Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Female Wanted.

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Kylen B. Griffin

unread,
Feb 7, 1993, 5:53:06 PM2/7/93
to
I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.

Kylen

Kenn Barry

unread,
Feb 7, 1993, 9:13:34 PM2/7/93
to

Just one bit of info I'd like, Kylen: were you born this stupid,
or should Auburn receive part credit for turning you into a moron?

Don't post personal ads in soc.singles, asshole.

Kayembee

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 8, 1993, 10:20:09 AM2/8/93
to


Boy, I can tell you're going to go far in life, given how good you are
at handling people - jerk...

dreas

unread,
Feb 8, 1993, 3:00:55 PM2/8/93
to
In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.

You appear to be young, sexy, and MOST interesting!
ARooo!

*I*'m a 28 year old man with slightly balding brown hair.
*I*'m 5'7" tall and ready for that most discrete relationship
with you on a very casual and hush-hush level.

*I* don't ski, hate sports, and detest music, but *I* have OTHER
interests.

Write to *me* if you are still interested! </.)

dweath

james.j.dutton

unread,
Feb 9, 1993, 8:54:10 AM2/9/93
to
You get your hands off him dweath, he's mine forever. Hiya Kylen(wink wink).
I'm four feet tall. I have red pigtails(perpendickular to the ground)(wink wink)


I have peppermint pantyhose and several blacked out teeth. I'm looking for
a wide open luv fest. A wham bam jam here I am. I also like ham, not
to mention sheep. I find .edu breaths so stimulating. If your up for it
I say we start our life together as soon as possible. So send my that address.
Am I male or am I female? Gosh maybe you can help me find out. Waiting
to hear from you with baited breath and lots of cats.

Sylvia Duutoan

================================================================================
Steatopygias's 'R' Us. doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================

Jeff Wall

unread,
Feb 8, 1993, 4:03:55 PM2/8/93
to

Wait a minute...... I thought it was accepable to talk to people like
that who post personals??? Am I wrong?? I thought there was a big long
thread about Flaming personals being acceptable behavior on soc.singles.

Hmmmm, maybe I need to readbetween the lines more carefully...

Cheers,

Jeff

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 9, 1993, 11:34:08 PM2/9/93
to
In <1993Feb8.1...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>Boy, I can tell you're going to go far in life, given how good you are
>at handling people - jerk...

Kenn Barry was posting here when you were in diapers. Fuck off and
learn to respect your elders.

And learn how to spell the name of the person you're flaming! It
makes you look like you might have a clue.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thu...@convex.com
"Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have all of this,
and, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, from you?"
- "Passionate Kisses" Lucinda Williams

dreas

unread,
Feb 9, 1993, 6:03:52 PM2/9/93
to
In article 67...@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jj...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1993Feb8.2...@sol.UVic.CA> atov...@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>>In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
>>> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.
>>
>>You appear to be young, sexy, and MOST interesting!
>>ARooo!
>>
>>*I*'m a 28 year old man with slightly balding brown hair.
>>*I*'m 5'7" tall and ready for that most discrete relationship
>>with you on a very casual and hush-hush level.
>>
>>*I* don't ski, hate sports, and detest music, but *I* have OTHER
>>interests.
>>
>>Write to *me* if you are still interested! </.)
>>
>>dweath
>>
>
>You get your hands off him dweath, he's mine forever. Hiya Kylen(wink wink).
>I'm four feet tall. I have red pigtails(perpendickular to the ground)(wink wink)

You slut, you! You're even cheaper and sleezier than *I* am.
Shame on you.

..Corrupting innocence and youth in such a tasteless manner!

>I have peppermint pantyhose and several blacked out teeth. I'm looking for
>a wide open luv fest. A wham bam jam here I am. I also like ham, not
>to mention sheep. I find .edu breaths so stimulating. If your up for it
>I say we start our life together as soon as possible. So send my that address.
>Am I male or am I female? Gosh maybe you can help me find out. Waiting
>to hear from you with baited breath and lots of cats.
>
> Sylvia Duutoan

Syl, honey. Leave the inexperienced child alone!
dweath will show YOU a real good time!

dweathmeithter!

