info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Why Section 3 Disqualification Doesn't Require a Prior Criminal Conviction on Charges of Insurrection
7 views
Skip to first unread message
David Hartung
Dec 29, 2023, 5:10:14 PM12/29/23
to
On 12/29/23 14:37, Gong wrote:
>>
>> The reason is a combination of the general structure of our legal system
>> and the original meaning of Section 3.
>
> Legal experts say it's only a matter of time before Trump's in a prison cell
> for a hundred years or so anyway. Why else would he be going for a Hail Mary
> play by begging for immunity?
Which legal experts are those?
Personally I think that you are on drugs.
>>
>> The reason is a combination of the general structure of our legal system
>> and the original meaning of Section 3.
>
> Legal experts say it's only a matter of time before Trump's in a prison cell
> for a hundred years or so anyway. Why else would he be going for a Hail Mary
> play by begging for immunity?
Which legal experts are those?
Personally I think that you are on drugs.
Skeeter
Dec 29, 2023, 5:33:03 PM12/29/23
to
In article <umnaln$v3nn$3...@dont-email.me>, el...@protonmail.com says...
>
> >
> >The reason is a combination of the general structure of our legal system
> >and the original meaning of Section 3.
>
> Legal experts say it's only a matter of time before Trump's in a prison cell
> for a hundred years or so anyway. Why else would he be going for a Hail Mary
> play by begging for immunity?
All bullshit. Post proof.
> >
> >The reason is a combination of the general structure of our legal system
> >and the original meaning of Section 3.
>
> Legal experts say it's only a matter of time before Trump's in a prison cell
> for a hundred years or so anyway. Why else would he be going for a Hail Mary
> play by begging for immunity?
0 new messages