proposed visit to arunachal pradesh during 20-22 february to study impact of dam on siang river

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Socialist Party India

unread,
Jan 28, 2026, 11:03:38 AM (4 days ago) Jan 28
to Socialist Party, Tapo neeya, Rumaan Mecci, Dr. Gunjan Singh, rajeev yadav, anandi...@gmail.com, Arundhati Dhuru
Dear friends, 
On the initiative of Socialist Party (India) a visit is being organised to Arunachal Pradesh during 20-22 February to understand the people's response to the dam projects on Siang river. See my write-up below. If you would like to join this group please make your travel plans to reach Dibrugarh by 19 February afternoon/evening. You may leave on 23 February morning or later. Do inform me once you've finalised your travel plans. Everybody is expected to bear their own expenditure during this visit.
Thank You,
Tapo Niya
Secretary, Socialist Party (India)
Mobile no.: 9863165917
---------------------------------
As we prepare to visit Arunachal Pradesh, it is important to have some background on the ongoing conflict surrounding the proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project, commonly referred to as the Siang dam. For many communities living in the Siang valley, this is not simply a development project, but a long and unresolved struggle over land, livelihood, and decision making rights. The Siang River is central to life in the region it supports agriculture, sustains local economies, and holds deep cultural and ecological significance for Indigenous communities. Any intervention of this scale therefore affects far more than just water or electricity.

The project was declared a national initiative in 2008, with official aims including hydropower generation, flood moderation, and maintaining river flow. In recent years, the dam has also been presented by the state as strategically important, especially in the context of China’s dam-building activities upstream on the Yarlung Tsangpo. However, while government narratives often frame the project in terms of national security and regional development, local opposition has focused on a different concern: the manner in which decisions are being pushed forward without meaningful public consent.
Over the past few years, tensions have grown as the government has moved toward initiating preliminary feasibility and pre-feasibility studies. In several villages, Memorandums of Understanding have been signed to facilitate these early processes. Officials have described these MoUs as proof of community cooperation and local support, but many residents and anti-dam groups argue that such agreements do not reflect collective consent. In their view, consultation has been insufficient, and in some cases only a small number of individuals have been approached or influenced, while broader community voices remain excluded. This has created division within villages and reinforced a sense that the project is being advanced in a top-down manner.
Promises of development packages and future benefits have also been used to justify the project’s progress. Government statements have highlighted possible improvements in infrastructure, livelihoods, and economic opportunity. Yet many local people continue to raise the question of what these promises overlook. Communities fear that farmers will bear the greatest costs through loss of land, disruption of livelihood systems, displacement, and irreversible impacts on the fragile Himalayan ecology. For many, compensation and short-term packages cannot replace what is at stake the river’s relationship with culture, identity, and survival.
The resistance to the Siang dam, therefore, is not simply opposition to development, but a demand for a development process that respects Indigenous rights, transparent consultation, and community-led decision-making. The conflict reflects a deeper issue in Arunachal, whether large-scale infrastructure can be pursued legitimately when those most affected feel unheard. As you visit the region, the Siang valley offers a critical lens into the broader tensions between mega-project driven narratives of progress and the lived realities of communities who have been defending their land and river for years.



--
Socialist Party (India)
Website: spi.org.in
Twitter: @spiinfo
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages