Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Women REALLY ARE incomplete or undeveloped men...

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:12:44 PM1/29/12
to

I got laid last night and afterwards I took the opportunity to closely
examine my female partner's genitalia.

What I discovered after viewing her genitalia in an unbiased and
impassionate fashion as possible (i.e. after I had cum three or four times
and was about half drained) is that the female genitalia prove the
old-fashioned, fundamentalist, doctrine that females are incomplete or
undeveloped males.

The clitoris is very obviously a penis that didn't develop. If you look
closely at it, you can see it has a very tiny head (glans) and even a
rudimentary foreskin (pupice). If you cast your eyes further south you can
see what looks like a deflated scrotum protruding. The skin is even
scrotum-like skin. All it would take is to insert a couple testicles and
let the labia hang down and you'd swear it was a legitimate nut sack. It
doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to conclude that if the female
fetus got the right hormones during its time in the womb that the
undeveloped and incomplete female genitalia would not have failed to
mature into a penis and scrotum with testicles.

It follows, then, that women are failed men. As undeveloped as their
genital are, it's patently obvious. Furthermore, current research has
proven that the female brain is less developed than the mail brain and it
masses less as well.

So, how dare women claim they are equal to men and should have equal
rights. Bah! Women would have to have EXTRA rights, EXTRA brain
development and EXTRA brain mass as well as fully-developed genitalia in
order to be the equal of men. They would also have to have more
testosterone and less estrogen so they wouldn't be so physically soft and
weak.

--
Sir Gregory

Free Willy

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:34:15 PM1/29/12
to
" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:5c0no2....@news.alt.net...
Is that why you lust after chicks with dicks? Because they're the next
stage of human evolution?

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:54:33 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:


>
> I got laid last night and afterwards I took the opportunity to closely
> examine my female partner's genitalia.

How long WAS your "female" partner's genitalia?


> What I discovered after viewing her genitalia in an unbiased and
> impassionate fashion as possible

Impassionately is the only way you could ever examine any female's
genitalia, dick-lover.




> (i.e. after I had cum three or four times
> and was about half drained) is that the female genitalia prove the
> old-fashioned, fundamentalist, doctrine that females are incomplete or
> undeveloped males.
>
> The clitoris is very obviously a penis that didn't develop. If you look
> closely at it, you can see it has a very tiny head (glans) and even a
> rudimentary foreskin (pupice). If you cast your eyes further south you can
> see what looks like a deflated scrotum protruding. The skin is even
> scrotum-like skin. All it would take is to insert a couple testicles and
> let the labia hang down and you'd swear it was a legitimate nut sack.



> It
> doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to conclude that if the female
> fetus got the right hormones during its time in the womb that the
> undeveloped and incomplete female genitalia would not have failed to
> mature into a penis and scrotum with testicles.


It takes an even bigger stretch of the imagination than the one required
to believe you actually got laid in the first place. It also takes a
healthy dose of ignorance, you deranged closet homo. It takes a Y
chromosome at conception to turn genitalia into the type you prefer...
NOT simply "the right hormones".



> It follows, then, that women are failed men.

The only failed man around here is YOU, you closet HOMO.


> As undeveloped as their
> genital are, it's patently obvious. Furthermore, current research has
> proven that the female brain is less developed than the mail brain and it
> masses less as well.

Somebody ought to research YOUR brain. I'm sure it would be fascinating
to say the least.




> So, how dare women claim they are equal to men and should have equal
> rights. Bah! Women would have to have EXTRA rights, EXTRA brain
> development and EXTRA brain mass as well as fully-developed genitalia in
> order to be the equal of men.



> They would also have to have more
> testosterone and less estrogen so they wouldn't be so physically soft and
> weak.

You prefer your "women" hard? No surprises there...



--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 2:08:26 PM1/29/12
to
"Checkmate" <RickS...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.298f35c3f...@news.alt.net...
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:
>
>
>>
>> I got laid last night and afterwards I took the opportunity to closely
>> examine my female partner's genitalia.
>
> How long WAS your "female" partner's genitalia?

Long enough on the inside, at least, so I could insert my entire, manly
and thick, 8 inches. Look how you managed to turn the conversation around
from female genitalia to male genitalia, you queer!

>> What I discovered after viewing her genitalia in an unbiased and
>> impassionate fashion as possible
>
> Impassionately is the only way you could ever examine any female's
> genitalia, dick-lover.

There's twice now that you've changed the discussion from heterosexual
activities to homosexual activities, fagboi!

