Title: "Alternative Perspectives on Electoral Control"
Abstract.
This talk integrates two complementary perspectives on candidate
control in voting. Traditionally, candidate control is studied as a
harmful intervention: an external agent changes the candidate set to
manipulate the winner, and the main question is whether such control is
computationally easy or hard. We broaden this view by asking when
candidate control can also be beneficial, not just for election outcomes
but for participation and representation. In particular, we connect
affirmative-action style interventions that can improve
representativeness with models in which candidate entry changes who
turns out to vote.
The first part of the talk introduces
endogenous turnout, where each candidate attracts a subset of voters, so
adding or deleting candidates affects both vote shares and electorate
size. The second part studies a dynamic, spatial view of elections in
which voters and candidates evolve over time, and candidate control can
be evaluated not only by winner selection but also by its effect on
substantive representation in fragmented electorates. Together, these
perspectives show that candidate control is not a single phenomenon:
depending on the setting, it may be a manipulation tool, a turnout
mechanism, or a way to repair structural inequities. The common theme is
understanding when procedural interventions harm collective decisions,
when they help, and how the computational complexity of those choices
shapes what is feasible in practice.
To obtain the Zoom link, please subscribe to the Seminar Mailing List, or contact one of the organisers.
Reminder: On the seminar website
you can find the video recordings, slides and supplementary materials
for all past presentations, as well as information about future
presentations.