John Herman is one of them. I am amazed that nobody on this group has paid him the courtesy of commenting in his submission.
It is closer to Social Credit than any other outside proposals I have seen and he is willing to take up reasoned argument on particular points. For example, the need to tax back money issued, on which I approached him personally.
I know he uses orthodox language and definitions. Unfortunately that is the way the various items are defined, and we need to cope with them if we are to get anywhere. He uses them logically and correctly, so that they can be turned against orthodox theory, which he despises.
Surely we have the knowledge and abiluity to handle this?
J R