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 10, 1993, 8:16:24 AM2/10/93
to

I think you and Mr. Berry must hit it off pretty well...

james.j.dutton

unread,
Feb 10, 1993, 9:16:21 AM2/10/93
to
In article <1993Feb9.2...@sol.UVic.CA> atov...@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>>>In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
>>>> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.
>>>
>>>You appear to be young, sexy, and MOST interesting!
>>>ARooo!
>>>*I* don't ski, hate sports, and detest music, but *I* have OTHER
>>>interests.
>>>Write to *me* if you are still interested! </.)
>>>dweath
>>You get your hands off him dweath, he's mine forever. Hiya Kylen(wink wink).
>>I'm four feet tall. I have red pigtails(perpendickular to the ground)(wink wink)
>You slut, you! You're even cheaper and sleezier than *I* am.
>Shame on you.
>..Corrupting innocence and youth in such a tasteless manner!
>>I have peppermint pantyhose and several blacked out teeth. I'm looking for
>>a wide open luv fest. A wham bam jam here I am. I also like ham, not
>>to mention sheep. I find .edu breaths so stimulating. If your up for it
>>I say we start our life together as soon as possible. So send my that address.
>>Am I male or am I female? Gosh maybe you can help me find out. Waiting
>>to hear from you with baited breath and lots of cats.
>>
>> Sylvia Duutoan
>Syl, honey. Leave the inexperienced child alone!
>dweath will show YOU a real good time!

Dear dweath,
I've met another man. A real Man. Do you hear me M-A-N. His name is Kylen
(Its bavarian. It means "Stinky fingers". He's all the man you'd ever hope
to be.

You know the war changed me. I realized I have a right to be happy. Sure I
have wants, needs, desires. Just like any hermaphrodite. You couldn't
meat (heh) any of those needs. With you it was always "ISObabe this and
ISObabe that".

I grew weary.

Kylen's given me the peace of mind to be happy. We're going to have butt babies
any day now. You must go on dweath. You must pull yourself up by your bootstra
ps. In fact I know the perfect place for you to find a catch. Write a personnel
to soc.singles.

Stop that Ky honey.

Oh well I'm off to the mall.

P.S. I never really loved you and take care of yourself. I couldn't bare
to think of you unhappy. Piss off.

Sylvia (undulation) Duutoan

dreas

unread,
Feb 10, 1993, 6:56:11 PM2/10/93
to
In article 88...@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jj...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:

>>>>In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
>>>>> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.

>Dear dweath,


>I've met another man. A real Man. Do you hear me M-A-N. His name is Kylen
>(Its bavarian. It means "Stinky fingers". He's all the man you'd ever hope
>to be.

Not a hope anymore, I'm afraid:

This is what I get for being a transsexual.
After the surgery, my lover leaves me...



>You know the war changed me. I realized I have a right to be happy. Sure I
>have wants, needs, desires. Just like any hermaphrodite. You couldn't
>meat (heh) any of those needs. With you it was always "ISObabe this and
>ISObabe that".

Since I couldn't beat them, I joined them. You could not endure the pain...
Wimp!

>I grew weary.

That's because of all those orgasms *I* gave you,
and you just couldn't reciprocate, You're a weenie and a traitor!

I was just too damn sexy for you, I guess...



>Kylen's given me the peace of mind to be happy. We're going to have butt babies
>any day now. You must go on dweath. You must pull yourself up by your bootstra
>ps. In fact I know the perfect place for you to find a catch. Write a personnel
>to soc.singles.

Then I'd be flaming myself.
I enjoy masturbation, but evan that's too kinky for me...

>Stop that Ky honey.

You really know how to hurt an ISObabe...



>Oh well I'm off to the mall.

..And don't be using *my* MonsterCard, Wench!



>P.S. I never really loved you and take care of yourself. I couldn't bare
>to think of you unhappy.

Excuse me for living. I'm SO depressed!!!!

> Piss off.

Been there, done that, you ungreatful slut!
I guess nobody will ever enjoy that NineInchLoveGun again...

dweath (Waaaaaaah! Nobody's gonna be *my* valentine this year!!!!)


dmc

unread,
Feb 10, 1993, 1:34:32 PM2/10/93
to
In article <1993Feb10....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com whimpers:
>Rob T sez in followup to Mr. Ireland's comment to Kayembee:

>> Kenn Barry was posting here when you were in diapers. Fuck off and
>> learn to respect your elders.
>>
>> And learn how to spell the name of the person you're flaming! It
>> makes you look like you might have a clue.

>I think you and Mr. Berry must hit it off pretty well...

To which I must respond (well, I really don't *have* to respond,
I just feel like it): Yea, I think they do, so what's your point?
(And before you attempt to say something along the lines of "you too";
I do get along pretty well with both of them -- unfortunately Rob lives
too far away for frequent socializing...)

Anywho, all this brings me to another thought that has been
blading around in my shredded brain for a day or two:

Why is it that newbies always take it upon themselves to try
and straighten out the old-timers that have a penchant for
calling-it-as-it-is? Do the newbies, like, think they are telling us
something that we've never realized in two, three or [gasp!] five
years on the net? How many times have we seen some kid who just got
usenet access come bombing along telling us all what we are doing
wrong? At first, it's funny to watch -- after a while it gets old.