>> (i.e. after I had cum three or four times
>> and was about half drained) is that the female genitalia prove the
>> old-fashioned, fundamentalist, doctrine that females are incomplete or
>> undeveloped males.
>>
>> The clitoris is very obviously a penis that didn't develop. If you look
>> closely at it, you can see it has a very tiny head (glans) and even a
>> rudimentary foreskin (pupice). If you cast your eyes further south you
>> can
>> see what looks like a deflated scrotum protruding. The skin is even
>> scrotum-like skin. All it would take is to insert a couple testicles
>> and
>> let the labia hang down and you'd swear it was a legitimate nut sack.
>> It
>> doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to conclude that if the
>> female
>> fetus got the right hormones during its time in the womb that the
>> undeveloped and incomplete female genitalia would not have failed to
>> mature into a penis and scrotum with testicles.
>
> It takes an even bigger stretch of the imagination than the one required
> to believe you actually got laid in the first place. It also takes a
> healthy dose of ignorance, you deranged closet homo. It takes a Y
> chromosome at conception to turn genitalia into the type you prefer...
> NOT simply "the right hormones".

Wrong! All it would take to develop a clitoris into a dick is the right
hormones in the womb.

>> It follows, then, that women are failed men.
>
> The only failed man around here is YOU, you closet HOMO.

You're batting 100 so far, Twinkmate. Every one of your replies brings
homosexuality to the forefront.

>> As undeveloped as their
>> genital are, it's patently obvious. Furthermore, current research has
>> proven that the female brain is less developed than the mail brain and
>> it
>> masses less as well.
>
> Somebody ought to research YOUR brain. I'm sure it would be fascinating
> to say the least.

True, I am a genius for sure. Scientists could use my brain as a blueprint
for cloning a superior race of humans. Homo Eruditus!

>> So, how dare women claim they are equal to men and should have equal
>> rights. Bah! Women would have to have EXTRA rights, EXTRA brain
>> development and EXTRA brain mass as well as fully-developed genitalia
>> in
>> order to be the equal of men.
>> They would also have to have more
>> testosterone and less estrogen so they wouldn't be so physically soft
>> and
>> weak.
>
> You prefer your "women" hard? No surprises there...

They get so excited that their little clits always get hard. I've seen
some of them grow at least as long as your dick, you know about one-half
inch. ROFL!

--
Sir Gregory

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 2:14:34 PM1/29/12
to
Do tell...




> >> It follows, then, that women are failed men.
> >
> > The only failed man around here is YOU, you closet HOMO.
>
> You're batting 100 so far, Twinkmate. Every one of your replies brings
> homosexuality to the forefront.
>
> >> As undeveloped as their
> >> genital are, it's patently obvious. Furthermore, current research has
> >> proven that the female brain is less developed than the mail brain and
> >> it
> >> masses less as well.
> >
> > Somebody ought to research YOUR brain. I'm sure it would be fascinating
> > to say the least.
>
> True, I am a genius for sure. Scientists could use my brain as a blueprint
> for cloning a superior race of humans. Homo Eruditus!

More like Homo Erectus... LOL!

PS: LOL!

PPS: LOL!

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 2:25:03 PM1/29/12
to
"Checkmate" <RickS...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.298f3a7ad...@news.alt.net...
<snip>
>>
>> Wrong! All it would take to develop a clitoris into a dick is the right
>> hormones in the womb.
>
> Do tell...


I hate to say it but you're beginning to sound almost as dumb as Ragnar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenatal_hormones_and_sexual_orientation

A teaser of contents:

"A 2010 endocrinology study by Garcia-Falgueras and Swaab[2] says that
intrauterine exposure to hormones is largely determinative. Sketching the
argument briefly here, it says that sexual organs are differentiated and
then the brain is sexually differentiated "under the influence, mainly, of
sex hormones such as testosterone, estrogen and progesterone on the
developing brain cells and under the presence of different genes as well .
. . . The changes brought about in this [p. 24:] stage are permanent. . .
. [S]exual differentiation of the brain is not caused by hormones alone,
even though they are very important for gender identity and sexual
orientation."[3] ". . . . These fetal and neonatal peaks of testosterone,
together with the functional steroid receptor activity, are thought to fix
the development of structures and circuits in the brain for the rest of a
boy's life (producing 'programming' or 'organizing' effects). Later, the
rising hormonal levels that occur during puberty 'activate' circuits and
behavioral patterns that were built during development, in a masculinized
and de-feminized direction for male brains or in a feminized and
de-masculinized direction for female brains."

--
Sir Gregory

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 3:02:28 PM1/29/12
to
" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:5c0rvl....@news.alt.net...
LOL!!! Crickets. That sure shut the Rube (Twinkmate) up! It's amazing what
a few simple facts can accomplish. . .


Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 3:21:41 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:


>
You apparently have a reading comprehension problem due to your defective
mind. Your statement was:

"All it would take to develop a clitoris into a dick is the right
hormones in the womb."

The cite you posted above does NOT support your statement that said
"right" dose of hormones in the womb would cause a clitoris to develop
into a penis. What it says is the BRAIN would be influenced by said
hormones AFTER the sexual organs have been differentiated. Is this an
example of that "genius" mind of yours at work, or are you assuming you
can snow the Snowman with this bogus line of crap?

Do you even know what a Y chromosome is?

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 3:24:31 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:


>
The only crickets are in your head, Retardo. There's a big difference
between brains and genitalia, however it's obvious you didn't get much of
either.

PV

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 3:28:20 PM1/29/12
to
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> I got laid last night and afterwards I took the opportunity to closely

<snip>

That opening line is right up there with, "This really happened" or "This is
the truth"

In other words a load of crap

But thanks for sharing your misogynistic fantasies anyways

--
PV

"This sig left intentionally blank"


Message has been deleted

Emmett KOOKOFTHEYEAR Gulley

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 7:41:24 PM1/29/12
to
On Jan 29, 1:12 pm, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>
wrote:
So you're almost 70 and you finally learned what the lady bits look
like? So much for being a lady's man. Hell if you wanted to know
what a pussy looks like you only need to look at a picture of Emmett
Gulley, the biggest pussy on AUK.

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 9:46:38 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what çu said:


>
> " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 29 Jan 2012:
>
> >
> > I got laid last night
>
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHAAHHHHHHAHHAHAHH!!!!
>
> yeah, right.

Greg couldn't get laid in prison.
Message has been deleted

Fred Hall

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 9:55:24 PM1/29/12
to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:52:17 +0000 (UTC), "çu" <a@b.ç> wrote in
<Xns9FE9DE7...@208.90.168.18>:

>Checkmate <RickS...@gmail.com> sez 29 Jan 2012:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>by
>> Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what çu said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 29 Jan 2012:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I got laid last night
>>>
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHAAHHHHHHAHHAHAHH!!!!
>>>
>>> yeah, right.
>>
>> Greg couldn't get laid in prison.
>>
>
>greg couldn't bet laid by a chikken.

Greg couldn't get his chicken up to choke it.
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan

"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall

KotAGoR XXXXI
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Trainer of Steve 'BowTurd' Young
COOSN-075-07-81342

PV

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 10:41:47 PM1/29/12
to
Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what çu said:
>
>
>>
>> " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 29 Jan 2012:
>>
>>>
>>> I got laid last night
>>
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHAAHHHHHHAHHAHAHH!!!!
>>
>> yeah, right.
>
> Greg couldn't get laid in prison.

Gweg couldn't get laid in a monkey whorehouse while carrying two buckets of
bananas

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 11:22:48 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what çu said:


>
> Checkmate <RickS...@gmail.com> sez 29 Jan 2012:
>
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what çu said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 29 Jan 2012:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I got laid last night
> >>
> >>
> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHAAHHHHHHAHHAHAHH!!!!
> >>
> >> yeah, right.
> >
> > Greg couldn't get laid in prison.
> >
>
> greg couldn't bet laid by a chikken.

Greg couldn't get laid if he was a carpet.

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 11:24:39 PM1/29/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

Greg couldn't get eaten in a lion's den wearing pork chop underwear.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Ragnar

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 2:11:29 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 29, 3:21 pm, Checkmate <RickSabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Checkmate" <RickSabi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
That’s not unusual for Gweggy. He’s made a career around here by
stepping on his own dick this way. Gweggy makes shit up in his crazy
head and then in an attempt at proving his insane argument he only
half reads the data that he attempts to use as support for his crazy
ideas. The worst part is the fact that what he actually does read, he
barely understands in the first place.

This is what comes of being "over qualified" for membership in Mensa.
ROTFLMAO! He’s so convinced that he is a genius that he thinks
everyone else will just fall down in awe of his huge intellect and
never question the crazy shit that spills out of his poor defective
mind. ROTFLMAO!

Ragnar

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 2:34:48 PM1/30/12
to
"Ragnar" <rapier...@live.com> wrote in message
news:ee276b64-c632-4ff8...@dn8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
=====================[REPLY]===========================

Sorry but it is you and Twinkmate who have reading comprehension problems.

Here it is again. Please read it again. This time with understanding.

" . . . it says that sexual organs are differentiated and then the brain
is sexually differentiated under the influence, mainly, of sex hormones
such as testosterone, estrogen and progesterone on the developing brain
cells and under the presence of different genes as well."

Now, just what don't you understand about "sex organs are differentiated .
. . under the influence, mainly, of sex hormones. . ."

Now, it doesn't get much more clear than that. It says that sex organs are
differentiated under the influence *mainly" of sex hormones.

Just like I freaking said. Fucking morons!

--
Sir Gregory

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 2:48:48 PM1/30/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

> That?s not unusual for Gweggy. He?s made a career around here by
> stepping on his own dick this way. Gweggy makes shit up in his crazy
> head and then in an attempt at proving his insane argument he only
> half reads the data that he attempts to use as support for his crazy
> ideas. The worst part is the fact that what he actually does read, he
> barely understands in the first place.
>
> This is what comes of being "over qualified" for membership in Mensa.
> ROTFLMAO! He?s so convinced that he is a genius that he thinks
> everyone else will just fall down in awe of his huge intellect and
> never question the crazy shit that spills out of his poor defective
> mind. ROTFLMAO!
>
> Ragnar

I think Gweggie's drinking a lot more salt water than he admits to.

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 2:57:02 PM1/30/12
to
> That?s not unusual for Gweggy. He?s made a career around here by
> stepping on his own dick this way. Gweggy makes shit up in his crazy
> head and then in an attempt at proving his insane argument he only
> half reads the data that he attempts to use as support for his crazy
> ideas. The worst part is the fact that what he actually does read, he
> barely understands in the first place.
>
> This is what comes of being "over qualified" for membership in Mensa.
> ROTFLMAO! He?s so convinced that he is a genius that he thinks
> everyone else will just fall down in awe of his huge intellect and
> never question the crazy shit that spills out of his poor defective
> mind. ROTFLMAO!
>
> Ragnar
>
>
>
>
> =====================[REPLY]===========================
>
> Sorry but it is you and Twinkmate who have reading comprehension problems.
>
> Here it is again. Please read it again. This time with understanding.
>
> " . . . it says that sexual organs are differentiated

---> AND THEN the *BRAIN* is sexually differentiated <---

> under the influence, mainly, of sex hormones
> such as testosterone, estrogen and progesterone on the developing brain
> cells and under the presence of different genes as well."
>
> Now, just what don't you understand about "sex organs are differentiated .
> . . under the influence, mainly, of sex hormones. . ."

The "AND THEN" part you just left out.



> Now, it doesn't get much more clear than that. It says that sex organs are
> differentiated under the influence *mainly" of sex hormones.
>
> Just like I freaking said. Fucking morons!

YOU DON'T GET A PENIS SIMPLY BY SEX HORMONES IN THE WOMB, YOU STUPID
TRANNY-FUCKING WEIRDO! It takes a Y chromosome at conception, and I'm
not talking about the "WHY" your mother asked when you were born!

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 3:24:33 PM1/30/12
to
"Checkmate" <RickS...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.299095db5...@news.alt.net...
You are so ignorant! Yes you DO get a penis under the influence of
testosterone even if you have female chromosomes. Ever hear of fetal stem
cells? Yes, siree, they can develop into either a penis or a vagina.
Hormones are what influence that development one way or the other. The
very existence of hermaphrodites proves you are WRONG!

GET A FREAKING CLUE!!

--
Sir Gregory

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 3:52:21 PM1/30/12
to
> testosterone <SMACK!>

And YOU get a penis under the influence of alcohol, but that ain't
science, you poor dumb gay bastard!

Ragnar

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 12:29:49 PM1/31/12
to
On Jan 30, 2:57 pm, Checkmate <RickSabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Ragnar" <rapierfen...@live.com> wrote in message
I'm pretty sure the question of "why me" has been asked by quite a few
of those who have had the bad luck of interacting or associating with
the Skunk Ape.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 12:24:44 PM1/31/12
to
Delirium IS a symptom of consuming too much salt water.

Ragnar
Message has been deleted

Sergeant Preston

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 6:02:19 PM1/31/12
to
On Jan 29, 1:25 pm, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>
wrote:
> "Checkmate" <RickSabi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I always wondered why Ferd Hall turned-out like he did !!

I feel sorry fer Ferd's parents !!
--
HJ

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 11:36:10 AM2/1/12
to
"Sergeant Preston" <Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3297bfe6-11b2-459e...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
=====================[reply]=======================

I feel sorry for Ferd, too. But Ferd's a scientific phenomena. He's living
proof that some Africans fucked monkeys.

--
Sir Gregory

Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 11:52:19 AM2/1/12
to
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
At least they didn't fuck trannys, because that would be gay.

