Sangh,  was the correct view; and 

(g) that the Party should usefully focus on municipal  and local Government institutions  (as Dadabhai Naoroji and many  like Rajendra Prasad, Jawaharlal Nehru, C Rajagopalachari, T Prakasam   and others had initially done)  so that its members could gain civic, administrative  and public experience  and also themselves be tested before seeking to  move on to Assembly and Parliamentary spheres. This would also serve, to some extent, to ensure   that the Socialist Party did not exist merely to contest elections or to seek entry into legislative institutions at any cost or by discarding its overall ideological, understanding..

With best wishes

Anil Nauriya

..

[Madan Lal Hind]

Thank you Anil Ji.

--
Socialist Party (India)
 
Website: spi.org.in.
Facebook: facebook.com/socialistpartyindia
Twitter: twitter.com/spiinfo
Email: socialist...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Socialist Party (India)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to socialist-party-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/socialist-party-india/CAEMcU%3DUS3_d9nC0-mju2_sUzf2ocoDMRjJsTwY8Y7dh9xHMhUQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[sgadh...@gmail.com]

Endorse thienwfdort count me j. As a volunteer to support  the effort .

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/socialist-party-india/CAONV01S%2BCuKWrh13ijGQSsRAM%3D6dBO4rcgGB_KCkN-FSregpkg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Anil Nauriya]

Dear Sanjay: The second word in your message seems garbled or mutilated. Could you please repeat your message? Regards, Anil Nauriya

[sgadh...@gmail.com]

Dear anil nauriya ji.

Sorry looks like auro correct is  u

consciously ensuring  auto garbling .....

Please read. it as ...

I fully Endorse this effort !    

Pleaee  count me in  As a volunteer to support  the effort . And contribute in all forms .

Taking  this opportunity  to slow introduce you to fr John and fr Edwin. From.the PNPI and neighbouracracy network .

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

[Anil Nauriya]

Dear Sanjay

Thank you. 

Thanks also for connecting Fr John and Fr Edwin.

Regards

Anil

[Sanjay Gadhalay]

I find a significant leaning towards inclusive socialistic and sociocratic  principles in the emerging younger policymakers in the west  ..this one was very interesting and convincing ..would urge all to have a look  and assimilate to analyse what he says  ... 

https://youtu.be/9M_dq_0ljsc?si=Dd9JsWr3I-atGC61

Warm regards,

Sanjay Gadhalay 
Ind           +91 9849454569 /

                +9140 2784 8837/0171

sgadhalay   skype : sg_europe_de        twitter :sanjay gadhalay

You are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart. : Steve Jobs

                                             __________________________________

   Infinite patience, infinite purity, and infinite perseverance                    are the secret of success in a good cause.                                                                        :Swami vivekananda                  

 http://www.swamivivekanandaquotes.org/2013/04/50-inspiring-and-motivational-quotes.html  

[Sanjay Gadhalay]

Fr john 

the anarchist approach is  dominating  in MS claras approach to evaluation  !! 

regards

sg 

Critical Synopsis of Key Ideas Stressed by Ms Clara Mattei
Mattei’s core thesis (building on her prior book The Capital Order and new work Escape from Capitalism) is that capitalism is not a spontaneous or “natural” order but a politically constructed and violently maintained system. She stresses three interlocking ideas:

Enforcement over spontaneity: Capitalism rests on wage-labour dependency (most people must sell their labour) + private profit-driven investment. These are upheld by continuous “violent” policies (austerity in fiscal, monetary, and industrial forms) that subordinate workers and depoliticise the economy.
Austerity as rational class tool: Far from economic incompetence, austerity deliberately creates scarcity, unemployment, and downward wage pressure to protect the “capital order” and prevent alternatives. It serves profit logic, not human needs — hence extreme inequality (12 people > 4 billion) is structural, not accidental.
Escape is possible through de-naturalisation and participatory construction: We are the architects. Mental deprogramming (“escape the mental trap”) + on-the-ground experiments (assemblies, participatory budgeting, public commons, needs-based taxation, horizontal/indigenous-inspired models) can replace profit with need. “Revolution” here is any social transformation that feeds people.

