Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku definitive-proof-that-god-exists

[GLOBALIST]

http://ageac.org/en/multimedia/scientist-says-he-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists-2/
=======================

One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force "that governs everything."

The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God.

The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.

To come to his conclusions, the physicist made ​​use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.

Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.

After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.

“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”

“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
=================

He is not hostile or mean when folks mention the
term "GOD" around him. He does not fly into
a frenzy like you guys do.

He all but spells it out,
but I guess he has to be careful "how" (the terms) he
says it, because of the haters, who would reject
his findings because of their hatred for the
subject.

[Z.]

In which mental hospital is he a patient? He didn't prove jack shit.

--
Z.

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:8a5ac39b-57b5-4943...@googlegroups.com...

****** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

ah yes...the huge, ugly head of the Village Idiot's hypocrisy yet again
rears up as the Village Idiot most hypocritically presents us with "old
news" that dates back at least to December, 2013. Note well the exact same
words in the Village Idiot's post said by Michio Kaku as in this December
2013 article.
https://mysticablog.wordpress.com/2013/12/20/scientist-finds-evidence-of-the-existence-of-god/

But that is Village Idiot hypocrisy for you, posting as he the Village Idiot
does such "old news" when he himself the Village Idiot disparaged and
condemned others for posting "old news" not even a month old. You just have
to love this continued hypocrisy that the Village Idiot displays time and
time again...as here.

ummm...Performance #842 of that honest to goodness Intellectual Coward ploy
by none other than our Village Idiot as he again today - tail well between
those legs of his - dashes away from the issue back into the cozy comfort of
that hole of his under his rock.

[mg]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:40:18 -0700 (PDT), GLOBALIST
<free....@gmail.com> wrote:

>http://ageac.org/en/multimedia/scientist-says-he-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists-2/
>=======================
>
>One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force "that governs everything."
>
>The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God.
>
> The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.
>

>To come to his conclusions, the physicist made ??use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.

>
>Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.
>
>After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.
>
>“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”
>
>“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
>=================
>
>He is not hostile or mean when folks mention the
>term "GOD" around him. He does not fly into
>a frenzy like you guys do.
>
> He all but spells it out,
>but I guess he has to be careful "how" (the terms) he
>says it, because of the haters, who would reject
>his findings because of their hatred for the
>subject.
>

Kaku has a net worth of approximately $5 million. It sounds like
he's getting ready to write another book, if he hasn't already.

[GLOBALIST]

You 2 idiots just proved my point
Michio Kaku is one of the most respected physicists
in the USA but of course you two mental midgets
know more than he does

[GLOBALIST]

He is one of those professionals that can explain to
the ordinary laymen, with no science background, what
psychists are talking about in 2016

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:390a6e6f-673d-4825...@googlegroups.com...

****** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

Village Idiot - psychists have been talking about things well before 2016.
from http://www.wordplays.com/definition/psychist
"someone interested in psychical research"
from http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/psychist
"a person who believes in psychic phenomena"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Psychical_Research
http://www.aspr.com/

And yes, much like you in the Catholic Church not needing any religious
background at all in order to believe that in which you in the Catholic
Church do believe, those in the Society for Psychical Research and in
American Society for Psychical Research, Inc. - as best I can make out -
similarly do not need (as you state) a scientific background at all in order
to believe that in which folks in these organizations believe.

Now...Performance #843 of that most believable Intellectual Coward ploy by
the Village Idiot as he once more - tail between his legs - runs away from
the issue back into his hole under that rock of his.

[wolfbat359]

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-6, GLOBALIST wrote:
> http://ageac.org/en/multimedia/scientist-says-he-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists-2/
> =======================
>
> One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force "that governs everything."
>
> The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God.
>
> The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.
>
> To come to his conclusions, the physicist made ​​use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.
>
> Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.
>
> After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.
>
> “I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”

Sounds off base there! The presence of physical realities does not require intelligence. That is an old mistake!

[Z.]

He probably also stupidly believes in god and the big bang. Sorry, fool,
there is no god, no virgin birth, no Adam, no Eve, no serpents that
talk, no ark, no Jesus, no cross, it's all bullshit to control the
masses that have IQ levels like yours.

--
Z.

[Lawrence Akutagawa]

"GLOBALIST" wrote in message
news:7e40103c-a29c-4224...@googlegroups.com...

