The
Watchman
Neal
Ross
6/2/2013
For nearly 35
years I have served my country in some fashion. I served in the United States
Air Force for thirteen years, then another ten as a military contractor
working with the U-2 reconnaissance program at Beale AFB, California. For the
remainder I have found myself fighting a losing battle against the ignorance
of the American populace. I say losing because I have found that most people
would rather accept outright lies than face the truth that their own
government has become their worst enemy.
You can't
possibly imagine the sadness, and anger, I feel when I watch the country that
I love go down in flames because the people living in it refuse to see what is
happening right before their very eyes. Thomas Jefferson was right when he
said, "Freedom is lost gradually from an uninterested, uninformed, and
uninvolved people..."
For a time I
had almost given up as I felt that I had said all that needed to be said and
if the people did not want to hear it, then so be it. But then someone
suggested I read Ezekiel 33:1-9, which I did. I then realized that God had
given me this gift to write in a manner that is both enjoyable and
informative, and also the ability to see, somewhat clearly, the problems
facing this nation. Call it what you will, but I consider it my calling, or my
purpose in life to be that watchman spoken of in Ezekiel, to warn people about
what is happening. If they refuse to heed my warnings, then my conscience will
be clear when the end of our Republic finally comes.
Nonetheless,
it still boggles my mind that people cannot see that, in regards to our system
of government, there are simple truths that cannot be denied. One of these
truths is that our government is not one which was bestowed with unlimited
power to do whatever it thinks is best for the general welfare of the people,
and the nation. In 1794 James Madison, the father of the Constitution, stood
before the House of Representatives and said, "[T]he government of the
United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is
not like the state governments, whose powers are more
general."
Another truth
is that our rights are ours by our virtue of being human, they are
unalienable, that is they are unable to be taken, or given away. Relatively
recently, in 1943 in fact, Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson ruled,
"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from
the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of
majorities and officials and to establish them as legal precedents to be
applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free
speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly and other fundamental
rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no
elections." Source: West Virginia Board of Education vs.
Barnette
Article 1,
Section 8 of the Constitution defines the specified powers that Madison spoke
of. There are no hidden, or implied powers with that document, whatever powers
granted our government are clearly defined right there.
The Bill of
Rights contains a list of certain rights that the Founders felt were so
important that they be specifically listed so as to ensure that they be
retained by the people. But there are many other rights that are not included
among them, which is why they included the Ninth Amendment, which states,
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people."
Do you
understand the meaning of retain? It means to continue to have (something); to
keep possession of. Our rights belonged to us BEFORE the government ever came
into existence and it was the protection of those rights for which our
government was established. Yet you, the people of America, are so unlearned
in these simple truths that you, either through ignorance or through fear, are
willing to see these rights trampled upon without uttering the slightest
protest.
In 1776 the
state of Virginia drafted its own Bill, or Declaration of Rights. Section 1 of
their document explains it much better than I, "That all men are by nature
equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when
they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or
divest their posterity; namely the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the
means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining
happiness and safety."
Let's take a
moment to discuss that last sentence, particularly where it says, "... with
the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining
happiness and safety." What exactly is property? Is it your home, your
car, the clothes that hang in your closet? Noted Frenchman Frederic Bastiat
wrote, "Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the
ceaseless application of his faculties to natural resources. This process is
the origin of property." Therefore, property is anything that we have
acquired by our labor; it can be the abovementioned things, or it can merely
be the money you earn at work, otherwise known as the fruit of our labor.
Virginia's Bill of Rights ALSO declares that it is our inherent right to have
the means to pursue and obtain happiness AND safety. Safety is equally
applicable to the protection of our lives, and our property.
When our
government takes from us the fruit of our labors, under the guise of taxation,
and spends it upon programs which are not among the specifically enumerated
powers granted them, it is theft, plain and simple. It then becomes our right,
and our duty, to defend ourselves against such theft. As Bastiat goes on to
say, "Each of us has a natural right—from God—to
defend his person, his liberty, and his property."