Amusingly, it's those same newbies (generally) that after a
toilet-training period suddenly start flaming anything that moves.
Unfortunately, they don't have the slightest idea of what constitutes
creative-flaming. Because of this, the quality and content of alt.flame
has declined and it's hey-day as the mecca for the performance-artists-
royale has long past.

Needless to say, all of this really hurts those of us that like
to flame. No longer can we have fun flaming these innocent little
toads -- yanking their chains and putting them through their paces is
just too easy. Those of us that have made our fame, fortune and reaped
in the hundreds-of-thousands of wannafucks just no longer have the
creative opponents that are oh-so-necessary to make us want to call up
the old muse and really rip 'em to shreds...

It really pisses me off...

Whatever,

Desiree

Whatever is (c) and (r) by Lance/Squiddie/Smith -- if you use it, you
gotta pay him royalties. Be warned. He's vicious; he'll make you
swallow razorblades...

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 10, 1993, 11:44:44 PM2/10/93
to
In <1993Feb10....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>I think you and Mr. Berry must hit it off pretty well...

Yeah, we can join the club of people whose names you can't spell.

Lesson #2 is "editing". Did you see how I made all that yukky
text you included go away, as if by magic? I can even teach you
the magic! Send $49.95 to my home address, and we can get started.

dmc

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 12:44:06 PM2/11/93
to
In article <1993Feb11....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com feebly attempts to garner attention avec:

[portions of RobT's and my entire article (including Lance's (c) notice)
deleted...]

>First of all, Desirbee,

My turn -- first off -- you must, absolutely must, learn to
use an editor to post to this group. If you haven't done so, you will
be automatically banished to the realms of ARC where "editor" is a nasty
word (with vowels *'d out even...).

Und me moniker kiddo, is Desiree -- not "Desirbee" -- it's a
cute try on twisting but it really doesn't make it, ya know? If you
really want to play with my name, learn what it means and then twist
from that. <-- that's a hint. No charge for the first one...

> I am NOT "Mr. Ireland".

Ahhh, d'accord, you're just an angry entity -- got it.

>Mr. Ireland is the warden
>here and he provides access to the net for a number of us on his terminal.

The Warden or the Keeper? And what you are you locked up for?
What does he do with you when you are playing on the terminal? Does
he make you bend over when you post? Are you posting to the right
group?

>I go by the name Buz here. Although Zonker, Crowbar, Hubcap, and Chain use this
>terminal as well, we haven't been identifying which one of us originates a
>message.

Cool, a gang-bang. I can dig it. Will you give us hints on
how to identify which one of you is writing a post? Or will that become
apparent in good time? (BTW Rule2: Hit return with a bit more frequency;
us geeks are sometimes judged by appearance too you know...)

>Secondly, rude conduct is unbecoming of an individual.

Nawwwww. Not everything Mommy told you was true, you know.

> I can't understand why
>this is such a difficult concept for you to grasp.

Isn't.

Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others
here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?

Toodles,

Desiree

Christopher Cherry

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 4:31:00 PM2/11/93
to
In <1993Feb11.1...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
> Nawwwww. Not everything Mommy told you was true, you know.
>
>> I can't understand why
>>this is such a difficult concept for you to grasp.
>
> Isn't.
>
> Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others
>here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
>it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
>little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
>interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?

Desiree,

They *do* have a point.

It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
soc.couples. N'est pas?

So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
line. As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

--------------------
Christopher Cherry INTERNET: CCH...@VNET.IBM.COM

phan...@iastate.edu

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 6:30:17 PM2/11/93
to
Greetings all...

From cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry):

> This much my mother did tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly*
> undesirable.

Ego is self... Self is undesirable? Or unattractive? I would not enjoy the
company of somebody without ego...

Egotism, perhaps...

Fortune smile...

phantasm

dmc

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 7:02:08 PM2/11/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) mistakenly has stumbled into real-life with:

[my previous words deleted -- if you want 'em, find 'em...]

>They *do* have a point.

They *do*? Where? What was it? Was I asleep during that lesson?
Please expound...

>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

Unbecoming? To whom? In your viewpoint, perhaps. To others,
not in the least. "Senselessly" is also open to debate...

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

You don't mean -- I've been playing on this here net for neigh
on five years now and I've been doing it all wrong? Oh me. Oh my.
Whatever shall I do? (BTW, I verbally filet folks in realtime too...
if they deserve it...ohmy!)

>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway?

About as much as discussions about Freud, I'd 'pect.

> This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable.

Your momma was wrong -- at least as far as I'm concerned. Sorry
toots. That's the way it is in zee real-world...

