On Apr 22, 11:40 am, Bassos <Root@Wan> wrote:
> On 21-4-2013 18:31, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Apr 20, 11:41 pm, Bassos <Root@Wan> wrote:
> >> On 20-4-2013 23:44, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> >> Philosopher wrote:
> >>> On Apr 20, 1:47 pm, Bassos <Root@Wan> wrote:
> >>>> On 20-4-2013 19:09, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> >>>> Philosopher wrote:
> >>>>> Notice, dog is god spelled backwards.
>
> >>>> Siriusly!
>
> >>> Not only that, God and Satan behave like dogs and cats, an animal
> >>> believed to be associated with the Devil in the Dark Ages --
> >>> particularly if it is black.
>
> >> You are dissing Catz in the i can haz cheeseburger era ?
>
> >> Take a hint from voltaire on his deathbed;
> >> Do you renounce the Devil ?
> >> Nou nou, my good man, this is no time to be making enemies.
>
> >>> Then we are not talking just about religion anymore, but superstition.
>
> >> Oh, make no mistake, Cats *ARE* evul, that's why i <3 em.
>
> >> They are so honest about it.
>
> >> Unlike women ... :)
>
> > Women?
>
> Yes, Women are evul.
>
> > The relationship between women and cats is obvious:
>
> Yeah, Netzach.
>
> Form before content.
>
> You know; evul!!
Well, they can be evil and they can be nice. But most women just go
through cycles because of the hormones. Or they can be prostitutes.
>
> > there you have the word "pussycat."
>
> Tweety is perhaps indeed a metaphor for the purrsuit of man after god
> and never catching IT.
> (see the TV series Supernatural, where they have an angel interpreting
> wily coyote versus road runner.)
"Pussy" and "cat"... two interesting words. The association must come
from their need for petting.
>
> > Do I need to elaborate?
>
> Heh; need felt is as you yourself do.
>
> > I don't think so.
>
> What is wrong with so ?
>
> > They can also scratch badly and they can be very loving.
>
>
> > And they have a mind of their own, unlike dogs which are easily tamed.
>
> My pet is a dragon.
Keep all flammable materials away please.
They are nice creatures provided you have a hose and plenty of water.
>
> You do not tame a cat/dragon, you befriend them, and allow for some
> cultural differences ;)
>
> Yet, there is only the one-King.
King of the Jungle?
>
> >>> That's where witchcraft comes handy. In Afro-Cuban culture and voodoo
> >>> the two are mixed together and we have a bunch of animals sacrificed.
>
> >> Nah, witchcraft is quite low brow everyday magic.
>
> >> AFAIK there is no curse to do anything solar/galactic.
>
> >> Pretty much here and neighbours.
>
> > Yeah, witchcraft is for the lesser gods,
>
> For everyday life.
>
> > while the bigger gods
>
> Wait, you differentiate between gods ?
>
> Funny.
No, I stand by my statement that all gods are equal, all 100,000 of
them. It's the Bible people who claim they have a monopoly to the true
god.
>
> > (the god of Abraham, for example)
>
> God of Abram, so Abram made that ?
>
> > can just curse humanity to suffering.
>
> No need ;)
>
> >>> Jesus was a sacrificial lamb for all, so the story goes. It all makes
> >>> sense, you see?
>
> >> Sure.
>
> >> I hardly see any demonic possessions, so perhaps there actually was a
> >> sacrifice.
>
> > Now let me ask you this and I want you to be honest:
>
> Heh.
>
> > Who do you rather be sacrificed for your sins, a god or a chicken?
>
> There is no such thing as sin.
>
> Your question became irrelevant.
I'm addressing their saying that Jesus died for our sins.
>
> > That's the same logic Christians apply to Jesus. He died for their
> > sins, so they say. I rather have a chicken.
>
> Stupid straw man tactix are stupid.
Like I said, I prefer chicken sacrifice...
http://www.indiastand.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2010/04/voodoo-sacrifices.jpg