Bukkake
Dick Megalong
I'm a big fan of Bukkake as the active part.
Bukkake means men shooting their semen all over a passive partner.
Unfortunately, there are not too many people interested in
Bukkake.It's common in porn, but I have a hard time finding partners
in the "real world".
Is this such an unusual fetish?
Did anyone in here try it?
Dick
Kat
The problem with finding a bukkake target is that the act offers
little to the target other than humiliation and maybe some
objectification or degradation without any sexual stimulation or
gratification. ever thought about trying the other end?
I've tried it and would enjoy doing it again but it's probably too
degrading to gain wide appeal.
Tom Allen
> The problem with finding a bukkake target is that the act offers
> little to the target other than humiliation and maybe some
> objectification or degradation without any sexual stimulation or
> gratification. ever thought about trying the other end?
>
> I've tried it and would enjoy doing it again but it's probably too
> degrading to gain wide appeal.
Wow, even Kat makes an appearance - and it's not even an Oleander thread.
The problem with humiliation scenes is that they often aren't exciting
to anyone except the players because many people have very specific
humiliation kinks.
Further, if you are looking for somebody to lay there and let a
half-dozen men spew on her, then you're looking for somebody with an
*exceptionally* specific kink. Most people don't play that way.
The lesson here is that you will find quite a few things in porn that
look good on paper, but simply don't translate well into real life.
--
Tom Allen
http://vanillaedge.wordpress.com
I don't have multiple orgasms, myself. However, I am known to be a carrier.
sleepy
> Kat wrote:
>
>> The problem with finding a bukkake target is that the act offers
>> little to the target other than humiliation and maybe some
>> objectification or degradation without any sexual stimulation or
>> gratification. ever thought about trying the other end?
>>
>> I've tried it and would enjoy doing it again but it's probably too
>> degrading to gain wide appeal.
>
> Wow, even Kat makes an appearance - and it's not even an Oleander thread.
>
> The problem with humiliation scenes is that they often aren't exciting
> to anyone except the players because many people have very specific
> humiliation kinks.
>
> Further, if you are looking for somebody to lay there and let a
> half-dozen men spew on her, then you're looking for somebody with an
> *exceptionally* specific kink. Most people don't play that way.
>
> The lesson here is that you will find quite a few things in porn that
> look good on paper, but simply don't translate well into real life.
>
degrading. The woman has had an orgasm and does not want to continue
vaginal sex, but likes it when her partner continues. Or she finds the
idea exciting that a man can have an orgasm just while looking at her
beautiful body.
Kat
That's not really bukkake though that's a facial. still hot but very different. comparing them is like comparing two people having sex to a gangbang, the basic activity is similar but it's a different experience and different place mentally.
ps Hi Tom! I noticed the flood of activity but didn't want to get involved. bukkake is my kind of activity flood.
sleepy
facial. I would normally associate the term bukkake as meaning both as
in the typical porn movie, but I'd like to break out of this to consider
the other erotic components possible outside of the commercialised cliche.
Tom Allen
>
> That's not really bukkake though that's a facial. still hot but very different. comparing them is like comparing two people having sex to a gangbang, the basic activity is similar but it's a different experience and different place mentally.
Well, true, but there wasn't a lot to go on.
For reference, though, I was imagining that a pearl necklace or a
facial might be close enough, but my understanding is that most women
really don't care for that, either.
> ps Hi Tom! I noticed the flood of activity but didn't want to get involved. bukkake is my kind of activity flood.
Really? How very interesting.
You're not blogging anymore. What happened?
--
Tom
Kat
I moved to take a promotion and got in a little over my head at work but I'm learning fast enough to keep my head above water. mostly. got good people around me so that helps. Bought a house too so that's been keeping me busy too.
Hope to get back to the blog at some point but a couple of the people that were motivating me and helping me edit disappeared too so I just haven't gotten around to it. Nice to feel wanted though that might help me actually write something.
Dave
<6bfd4e11-841d-445d...@l24g2000vby.googlegroups.com> Tom
Allen <tao...@gmail.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>On Jan 20, 3:27 pm, Kat <ki...@gothkat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> That's not really bukkake though that's a facial. still hot but
>> very different. comparing them is like comparing two people having
>> sex to a gangbang, the basic activity is similar but it's a
>> different experience and different place mentally.
>
>Well, true, but there wasn't a lot to go on.
I can see a couple clues from the original message, two of them in this
sentence: "Bukkake means men shooting their semen"
Plus the definition of bukkake:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake says
... "being ejaculated on by several men"
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bukkake says
... "The act of multiple men ejaculating onto a woman's face"
http://www.bdsmgifts.com/bdsm-dictionary/ says
... "in which a very large number of men"
I'd say it's likely that he meant multiple men. You don't usually
accidentally use a word correctly, especially while explaining the
word's definition. Plus, at least in my experience, it's not that
difficult to find a woman willing who enjoys a facial or pearl necklace
whereas bukkake is much more difficult.
Serene Vannoy
I don't find it degrading, but then I've never been ejaculated on by
someone who spoke or behaved in a degrading fashion toward me. (I'm not
dissing anyone who's into degradation; it's just not my kink.)
Serene
Orlando Enrique Fiol
>I don't find it degrading, but then I've never been
ejaculated on by
>someone who spoke or behaved in a degrading fashion toward me. (I'm not
>dissing anyone who's into degradation; it's just not my kink.)
Why can't liberals ditch this foolish relativism bullshit and
take a stand against sexual degradation? It's hypocritical to
be prohibited from articulating sexually degrading words or
gestures outside a specific context in which they're welcome.
Then, there's the issue of breaking character during or after
the "scene". Honestly, if people feel the need to be spat on,
called filthy names and otherwise degraded, they need
psychological counseling rather than bullshit relativist
encouragement.
Orlando