But keeping in mind that this *is* soc.sniglets: do you mean to
tell me that you don't date chicks with an "ego"? Do you prefer the
vapid type of person that says, "yes, dear/no, dear/which way, dear?"
on command? *Ego* is something that we all have (or damned well should);
a good sense of self is important in the real-world. And it's *damned*
desirable to me (and manymanymany others)... Neener, neener, neener.

> It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Oh, j'n'sais pas... Here's an interesting tidbit for you to
gnaw on: how do you know if I'm single or not? Just because I post
here doesn't mean that I am...

>So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
>line.

Thanks for the input Chris (say, when did you get your
usenet access? Just curious...). As long as people followup to me
publicly, I respond publicly... (les actes sont plus eloquents que
les paroles...)

> As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

Actually not in the least. Playing is the *most* social behaviour
that we can exhibit -- be it in younger people or us older people...


Run off now,

Desiree


N.B. Are they biting or what?

james.j.dutton

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 8:46:25 AM2/11/93
to
In article <1993Feb10.2...@sol.UVic.CA> atov...@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>In article 88...@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jj...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>
>>>>>In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
>>>>>> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.
>
>..And don't be using *my* MonsterCard, Wench!
>
>>P.S. I never really loved you and take care of yourself. I couldn't bare
>>to think of you unhappy.
>
>Excuse me for living. I'm SO depressed!!!!
>
>> Piss off.
>
>Been there, done that, you ungreatful slut!
>I guess nobody will ever enjoy that NineInchLoveGun again...

Pea shooter.


>
>dweath (Waaaaaaah! Nobody's gonna be *my* valentine this year!!!!)

There you have it ladies and germs. One more reason why personals belong
in alt.personals. Another relationship turned ussunder. A healthy caring
share bear perfect couple forced to go their separate ways in life simply
because someone was pandering inapropritely(hey I've spelled it 6 diff ways,
they all look wrong). Alas poor Urich.

dreas

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 9:52:54 PM2/11/93
to
cch...@vnet.ibm.com writes:

> des...@netcom.com writes:
>
>> Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others
>>here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
>>it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
>>little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
>>interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?
>
>Desiree,
>
>They *do* have a point.

..Albeit a blunt one.

>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

Well how incredibly flippin' brilliant! Take all the fun out of the best
thing going in our pathetic, little lives...

Understand that your subjective tastes are far from being universal.
I happen to enjoy receiving intelligently crafted flames and throwing
more fuel onto the fire. I happen to be snide and facetious in person
just like on the net, but I say mean things in polite tones and gentle
inflections. Unfortunately, these subtleties and nuances of tone are not
easy to type out, even with the best editor...

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

Perhaps she also enjoys it in person. Gosh-darn, Ain't she sexy when she
gets TheHots?



>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Only a ClueLessWeenieVendor would say that.

I find good flames to be extremely attractive because it takes a certain
measure of intelligence to come up with good ones. What attracts me is the
intelligence. Intelligent women ARE a turn-on for me, BTW...

>So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
>line. As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

I find that *you* are being anti-social right now in the context of
soc.singles, or is this another soc.singles joke?

Des, I think he actually means it...

dreas


Kenn Barry

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 12:51:26 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:
>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

Christopher, few of us read the net as a business; we _are_ here
for amusement. And, amusement aside, Desiree is helping us all learn
French.

>Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable.

Ooh, speak for yourself, chum. What's unattractive is ego
without visible means of support. Ego supported by intelligence and
literacy is quite welcome on the net, to me.

Kayembee

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 7:35:03 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.1...@netcom.com>, des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
> In article <1993Feb11....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com feebly attempts to garner attention avec:
>
> [portions of RobT's and my entire article (including Lance's (c) notice)
> deleted...]
>
>>First of all, Desirbee,
>
>>


You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
in here toots.

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 7:39:29 AM2/12/93
to
In article <thurlow....@convex.convex.com>, thu...@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
> In <1993Feb10....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>
>>I think you and Mr. Berry must hit it off pretty well...
>
> Yeah, we can join the club of people whose names you can't spell.
>
> Lesson #2 is "editing". Did you see how I made all that yukky
> text you included go away, as if by magic? I can even teach you
> the magic! Send $49.95 to my home address, and we can get started.
>
> Rob T
> --


Okay, so what is your address Tinkerbell?

Jeff Wall

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 8:54:49 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.1...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
>
>
> Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others
>here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
>it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
>little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
>interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?
>
>Toodles,

When Desiree says "Toodles" She means business. Take it from me I know...

