Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NY Times in bed with Hillary Clinton

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gator Slayer

unread,
Dec 20, 2007, 8:52:09 PM12/20/07
to
After seeing the latest hit piece the slimes is doing on John McCain
and the way they've gone after Barack Obama I can see who the Slimes
favors. What a dirty and disgusting piece of filth this newspaper
is. Say what you want about Bill O'Reilly but what he has said about
the slimes is correct. They're no better than the National Enquirer.
To impugn great men like Obama and McCain is nothing more than sad.
What Hillary won't do to win this thing. I wonder what she's promised
the slimes.

Phlip

unread,
Dec 20, 2007, 9:06:45 PM12/20/07
to
Gator Slayer wrote:

> After seeing the latest hit piece the slimes is doing on John McCain
> and the way they've gone after Barack Obama I can see who the Slimes
> favors. What a dirty and disgusting piece of filth this newspaper
> is. Say what you want about Bill O'Reilly but what he has said about
> the slimes is correct. They're no better than the National Enquirer.
> To impugn great men like Obama and McCain is nothing more than sad.

Point. Yet another sad commentary on our "journalism" is mud-balls that
wouldn't work in other situations will work very well here...

> What Hillary won't do to win this thing.

And yet you yourself fell for the bait, too.

> I wonder what she's promised the slimes.

A distraction from Giuliani's spreading scandal?

He can't be America's Mayor if his NYC police are too busy serving his
mistresses to notice the terrorists busy casing their targets...


GhostofFDR

unread,
Dec 20, 2007, 9:48:15 PM12/20/07
to

Almost every major media oultet is owned by corporate america and is
in bed with the Bush clan and the GOP. Judith Miller wrote for the
NYT but she was a neocon shill.

Message has been deleted

Phlip

unread,
Dec 20, 2007, 11:17:57 PM12/20/07
to
> Better them than me. If there ever was a case for ED, Hillary qualifies.
> No wonder the Arkansas Lothario gets his on the side.

You need a president who arouses you? Why?


Phlip

unread,
Dec 20, 2007, 11:30:15 PM12/20/07
to
> > A distraction from Giuliani's spreading scandal?
>
>> He can't be America's Mayor if his NYC police are too busy serving his
>> mistresses to notice the terrorists busy casing their targets...

> Almost every major media oultet is owned by corporate america and is in
> bed with the Bush clan and the GOP. Judith Miller wrote for the NYT but
> she was a neocon shill.

Exactly. Reporting on Edwards's alleged love-child is quite a gamble, no
matter what evidence backs it up. Edwards is a trial lawyer specializing in
lawsuits with punitive damages, after all. Nobody would publish such a story
without someone offering to cover a very large bet. Smearing McCain, Edwards
& Obama, in one week, in a way that suggests Clinton is behind the smear, is
a great way to defend Giuliani. To some people, that's an investment worth
the cost of losing one libel lawsuit.


Gator Slayer

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 7:34:00 AM12/21/07
to
> NYT but she was a neocon shill.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

She was also jewish as was her husband. That's what you find neocons
to be, jews. I have nothing against Israeli's and would defend them
in a minute but US Jews get away with too much. Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld,
Scotter Libby and so many more in Bush's inner cabinet. At times I'm
a Pat Buchanan fan, not of his anti semetism but his calling out these
neocons. They have the power.

Gator Slayer

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 7:34:37 AM12/21/07
to
On Dec 20, 10:58�pm, �so...@privacy.org wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:52:09 -0800 (PST), Gator Slayer
> Better them than me. If there ever was a case for ED, Hillary qualifies.
> No wonder the Arkansas Lothario gets his on the side.

Right on. The slimes could dig up dirt on Hillary but won't do it.

Gator Slayer

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 7:35:35 AM12/21/07
to

Giuliani with all due respect to you doesn't have a ghost of a chance
in hell to win this. If anyone would dislike Rudy it would be the
slimes.

Phlip

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 7:46:57 AM12/21/07
to
Gator Slayer wrote:

>>> Almost every major media oultet is owned by corporate america and is in
>>> bed with the Bush clan and the GOP. �Judith Miller wrote for the NYT but
>>> she was a neocon shill.

