Pistachio Code
Joe Zeff
while. Finally, I found the translation at http://www.geekcode.com/
and made my own. A thought occurs to me: shouldn't we have our own
pistachio code, so that those of us in the know can tell each other
what our likes/dislikes are? We can use the same format as the geek
code, as well as the variables. Suggestions?
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1
GCS/CC dpu s+:+ a+ C++ U !P L+>++ E W+ N++ o
!K w>-- !O M-- V PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t- 5++ X--
R++@ !tv b+++ DI+ !D G e h+ r* y+*
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
---
Joe Zeff
The Guy With the Sideburns
If you can't play with words, what good are they?
http://www.lasfs.org
-^-^spectrum-^^-
Webcretin <cot...@qis.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>>and made my own. A thought occurs to me: shouldn't we have our own
>>pistachio code, so that those of us in the know can tell each other
>>what our likes/dislikes are? We can use the same format as the geek
>>code, as well as the variables. Suggestions?
>
>
>kinda
>symbol on a persons body. If they are inot D/s? or this
>lifestyle at all?
>Swingers have the apple with a bite taken out of it.
>
>Polyamory has several symbols
>
>what does this GROUP have?
Words. We say we're kinky here, and, guess what? We meet others who are
kinky too. It seems to work pretty well.
There's been various symbols proposed over time. The leather pride flag is
probably the most widespread, but it's intriguing enough that people ask
what it means. I've suggested an mini-flogger leather keychain/tab as a
subtle yet deniable symbol. There's been nothing that folk have agreed
upon, save the flag.
-^-^spectrum-^^- spectrum@magenta..COM
Tales of the ASBWorld: http://magenta.com/lmnop/users/spectrum
The description of Pervhome and the Guestbook are there also.
"We are perv of net. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."
- CaveBat
DG McDaniel
>
> >and made my own. A thought occurs to me: shouldn't we have our own
> >pistachio code, so that those of us in the know can tell each other
> >what our likes/dislikes are? We can use the same format as the geek
> >code, as well as the variables. Suggestions?
The Whore Code (2.0) at:
http://www.dreamscape.com/elusis/whore.html
describes all kinds of kinky sex things. I think it's a hoot to read,
too!
Devon
(I'll post my whorecode with my delurk, when I get it finished)
[to reply, remove thingy from my e-dress]
SilverOz
-^-^spectrum-^^- <spectrum@magenta..COM> wrote:
>There's been various symbols proposed over time. The leather pride flag is
>probably the most widespread, but it's intriguing enough that people ask
>what it means. I've suggested an mini-flogger leather keychain/tab as a
>subtle yet deniable symbol. There's been nothing that folk have agreed
>upon, save the flag.
>
And some of us don;t agree on that because of its resemblance to
the US flag. I won't use it because of that and last time
this came up (with a long debate) several europeans didn't like
it for the same reason.
(Also, according to the Leather Pride folk in Oz that I've talked
to, "leather" is not a synonym for What It Is That We Do but includes
things like denim fetish and uniform fetish with no exploration of
pain or power involved.)
I rather like the form of triskellion that has been promoted, but
it will takre a long time for that to get known. A mini handcuff
sounds good but there is the "are you a perv?" "no I'm a cop"
problem.
SilverOz
--
========================================================================
Australian BDSM Information Site http://www.zed.com.au/~master/abis/
========================================================================
Joe Zeff
>is there any way to know, by a locket or braclet or some
>kinda
>symbol on a persons body. If they are inot D/s? or this
>lifestyle at all?
Look at the website I referenced in the orginal post. I'm thinking of
a block of text that can be added to the end of a post to tell other
pervs just what your tastes are, and to what extent.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1
GCS/CC dpu s+:+ a+ C++ U !P L+>++ E W+ N++ o
!K w>-- !O M-- V PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t- 5++ X--
R++@ !tv b+++ DI+ !D G e h+ r* y+*
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
---
Joe Zeff
The Guy With the Sideburns
Debating unix flavors in the context of anything Microsoft is like\
talking about which ice cream flavor tastes least like sawdust with
turpentine sauce.
http://www.lasfs.org
-=- kajira hill -=-
following, and i quote:
:>what it means. I've suggested an mini-flogger leather keychain/tab as a
:>subtle yet deniable symbol. There's been nothing that folk have agreed
i've got one of those! Neat little whip hanging off my keys.
(female type tip: Makes keys much easier to find in purses, too!)
--
****************************************************************************************
-- @ -- kajira hill -- @ -- odalisque -- @ -- bonkers -- @ -- blissful -- @ --
****************************************************************************************
You have the right to remain silent.... USE IT!
Joe Zeff
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> >and made my own. A thought occurs to me: shouldn't we have our own
>> >pistachio code, so that those of us in the know can tell each other
>> >what our likes/dislikes are? We can use the same format as the geek
>> >code, as well as the variables. Suggestions?
>
>The Whore Code (2.0) at:
>http://www.dreamscape.com/elusis/whore.html
>describes all kinds of kinky sex things. I think it's a hoot to read,
>too!
>
Thanx! I've bookmarked it.
---
Joe Zeff
The Guy With the Sideburns
DG McDaniel
> >> > A thought occurs to me: shouldn't we have our own
> >> >pistachio code, so that those of us in the know can tell each other
> >> >what our likes/dislikes are? We can use the same format as the geek
> >> >code, as well as the variables. Suggestions?