Cheers,

Jeff

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 10:30:54 AM2/11/93
to

First of all, Desirbee, I am NOT "Mr. Ireland". Mr. Ireland is the warden


here and he provides access to the net for a number of us on his terminal.

I go by the name Buz here. Although Zonker, Crowbar, Hubcap, and Chain use this
terminal as well, we haven't been identifying which one of us originates a
message.

Secondly, rude conduct is unbecoming of an individual. I can't understand why


this is such a difficult concept for you to grasp.

Buz

Jeff Smith

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 9:32:14 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com>, cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:

|> Desiree,
|>
|> They *do* have a point.
|>
|> It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
|> to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

Oh my god, this is too precious!

|>
|> I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
|> electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

Now what the hell does this mean? Just what business are we in, anyway?


|> So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
|> line. As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

You don't really mean to be here do you? Maybe alt.hugs?

jds

***************************************************************************
* Health and knowledge and wealth and power,
Jeff Smith * Passion and poems and sex
sm...@fl08-g.comm.mot.com * I wear a smile like a leather glove,
* I won't shut my mouth for less.
- shriekback
***************************************************************************

james.j.dutton

unread,
Feb 11, 1993, 11:23:50 AM2/11/93
to
In article <1993Feb11....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>>
>> Needless to say, all of this really hurts those of us that like
>> to flame. No longer can we have fun flaming these innocent little
>> toads -- yanking their chains and putting them through their paces is
>> just too easy. Those of us that have made our fame, fortune and reaped
>> in the hundreds-of-thousands of wannafucks just no longer have the
>> creative opponents that are oh-so-necessary to make us want to call up
>> the old muse and really rip 'em to shreds...
>>
>> Desiree

>
>First of all, Desirbee, I am NOT "Mr. Ireland". Mr. Ireland is the warden
>here and he provides access to the net for a number of us on his terminal.
>I go by the name Buz here. Although Zonker, Crowbar, Hubcap, and Chain use this
>terminal as well, we haven't been identifying which one of us originates a
>message.
>
>Secondly, rude conduct is unbecoming of an individual. I can't understand why
>this is such a difficult concept for you to grasp.
>
>Buz

Dear Buzoff,
You friends have real cool names. Please proceed directly to
soc.singles.nice.uterus.

Thank you for your cooperation. Do tell. Chip chip. Tally ho.

Ta ta.

trygve lode

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 11:51:44 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:
>
>Desiree,
>
>They *do* have a point.
>
>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. What is the world coming to when women start
behaving in ways that some people label 'unladylike'? Why, before you
know it, these uppity females are going to vote or work outside the
kitchen or whoknowswhat....

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

We're not? But if we're not here to amuse ourselves and others, what
are we here for? (And if there is some deep, philosophical purpose
behind soc.singles, how come nobody told me? If anyone out there knows
what it is, let me know so I can put it in the min-FAQ.)

>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Hmmmm..."ego is unattractive and *certainly* undesirable"? How on
earth are we to reconcile this with "how come MOTAS only go for jerks?"

Trygve (I've noticed that people who preach the virtues of humility
and modesty and the evils of ego generally have very good
reasons for being humble and modest.)
--
"Target Shooting for the Blind by Harriet Frumich. The first complete,
easy to understand guide to target shooting written in Braille. Covers
pistols, shotguns, rifles, and automatic weapons. 450pp."

RO...@mtus5.bitnet

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 12:52:52 PM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb12....@sol.UVic.CA>, atov...@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
says:
>
>cch...@vnet.ibm.com writes:

>> des...@netcom.com writes:
>Des, I think he actually means it...
>
>dreas
>
> Have heart dreas. These are only the opening follies in a flame
>fest that will only end when the two people meet and work out all
>their frustrations upon each other. I think their kids will be
>cute if not a bit confused...
>
> songbird
>

Piglet

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 2:08:00 PM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:
>They *do* have a point.

Yeah, right on the tops of their pointy little heads.

>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

Really. Well, isn't that sweet. Now take your sexist little opinions on
how people should act and stuff them right up your tight little net-connection.

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

Maybe it's not the business _you're_ in....but then, we knew that.

>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Oh, stuff it. (Not to repeat myself, or anything.) Some of us don't want
to get to soc.couples. Evidently you do. Hey, I have an idea--why not hop
over there RIGHT NOW? This has everything to do with soc.singles, or haven't
you been reading long enough to figure that out?? Frutex (yes, I know I'm
re-using it, but I'm too tired [and bored] to be original).


Piglet

Vision

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 11:09:01 PM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb12.0...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:

[ Alot of stuff deleted ]

Desiree, what makes you think that being on the net longer makes you just
*so* much wiser and *so* much more knowledgeable than everyone else?
Please, give the group a break.

