Modern art in Stockholm is notorious and considered by some to be way
over the line. Is this "good" publicity for Israel in these times?
Gives one pause for thought, doesn't it? This act has focused a good
part of the world's attention on the incident and many many more people
will know about the art and what it supposely alleged because of it.
My opinion is that the art stank, but the action taken against it was
very wrong! Jeanette
In news:15258-40...@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net,
Jeanette S. <jenah...@hotmail.com> stated
I haven't seen the 'art' in question, so I am unable to judge whether it
glorifies suicide bombers, but all nations and religions have resulted
in art which glorified their conquests, often at the expense of others.
I do not approve of such art.
--
Gordon
Let's say I commission a painting that shows Mohammed having sex with
a pig with the face of that female suicide bomber, call it "Reward
in Hell" - do you think that museum will exhibit it?
One may approve or not approve of any work of art (I can't listen to John
Cage's music), but vandalism of any work of art is barbarism.
As a Jew I'm deeply ashamed of the actions of an Israeli official and more
ashamed of the government's approval of it.
Connie
No. It would be kept in the museum vaults whilst agonising debate took
place as to whether it was 'art', and whether it should be seen by the
public.
Then a rich American would buy it, and the museum would have billions to
spend on some other treasures....
--
Gordon
> No. It would be kept in the museum vaults whilst agonising debate took
> place as to whether it was 'art', and whether it should be seen by the
> public.
>
> Then a rich American would buy it, and the museum would have billions to
> spend on some other treasures....
> --
> Gordon
-----------
Hum......Well, art and artists can be controversial ...(G)
The crucifix in a container of urine didn't go so well here.
Serrano, I think. As far as I know, no one destroyed it or bought
it. Just hooted and jeered as it went on tour.
Then there's the Turner Prize...
The Turner is said to be the award that put British art
on the map. The prize, worth £20,000, is given to a British
artist under 50
for an outstanding exhibition or other presentation of work in
the past 12
months. And this year the prize is 20 years old. Sensational art, fizzing
column inches and partying arterati are guaranteed.
The 2003 winner was a transvestite potter...I saw a photo of the
winner in his Shirley Temple outfit and full make up.
It's all pretty silly from where I sit....LOL
--
Patricia
Florida-USA
>Hum......Well, art and artists can be controversial ...(G)
>
>The crucifix in a container of urine didn't go so well here.
>Serrano, I think. As far as I know, no one destroyed it or bought
>it. Just hooted and jeered as it went on tour.
>
>Then there's the Turner Prize...
>
>The Turner is said to be the award that put British art
>on the map. The prize, worth £20,000, is given to a British
>artist under 50
>for an outstanding exhibition or other presentation of work in
>the past 12
>months. And this year the prize is 20 years old. Sensational art, fizzing
>column inches and partying arterati are guaranteed.
>
>The 2003 winner was a transvestite potter...I saw a photo of the
>winner in his Shirley Temple outfit and full make up.
>
>It's all pretty silly from where I sit....LOL
>
I don't know about art, but I know what I like!
I don't rate the Turner prize.
I expect the King's new set of clothes to win one day.
--
Gordon
Hi, Rita -
I like variety as well and can appreciate most of what I see.
MOMA is frequent and pleasant stop when we are in New York. Art
appreciation can be one of life's real pleasures...
Some of what I see I find shocking,some interesting, creative and
unusual...but I do enjoy seeing it. I love the old masters,
religious paintings and some examples of almost anything you can
imagine. Having said that.. some of what I see also makes me
wonder. The last exhibit we saw in the city was the Vermeer. It
was amazing.
> In the last class we visited a gallery for an exhibition of work by
> Andy Warhol which he had created with his own piss. Actually,
> the works were very attractive and had one not been told what
> the media was, one would never have known. Why he chose to
> do this I don't know but I expect shock value was the reason.
I've read that he was as strange as the personal he created for
himself. In a biography, they wrote that he had taken the
original photo of Marilyn Monroe but that all the silk screens
that resulted from the photo..were done by his apprentices as was
much of his other work. He developed the concept and others
carried it out. Not so unusual, I understand that the "old
masters" had understudies that did much of the painting under
directions from the master.
> I enjoy contemporary art and am willing to suspend prior judgment
> and look at all works to see if I like them or not.
As do I.. but it has to hit some responsive chord. Much of it
doesn't. I forget who created the vignette ..but a white
porcelain toilet sitting in a corner illuminated by a spot light
is "much" for me.I find that sort of thing contrived and silly.
But that's just me.....there must be others that appreciate that
sort of thing or it wouldn't be on display.
>Whenever I travel
> I look for contemporary art, and had a marvelous time in 1999 in
> Venice at the Biennial Exhibition held there for contemporary art
> by artists worldwide.
The Louvre is spectacular in it's size and content, the pyramid
.. interesting. We've been to other galleries in Rome, Athens,
etc. and enjoyed each for what it offered.
>There was a portrait of Monica Lewinsky as
> the Mona Lisa and the picture frame was made of cigars.
I saw a reproduction in a magazine..interesting, creative but not
something I would want around for very long ... enough to see it
and move on.
>There
> also was a video of a Chinese artist walking nude along the top
> of the Great Wall of China. Who would not have fun at such an
> exhibition? One needs to try to wipe out all prior expectations of
> what art "should be" and look and enjoy.
I do hope he didn't walk the wall(or worse yet sit down on it) in
August...that's when we were there and it was impossibly hot.(g)
My feeling for art is similar to my feeling for music. If either
are discordant, or too aggressive, with no theme.. or generally
aimless thumping .. I just don't get anything from it.
Patricia
Hmmm...........
....... what kind of a pig is it ??????
Yosemite Andy
Now I call that art with a touch of humour...
>************************************************
>I call that type of art extremely modern, if not over the top. I have
>looked but didn't enjoy so give up on it. The Andy Warhola painting I
>remember, I believe, was where he painted a can of soup on a blank
>canvas! Absolutely ridiculous, in my view, but then, not all of us
>like the same things. Jeanette
>
I don't know about Warhol, that was my first reaction to his can of
soup, but his stuff was fresh at that time, and still has enough style
to be recognisable as his.
I am always fascinated by Salvador Dali's creations. They may look
like the product of a deranged mind, but they are full of interest, and
some are erotic in a strange, distorted way.
--
Gordon
Mabel adds:
It probably doesn't matter. And he has 69 more virgins just
like it !!!!!
Mabel :>)))