--
Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 12:34:27 PM2/1/12
to
"Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box> wrote
in message news:MPG.29930d953...@news.alt.net...
> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
<snip>
>> =====================[reply]=======================
>>
>> I feel sorry for Ferd, too. But Ferd's a scientific phenomena. He's
>> living
>> proof that some Africans fucked monkeys.
>
> At least they didn't fuck trannys, because that would be gay.


You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just know
you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little something extra?

--
Sir Gregory

Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 12:37:10 PM2/1/12
to
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>
> "Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box> wrote
> in message news:MPG.29930d953...@news.alt.net...
> > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
> <snip>
> >> =====================[reply]=======================
> >>
> >> I feel sorry for Ferd, too. But Ferd's a scientific phenomena. He's
> >> living
> >> proof that some Africans fucked monkeys.
> >
> > At least they didn't fuck trannys, because that would be gay.
>
>
> You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just know
> you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little something extra?

I'm fascinated by whatever it is that makes you tick, tranny-fucker.

--

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 12:50:59 PM2/1/12
to
"Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box> wrote
in message news:MPG.29931825f...@news.alt.net...
> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...

<snippage>

>> You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just know
>> you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little something
>> extra?
>
> I'm fascinated by whatever it is that makes you tick, tranny-fucker.

You're fascinated because you think I'm gay and that's right up your
alley. Bwahahhaha. But, I'm not gay as chicks with dicks are chicks. They
are not men. Only a homosexual projects his desire that gender is based
solely on the presence or lack thereof of a dick.

--
Sir Gregory

Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 1:05:28 PM2/1/12
to
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>
> "Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box> wrote
> in message news:MPG.29931825f...@news.alt.net...
> > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>
> <snippage>
>
> >> You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just know
> >> you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little something
> >> extra?
> >
> > I'm fascinated by whatever it is that makes you tick, tranny-fucker.



> You think I'm gay.

> I'm not gay.

Who are you trying to convince, fagula?

--

pandora

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 2:16:12 PM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:50:59 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> "Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box>
> wrote in message news:MPG.29931825f...@news.alt.net...
>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>
> <snippage>
>
>>> You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just
>>> know you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little
>>> something extra?
>>
>> I'm fascinated by whatever it is that makes you tick, tranny-fucker.
>
> You're fascinated because you think I'm gay and that's right up your
> alley. Bwahahhaha. But, I'm not gay as chicks with dicks are chicks.
> They are not men.

Yes, they are men.

Only a homosexual projects his desire that gender is
> based solely on the presence or lack thereof of a dick.

Yes it does. You are one seriously confused individual.

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 2:46:57 PM2/1/12
to
"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
news:lumdnb6hy-ThErTS...@scnresearch.com...
Oh, c'mon Pandora. Here is a photograph of a fully clothed tranny. Tell me
the truth, if you saw her walking down the street would you say, "that's a
man"?

http://www.shemale-porn-galls.com/galls/bobstgirls/gam_leopard_blouse_pic/1.jpg

You'd say, "nice-looking young lady'! You'd probably be jealous of her.

--
Sir Gregory

pandora

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 12:01:49 AM2/2/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:57 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
> news:lumdnb6hy-ThErTS...@scnresearch.com...
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:50:59 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>
>>> "Rick Sabian's Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band" <Bung...@Squeeze.Box>
>>> wrote in message news:MPG.29931825f...@news.alt.net...
>>>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>>>
>>> <snippage>
>>>
>>>>> You sure seem obsessed with trannys lately. Is it because you just
>>>>> know you'd have some serious fun with a woman who had a little
>>>>> something extra?
>>>>
>>>> I'm fascinated by whatever it is that makes you tick, tranny-fucker.
>>>
>>> You're fascinated because you think I'm gay and that's right up your
>>> alley. Bwahahhaha. But, I'm not gay as chicks with dicks are chicks.
>>> They are not men.
>>
>> Yes, they are men.
>>
>> Only a homosexual projects his desire that gender is
>>> based solely on the presence or lack thereof of a dick.
>>
>> Yes it does. You are one seriously confused individual.
>
>
>
> Oh, c'mon Pandora. Here is a photograph of a fully clothed tranny. Tell
> me the truth, if you saw her walking down the street would you say,
> "that's a man"?

Doesn't matter what clothes one wears. It's all in the DNA.

> http://www.shemale-porn-galls.com/galls/bobstgirls/

Checkmate

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 3:40:08 PM2/2/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

Are you a heavy precummer? It makes wonderful lube.

Rick Sabian's All-Star Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 3:42:22 PM2/2/12
to
Checkmate put forth the notion that...
You're not supposed to drink tranny fluid, Greg.

--
Rick Sabian's All-Star Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band
0 new messages