__
Vision. - Andrew Odom
bi switch B0 f- t w- dc- g+(v) k++(+) s+(v) h- r+ p q-

Charles R. Martin

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 5:28:25 PM2/12/93
to


You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
in here toots.

This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.

We should sell tickets. Really we should.


--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/mar...@cs.unc.edu
Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
Stupid news program.....

Charles R. Martin

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 5:30:25 PM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb12.1...@oz.plymouth.edu> pat...@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:


And here's the ultimate hypocrisy: *posting* a request that someone
take the discussion off-line! It's the basic "Aren't I a wonderful,
rational person" post.

Practice what you preach, shotgun. Meanwhile, we "ladies" will
continue our discussions as we see fit.

Now, Patricia -- do you think it's nice or ladilike for you and Desiree
to both gang up on this guy in a battle of wits for which he is clearly
only half-armed?

dmc

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 2:34:50 AM2/13/93
to
In article <C2DCv...@athena.cs.uga.edu> od...@athena.cs.uga.edu (Vision)
brings about the profound question of:

>Desiree, what makes you think that being on the net longer makes you just
>*so* much wiser and *so* much more knowledgeable than everyone else?
>Please, give the group a break.

Vision (a wee bit ethereal there, eh?) -- do you see a wee
bit of irony in here? Just an eensy bit?

Think, child, then come back... Or better yet, have your
people call my people -- they can do lunch.


Snicker,

Desiree

Pat Steward

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 9:18:54 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:
>In <1993Feb11.1...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
>>
>> Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others
>>here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
>>it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
>>little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
>>interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?
>
>Desiree,

>
>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

"Unbecoming to a lady"? Ohmigod, I'm ROTFL!

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

Maybe not the business YOU'RE in, bud.

>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Ego is apparently unattractive in "ladies", but I sure see a lot of it
in your post, Christopher!

>So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
>line. As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

And here's the ultimate hypocrisy: *posting* a request that someone


take the discussion off-line! It's the basic "Aren't I a wonderful,
rational person" post.

Practice what you preach, shotgun. Meanwhile, we "ladies" will
continue our discussions as we see fit.

--
Patricia Martin Steward pat...@oz.plymouth.edu
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is;
I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express senti-
ments that differentiate me from a doormat. Rebecca West, 1913

dmc

unread,
Feb 12, 1993, 10:59:05 AM2/12/93
to
In article <1993Feb12....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com babbles:

[my *entire* article deleted...]

Okay -- Listen ChainGangKids -- you really gotta learn to edit
out unnecessary lines. If you don't -- you *will* be banished to other
realms... And don't think that it's not possible. Your last warning,
children.

>You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
>tolerence for after awhile.

Wow... and you think that perhaps her propensity for popping
wisecracks had *anything* to do with the way that you refer to her?
And what happened when your tolerance-levels dipped too low? Did you,
like, just demand she shut the fuck up and when she didn't what happened?
You punished her in some way?

> That's part of why I'm in here, toots.

Trolling? Scamming? Sorry, Boy -- you won't find a hell of
a lot of women on the net that don't have a "smart mouth" -- the
ones that I've run into (over the years) all have this remarkable
capacity for speaking and even go so far as to tell people what is on
their mind -- some even use humor, wit, sarcasm, and other tools, to
get their point across.

Last I heard though, the "cool" babes could be found hanging
in alt.romance.chat, alt.fan.amy-fisher, and alt.tasteless.penis.


Toddle off now, kid --

Desiree

John Fereira

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 1:01:03 AM2/13/93
to
In article <1993Feb12....@sol.UVic.CA> atov...@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>>>interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?
|>
|>Desiree,
|>
|>They *do* have a point.
|
|..Albeit a blunt one.

And it's on the top of their head.

|>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
|>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

What, exactly, *is* the business we're in?

|I find good flames to be extremely attractive because it takes a certain
|measure of intelligence to come up with good ones. What attracts me is the
|intelligence. Intelligent women ARE a turn-on for me, BTW...

Careful, dreas. Last time I said something almost exactly like, which
coincidently had to do with Desiree and another net.godess, I was flamed
for being a suck up. I believe that's what started the whole suckup
rating thing.

Since it lacked originality, I gave it a 7.4.

--
-john

Jeff Smith

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 2:26:33 PM2/13/93
to

|> > Und me moniker kiddo, is Desiree -- not "Desirbee" -- it's a
|> > cute try on twisting but it really doesn't make it, ya know? If you
|> > really want to play with my name, learn what it means and then twist
|> > from that. <-- that's a hint. No charge for the first one...

|> > Lookie Kiddo, if you boys wanna play with me (and the others


|> > here) I'm willing to do so -- but you gotta show me something to make
|> > it worth my effort. If you can't do that, I won't play. So, put your
|> > little heads together, rub the smega around and come up with something
|> > interesting to respond to -- if you can't, don't bother. Capische?

|> You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little


|> tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
|> in here toots.

