Anyone?

[bfla...@gmail.com]

Anyone here (Globy, EC to name a few) concerned about Trump's conflicts
of interest?

The latest report indicates that Trump's promise to donate any profits
derived from the hotel Trump owns in Washington from foreign entities
will be just too difficult to comb out.

Mark my words, Trump will make Tammany Hall look like a charity
organization.

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

bflanier wrote in message
news:3cd834aa-352e-4640...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

The Whining Donald having any conflict of interest?
What conflict of interest?
Do you mean The Whining Donald bad mouthing leaks in his Whining Donald
administration while he himself The Whining Donald is by far the biggest and
most prominent of leakers of classified information?
Do you mean The Whining Donald assigning the investigation of all those
leaks to the Justice department that today is headed by a shown liar?
Do you mean The Whining Donald making nice to NATO and all those Muslims
after bad mouthing those folks as much as he has done?
Do you mean The Whining Donald setting forth a one page tax reform wish list
whose contents primarily benefit himself and his fellow wealthy folks?
Do you mean The Whining Donald firmly retaining ownership...and therefore
all the benefits...of his executive orders?
Do you mean The Whining Donald spending all those taxpayer dollars to pay
his travel to his very own luxury resorts?
etc., etc., etc.

I tell you, bflanier...The Whining Donald's world is completely and utterly
devoid of any and all conflicts of interest. There are, of course, the sole
and lone interests of The Whining Donald. Heck even you know that. And
there is no absolutely and utterly no conflict whatsoever in those interests
being solely and only for the benefit of the Whining Donald.

[GLOBALIST]

You are a day late and a dollar short
It was clarified at some point that Trump himself would not
be managing his real estate. In many cases hotels just pay
to use his name only.
However I think Melania runs over and strips and remakes
beds over there at times.
But if I were you I would contact someone very impotent
and report this, so you can sleep better at night.

[bfla...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-7, GLOBALIST wrote:
> You are a day late and a dollar short

So, I guess, Globy, you are not concerned about Trump's conflicts
of interest? How concerning of you.

[GLOBALIST]

Unlike some of you guys I am not preoccupied with someone else's
wealth. Trump was a multi-billionaire when he paid for his
own campaign with no help even from the Republican party
Real estate is his game and there is not realistic method
of casting all that to the side to placate haters.

[rumpelstiltskin]

I'm just enjoying the comedy, since there's no alternative
to Trump now anyway except for the VP who's far worse.
I loved it when Trump called the head of the CIA a "nut job".
The man does have a way with words!

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:dd2dc132-7576-4cb9...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

uh oh...the Village Idiot is clearly into things sexual yet again!
What is truly delightful here is the Village Idiot's clear implication of
various degrees of impotency. I for one had thought until now that one is
either impotent or not...you know - a definitely binary 0-1, yes/no
situation. However the Village Idiot here raises the distinctly intriguing
possibility of being "just a little" impotent, "somewhat" impotent, "
mildly" impotent, "medium" impotent, "definitely" impotent, and - of
course - "very impotent." Man, the things you can learn from the Village
Idiot!

The bottom line lesson here, of course, is to never leave home without your
Viagra or Cialis!

You, Village Idiot, are just so very very
*F*U*N*N*Y* !!!
ha ha ha

wups...and now the Village Idiot - in true Village Idiot tradition -
performs for us his Intellectual Coward ploy to run away again from the
issue of impotency, of course with his tail much between his legs, back into
that deep dark dungeon like hole of his under his rock!

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:ed6b7099-e749-4e89...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Of course there is, Village Idiot.
How, Village Idiot, is it that you the Village Idiot (or The Whining Donald)
have never ever heard/read of blind trusts?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_trust
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blindtrust.asp
http://estate.findlaw.com/trusts/what-is-a-blind-trust.html

ummm...have you, Village Idiot, been spending too much time in that hole of
yours under your rock so as to be as ignorant of blind trusts as you clearly
are?

Please clarify, Village Idiot.
chuckle chuckle chuckle

You, Village Idiot, are so very very

*F*U*N*N*Y* !!!
ha ha ha

And now - yet another performance by the Village Idiot of his Intellectual
Coward ploy to run away from the issue, of course with his tail rigld
between his legs, back into that deep dark depressing hole of his under his
rock!

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:ed6b7099-e749-4e89...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Note well the Village Idiot's repeated penchant when he the Village Idiot
cannot address the issue directly with facts and/or logic...as here...to
toss out ever so boringly yet again another "Look here, not there" ploy!

"not there"
- concern over The Whining Donald's conflicts of interest

"Look here"
- "Unlike some of you guys I am not preoccupied with someone else's wealth."
yadda yadda yadda

You, Village Idiot, really really like being the Village Idiot that you here
vindicate yet again you are...do you not? If not, Village Idiot, what is
your rationale for yet again and again - as here - vindicating that you
honestly and truly are the Village Idiot?

Please clarify, Village Idiot.
chuckle chuckle chuckle

You, Village Idiot, are so very very solidly
*H*I*L*A*R*I*O*U*S*L*Y*
*F*U*N*N*Y* !!!!
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

wups...the Village Idiot again performs his Intellectual Coward ploy to run
away from his latest "Look here, no there" ploy, of course with his tail
centered between his legs, back into that deep dark dysfunctional hole of
his under his rock!

[Dan C]

You ignorant fuck.

Why should he have to filter out foreign entities? He owns a fucking
hotel, people from all over stay there. What the fuck does it matter if
they are from another country?

You stupid cocksucker.



