Re: The Decade From Hell
Nixon.D
You poguey-boys need to attempt to rise above your childish, two-party,
out-of-the-past, crap-ola and join with folks (legal citizens) in
anticipating/considering ways and means for inserting some rational thought
and improved leadership into the monetary/energy/international policies of
our beloved nation here between the oceans.
Another decade like the last and it will definitely be all over for us for
lack of anyone with enough brains to lead a really large/powerful nation.
The British may, by default, have to take over and we'll be reduced to some
sort of a United Kingdom protectorate.
Do not let your hallucinations in regard to W.Bush distort all your future
thinking and blathering. Better to put in effort to find ways to bring to
national attention, some REAL and VIABLE talent like we have had at times in
the past. Have you ever heard of George Washington, Teddy Roosevelt,
Thomas Jefferson; MEN (not females) of that stature and intelligence?
Have you?
McD.OfMerryland
===============================================================
"mg" <mgke...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e1bdd1bb-f6ed-4c0b...@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 23, 5:21 am, GLOBALIST <free.tun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> George Bush's reign as the leader of his Empire was sheer disaster.
> Then the Republicans say..."how long are you going to blame Bush?"
> Well fuckheads, since 99% of Pres Obama's challenges are in response
> to the disasters left by Bush, you need to keep your damned mouths
> shut. I am really amazed that Obama has gotten a handle on some
> things so quickly. Obama is able to element some of his own
> projects , while at the same time ,doing repair work on the Bush
> disasters. I can never remember any vice president like Cheney,
> interferring in areas that were never his to be involved in.
The amazing thing is that Republicans don't believe that the problem
was that Bush caused to much hell. They actually think the problem was
that he didn't cause enough.
mg
> You poguey-boys need to attempt to rise above your childish, two-party,
> out-of-the-past, crap-ola and join with folks (legal citizens) in
> anticipating/considering ways and means for inserting some rational thought
> and improved leadership into the monetary/energy/international policies of
> our beloved nation here between the oceans.
>
> Another decade like the last and it will definitely be all over for us for
> lack of anyone with enough brains to lead a really large/powerful nation.
> The British may, by default, have to take over and we'll be reduced to some
> sort of a United Kingdom protectorate.
>
> Do not let your hallucinations in regard to W.Bush distort all your future
> thinking and blathering. Better to put in effort to find ways to bring to
> national attention, some REAL and VIABLE talent like we have had at times in
> the past. Have you ever heard of George Washington, Teddy Roosevelt,
> Thomas Jefferson; MEN (not females) of that stature and intelligence?
> Have you?
>
> McD.OfMerryland
I believe that both the past and the future are important subjects for
discussion. As the old saying goes, "Those who forget history, are
doomed to repeat it". You, on the other hand, apparently believe we
should forget the past and you obviously believe that name calling and
personal attacks are an effective method of persuasion.
> ===============================================================
>
> "mg" <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
mg
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:49:45 -0800 (PST), mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > You, on the other hand, apparently believe we
> >should forget the past and you obviously believe that name calling and
> >personal attacks are an effective method of persuasion.
>
>
> You have no problems initiating and engaging in name calling and
> personal attacks.
There a few cases over the years when I have used personal attacks as
a vehicle to get my point across. One of those cases was after
standing by quietly for a very long time, while someone lead a
personal crusade, including gross personal insults, against
Rumpelstiltskin, a gay member of the group.
I believe people should speak out forcefully whenever minorities are
persecuted. Pastor Martin Niemoller taught us that lesson following
the Nazi rise to power with the following poem:
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I
was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not
a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me."
Evelyn
Dave is hopeless, Max.
--
Evelyn
"Even as a mother protects with her life her only child, So with a boundless
heart let one cherish all living beings." --Sutta Nipata 1.8
Evelyn
"Bio-Ear" <nos...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:7pkd0s...@mid.individual.net...
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:49:45 -0800 (PST), mg <mgke...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> You, on the other hand, apparently believe we
>>should forget the past and you obviously believe that name calling and
>>personal attacks are an effective method of persuasion.
>
>
> You have no problems initiating and engaging in name calling and
> personal attacks.
Nor do you, Bio hazard.
Evelyn
> On Dec 25, 11:02 am, Bio-Ear <nos...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:49:45 -0800 (PST), mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > You, on the other hand, apparently believe we
>> >should forget the past and you obviously believe that name calling and
>> >personal attacks are an effective method of persuasion.
>>
>> Hypocrite!
>>
>> You have no problems initiating and engaging in name calling and
>> personal attacks.
>
> There a few cases over the years when I have used personal attacks as
> a vehicle to get my point across. One of those cases was after
> standing by quietly for a very long time, while someone lead a
> personal crusade, including gross personal insults, against
> Rumpelstiltskin, a gay member of the group.
>
> I believe people should speak out forcefully whenever minorities are
> persecuted. Pastor Martin Niemoller taught us that lesson following
> the Nazi rise to power with the following poem:
>
> was not a communist;
> Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out�
> because I was not a trade unionist;
> a Jew;
> Then they came for me�and there was no one left to speak out for me."
Bravo for you Max. McDave and BioHazard are two not worth even answering,
but like you, I occasionally like to shoot proverbial fish in a barrel.
They are so easy to debunk.
Evelyn
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:32:57 -0800 (PST), mg <mgke...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 11:02 am, Bio-Ear <nos...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:49:45 -0800 (PST), mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> > You, on the other hand, apparently believe we
>>> >should forget the past and you obviously believe that name calling and
>>> >personal attacks are an effective method of persuasion.
>>>
>>> Hypocrite!
>>>
>>> You have no problems initiating and engaging in name calling and
>>> personal attacks.
>>
>>There a few cases over the years when I have used personal attacks as
>>a vehicle to get my point across. One of those cases was after
>>standing by quietly for a very long time, while someone lead a
>>personal crusade, including gross personal insults, against
>>Rumpelstiltskin, a gay member of the group.
>>
>>I believe people should speak out forcefully whenever minorities are
>>persecuted. Pastor Martin Niemoller taught us that lesson following
>>the Nazi rise to power with the following poem:
>>
>>was not a communist;
>>Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out-
>>because I was not a trade unionist;
>>a Jew;
>>Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak out for me."
>
> Like I said, you're a hypocrite and also a homophile.
Why? Because he is tolerant and you are not? Did it ever occur to you that
tolerant people are not the hypocrites, but those who criticize others for
something they cannot help ARE?
mg
Who am I talking to, by the way? Are you the one who usually posts
under the name of Sordo, but sometimes posts with the following fake
names in order to insult Rumpelstiltskin?
Rumpelshitskin <nob...@nowhere.net>
Rumpleforeskin <nob...@nowhere.net>
Rumpledforeskin <nob...@nowhere.net>
Rumpledshitskin <nob...@nowhere.net>
Nixon.D
"Evelyn" <evely...@gmail.com> wrote in
> Dave is hopeless, Max. -- Evelyn
Why, oh why, do you write such things when I've always tried to address you
in cordial ways?
Even at those times when you don't deserve such friendly commentary?
McD
==========================================