Economists, scientists, and politicians…I challenge you to consider
something new under the sun, to have courage, in fact to have the
courage….to have and embrace faith! Faith as in the psychological
experience of confidence. Grace was an evolutionary concept in the
first century. It has proven to be an evolutionary experience to
hundreds of millions since. Join me in embracing it as an equally
evolutionary economic, financial and monetary policy. Can it be too
much to believe in the transformational policy…of a transformational
idea and experience? After all what is the entrepreneurial and
productive value of loosing technological innovation from any
restraint associated with the human suffering caused by unemployment?
What are the possibilities for discovery and further enlightenment of
the nature of the cosmos as a result of the same? What are the
personal advantages to knowing that you’ve risen above narrow self
interest and evolved your own profession in the name of better serving
Humanity? Have faith in monetary Grace! It does not restrict or
exclude profit, it frees, enables and transforms it. It does not
restrict or exclude research and discovery, it frees and enables it
and might even enhance and transform science itself. It doesn’t even
restrict or exclude self interest…it just broadens its constituency
and better enables the ethics of statesmanship.
On May 17, 2:34 pm, John G Rawson <
johngraw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Wallace, this gets embarassingly naive.
>
> Who do you expect to produce items thatare not paid for?
>
> J R
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Post on Wisdom and its pinnacle Grace to INET's Real-World Economics Review Blog
> > From:
wmkli...@shaw.ca
> > Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 23:35:42 -0600
> > To:
social...@googlegroups.com
>
> > > "A free gift of Monetary Grace can make that
> > > theory truly free and graciously free flowing…finally, as well as
> > > awaken us to the abundance of the VALUE of the capital appreciation
> > > that is all around us…and that debt is merely the unintegrated, unsymmetrical manifestation thereof."
>
> > Yes Steve, society as a whole should not pay for what it produces but only for what it consumes. This core Social Credit precept is no doubt a very difficult proposition to accept by people accustomed to our accepted conventional and defective mode of payments and the prevailing false ethics or philosophy which elevates work for its own sake and supports, thereby, the current tyrannical and oppressive debt edifice.
>
> > Sincerely
> > Wally
>
> > > For more options, visithttps://
groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.