Hey I guess you showed her didn't you.

Is there an echo in here?
in here?

Robert Ashcroft

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 2:44:52 PM2/13/93
to
In article <MARTINC.93...@grover.cs.unc.edu> mar...@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1993Feb12....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>
>
> You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
> tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
> in here toots.
>
>This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.
>
>We should sell tickets. Really we should.

Yeah, but who is who?

RNA


Charles R. Martin

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 5:52:11 AM2/13/93
to

In article <1993Feb12.0...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:

[ Alot of stuff deleted ]

Desiree, what makes you think that being on the net longer makes you just
*so* much wiser and *so* much more knowledgeable than everyone else?
Please, give the group a break.

Experience?

Charles R. Martin

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 2:58:34 PM2/13/93
to
In article <1993Feb13....@leland.Stanford.EDU> r...@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:

>This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.
>
>We should sell tickets. Really we should.

Yeah, but who is who?

That's easy -- Desireee is Desiree, and the other guy isn't.

See, doesn't logic make things easy?

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 14, 1993, 11:49:04 AM2/14/93
to
In <1993Feb12....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
>tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
>in here toots.

In the dungeon, or in soc.singles, Mr. Whatever-the-fuck-you-call-yourself?

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thu...@convex.com
"Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have all of this,
and, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, from you?"
- "Passionate Kisses" Lucinda Williams

Pat Steward

unread,
Feb 13, 1993, 6:48:36 PM2/13/93
to
In article <C2DCv...@athena.cs.uga.edu> od...@athena.cs.uga.edu (Vision) writes:
>
>Desiree, what makes you think that being on the net longer makes you just
>*so* much wiser and *so* much more knowledgeable than everyone else?
>Please, give the group a break.
>__
> Vision. - Andrew Odom

Oh, stop! Oh, please! I can't stand it, I'm gonna bust a gut
laughing!

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 14, 1993, 11:50:10 AM2/14/93
to
In <1993Feb12....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>Okay, so what is your address Tinkerbell?

Cute. Very cute. Do your parents know you're posting? They might
be concerned.

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 14, 1993, 11:52:13 AM2/14/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.2...@watson.ibm.com> cch...@vnet.ibm.com (Christopher Cherry) writes:

>It it quite unbecoming a lady to senselessly attack (never could get used
>to the 'flaming' concept) others over the net.

That's right, by God. If we don't nip this in the bud, they'll be
wearing knickers and even (gasp) smoking and voting. We can't have
that, certainly. Harrumph!

>I'm sure you find it amusing to verbally filet individuals from a safe
>electronic distance - but amusement, dear, is not the business we're in.

So what, in your esteemed opinion Mr. Cherry, IS the purpose of
soc.singles? Go on, tell us. I'm always astonished when some
wet-behind-the-ears newbie decides to tell us posters who've been
here for years (eight in my case) what we should and shouldn't be
doing. I may not come here for flames per se, but I certainly do
come here in part to give and receive amusement.

>What has this to do with soc.singles anyway? This much my mother did
>tell me: Ego is unattractive, and *certainly* undesirable. It's a good way
>to keep posting in soc.singles and never find the glorious world of
>soc.couples. N'est pas?

Chuckles, you can go over there any time you want, you don't have
to be "promoted". Many people who post here are not single, just
in case you've been too clueless to notice.

>So feel free to launch your trite verbal digs - but please take them off
>line. As for playing, don't you think it's a bit anti-social??

You wanted the world to see your criticism, so I'd expect you won't
only get private responses. Just a hint.

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 14, 1993, 12:01:52 PM2/14/93
to

>Desiree, what makes you think that being on the net longer makes you just
>*so* much wiser and *so* much more knowledgeable than everyone else?

Long experience? Backed up with being right more often than not?

How long have you been here, and what gives you the wisdom to say
what she should and shouldn't be doing here?

>Please, give the group a break.

Please, speak for yourself and learn to cope with people you don't
like reading.

dreas

unread,
Feb 15, 1993, 3:59:20 PM2/15/93
to

Shhhhh! She liked it...

dreas


dmc

unread,
Feb 15, 1993, 7:59:47 PM2/15/93
to
In article <1993Feb13....@leland.Stanford.EDU> r...@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) tries to be witty with:
>Charlie Martin tries to make a buck:

>>
>>This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.
>>We should sell tickets. Really we should.
>
>Yeah, but who is who?

