In article <2608126d-9c37-4fd1-a0cb-
4194a0...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Monica <
freedom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2:50�pm, Eldon <
EldonB...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 8:18�pm, John Dorsay <
restimula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Monica wrote:
> > > > On Nov 11, 12:09 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> > > >> It's easy to tell when a person is totally preoccuppied with herself
> . A good
> > > >> gauge is to count the number of times *I* and *my* and *me* occurs w
> hen they
> > > >> speak or write.
> >
> > > >> For example, in the above, they appear TWENTY times.
> >
> > > >> What a little spoiled brat you are, Monica. . . Are you Barbara's si
> ster?
> >
> > > >> --
> > > >> Gregory Hall
> >
> > > > That is bullshit because you drop the context. I was having to
> > > > repeatedly use the word "I" because I am the one that this abuse is
> > > > being directed at. You adopt some kind of nonsensical pop psychology
> > > > notion, typical of clueless trolls such as yourself who aid and abet
> > > > abusers. But then again, why should this be a surprise, since you hav
> e
> > > > attacked Scientology critics and survivors as well. You have the
> > > > mindset of a typical abuser. When someone has the guts to stand up to
> > > > the abusers, you attack and blame the person. I won't waste further
> > > > time responding to you, Neal Warren, because you have zero credibilit
> y
> > > > here. Isn't it utterly amazing how people on ARS who disagree over
> > > > just about everything else with one another, completely agree about
> > > > what an utterly worthless troll you are. I supposed I should give you
> > > > credit for that at least, uniting people on ARS, bringing people
> > > > together. Not one person has come to your defense -- hope you are
> > > > enjoying yourself, all alone on your pathetic little shell of a boat.
> >
> > > Monica, you are arguing with a trolling asshole. �He has nothing to
> > > do with your cyberstalkers.
> >
> > > Your willingness to argue with him reinforces his trolling.
> >
> > > John
> >
> > You're right, John. Monica is taking the bait. She should probably
> > spit it out and just ignore these assholes.
>
> No, I am not taking any bait. I am choosing to answer back because I
> want to send them the message that I will not be intimidated or
> silenced. You of all people ought to recognize that these folks are
> not simple trolls. The smear campaign against my colleagues and I is
> about the fact that we criticized their dangerous, bogus pseudotherapy
> and I am sending them the message that I will not back down. If I
> ignore them, that will be read as intimidation and victory on their
> part. I tried ignoring them and it did not work. The attacks continued
> because their purpose is to shame and intimidate me into silence. My
> silence reinforces them, so that the louder their attacks get, the
> louder I will shout back because I will not be intimidated.
You tell them, girl. Go kick some ass and let them know they
can't get away with this sort of abuse.