Social Credit website

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Henry Raynel

unread,
May 19, 2013, 10:16:18 PM5/19/13
to social...@elistas.com, social...@googlegroups.com, ste...@stefanlipa.co.uk

Hello all,

Go to www.socialcredit.com.au registration it is free, and see what your friends and the world can discover about the philosophy and what New Economics of Social Credit is about.

 

Kindest regards

Henry Raynel

 

 

Wallace Klinck

unread,
May 21, 2013, 2:10:57 AM5/21/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
Many thanks, Henry.  Appears to be an excellent SC site.  Will look forward to exploring it in detail.
Sincerely
Wally





--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "socialcredit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to socialcredit...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

John G Rawson

unread,
May 21, 2013, 5:14:34 PM5/21/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
When they can't even spell Social Crediters?
No experienced SCer would make that mistake. Social creditors are the banks.
Or start by explaining how nearly impossible it is to become a "complete" Social Crediter.
Looks like another group set up to make us look stupid, to me.
J R

From: wmkl...@shaw.ca
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Social Credit website
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:10:57 -0600
To: social...@googlegroups.com

Wallace Klinck

unread,
May 23, 2013, 3:48:13 PM5/23/13
to social...@googlegroups.com


John,

I did not have an opportunity to proof-read the site but merely scanned it rapidly for  visual appeal and general content and it seemed to have a representative selection of titles, etc.   I note that the site appears to be down at present--perhaps for corrections, etc.  I am not sure who is the Webmaster and there is no guarantee that a Webmaster is entirely conversant with a subject or its specific terminology inasmuch as he or she is primarily a technician  responsible for the construction and administration of the site.  The site is new and anyone who knows anything about proof-reading understands the degree of concentration necessary to perform the task.  I have seen academic works published by university presses which have had errors even on the jackets.  While "typos" may not be desirable or even acceptable the reality is that they do occur and will no doubt continue to occur as long as works are produced by fallible mortals.  I would hope that you would look to the overall quality and potential of a site and at least initially give the producer of it credit for whatever good intentions and effort may be involved in the venture, rather than simply deriding it for minor or temporary errors.  I have noticed that many messages on this list have contained errors including those posted by yourself.  Pointing out any observed errors in a constructive spirit is desirable, but surely prejudging the project as likely set up to make "us" or Social Credit look "stupid" is both premature and presumptuous, if not unfair.  Don't you think?

Wally Klinck

Ellen Brown

unread,
May 23, 2013, 9:12:00 PM5/23/13
to social...@googlegroups.com

John G Rawson

unread,
May 23, 2013, 10:12:51 PM5/23/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
Your faith is grest, Wallace, but I think you underestimate the wiles of those opposed to us.
That is not a typo. The letters are too far apart on the board. 
It is, of course, a correction that could come up if the English used was American.  But it purports to come from Australia. Even with my eyersight I would expect to note an error in the main subject of discussion.
J R 

Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Social Credit website
From: wmkl...@shaw.ca
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:48:13 -0600
To: social...@googlegroups.com

Joe Thomson

unread,
May 24, 2013, 10:57:46 AM5/24/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
 

(Ellen Brown wrote:-)  Did you see this?  Jeesh!

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Some of the concerns expressed are no doubt valid, IF what seems to be promoted were  really  'Social Credit'.  It isn't.  The author fails to distinguish what  Major Douglas actually advocated  from the contorted interpretations of 'Social Credit' given in the article.  
 
Once again, there seems to be great emphasis in putting more money into the hands of the people, but little or nothing substantive on the effects of this  on PRICES.   
 
The Compensated Price Discount would alleviate this problem, but, as usual, it gets no attention from those who can't, or won't, see that 'credit issue' and 'price making' are the positive and negative sides of the same thing.   And no real benefit can be gained and kept without keeping them in a proper nexus to one another that's genuinely advantageous to the general community any money system is supposed to serve.
 
Joe

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3184/6352 - Release Date: 05/23/13

Jim Schroeder

unread,
May 26, 2013, 10:02:05 AM5/26/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
Hi John:
 
I think the website is very good as well.  I'm going to link it at my blog and the Social Credit article at Wikipedia.
 
One of the things I was trying to do with my blog is have a location where any digitized material can be made available by linking it there.  There's also material at American Libraries including many of Douglas's books.
 
I like the idea of having a centralized database, and dividing the literature into basic and advanced.
 
What I have always wanted to do with this list is get those of us who are knowledgeable on the subject organized and promoting the subject in an organized manner instead of merely discussing differences of opinion on the subject.  I don't mind discussing differences of opinion, but if that's all we do, then we are really wasting our time here.
 
We have a group of knowledgeable Social Crediters on this list, and if we just organized that knowledge in terms of promotion, we would be far more successful.  There are also a couple of of people that I know of who are very knowledgeable who are not on this list.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM, <johnw...@gmail.com> wrote:
So far as I can tell the website is pretty good.  Certainly could use more material on it if it claims to be an online repository of Social Credit literature, but I understand that this is being worked on.  There's apparently a lot of digitized material available in scattered locations online and on private drives.  (E.g., the Secretariat's page, the Australian League of Rights' page, and so on.)

By the way, are we open to a policy of freely sharing this literature, or has it been a sort of peer-to-peer sharing format for a reason?  Are we waiting for the right strategy in regards to spreading this information to crystallize, as well as the tools for the effective implementation of this strategy?

It seems like the best strategy (to me, at the moment) would be to have some sort of centralized database, where there would be "basic" and "advanced" literature for those just beginning and those pursuing a wider study of it, as this site has done, as well as a community (or a referral to a community such as this one) for those interested in actively taking up the idea.  It seems that if we were to create a new community it may be expedient to have it in a group social networking format, such as Ning or Buddypress, as I have participated in these sorts of groups previously and, compared to Google Groups (at least in my opinion), they are aesthetically and organizationally better done.  This way, it would be easy to get people interested by talking about it in person, and then give them a place online that is the go-to place that provides real, living resources for them to study and use.

I dunno, what do you think?
--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "socialcredit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to socialcredit...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
Jim Schroeder
 
 
 

Henry Raynel

unread,
May 27, 2013, 1:01:15 AM5/27/13
to social...@googlegroups.com

Dear Wally,

We very much appreciate your initial approval comment it gives us encouragement.

 

Thank you

Henry Raynel

 


From: social...@googlegroups.com [mailto:social...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Wallace Klinck
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May 2013 6:11 p.m.
To: social...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Social Credit website

 

Many thanks, Henry.  Appears to be an excellent SC site.  Will look forward to exploring it in detail.

Internal Virus Database is out of date.


Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/5105 - Release Date: 07/01/12 18:34:00

Wallace Klinck

unread,
May 28, 2013, 1:24:28 AM5/28/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for your kind comments, Henry.  Sorry to note that you have experienced major technical problems with the site and that it has required reconstruction.  Will watch for its imminent reappearance and look forward to exploring it at that time.  

Good Luck and Good Wishes.

Wally Klinck

Robert Klinck

unread,
Jun 2, 2013, 12:49:32 AM6/2/13
to social...@googlegroups.com
When this kind of attack is being mounted against Social Credit, it's probably a reaction to attention being drawn to it by readers of the website, which is a good sign.  If Social Credit advocacy was ineffective, it would not be the object of such a hostile (and desperately distorted) misrepresentation.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages