"unverified claiming nodes" and rel=me
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Quicksave
Aug 27, 2009, 6:36:35 AM8/27/09
to Social Graph API
Hi,
It seems there is a problem with the "rel=me" attribute.
I added in my Google Profile my blog's url and checked "This is a
profile page about me" in order to be a dorky as Brad said.
When I use the social graph API on my blog
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://piocheetjoue.blogspot.com&fme=1&edi=1&edo=1&pretty=1&callback
We can see that :
...
"unverified_claiming_nodes": [
"http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318"
],
...
This is MY Google Profile URL but apparently, I'm not a verified link
according to http://code.google.com/apis/socialgraph/docs/lookup.html
Am I wrong ?
It seems there is a problem with the "rel=me" attribute.
I added in my Google Profile my blog's url and checked "This is a
profile page about me" in order to be a dorky as Brad said.
When I use the social graph API on my blog
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://piocheetjoue.blogspot.com&fme=1&edi=1&edo=1&pretty=1&callback
We can see that :
...
"unverified_claiming_nodes": [
"http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318"
],
...
This is MY Google Profile URL but apparently, I'm not a verified link
according to http://code.google.com/apis/socialgraph/docs/lookup.html
Am I wrong ?
Brad Fitzpatrick
Aug 27, 2009, 8:41:16 PM8/27/09
to social-g...@googlegroups.com
That looks correct.
You don't have a me link from http://piocheetjoue.blogspot.com to that Google Profile URL. "unverified_claiming_nodes" means URLs which claim to be you, but don't have a reciprocal me path back (however indirectly).
Quicksave
Aug 28, 2009, 2:55:00 AM8/28/09
to Social Graph API
Ok I get it now. Thx !
I have another question.
When I check my Google Profile URL (not vanity) :
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318&fme=0&edi=1&edo=0&pretty=1&callback
I see at the end :
"nodes_referenced_by": {
"http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
"types": [
"me"
]
In fact, I created my vanity profile URL as
http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francois and not
http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois
I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
It's weird because when I look at
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francois&fme=0&edi=1&edo=0&pretty=1&callback
I don't see "nodes_referenced_by" although it's the same page ...
I would be grateful if you can explain me the underground things of
that.
> You don't have a me link fromhttp://piocheetjoue.blogspot.comto that
>
> > Am I wrong ?
I have another question.
When I check my Google Profile URL (not vanity) :
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318&fme=0&edi=1&edo=0&pretty=1&callback
I see at the end :
"nodes_referenced_by": {
"http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
"types": [
"me"
]
In fact, I created my vanity profile URL as
http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francois and not
http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois
I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
It's weird because when I look at
http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francois&fme=0&edi=1&edo=0&pretty=1&callback
I don't see "nodes_referenced_by" although it's the same page ...
I would be grateful if you can explain me the underground things of
that.
> You don't have a me link fromhttp://piocheetjoue.blogspot.comto that
> Google Profile URL. "unverified_claiming_nodes" means URLs which claim to
> be you, but don't have a reciprocal me path back (however indirectly).
>
> be you, but don't have a reciprocal me path back (however indirectly).
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Quicksave <beaufort.franc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > It seems there is a problem with the "rel=me" attribute.
> > I added in my Google Profile my blog's url and checked "This is a
> > profile page about me" in order to be a dorky as Brad said.
> > When I use the social graph API on my blog
>
> >http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://piocheetjoue.blogs...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > It seems there is a problem with the "rel=me" attribute.
> > I added in my Google Profile my blog's url and checked "This is a
> > profile page about me" in order to be a dorky as Brad said.
> > When I use the social graph API on my blog
>
> > We can see that :
>
> > ...
> > "unverified_claiming_nodes": [
> > "http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318"
> > ],
> > ...
>
> > This is MY Google Profile URL but apparently, I'm not a verified link
> > according tohttp://code.google.com/apis/socialgraph/docs/lookup.html
>
> > ...
> > "unverified_claiming_nodes": [
> > "http://www.google.com/profiles/100132233764003563318"
> > ],
> > ...
>
> > This is MY Google Profile URL but apparently, I'm not a verified link
>
> > Am I wrong ?
Quicksave
Sep 1, 2009, 2:12:18 AM9/1/09
to Social Graph API
Up ?
On Aug 28, 8:55 am, Quicksave <beaufort.franc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok I get it now. Thx !
>
> I have another question.
> When I check my Google Profile URL (not vanity) :http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/pro...
On Aug 28, 8:55 am, Quicksave <beaufort.franc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok I get it now. Thx !
>
> I have another question.
> I see at the end :
>
> "nodes_referenced_by": {
> "http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
> "types": [
> "me"
> ]
>
> In fact, I created my vanity profile URL ashttp://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francoisand nothttp://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois
>
> "nodes_referenced_by": {
> "http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
> "types": [
> "me"
> ]
>
>
> I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
> Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
> Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
>
> It's weird because when I look athttp://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/pro...
> I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
> Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
> Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
>
Brad Fitzpatrick
Sep 1, 2009, 10:02:18 AM9/1/09
to social-g...@googlegroups.com
Canonicalization quirk. Nothing to worry about for ranking or anything. I can make a note to clean it up when I have a sec.
Quicksave
Sep 1, 2009, 10:07:31 AM9/1/09
to Social Graph API
Thx.
On Sep 1, 4:02 pm, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@google.com> wrote:
> Canonicalization quirk. Nothing to worry about for ranking or anything. I
> can make a note to clean it up when I have a sec.
>
On Sep 1, 4:02 pm, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@google.com> wrote:
> Canonicalization quirk. Nothing to worry about for ranking or anything. I
> can make a note to clean it up when I have a sec.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Quicksave <beaufort.franc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Ok I get it now. Thx !
>
> > I have another question.
> > When I check my Google Profile URL (not vanity) :
>
> >http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/pro...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Ok I get it now. Thx !
>
> > I have another question.
> > When I check my Google Profile URL (not vanity) :
>
> > I see at the end :
>
> > "nodes_referenced_by": {
> > "http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
> > "types": [
> > "me"
> > ]
>
> > In fact, I created my vanity profile URL as
> >http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufort.francoisand not
>
> > "nodes_referenced_by": {
> > "http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois": {
> > "types": [
> > "me"
> > ]
>
> > In fact, I created my vanity profile URL as
> >http://www.google.com/profiles/beaufortfrancois
>
> > I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
> > Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
> > Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
>
> > It's weird because when I look at
>
> >http://socialgraph.apis.google.com/lookup?q=http://www.google.com/pro...
>
> > I know it's the same but it's not quite just.
> > Should I be worried about that (for ranking, referencement, etc.) ?
> > Should I share the "'without dot" URL instead of "with dot" ?
>
> > It's weird because when I look at
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages