Re: Buckwheat is Subverting the Constitution
AnAmericanCitizen
"If the American people stay engaged in this fight over what's going to happen with
our healthcare, the American people are going to win. At the end of the day, when
the American people get engaged with their government, they speak up, Washington
listens"...... House Minority Leader John Boehner
CALL WASHINGTON (The toll free phone numbers to the US Capitol in
Washington DC are: 888-355 -3588, 877-762-8762 and 866-340-9281.)
Alert everyone you know to do the same. Harry Reid's personal number is
866-SEN-REID. Tell them the majority of Americans told you to call....AAC
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:20:33 -0400, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
>http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/boehner_healthcare_reform/2009/10/02/267705.html
>
>Rep. Boehner Accuses Obama of Subverting Constitution
>
>Friday, October 2, 2009
>
>House Minority Leader John Boehner is accusing President Obama of
>subverting and circumventing the Constitution by appointing so-called
>czars who are not subject to Senate confirmation or scrutiny.
>
>In a wide-ranging interview with Newsmax.TV on Thursday, the Ohio
>Republican discussed issues ranging from healthcare reform to
>President Obama�s refusal to engage the GOP leadership in
>bipartisanship.
>
>But Boehner�s most pointed comments came when Newsmax.TV's Ashley
>Martella asked whether he is concerned that Obama has appointed so
>many czars � special advisers or envoys who have relatively few
>restrictions on their authority or salary � most of whom do not have
>to win confirmation in the Senate, as Cabinet secretaries do.
>
>To see the video of Minority Leader John Boehner's assessment of
>President Obama's proliferation of czars and the status of the
>healthcare debate, Click here.
>
>"I think this whole issue has gotten way out of control in terms of
>the number of czars that he has and advisers around him," Boehner
>said.
>
>While acknowledging that Obama has a right to domestic and
>international policy advisers, he contends that the president crossed
>the line with his czar appointments.
>
>"He clearly is circumventing the Constitution, in my view, and I think
>the heat continues to build on the administration to deal with this,"
>Boehner told Newsmax. "It's one thing to have domestic policy advisers
>or international policy advisers, but to have this many people at the
>White House who have really more control than the Cabinet secretaries,
>I think is a subversion of the Constitution."
>
>Since taking office, the Obama administration has appointed about 33
>of the so-called "czars," although the precise number depends on the
>definition used. Some czar positions, such as the cyber security czar,
>have been created but not filled.
>
>Though past administrations have used czars � the most famous being
>the drug czar � Obama appears to have carved out much wider policy and
>executive roles for his appointees. So far only two of his czar
>appointments passed through the Senate's constitutional
>advice-and-consent confirmation procedure.
>
>Obama�s czars are well compensated with six-figure salaries, and many
>of their budgets are buried within Cabinet or executive branch
>budgets. Of major concern to Congress are the unconfirmed czars who
>operate beyond Congressional oversight and appear to have authority
>beyond even that of some Cabinet secretaries, at least in their
>special fields of expertise. Health-reform czar Nancy-Ann DeParle and
>global-warming czar Carol Browner are two examples.
>
>There is little doubt many of the czars wield enormous power. The czar
>appointments have raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill, including among
>some Democrats. Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., wrote Obama a letter
>warning: �The rapid and easy accumulation of power by White House
>staff can threaten the constitutional system of checks and balances.
>At the worst, White House staff have taken direction and control of
>programmatic areas that are the statutory responsibility of Senate
>confirmed officials.�
>
>Senate Democrats Dianne Feinstein of California and Russ Feingold of
>Wisconsin also have expressed misgivings.
>
>Obama has appointed six special envoys who act as czars
>internationally. Obama's foreign-policy czars have not been confirmed
>by the Senate.
>
>Afghanistan-Pakistan Czar Richard Holbrooke and Mideast Peace Czar
>George Mitchell both technically report to Secretary of State Hillary
>Clinton, according to the State Department. But press reports suggest
>they can bypass her easily by communicating directly with the White
>House.
>
>Some Republican members of Congress have gone so far as to suggest
>that the czars represent establishment of a "parallel government."
>
>The use of such czars has come back to haunt Obama. His choice for the
>"green jobs" czar post, Van Jones, resigned after a spate of
>inflammatory remarks, as well as his participation in "9/11 truther"
>activities that seek to somehow blame former President George W. Bush
>for the 9/11 attacks. This drew criticism that some czars have not
>gone through the proper vetting that occurs during Senate
>confirmation.
>
>Boehner has other major concerns that transcend the czars. The Ohio
>Republican also took aim at Democratic proposals for healthcare reform
>and said the United States needs to reform medical malpractice laws to
>deal with the "healthcare junksuit lottery" prevalent today. He
>wondered how Democrats could say "with a straight face" that they're
>protecting Medicare.