Critically, her analysis is powerful and evidence-based: it historicises austerity as a deliberate counter to post-WWI worker power, demystifies mainstream economics as ideological scaffolding, and highlights lived alternatives already emerging. Strengths include clarity on how liberal democracy masks economic coercion and the insight that liberals/fascists converge in preserving capital. Weaknesses: the transition path remains somewhat vague (how to scale participatory experiments globally without backlash or coordination failures?), and it risks underplaying cultural/psychological inertia or geopolitical constraints. Overall, she offers a compelling invitation to agency rather than fatalism.
Contrast from the Lens of Socialism and Sociocratic Principles of Governance
Socialist lens: Mattei’s diagnosis aligns closely with core socialist (especially Marxist) principles. She echoes the critique of wage labour as alienation/exploitation, production for profit over use-value, and the state/economic “coercion” that reproduces class power — classic socialist territory. Austerity as a tool to discipline labour and restore “capital order” mirrors analyses of primitive accumulation and surplus-value extraction. Her anti-capitalist stance (“if you want needs met, you’re anti-capitalist”) and call for social transformation (“revolution = feeding people”) resonate with socialist demands to abolish private ownership of the means of production. However, contrasts emerge in strategy: traditional socialism (Marxist-Leninist variants) often emphasises seizing state power for central planning or proletarian dictatorship to socialise the economy. Mattei leans more toward decentralised, plural grassroots experiments (“testing alternatives on the ground”) and explicitly draws on indigenous horizontal models rather than vanguard parties or state-centric ownership. She avoids prescribing a single socialist blueprint, framing escape as plural and needs-driven — a softer, more anarchist-inflected socialism that prioritises immediate participatory action over waiting for “conditions to ripen.”
Sociocratic principles of governance lens: This alignment is even stronger and more constructive. Sociocracy (invented by Kees Boeke, refined by Endenburg) rests on four principles: (1) consent-based decision-making (no majority rule; proposals pass unless reasoned objections), (2) organisational structure in semi-autonomous “circles” (not top-down hierarchy), (3) double-linking (upward/downward representation), and (4) continuous improvement via feedback. Mattei’s advocated alternatives — “organize through an assembly,” participatory budgeting, horizontal circular organisation, commons care, and wealth taxation by need — map almost directly onto sociocratic practice. She contrasts these with liberal democracy’s “superficial facade” sustained by economic coercion, exactly as sociocrats critique majority-vote systems that ignore minority objections and concentrate power. Indigenous models she praises (circular, horizontal, commons-focused) prefigure sociocracy’s equivalence and consent ethos. Where capitalism “enforces” via austerity and wage dependency, sociocracy offers a governance technology to operationalise her escape: circles could run participatory budgeting or assemblies without profit distortion, ensuring decisions serve needs equitably. The contrast she draws (coercion vs. voluntary horizontalism) is sociocracy’s raison d’être — it provides the missing “how” for scaling her alternatives without recreating hierarchy or coercion. She doesn’t name sociocracy explicitly, yet her vision effectively calls for sociocratic tools to dismantle the capital order.

In short, Mattei’s interview supplies a radical economic critique (socialist-compatible) while pointing toward a governance model (sociocratic) that could actually realise the participatory, needs-based system she envisions. The synthesis she implies — socialist ends via sociocratic means — offers a practical bridge beyond both liberal capitalism and top-down statism.                                                                                   https://youtu.be/9M_dq_0ljsc?si=Dd9JsWr3I-atGC61

Warm regards,

Sanjay Gadhalay 
Ind           +91 9849454569 /

                +9140 2784 8837/0171

sgadhalay   skype : sg_europe_de        twitter :sanjay gadhalay

You are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart. : Steve Jobs

                                             __________________________________

   Infinite patience, infinite purity, and infinite perseverance                    are the secret of success in a good cause.                                                                        :Swami vivekananda                  

 http://www.swamivivekanandaquotes.org/2013/04/50-inspiring-and-motivational-quotes.html  

[Sanjay Gadhalay]

Anil Ji  ,

Can we havea separate team  to take  up the redrafting of this original document  for relevance in current times ..protecting the ideology by becoming inclusive of the new concerns in LGBT  /Climate exchange  etc that have merged in Society ?

i would  request the involvement fo the PNP   initiative lead by Fr john /Fr edwin   to bring in the Sociocratic and Neighbouracracy perspectives  and additionally the Children's parliament and youth participation pan india under the pratyek  banner  by Bro Steve rocha in Delhi    to plan an inclusive approach   .

would invite a response from all and possibly a special VC call Sandeep bhai that can get all the people together to take it forward ? 

Warm regards,

Sanjay Gadhalay 
Ind           +91 9849454569 /

                +9140 2784 8837/0171

sgadhalay   skype : sg_europe_de        twitter :sanjay gadhalay

You are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart. : Steve Jobs

                                             __________________________________

   Infinite patience, infinite purity, and infinite perseverance                    are the secret of success in a good cause.                                                                        :Swami vivekananda                  

 http://www.swamivivekanandaquotes.org/2013/04/50-inspiring-and-motivational-quotes.html  

[Anil Nauriya]

Dear Sanjay

I am travelling and unable to respond in any structured way.

Maybe  a few days later, after I am back in Delhi.

Meanwhile, I leave you with two thoughts.

One. I think LGBT or LGBTQ is not a category even though the acronyms have caught on the world over.

For example, the problems of Transgender people in India are quite distinct from those of the others included in the acronym. The  discrimination and  issues faced by the Transgender people need separate intensive attention. which is not secured by lumping them together with the rest.

Two. As to redrafting,  there can hardly be a restriction on any further development of one's understanding..My own approach is. that unless anything in a draft needs to be deleted,  supplementing is better than redrafting, because an original draft usually has a logical structure that holds it together.

Those who supplement then take on a beneficial (also to themselves)  responsibility of working out a logical structure for the supplementary thesis, rather than simply piggy-backing on something that may be already there

Best wishes

Anil Nauiya

[Sanjay Gadhalay]

i concur ..we will await to have the call once you are back in delhi .

thank you 

Warm regards,

Sanjay Gadhalay 
Ind           +91 9849454569 /

                +9140 2784 8837/0171

sgadhalay   skype : sg_europe_de        twitter :sanjay gadhalay

You are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart. : Steve Jobs

                                             __________________________________

   Infinite patience, infinite purity, and infinite perseverance                    are the secret of success in a good cause.                                                                        :Swami vivekananda                  

 http://www.swamivivekanandaquotes.org/2013/04/50-inspiring-and-motivational-quotes.html