Re: How long was 6StringStu locked up in a loony bin?

[earthpots]

"SixStringStu" <hawkinnc...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:jra687$30c$1...@dont-email.me:

>
> "earthpots" <noemail@wanted.> wrote in message
> news:XnsA06FBDDF5...@69.16.185.252...
>> "SixStringStu" <hawkinnc...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:jr4tj1$c91$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>> "earthpots" <noemail@wanted.> wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA06EC8C6A...@69.16.185.252...
>>>> "SixStringStu" <hawkinnc...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:jr16mr$ha8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "earthpots" <cml@inhiding..> wrote in message
>>>>> news:XnsA06DBEABA...@69.16.185.252...
>>>>
>>>>>> According to one account on the Internet, which has since been
>>>>>> deleted, James Stuart Hodges (aka 6StringStu) was locked up by
>>>>>> the Feds in an institution for the criminally insane for a period
>>>>>> of four years.
>>> Why was it deleted? Who had that deletion done? and, Why do you
>>> continue to tout that as an official source for information?
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Deleted? Surely your way back machine isn't broken, you can pull
>>>>> it up (make it up) at will, right?
>>
>>> Nothing that was ever on the net is deleted, somebody has a copy
>>> somewhere.
>>
>> Unlike career criminals and life-long soceital parasites like you, I
>> have to actually work and earn the money that I receive. So, I've
>> got better and more important things to do with my time than waste it
>> trying to the copy that somebody has somewhere.
>>


> "more important things to do with my time than waste it trying to the
> copy that somebody has somewhere." What does this nonsensical verbage
> mean? Dumbass! What's the deal, too drunk to type last night?

Nope. I just didn't bother to waste my time going back to proof read the
reply. Except to morons like you, it's pretty obvious that reply was
intended to read "...trying to find the copy..."

> Also, considering how prolific you are trolling on USENET it would
> appear that you do hardly anything BUT spend all your time trolling.
> Some job!

All posts to the UseNet are time stamped, so, if that allegation is true,
you shouldn't have any trouble backing it up with some proof. Or is it
that you have me confused with your lord and savior who is one of the most
notorious spammers and trolls on the UseNet.


>>> Use your superior intellect to find one. That is IF you are
>>> as smart as you claim to be.
>>
>> You've got me confused with your lord and savior, psychopath Jack
>> Wesolowski.


> fyi twink cushion, my Lord and Savior is non other then Jesus Christ.

As is clearly evident by your foul mouth, hate-filled comments and
defamatory lies. In reality, that's just another one of your many
delusions, DUMBO.


> Jack just happens to be another one of your victems. AND an all round
> nice guy.

Not according to what I read on the UseNet, and certainly not based on my
own experience. Another one of your many delusions, DUMBO.

> a person who has done more good for society then you ever
> will.

According to what criteria? What specifically has your psychopathic lord
and savior discovered, developed or created for the benefit of mankind?
Based on what I've read, he's spent the past fifteen years of his otherwise
useless life trolling, spamming and posting vile, bigoted and racist
comments on the UseNet.


> A person who doesn't run around picking on disABLED people and
> crying like a little school yard sissy whenever somebody disagrees
> with him.

No one who I know does that either. But if you mean a person who gives
back in like kind the same sort of crap that a handfull of societal
parasites dish out, then that's another story.


>>I've never made any claims about either having a superior
>> intellect or being smart. On the other hand, I have stated on
>> several occasions that , in addition to being a career criminal, a
>> pathological liar and a self-proclaimed sociopath, you have shit for
>> brains and are dumber than a box of rocks.
>

> Ok, then I'll call you a deluded narciscist. An egotistical piece of
> shit with his own head rammed so far up his own ass that all he can
> smell is shit of his own creation.

Given that you are a piece of scum that lives in the ditch that is beneath
the bottom rung of the ladder of human evolution, you can call me anything
you wish, because it doesn't matter, asswipe.


>>>> Unnecessary because on numerous occalsions, which are documented in
>>>> the google-groups archive, you have made reference to the content
>>>> of the American Profile article to which I was referring.
>

> Yes, but where in all of that is the article an official record? How
> many times in those responses did I report that there are many false
> allegations in said article? And yet you still continue to reference
> it as tho it were the gospel.

The American Profile article was on the Internet for several years before I
became aware of it. You claim that it contained "many flase allegations."
If that is so, why wheren't you whining about the "many false allegations"
during the several year time period between when the article first appeared
and when I became aware of it?