>
>Martella asked Boehner about the healthcare reform plan the Democrats
>are trying to "ram through" Congress. Boehner has referred to the plan
>as a "garlic milkshake."
>
>"The American people don't want the government to run their healthcare
>� 83 percent of Americans like the healthcare they have, 80 percent
>think it's too expensive," Boehner said.
>
>"So what we really need to be doing is working within the current plan
>to make it work better.
>
>"Having said that, the more the president and Democrat leaders talk
>about their government-run plan, the less popular it becomes. That's
>why I think it's as popular as a garlic milkshake."
>
>Martella asked what Boehner thinks will be the final outcome if the
>Democrats insist on including the public option in their reform plan
>even though a Senate committee has voted it down twice.
>
>"I don't know how they're going to find the votes, in the House or the
>Senate, for their so-called government option," Boehner said.
>
>"There's a lot of moving parts here, but they're going to have a very
>difficult time with this.
>
>"If the American people stay engaged in this fight over what's going
>to happen with our healthcare, the American people are going to win.
>At the end of the day, when the American people get engaged with their
>government, they speak up, Washington listens.
>
>"So it's critically important that the American people not forget what
>they did in June and July and August. They have to stay involved. They
>have to keep in touch with their members of Congress and keep the
>pressure on, and if that happens I do think it will be impossible for
>them to pass a very unpopular bill."
>
>Martella noted that the Democrats' plan includes $500 billion in cuts
>to Medicare. Boehner responded:
>
>"Yesterday was rather interesting. I walked by a Democratic press
>conference where the Speaker of the House and other Democrat leaders
>[were] talking about how there were going to be no cuts for seniors,
>how they were protecting Medicare. Now I don't know how they can do
>this with a straight face.
>
>"They're the ones offering some $500 billion in cuts to Medicare, and
>yet they say it's not going to affect seniors."
>
>Boehner told Newsmax that the Republicans have countered the
>Democrats' reform efforts with several plans of their own.
>
>"You can go to healthcare.gop.gov and look at the various Republican
>plans that are out there," he said.
>
>"All of them are fairly consistent in terms of making our current
>healthcare system work better. We don't want to rely on the
>government. We don�t want government officials getting between
>patients and their doctors. And we do think we need to do something
>about cost, which is the big issue that the American people care
>about.
>
>"But there is really nothing done about cost in any of the Democrat
>proposals that we've seen. . . No tort reform, no junk lawsuits. It's
>not just the tort reform, it's the defensive medicine that doctors
>practice as a result of this healthcare junksuit lottery that goes on
>today.
>
>"We could save over $100 billion a year in less medicine being
>practiced if in fact we were to have real reform of medical
>malpractice laws."
>
>When Martella asked Boehner whether he wanted to take any action
>against Florida Democrat Alan Grayson, who alleged that the GOP health
>plan is to hope sick people "die quickly," Boehner said simply:
>
>"You have to remember an old political adage: When your opponents are
>committing suicide, there's no reason to murder them."
>
>Incredibly, even though Boehner is the leading Republican in the House
>and the president has spoken of his desire for a bipartisan approach
>to issues, Boehner says he has not been to the White House in five
>months.
>
>Martella said: "Minority Whip Eric Cantor says Obama has cut off all
>communication with Republican leaders. Is that so, and if so, how can
>he possible use the word bipartisan in anything he says?"
>
>Boehner answered: "I don't know, because I've not talked to him. We
>haven't been to the White House since late April, early May. No
>discussions about healthcare. No discussions about Afghanistan. No
>discussions about all their spending and debt.
>
>"And so there's nothing bipartisan coming out of this White House, and
>there's nothing bipartisan that's come out of the Democrat leadership
>here in the House. Nothing."
>
>To see the video of Minority Leader John Boehner's assessment of
>President Obama's proliferation of czars and the status of the
>healthcare debate, Click here:
>http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=43132720001
AnAmericanCitizen
AnAmericanCitizen
>On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:47:08 -0500, "ArmyOfDorkness"
><DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Patriot Games" <Pat...@America.Com> wrote in message
>>news:jcnec55omdeu3pbqr...@4ax.com...
>>> http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/boehner_healthcare_reform/2009/10/02/267705.html
>>> Rep. Boehner Accuses Obama of Subverting Constitution
>>> Friday, October 2, 2009
>>> House Minority Leader John Boehner is accusing President Obama of
>>> subverting and circumventing the Constitution by appointing so-called
>>> czars who are not subject to Senate confirmation or scrutiny.
>>Bush had more czar's.