Here we go:
Whore Code 2.0
http://www.dreamscape.com/elusis/whore.html
Devon's whore code
WhS3Zz6 LPrFe hBr|Pu|s--- b62/57 B4ENiT|G3|# a30-
sm7gP20+ K8cZ k7BDSMACFGImOPRrTtWxX QABCDdELlPRTV
v66s oCsQTt @X27 w4T E- p2f*v2*g*s8 D6ma{5 Hho+usMI7
The long strings in the second row are "k" for kink (so many letters, so
little time) and Q for equipment (what you have laying around the
bedroom). I got tired of putting in letters, so I left a few out.
If you really have the patience to figure it out, I'll be impressed. I
think these codes are fun, but it's hard to be familiar enough with them
to decode them in less than 20 minutes.
Devon
[remove the thingy from my address]
--
maybe you just had the worst day of your life
but, you know, there's no escape and there's no excuse
so just suck up and be nice -Ani Difranco
SlackTop
>http://www.dreamscape.com/elusis/whore.html
>Devon's whore code [...]
>The long strings in the second row [...] I got tired of putting in letters,
so I left a few out.
>
>If you really have the patience to figure it out, I'll be impressed. I
>think these codes are fun, but it's hard to be familiar enough with them
>to decode them in less than 20 minutes.
Okay--by show of hands:
Who thinks I should fuck off this weekend and probably the next building a
drag-n-drop Whore Code generator/interpreter?
I'll make it for 16-bit Windows (i.e. Win 3.x or higher) and re-use the hard
work that Elusis has already done for us in wording the descriptors ... *if*
Elusis doesn't object and other folks think it'd be fun.
And I'm glad Devon brought up the long-strings thing, 'cause I was gonna
suggest this for Whore Code 2.023 anyway--I note that in both those sections
you can put 'X' for 'something other than the above' and 'Z' for 'none of the
above' ... but 'Y' is undefined, and there are a few of us who could tighten up
the code block considerably with an 'all of the above' option.
Just a thought ... .
--
SlackTop
posted to ssbb and mailed to the principals
Douglas Reay
>
> Who thinks I should fuck off this weekend and probably the next building a
> drag-n-drop Whore Code generator/interpreter?
Interpreters work well for the geek code, eg:
http://www.ebb.org/ungeek/
> I'll make it for 16-bit Windows (i.e. Win 3.x or higher)
How about doing it as a CGI script?
>And I'm glad Devon brought up the long-strings thing, 'cause I was gonna
>suggest this for Whore Code 2.023 anyway--I note that in both those sections
>you can put 'X' for 'something other than the above' and 'Z' for 'none of the
>above' ... but 'Y' is undefined, and there are a few of us who could tighten
>the code block considerably with an 'all of the above' option.
I think there needs to be a meta code protocol. Something that would allow
you to use the Geek code to describe your computer interests, the whore
code for appearence and orientation, and maybe a BDSM code that is a mix of
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/bdsm/bscq/0.0.txt
and
http://ms.ha.md.us/~tammad/over21/bondage/sub-checklist.html
Douglas
--
http://www.dreamscape.com/elusis/whore.html
WhPPH7 LJ hBr-p+++b b71/8/2 B4Z a30+ sM3O! K7c
k7BDdSMAEefFGhImOPpRrTtxX QABbCcDdEeFKLlMPRsTtVO
v34 oLSs X45 w6T r6I E+ p*f7v7#g7s7C D5msr6 Ho+ukCB7
SlackTop
>> I'll make it for 16-bit Windows (i.e. Win 3.x or higher)
>
>How about doing it as a CGI script?
Not a bad idea. Unfortunately, it didn't occur to me until .8 seconds after
hitting "send", so I look like an idiot. Oh, well.
The only problem with that way of doing it is that somebody'd have to run it on
their server--aol won't let me do it, and I refuse to look into the matter any
further. So, by show of hands, who's got half a meg free with a perl
interpreter?
--
SlackTop
Getting too complicated
Ian Jackson
SlackTop <slac...@aol.com> wrote:
>The only problem with that way of doing it is that somebody'd have to
>run it on their server--aol won't let me do it, and I refuse to look
>into the matter any further. So, by show of hands, who's got half a
>meg free with a perl interpreter?
If you mail me the script I'll be happy to install it at an
appropriate URL under www.chiark.greenend.org.uk. I don't really have
time to write it, I'm afraid.
--
Ian Jackson personal email: <ijac...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
These opinions are my own. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/
PGP2 public key id 0x23f5addb, fingerprint 5906F687 BD03ACAD 0D8E602E FCF37657
SlackTop
>SlackTop <slac...@aol.com> wrote:
>>The only problem with that way of doing it is that somebody'd have to
>>run it on their server--aol won't let me do it, and I refuse to look
>>into the matter any further. So, by show of hands, who's got half a
>>meg free with a perl interpreter?
>
>If you mail me the script I'll be happy to install it at an
>appropriate URL under www.chiark.greenend.org.uk. I don't really have
>time to write it, I'm afraid.
Zang! Well, that's settled then.
I'll mess around with it and mail you when it seems to be working. Thanks!
--
SlackTop
who hopes nobody minds waiting a few weeks, but that's a whole 'nother post.