--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he declared his horse a Senator.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:dd2dc132-7576-4cb9...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Hey...Village Idiot - so what is your secret on how to tell upon meeting a
guy whether or not he is impotent? What tests do you the Village Idiot
administer then and there to ascertain whether or not he is in the first
place impotent and in the second place whether he is "very impotent"? Do
you, Village Idiot, sic on him a well developed, ready willing, and able
nubile skimpily dressed eighteen year old female right then and there? Or
do you, Village Idiot, have a secret, most suggestive phrase to two by which
you the Village Idiot determine the degree of impotency possessed by this
guy?

Please clarify, Village Idiot.
chuckle chuckle chuckle

You, Village Idiot, are much too much so very very
*F*U*N*N*Y* !!!
ha ha ha ha ha

And for even more fun and laughs, the Village Idiot now performs his
Intellectual Coward ploy to run away again from the issue, of course with
his tail brilliantly held between his legs, back into that deep dark
dreadful hole of his under his rock!

[bfla...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 4:28:39 PM UTC-7, Dan C wrote:
> Why ...

Here's why....

Critics argued that the luxury hotel housed in the historic Old
Post Office a few blocks from the White House was a conflict of
interest for Republican President Donald Trump because he is both
landlord and tenant of the building.

lawmakers asked the GSA, which oversees federal property, to
clarify the status of the lease arrangement.

In January, Trump said he would maintain ownership of his global
business empire, but hand control to his two oldest sons while
president. His eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., subsequently took
the reins of the Washington hotel.

In a letter from GSA contracting officer Kevin Terry to Donald
Trump Jr., the agency said the issue had been resolved by the
younger Trump taking over as head of the company that runs the
hotel and by changes to its internal operating agreement.

The GSA said the company, the Trump Old Post Office LLC, was in
full compliance with the section of the lease prohibiting elected
federal officials from having any part of it.

Critics argue that any profits from any source including foreign
sources would acrue to Donald after he leaves office but the dodge
resolved the issue.

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

bflanier wrote in message
news:2ad7f92f-0963-408a...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Hey..bflanier:
Have you at all taken the advice of the Village Idiot to you in this thread:

"But if I were you I would contact someone very impotent
and report this, so you can sleep better at night."

and indeed contacted "someone very impotent"? If so, allow me to ask you -
inasmuch as the Village Idiot fled back to that hole of his under his rock
when I did ask him - exactly how did you determine on first meeting the guy
whether or not he was impotent? And having indeed determined that the guy
was actually impotent, (and this is by far the more interesting issue) how
in the world did you establish that the guy was "very impotent" as - for
example - compared to somewhat impotent, so-so impotent, average impotent,
or even measurably impotent? What kind of objective metric did you use to
make that determination? Did you, for example, measure the angle of the
dangle?

Just asking....

[bfla...@gmail.com]

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> Hey..bflanier: Have you at all taken the advice of the Village Idiot

Well...we know that Globy is short some furniture in his upstairs so
any advice is problematic.

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

bflanier wrote in message
news:4f181db8-82eb-46f8...@googlegroups.com...

***** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Now here, bflanier, I do most respectfully disagree with you, though I most
of the time am much inclined to agree with you.
The advice of the Village Idiot, I for one say, is not at all "problematic"
as you say. I myself find the advice of the Village Idiot most often than
not to be simply very, very entertaining and just full of fun and laughs,
just as this special tidbit of his is!

Just look at those words of the Village Idiot here, just begging as they do
a host of other follow-up questions not at all answered by him. In fact,
when asked questions to clarify these words of his, he yet again...yes, ever
so boringly yet again...runs away back into that deep dark hole of his under
his rock!

"But if I were you I would contact someone very impotent
and report this, so you can sleep better at night."

- How does one...anyone...upon just meeting a guy immediately tell whether
or not he is in the first place impotent so as to know that he is the one to
whom to report? What kind of determining tool/factor/criteria does one
employ to make this discernment? Does one toss into the guy's lap a sexy,
skimpily clad, ready, willing, and able 18 or 20 year old male or female and
then stand back to observe the reaction of said guy? Does one have the guy
then and there fill a 500 question test to make that determination? Does
one invite said guy into a skinny dipping session at a local sauna with that
18 or 20 year old male or female? Does one discreetly ask the guy's
wife/girlfriend/boy friend/significant other? The mind just boggles with
all these possibilities!

- Having somehow established that the guy is indeed impotent, how in the
world does one next determine that he is in actual fact "very impotent" as
versus "sometimes impotent," "so-so impotent," "somewhat impotent," "average
impotent,," "more than average impotent," "more often than not impotent," or
"really, really very, very impotent"? After all, the Village Idiot's advice
is to "contact someone very impotent" such that clearly and obviously
someone however impotent will not meet the Village Idiot's criteria unless
said person is in actual fact "very impotent." What objective metric is
used to make such determination? Does one really measure that angle of the
dangle?

- And what if this "very impotent" guy finds that he temporarily can
overcome this state of "very impotent" with appropriate one time use of
Viagra/Cialis? Is he then to be designated to be not "very impotent" or is
he still for all intents and purposes "very impotent"? If the former,, then
what is the critical determining point between being "very impotent" and
being not "very impotent"? And what objective metric is to be employed to
make this determination? Are we back to measuring the angle of the dangle
again?

As you can see, this advice from the Village Idiot is not at all
"problematic," but is instead just chockfull of most interesting and
certainly by far fun filled questions! Who else but the Village Idiot can
give advice that results in so many questions filled with so much fun and
laughs!

[Dan C]

Like I said, you are one stupid motherfucker.

No matter what he does, asswipes like you have a problem with it.

Fuck off and kill yourself, dimwit.

--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".

"Bother!" said Pooh, as he stepped into the acceleration chamber.