It doesn't say snuff films exist, it says the Russians is involved with
"sadistic child porn videos and pictures".
--
The poor of England have remained silent too long. [...] The blade of a
tyrant is dull and flat, like its owner.
-- Hugh Laurie, "A Bit of Fry and Laurie"
[Russian child porn ring that apparently really has snuff films]
Holy shit! This is what I get for not reading a thread completely
before posting.
Life imitates urban legend. I don't like this one bit.
--
-ed falk, fa...@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#*
http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!****
and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#**
to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW****
Stephen Morgan wrote:
It doesn't say snuff films exist, it says the Russians is involved with
"sadistic child porn videos and pictures".
While I agree that Parg is wrong in her classification of snuff films, I also think your response misses the point. If indeed the materials contain what is described, then they would be classified as snuff films. Whether they do or not is yet to be shown. In addition, whether they feature male or female victims, adult or children, is irrelevant.
-
So perhaps we should change our refrain to --
There WEREN'T any snuff films -- until feminism planted the idea...