> What a fucking loser you are, believing
> just any ol thing you read and using it for your own twisted purposes.

It wasn't "any ol thing." It was an article about you that appeared in a
nationl publicaton.



>>> "Numerous occasions"? lol you are the one who keeps making those
>>> references, not me, jackass.
>>
>> And, nn numerous occasions, you have acknowledged the existence of
>> the American Profile article to which I was referring.
>
> "nn numerous"? wtf, are you drunk AND stuttering? Dip shit, do not try
> to communicate when you are drunk, it makes you look like a bigger ass
> then you already are! Dumb shit for brains alcoholic! Oh yeah, and
> hypocrit!

You mean hypocrite, right....DUMBO.

>>
>>
>>>>>> Perhaps 6StringStu, the criminal, pathological liar,
>>>>>> self-proclaimed sociopath and life-long societal parasite, should
>>>>>> post the so-called "offical" records to which he repeatedly
>>>>>> refers regarding his numerous self-admitted felony arrests and
>>>>>> his incarceration in a loony bin by the Feds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Failure by 6StringStu to post the "official" records, and clear
>>>>>> up this matter once and for all, strongly suggests that the
>>>>>> account of his incarceration by the Feds in an institution for
>>>>>> the criminally insane for a
>>>>>> period of four years is likely correct.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL oh realy? I am required to prove your accusations for you?
>>>>> You realy do have shit for brains, don't you?
>>>>
>>>> It's not my accusation DUMBO. I'm just asking you to provide
>>>> evidence that
>>>> the specifics in the American Profile article regarding your
>>>> incarceration by the Feds in a loony bin are incorrect. In the
>>>> absence of such evidence,
>>>> I'm inclined to believe the statements in the American Profile
>>>> article especially in view of your well-documented record on the
>>>> UseNet as a criminal, a self-proclaimed sociopath and a
>>>> pathological liar.
>>>>
>>
>>> IF I were incarcerated it would be a matter of public record, right?
>>
>> Right, but there is no "if" about it. According to your own public
>> admission "3rd felony arrest assault with intent, pled down to simple
>> assault, six months in county jail."
>> http://tinyurl.com/6yh4oj7
>>


> Ok , lets play your game, prove that those statements were true. Show
> the readers some factual evidence from the "PUBLIC" record (you know,
> the stuff that is easialy discovered by asking for the "truth" from
> our great justice system.

I don't need to prove anything, DUMBO. Those are admissions that came
directly from your own mouth. It's not like anyone has a video recording
with sound of your admission, but your admission in a public forum is
pretty damn close.


>>> I am not required to prove OR disprove your assertations. That's
>>> your job lazy ass.
>>
>> They aren't my assertions (assertations for you....DUMBO). They are
>> assertions that were made by the author of the American Profile
>> article about you.


> Who was that author?
Don't know, don't care.
That's your concern, not mine.


> Was the author a creditable source?
I don't have a clue.
Also, you mean credible, right....DUMBO?

> Did you make sure that those "assertions" were the truth before you went
> spreading them all over the net?

Specifically what are the assertions to which you are referring?

> Did you verify what was truth and what
> was not, AFTER being informed that the post was highly fraudulant?

I have no responsibility to verify the truth of what someone else said in
an article that was published nationally in the American Profile magazine
and posted on the Internet. If the content of the articl was fraudulent,
that's something that you should have taken up with the publisher at the
time that the Americn Profile article about you was published.



> that makes you culpulable in spreading lies and false truths.
> IOW that makes you a LIAR. DUMBASS! SHIT FOR BRAINS!

Then sue me, asswipe.
But before you do, just tell me what's a false truth?


>>> You keep claiming that you information is from me,
>> References?
> Don't need them, this post alone is filled with them.
>
>>
>>> why not get an
>>> offical source to back up your claims?
>>
>> Because I haven't made any claims. All I've done is cite statements
>> about your felony arrest record that you posted on the UseNet.

> You haven't madeany? Drunk AND in Denile. It aint no river in Egypt
> bubba.

You mean denial, right....DUMBO?
>
>>
>>> Afterall you also continue to
>>> claim that I am a liar,
>>
>> That's not a claim. It's a demonstrable fact.
>
> The pot calling a kettle black. Talk about demonstrable! LOL

Assertions are cheap...especially the false ones.. DUMBO.