>> Exactly. Reporting on Edwards's alleged love-child is quite a gamble, no
>> matter what evidence backs it up. Edwards is a trial lawyer specializing in
>> lawsuits with punitive damages, after all. Nobody would publish such a story
>> without someone offering to cover a very large bet. Smearing McCain, Edwards
>> & Obama, in one week, in a way that suggests Clinton is behind the smear, is
>> a great way to defend Giuliani. To some people, that's an investment worth
>> the cost of losing one libel lawsuit.
>
> Giuliani with all due respect to you doesn't have a ghost of a chance
> in hell to win this. If anyone would dislike Rudy it would be the
> slimes.

Please focus; I'm not the one covering that bet! I personally hope G. goes to
jail for his crimes, beginning with defrauding the taxpayers of NYC, where he
can rot with all the other white-collar criminals.

Yet someone apparently covered that bet, to smear Edwards in a way that makes
Hillary look bad.

If the polls between Hillary and the other Democrats are in fact fluctuating,
while the polls between the GOP and Dems remain the same, then the GOP's only
hope is to split the Democrats, and secretly promote whoever's in the runner-up
position...

About Edwards' love-child - props! Perpetuating lineages of healthy humans is
what it's all about!

Gator Slayer

unread,
Dec 21, 2007, 11:43:16 AM12/21/07
to

Agree with your last statement wholeheartedly. As for republicans
splitting democrats I don't think so because when the general election
arrives most of this will be forgotten. In other words both
candidates better run on their records because the American people
have had enough of slimeball politics and personal attacks. You watch
because the swiftboating days are over. The only ones buying into the
negatives are the ones with their minds made up. I don't care for
Edwards at all. I think he's sneaky just like I think Hillary is.
But what he does on his personal time is between him and his family
and his God. I have an aversion to lawyers I guess. I respect Obama
not because he's black but because in my heart I think he means well.
I think he had a rough time growing up because of his different
ethnicities. I think when he says he's for the poor he means it. I
don't buy it from Hillary or Edwards. I think McCain is a decent
human being as well. Any person spending 7 years in the enemy's
prison had to had learned something about humanity. It's time to care
for the middle and lower classes for once. But those days are long
gone I'm afraid of.

Richard Mellon-Goebbels

unread,
Dec 22, 2007, 7:05:29 AM12/22/07
to

< so...@privacy.org> wrote in message
news:5t0ruhF...@mid.individual.net...

> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:52:09 -0800 (PST), Gator Slayer
> Better them than me. If there ever was a case for ED, Hillary qualifies.
> No wonder the Arkansas Lothario gets his on the side.

Yeah, and we all know how important it is for our country that the president
be sexually attractive to his or her mate. Do you shitheads EVER come up
with anything relevant?


Richard Mellon-Goebbels

unread,
Dec 22, 2007, 7:06:04 AM12/22/07
to

"Phlip" <phli...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ju-dnQFu183qo_ba...@adelphia.com...

>> Better them than me. If there ever was a case for ED, Hillary qualifies.
>> No wonder the Arkansas Lothario gets his on the side.
>
> You need a president who arouses you? Why?

Because Bush arouses them and they'd to see that continue?


Lt Gen Al E. Gator

unread,
Dec 23, 2007, 1:48:29 AM12/23/07
to

"Gator Slayer" <gator...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7a526302-e107-4e89...@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 20, 10:58?pm, ?so...@privacy.org wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:52:09 -0800 (PST), Gator Slayer
>
> <gatorisb...@aol.com> wrote:
> >After seeing the latest hit piece the slimes is doing on John McCain
> >and the way they've gone after Barack Obama I can see who the Slimes
> >favors. ?What a dirty and disgusting piece of filth this newspaper
> >is. ?Say what you want about Bill O'Reilly but what he has said about
> >the slimes is correct. ?They're no better than the National Enquirer.

> >To impugn great men like Obama and McCain is nothing more than sad.
> >What Hillary won't do to win this thing. ?I wonder what she's promised

> >the slimes.
>
> Better them than me. If there ever was a case for ED, Hillary qualifies.
> No wonder the Arkansas Lothario gets his on the side.

>Right on. The slimes could dig up dirt on Hillary but won't do it.

showing that simple and feeble minded hillbillism again gomer,

if the right wing hate media could find any dirt on hilary the whole world
would
know it

just like if there were the slightest hint of WMD's the bush would have been
crowing like a castrated rooster

so where is the dirt gomer,

it's not like they don;t have teams of investigators out there looking for
it

as far as mccain, no republican gives a shit about any poor or middle income
people,
he's an arrogant, loud mouth, rapidly deteriorating lying hillbilly, he'll
be a complete and total
imbecile long before reagan was

o'reilly is a bought and paid for piece of murdich owned, sexual predating
shit


0 new messages