Noted English
political philosopher, whose works heavily influenced our Founding Fathers,
once wrote, "The great chief end therefore, of Mens uniting into
Commonwealths, and putting themselves under Government, is the Preservation of
their Property." However, Locke goes on to say, "Whenever the
legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or
to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a
state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further
obedience,..." John Locke's 2nd Treatise of Civil Government,
(1690)
These are the
simple truths upon which our entire system of government was founded. Yet, did
you know, that according to data by the Heritage Foundation, upwards of 62% of
all spending by our government goes towards entitlement programs of some sort?
I'll ask you but one time, find me where in the Constitution that it is
specifically authorized that the government take money from you and give it to
someone else, no matter the reason. I'll wait...
Can't find
it? That's because it does not exist, it is not within the power of the
federal government to take your earnings and redistribute them to anyone else,
and this applies equally to entitlements and benefits at home, and to foreign
aid.
Numerous
Presidents in the past understood this simple truth. In 1794 President James
Madison vetoed a Congressional appropriations bill to assist refugees. In his
veto statement he wrote, "I cannot
undertake to lay my finger on that Article of the Constitution which granted a
right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their
constituents."
In 1854
President Franklin Pierce vetoed a bill to help the mentally ill, saying,
"I cannot
find any authority in the Constitution for public charity .... [this] would be
contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to
the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is
founded."
During his
administration President Grover Cleveland vetoed an Appropriation bill to
provide disaster relief aid to victims of a Texas drought, wherein he said,
"I feel obliged to withhold my approval of the plan to indulge in
benevolent and charitable sentiment through the appropriation of public funds
... I find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution. The
lesson should be constantly enforced that though the people should support the
government, the government should not support the
people."
Yet, as
stated by the Heritage Foundation, 62% of our governments spending goes
towards these very entitlement programs that earlier presidents clearly
understood are not among the powers granted government. What has changed? Ben
Franklin once warned, "When the
people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of
the republic." He did not
mean that the land and the people will simply vanish. What he meant was that
our government, built upon the rule of law, would vanish.
You might
think that it is the purpose of government to do all these things for the
people, and the country...you would be wrong. You might think that since the
majority wants these things, they can elect individuals who will provide them
for you...you would still be wrong. In a 1786 letter to James Monroe,
James Madison wrote, "There is no
maxim in my opinion which is more liable to be misapplied, and which therefore
needs elucidation than the current one that the interest of the majority is
the political standard of right and wrong... In fact it is only reestablishing
under another name and a more specious form, force as the measure of
right..."
If a gang of
armed men forced their way into your house and demanded that you give them
your property would it make it right just because they outnumbered you? No, it
would not, it would be criminal, yet that is exactly what you are doing to the
strict Constitutionalists in this country by your continued voting for
representatives who overstep their authority and plunder the people of their
earnings. And let us not forget about the irreparable damage to the Bill of
Rights shall we.
I understand
that you have been not taught these things in school, but it does not excuse
you from accepting them as truths when they are presented to you. The least
you could do is to research them to see if I am telling you the truth. But no,
that would simply be too much to ask, wouldn't it?
Science
Fiction writer Isaac Asimov once said, "There is a
cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain
of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our
political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." I find that
to be true when discussing politics with someone who has absolutely no clue as
to what they are talking about. It does not matter that they cannot back their
claims up with facts, they believe that they are right and nobody has the
right to disagree with them. Maybe van Loon was right when he said,
"Any formal
attack on ignorance is bound to fail because the masses are always ready to
defend their most precious possession - their ignorance."
Yet
the majority of you reading this is are Americans, why don't you start
acting like one? Do you care so little for your country that you would
rather flood your mind with trivial nonsense while your nation goes to
ruin around you?
|
|
|
|
Theodore
Roosevelt once said, "I am an American; free born and free bred, where I
acknowledge no man as my superior, except for his own worth, or as my
inferior, except for his own demerit. " Roosevelt ALSO said, "If an American is to amount to anything he must rely
upon himself, and not upon the State; he must take pride in his own work,
instead of sitting idle to envy the luck of others. He must face life with
resolute courage, win victory if he can, and accept defeat if he must, without
seeking to place on his fellow man a responsibility which is not
theirs."
I know there
is a good chance that I have pissed off a good many people with this. Too bad.
To justify myself I leave you with one last quote by Teddy Roosevelt,
"I care not what others think of what I do, but
I care very much about what I think of what I do! That is
character!"
Comments will be accepted if they are
well
thought out and based upon fact.