>>
>>> surely you don't trust what I say if you keep
>>> warning folks on that point. It seems a bit hypocritical to have
>>> both the cake AND be eating it.
>>
>> I don't trust what you say, and there's nothing hypocritical about
>> asking you to provide proof that the statements made in the American
>> profile artical are false. What you say is neither proof nor
>> trustworthy.
>

> I don't need to prove crapola, but if you are going to continue to
> base your allegations upon that one article, you had better make sure
> the information you are relying upon has been properly vetted!

Properly vetting the content of an article that is published in a national
magazine such as the American Profile is the job of the publisher, not
mine. So take up your complaint with the publisher and/or the author of
the article, asswipe.


>>>>> "Public record" is PUBLIC, go get your friggin proof on your own,
>>>>> or shut up IF you can't put up.
>>>>
>>>> I'm just asking a question, as the Subject of this thread
>>>> indicates. So, I
>>>> don't need to put up (prove) anything, and I'm certainly not going
>>>> to shut up.
>>
>>
>>> No you certianly wont shut up. Probably will never grow up or mature
>>> either!
>>
>> Now, that statement is absolutely precious, and could only originate
>> in the
>> dysfunctional and delusional mind of a sociopath like you.
>>
>>> Yet someday you will stop breathing and the internet will have
>>> less clutter. Something we all can look forward to.
>>
>> Ditto...DUMBO.
>>
>>>>> While you are at it, prove it was my fingers on the keys to any
>>>>> post you continue to use as "Proof". Most of it you can't. not
>>>>> even the ones where YOU have typed shit only to reffernce later.
>>>>
>>>> The headers of your posts provide all of the proof that is
>>>> necessary. Ther's a lot in the heasders that the Easter Bunny can
>>>> forge, but there's also a lot that he can't.
>>
>>
>>> And later on you posted that "Psychopath Jack Wesolowski can easily
>>> forge headers".
>>
>> No I didn't. What I said was "Psychopath Jack Wesolowski can easily
>> forge headers and post as Bob Cain <arc...@arcanemethods.com>


> See how those words still fit into what you said? DUMBASS! Nice try at
> telling your lies, but the proof is right there in black and white.
> Drunk assed Shit For Brains!

I don't know if you're drunk or just plain stupid. But, you're the one
with shit for brains if you are unable to see the distinction between what
I actually posted and what you cited.


>>
>>> Is he the only one who can preform this feat?
>>> NO! You do it all the time,
>>
>> Not true, but if you believe otherwise, prove your allegation by
>> providing references to posts in which I hijacked someone's nym,
>> email address and domain name.


> Oh, it has to be all three criteria?

That's right, DUMBO, it has to meet all three criteria.

> Don't dodge the truth you fucking insipid liar.

You're the one who is dodging the truth, you fucking liar.


>>
>>> as well as constantly using other
>>> individual's identifiers to munge your own credentials. Not only is
>>> that childish behavior, it is highly suspect!
>>
>> Kinda like what Jack Wesolowski, your lord and savior who you
>> worship, has been doing for the past decade. Now that's true
>> hypocrisy...DUMBO.
>>
>>> Here is a scenerio for ya twinky. Picture a house with three desktop
>>> computers in it, all hooked to the USENET. This same house has, at
>>> the very least, twenty people who regularly access these computers
>>> AND this newsgroup. Which computer at which times was it MY fingers
>>> touching the keys?
>>
>> Here's the correct and accurate picture....asswipe. A three-room shit
>> hole with one computer hooked to the UseNet via a static IP address,
>> and the fingers of a criminal, pathological liar and self-proclaimed
>> sociopath by the name of James Stuart Hodges (aka 6StringStu) at the
>> keyboard.
>

> LOL so wrong, ever heard of a Mac address? Also that ip address was
> changed a couple of times, yet you keep dismissing that fact. Hard to
> prove your lies with just empty statements. Should somebody do the leg
> work that your lazy ass hopes they wont, it proves once again what a
> fucking lieing piece of shit you really are. Also, how do you know
> that there were not three machines hooked to one router? Again we turn
> to the Mac address. Dumbass!

The amount of bull shit that you can come up with is absolutely incredible.
Your static IP address may well have changed couple of times over a period
of a decade, but it most certainly didn't change during the thread to which
I was referring, nor did it change during the immediate time period that
was either befor or after the thread to which I was referring.


>>
>>>>> You may have been a passable researcher, back when universitys
>>>>> were dumb enough to hire you - before you made such a bad name for
>>>>> yourself- but you are a horrible liar.
>
>
> You are a punk assed lil schoolyard sissy with a big mouth and tiny
> little balls, now piss off Twink Cushion.

How would you know the size of my balls?
Also, what's a Twink Cushion?