To the people who were..airheads

[curiousp...@gmail.com]

One criticized that he was hardly ethical if he was talking about
relationship in class despite my stating clearly in previous posts in
another thread which I referred to in the first post of thread "I am
completely available.." that the class was career advancement class
and most students are over 40.

It is a amazing (not really considering most people are airheads) how
some people twist and takes things out of context and criticize
instead of keeping their mouth shut if they cannot be helpful.

Yes, I am posting here for the last time to taunt those that are
airheads that all my concerns (such as whether he in only interested
in sex and already knew he didn't want more, etc. ) have been answered
with his not saying in explicit words.

I explained that due to the nature of the situation - I can't ask him
"Do you want to go get some coffee?" especially since the class ends
at late night, he can't ask me "do you want to go out?", not without
checking a few things out whether my response would be favorable or
not and yet all these retarded statement as if we were not behaving
like adults. Well, the joke is on you. He is on his way to ask me out,
according to not just me but also my online friend from another
forum. Yes, this forum sucks. people in this forum act like they know
about relationships while all they really know is about penis and
vagina only just as animals do. Let's see whether this post gets
posted or not.

[JustGB]

On Oct 31, 12:31 am, curiousperson...@gmail.com wrote:

> Yes, I am posting here for the last time

At last.

[Tom Allen]

So, let's see:

You posted here with the intention of "to taunt" people who replied to
your original post.

You are in a class with other adults, and yet refuse to ask the prof to
go for coffee because it's late (past your bedtime?).

You believe that he can't ask you out directly because (you believe) he
needs to know how you will answer *before* he asks.

You heard from another friend (through the gossip grapevine, apparently)
that the prof was actually going to visit you to ask you out.

And yet, you keep claiming that this is not a high school-ish situation,
and that the rest of us are airheads.

I'm sorry... just *how* adult are you claiming to be, again?

--
Tom Allen
http://vanillaedge.wordpress.com

"I don't have multiple orgasms, myself... I am, however, known to be a
carrier."

[Norton]

>At last.

Now now. There is always another one waiting.

I think though that curiousperson represented one particular
view of sexual involvement. Most of it was centered on her
and her assumption that the instructor could read her somewhat
obscure cues.

Men often miss even obvious cues.

And her interpretation of what may have been innocent comments
on the part of the instructor also was very self-serving. Did
she have any idea what the instructor risked in coming on to
a student?

And then there was her assumption that certain rules she
imposed about what could or could not happen were fair
and reasonable and how could anybody possibly object.

So all in all, I think that we have seen the nearest thing
to an unstoppable force (us) hit an immovable object (her).

--
--- Norton

[Bob Eld]

<curiousp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1fda5897-772b-4388...@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Snip....

Yes, this forum sucks. people in this forum act like they know
> about relationships while all they really know is about penis and
> vagina only just as animals do. Let's see whether this post gets
> posted or not.

Hey, I represent that remark!