Cloud condensation nuclei are:
Aerosol particles (typically 0.05–1 μm radius)
Solid or liquid
Stable at tropospheric pressure
Hygroscopic (e.g., sulfates, sea salt, organics, dust)
They provide a surface onto which water vapor condenses when relative humidity exceeds 100% (or slightly below if hygroscopic).
Typical CCN sources:
Sea salt spray
Volcanic aerosols
Biogenic emissions
Industrial sulfate particles
A coronal mass ejection (CME) consists of:
Ionized hydrogen (protons)
Helium nuclei
Electrons
Embedded magnetic fields
When a CME reaches Earth:
Most charged particles are deflected by the magnetosphere.
Some enter near polar regions.
Energy deposition occurs mainly in the ionosphere (~80–500 km altitude).
Importantly:
CME plasma does not arrive as micron-sized aerosol particles.
It arrives as high-energy charged particles.
It does not persist as solid condensation surfaces.
There are three possible pathways often discussed in the literature:
(A) Direct plasma particles acting as CCNNot physically plausible because:
Protons/electrons are not stable solid surfaces.
They do not form persistent aerosol particles at tropospheric pressures.
They recombine rapidly.
Conclusion: No direct CCN role.
Ionization increases:
Small ion concentrations
Molecular cluster formation
This mechanism has been studied in the context of cosmic rays (e.g., Svensmark hypothesis). Laboratory work (such as the CLOUD experiment at CERN) shows:
Ionization can enhance formation of ultra-fine aerosol clusters.
However, most clusters do not grow to CCN size.
Growth requires sulfuric acid, ammonia, organics.
So ionization can assist nucleation, but:
The effect is modest.
It depends on precursor gases.
It is strongest in the upper troposphere, not ionosphere.
Water vapor concentration above ~15 km drops sharply.
In the ionosphere:
Water vapor mixing ratio is extremely low.
Temperatures are high.
Air density is extremely low.
Therefore:
Even if ionization occurs, there is insufficient water mass to produce significant latent heat release.
Any condensation would be negligible in terms of global energy balance.
CMEs:
Affect space weather for hours to days.
Deposit energy mainly in auroral zones.
Modify ionospheric conductivity.
But:
Global latent heat flux from the hydrological cycle ≈ 80 W/m².
CME-induced atmospheric energy perturbations are small compared to this.
No observational record shows:
Sustained hemispheric cooling events
Large-scale cloud increases
Multi-month cold waves
that correlate robustly with CME activity.
A more physically defensible research question would be:
Can CME-enhanced ionization slightly modify upper-tropospheric aerosol nucleation rates, which in turn alter cloud microphysics regionally?
That is a subtle microphysical question.
But current evidence suggests:
Any such effect would be small.
It would not dominate over greenhouse gas radiative forcing.
It would not produce large global cooling episodes.
For condensation to cool the planet:
Vapor must condense.
Latent heat must be released.
That energy must radiate to space.
Net outgoing longwave radiation must increase.
Ionization alone does not guarantee steps 2–4.
Can CME plasma act as CCN?
No, not directly.
Can CME-induced ionization slightly enhance molecular nucleation under certain conditions?
Possibly, but the effect is weak and not climatically dominant.
Is there evidence that CME events produce sustained global cooling via water vapor condensation?