>
>Oops! Caught LYING:
>
>Number of "czar" jobs
>George W. Bush 2001�2009 31
>Buckwheat 2009� 32
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_czars_of_the_Obama_administration
>
In addition, Bush's czars weren't the radicals and whackjobs many of Obama's are.
Bush's czars weren't closet cabinet members with more power than senate-approved
members of the cabinet. Obama is working very diligently with his appointees to
change the country without being inconvenienced by the Constitution or the
voters....AAC
"Opposing this health care bill ought to be the focus of everybody's energy, because
if they get it, it will allow the government to regulate and control virtually every
aspect of our lives. Not to mention raise everybody's taxes, which will further choke
off any economic recovery. Your health care will cost more and be of lower quality."
-Rush
Billy
AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> "If the American people stay engaged in this fight over what's going to
> happen with
> our healthcare, the American people are going to win. At the end of the day,
> when
> the American people get engaged with their government, they speak up,
> Washington
> listens"...... House Minority Leader John Boehner
There is a reason why he is a minority leader. The Republicans sold out
to private interests, big time. I'm not going to defend our "puppet"
President. What we need, is what neither political party will admit to,
is a single payer (out of taxes) health care system like France's.
--
�When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.�
-Archbishop Helder Camara
http://tinyurl.com/o63ruj
http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm
Billy
Buckwheat? You stupid, ignorant, bigoted, white-racist, stinking pile of
crap. Don't you know that we all came out of Africa, and that your skin
color is a function of our environment? How stupid are you?
--------
August 27, 2000
UV light, skin color linked
Variations due to geography
Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO - Two San Francisco scientists using data from a NASA
satellite say they have discovered why people come in different colors.
Variations in human skin color are the result of adaptations to the
amount of ultraviolet light from the sun falling on different regions of
Earth, according to Nina Jablonski and George Chaplin, scientists with
the California Academy of Science.
People's bodies change their skin color over time to let in just the
right amount of UV light, which is key to having healthy babies.
UV light affects the skin's production of folate, part of the B vitamin
complex, and vitamin D-3, both of which are essential for having healthy
children.
Folate is necessary for the proper development of the nervous system in
fetuses and for sperm production in adult males. Vitamin D-3 helps build
and maintain strong bones and a healthy immune system.
But too much solar UV light can not only cause skin cancer, it can also
damage those chemicals, thereby hurting a person's chances for
reproductive success.
The scientists' finding may also explain why women tend to be
lighter-skinned than men. Lighter skin lets in more solar UV light,
increasing a woman's vitamin D-3 production, which helps the fetus grow
during pregnancy and helps nourish newborns through breast feeding.
UV light from the sun varies from region to region for reasons including
latitude, humidity and cloudiness.
Jablonski and Chaplin's discovery isn't entirely new. For a long time,
scientists have thought there was a correlation between UV light and
skin color, and they knew the light helped produce vitamin D and that it
could cause cancer.
"But this explanation was considered weak by some scientists because
skin cancer has little or no effect on people's ability to reproduce,
which is really the bottom line of every evolutionary spreadsheet,"
Jablonski said.
Jablonski developed the hypothesis that links UV light to reproduction
in 1991. The scientists analyzed published measurements of human skin
color from around the world and data from NASA's Total Ozone Mapping
Spectrometer satellite, which orbited Earth from 1978 to 1993 and
gathered direct UV measurements for the entire globe to find the
correlation between skin color and UV light.
Jablonski and Chaplin found that dark skin acts as a natural sunscreen
to help prevent UV light from breaking down folate, so it is helpful in
areas with a lot of sun. But in less sunny areas, dark skin screens out
too much sunlight, and can inhibit the production of vitamin D-3, so
lighter skin is helpful for reproductive success.
Skin color is based on the level of melanin, an organic molecule with an
undetermined chemical structure. Those with more melanin have darker
skin, and melanin levels are genetic. But the variations in skin color
are adaptations to solar UV light, not biological differences among
people, according to Jablonski and Chaplin.
"We're all the same under the skin," Jablonski said.
Patriot Games
<buttfucked_billy@without_a.net> wrote:
>In article <p4dkc59lv1uspf90t...@4ax.com>,
> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Buckwheat?
Learn to use your newsreader, dumbass.
You OWE "AnAmericanCitizen" an apology for being a DUMBASS.
>You stupid, ignorant, bigoted, white-racist, stinking pile of
>crap.
Go fuck yourself, dumbass.
You OWE "AnAmericanCitizen" an apology for being a DUMBASS.
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
I'm sure the honor is all your's, that and being an embarrassment to the
gene pool.
Patriot Games
wrote:
>In article <ummmc5l6mtc219r78...@4ax.com>,
> Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:58:01 -0700, Billy
>> <buttfucked_billy@without_a.net> wrote:
>> >In article <p4dkc59lv1uspf90t...@4ax.com>,
>> > AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >Buckwheat?
>> Learn to use your newsreader, dumbass.
>> You OWE "AnAmericanCitizen" an apology for being a DUMBASS.
>> >You stupid, ignorant, bigoted, white-racist, stinking pile of
>> >crap.
>> Go fuck yourself, dumbass.
>> You OWE "AnAmericanCitizen" an apology for being a DUMBASS.
>I'm sure the honor is all your's, that and being an embarrassment to the
>gene pool.
From: Billy <wldbilly@without_a.net>
Message-ID: <61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>
61.68.245.199 = Perth, Australia.
I apologize for telling you to "Learn to use your newsreader..."
Given YOUR gene pool, the spawn of Europe's worst faggots, bull dykes,
pedophiles, murderers, rapists and other criminals there's NO CHANCE
you could EVER learn...
Oh... Wait...
Perhaps I'm wrong. Are you an Aboriginigger?
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
And what would a dumb, racist peckerwood, like you, know that would be
of any use to to people who don't drag their knuckles?
Do you have anything of intelligence to say, or are you just here to
talk stupid? If you are, you're doing a damn fine job of it.
If not, tell us how is the Constitution being subverted?
AnAmericanCitizen
Why would you, in Australia, be concerned about our Constitution, a planned takeover
of the health insurance business or just anything regarding the U.S. in
general?...AAC
This administration inherited a national security infrastructure that was put in
place by the Bush administration that works.....Eric Holder
Billy
AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Your ignorance is truly astonishing. There is so much you don't know.
Patriot Games
You ducked the question...
>Do you have....
You ducked the question...
>If not, tell us how is the Constitution being subverted?
"The Constitution?"
There is no such thing.
There is the Australian Constitution, which I could care less about.
And there is the United States Constitution THAT IS NONE OF YOUR
BUSINESS.
Now take your hammered-shit Aboriginigger roo-fucked ass and go fuck
yourself.
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
As an intelligent a statement as I have ever heard from a
"hog-in-a-trough", "shrink-government-so-that-they-can't-regulate-us"
Republican.
All dirty mouth and no ideas.
Aren't your tea bags getting soggy? (You do know that the British were
selling tea , cheaper than John Hancock could smuggle it? Which is why
the British tea was thrown into Boston Harbor. What a bunch of buffoons
you are, i.e. a mob lead by a "drug user", brilliant.)
Patriot Games
Pay attention, Aboriginigger.
The United States Constitution THAT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
>You do know that...
I do know that YOU were CAUGHT PRETENDING to be an American.
I do know that YOU were OUTTED AS AN Aboriginigger posting from
Australia.
I do know that MOST AMERICANS in THIS newsgroup will IGNORE YOU
because YOU are an OUTTED Aboriginigger posting from Australia.
Allow me to quite myself: "Now take your hammered-shit Aboriginigger
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
If your brains were dynamite, you couldn't blow your nose. So if I were
a U.S. citizen, then you would be unmasked as the ignorant,
foul-mouthed, thoughtless bigot, that you are.
You should crawl back into the out-house hole that you crawled out of,
peckerwood.
If you had it your way we would arrest people with red hair because they
are always disturbing the public tranquility, and people with green
eyes, because they are the cause of sin. I won't even go into the
horrors that you think were committed by people who eat garlic. It would
be enough to make people want to give up hope. And idiots, have you ever
noticed that when hard questions are asked, they go run an' hide under
white sheets? Might as well arrest them too.
America has real problems, and you're one of them.
Patriot Games
But YOU are ONLY an UGLY Aboriginigger posting from Australia.
hahahahahah!!!
>America..
IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, ugly little Aboriginigger posting from
Australia.
HHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
And here is what Mr. Games offers us as America's pride: a foul-mouthed,
small-minded bigot, and a fool to boot. Try googling sonic.net Einstein.
The thing about you "brown shirts" is that you're brawlers, and not very
smart. . . but pimping for the Republican (Don't Regulate Me) Party is
probably the best you can do.
"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel." - Samuel Johnson
Patriot Games
YOU HAVE BEEN OUTTED.
GO AWAY.
EVERYBODY now knows YOU are an ugly little Aboriginigger posting from
Australia.
YOU HAVE BEEN OUTTED.
GO AWAY.
THERE WILL BE NO CONVERSATION WITH YOU.
EVERYBODY now knows YOU are an ugly little Aboriginigger posting from
Australia.
YOU HAVE BEEN OUTTED.
GO AWAY.
Hahahahahahahahah!!!
Billy
Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> wrote:
There you are folks, our Ubermench. Who wants to follow this psychopath?