Re: Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama: The approval gap silently
Anonymous
>
> Most recent media attention has focused on the 60% who say she's
> unqualified to become president. Her unfavorable rating is 52%, down
> from 53%, which still doesn't ignite a lot of optimism for Palin-lovers.
Cut and paster Sordo does not read his own stuff.
Who among the pundits say she is qualified Even knee jerk Krauthammer
has remained silent a year after hs slammed her in
2008.
In American history none of the populists have been qualified
to be President. The biggest one, a Democrat, William Jennings
Bryan tried three times and failed. Fortunately, he was
much too radical.
Jerry Okamura
"Anonymous" <cri...@ecn.org> wrote in message
news:2009112408594...@www.ecn.org...
How do you determine beforehand, with absolute certainty, that someone is
not qualified to be President? What criteria do we use to make that
determination? Just because we may not think a person is qualified, does
that mean that they are really not qualified does it? When we say that
someone is "too" radical, what does that mean? A far out liberal would not
think that a far out liberal is radical would they? Nor would a far out
conseervative think that a far out conservative is radical would they? Who
makes that decision?