Awww, poor Robert. I guess he's still licking himself over that
alt.romance.gag.upchuck thing a few years ago.

It's okay Robert. It was only a flamewar. It wasn't personal.
It's not real life... You don't need to pout.

Whatever,

Desiree


shut up Lance -- I'll pay you.

quir...@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

unread,
Feb 16, 1993, 11:33:32 AM2/16/93
to
mar...@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

> You know my x old lady had a smart mouth just like yours that I had little
> tolerence for after awhile. That's part of why I'm in here, toots.
> in here toots.

> This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.
> We should sell tickets. Really we should.

Desiree up against a jail convict who's possibly an aggressive and hardened
murderer ?
Isn't there a law against unusual punishment ? Let the poor sod work off his
sentance in peace !


Seriously, Bozo, or Crusher, or whatever the hell your name is.
What Desiree, in her aggressive little fashion, is trying to beat into your
head is that the social standards for groups are arrived at via consensus. The
general attitude in this group is that almost anyone is welcome, given that
they are literate enough to be readable, and post intelligently. If you want to
be accepted and you can't pass muster, go elsewhere. Fools are not suffered
lightly here, and we reserve the right to rip you to pieces, virtually
speaking. Yes, it ain't fair, but you're welcome to respond in kind. The
problem is that the sort of person who gets flamed in this group just does not
have the ability to retaliate effectively, and sooner or later realises it.
Why not go to some other twee little group like Alt.romance.chat or
something ? We don't go wandering into prisons saying "I'm tougher than you
chickenshit pussies", you don't come here saying "It's impolite to flame those
less able than yourself !", ok ?

--
Tony Quirke, Wellington, New Zealand (Quir...@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz)
"Only the free have disposition to be truthful.
Only the truthful have the interest to be just.
Only the just possess the willpower to be free." - WH Auden.

ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com

unread,
Feb 16, 1993, 1:29:17 PM2/16/93
to
In article <thurlow....@convex.convex.com>, thu...@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
> In <1993Feb12....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>
>>Okay, so what is your address Tinkerbell?
>
> Cute. Very cute. Do your parents know you're posting? They might
> be concerned.
>
> Rob T
> -


Well what about that address Tinkerbell?

dde...@uwovax.uwo.ca

unread,
Feb 16, 1993, 1:46:24 PM2/16/93
to
In article <1993Feb11.1...@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jj...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
> In article <1993Feb10.2...@sol.UVic.CA> atov...@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>>In article 88...@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jj...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>
>>>>>>In article 18...@news.duc.auburn.edu, gri...@eng.auburn.edu (Kylen B. Griffin) writes:
>>>>>>> I'm a 19 year old student going to Auburn University and I'm searching for a female that will keep me company in a non committment relationship although it could develop into one. I'm 6'1" and have reddish brown hair. My interedts are skiing, sports, and listening to music. I really would like to meet new people. Please write me directly. Mail for more info.
>>
>>..And don't be using *my* MonsterCard, Wench!
>>
>>>P.S. I never really loved you and take care of yourself. I couldn't bare
>>>to think of you unhappy.
>>
>>Excuse me for living. I'm SO depressed!!!!
>>
>>> Piss off.
>>
>>Been there, done that, you ungreatful slut!
>>I guess nobody will ever enjoy that NineInchLoveGun again...
>
> Pea shooter.
>
>>
>>dweath (Waaaaaaah! Nobody's gonna be *my* valentine this year!!!!)
>
> There you have it ladies and germs. One more reason why personals belong
> in alt.personals. Another relationship turned ussunder. A healthy caring
> share bear perfect couple forced to go their separate ways in life simply
> because someone was pandering inapropritely(hey I've spelled it 6 diff ways,
> they all look wrong). Alas poor Urich.

Robert Thurlow

unread,
Feb 16, 1993, 2:08:00 PM2/16/93
to
In <1993Feb16....@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> ire...@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>Well what about that address Tinkerbell?

I'm listed in the Dallas phone directory, if you know how to read.

Robert Ashcroft

unread,
Feb 17, 1993, 12:54:01 AM2/17/93
to
In article <1993Feb16.0...@netcom.com> des...@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
>In article <1993Feb13....@leland.Stanford.EDU> r...@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) tries to be witty with:
>>Charlie Martin tries to make a buck:
>>>
>>>This oughta be good. Desireee vs. Bozo the Clown.
>>>We should sell tickets. Really we should.
>>
>>Yeah, but who is who?
>
> Awww, poor Robert. I guess he's still licking himself over that
>alt.romance.gag.upchuck thing a few years ago.

??

I guess you'll have to refresh my memory, or at least make sure that your's
isn't faulty.

RNA


0 new messages