****** This line separates my response from the foregoing ******

I'll take a chance and assume that the Village Idiot means that I am one of
his two idiots who proved his point that we "two mental midgets know more
than he [Michio Kaku] does." Well, this "mental midget" has often said that
the Village Idiot should really read and understand the written word as we
"anal" folks - as the Village Idiot so lovingly calls us - do instead of
relying on those vast and mighty (but oh so fatally flawed) Village Idiot
mind reading powers as the Village Idiot clearly does here once more. And
how exactly to show that the Village Idiot is using his Village Idiot mind
reading powers instead of reading the written word? Well...that is
something actually very simple to do: Please, Village Idiot, quote my words
in this thread of yours where I said anything...anything at all...that
causes you the Village Idiot to conclude that I for one of your "mental
midgets" say/show that I know more than Kaku does. Dollars to donuts,
Village Idiot, you the Village Idiot can't at all find such words of mine
because - you see, Village Idiot - I never did actually write such
words...much as your Village Idiot mind reading powers insist that I did
write such words. But - as they say - the proof is in the pudding...so do
find and quote those words of mine, Village Idiot.

And while the Village Idiot scurries here and there to find those words of
mine, let us be entertained by Performance #844 of that awesome and never
boring Intellectual Coward ploy as the Village Idiot once again - tail held
snug between his legs - avoids the issue by storming back into that hole of
his under his huge gigantic rock.

[El Castor]

This post is not about God, as we think of Gad. Kaku uses the term God
in a philosophical, not a theological manner, in mathematical
reference to the most fundamental structure of the universe. God, in
his words, is a mathematician.

[GLOBALIST]

However God is a God of order and beauty and
we can only perceive HIM by what HE "does"
Some folks would call beauty: perfect order.
Genesis says that God created order out of
chaos. And HE is still doing it.

[wolfbat359]

Plus massive death of infants and unfertilized eggs. Plus a short life span! No, Such a God is indifferent to mankind!

[Z.]

"He"? White, with a white flowing beard, blond with blue eyes? You are
so fucking gullible except when it comes to facts. You don't do facts.

--
Z.

[mg]

Yes, I believe that's the case, just as I suppose it was the case
with Einstein, too. However, I think he is probably being
deliberately deceptive in order to sell books. The situation is
similar, I think, to the physicists who recently claimed that
something can come from nothing.

[El Castor]

Kaku may have been indirectly referring to the belief shared by some
physicists that we could be living in a computer simulation and that
traces of computer code can be found in matter. In that case, we would
be a product of a higher intelligence, although not necessarily God as
we think of God. I know that sounds crazy, but Google "we live in a
computer simulation".

[rumpelstiltskin]

Mozart died at 35. Is that a god who loves or
values humanity? Obviously not ... case closed.

[rumpelstiltskin]

Obviously something DID come from nothing. If it
wasn't the Universe, then the god must have come
from nothing. To pretend not to realize that is like
saying you've cleaned the house when all you did
was sweep the dirt under a carpet out of sight so
that people can't see it right away.

It's hard for me to believe that people can be so
stupid.

[mg]

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 23:05:55 -0700, El Castor

Actually, I'm a huge fan of that hypothesis. I read a sci-fi novel
like that when I was about 17 and I've been fascinated with that
idea ever since.

[mg]

In regard to the religious question of where did God come from (or
more specifically the original God), I think the LDS answer is
simply "I don't know".

In regard to the scientific question of can something come from
nothing, as I recall, the scientists who made that claim were
defining gravitational forces as nothing. I'm not sure, though, I
would have to go back and look it up.

[rumpelstiltskin]

Even if the world is entirely illusion, knowing that would not
make it less than it is.

[rumpelstiltskin]

That's my answer to "why is there something instead of
nothing? I stop there without getting into any "god" garbage,
because I'd rather stick with stuff that I can see and with
stuff that seems to throw some realistic, rather than
preposterous and ridiculous, light on the matter. What I
think I can see might be delusion, but at least it's a bit less
surely delusion than something fantastic and preposterous
that sounds exactly like the ravings of someone so
catastrophically deluded and intellectually impaired that he
properly belongs in an asylum, because he just might
turn dangerous.

Deeply religious people are sometimes nice, though they're
more often not-nice than most other people, but everytime I
listen to any of them, I have a distinct feeling that there has
to be something wrong with their brains. It's not "wrong"
of course: it's just something Natural Selection forced on
them just as it forced sex on most people, but they just
don't realize how they're being tricked. I think sex is more
fun than religion, but I guess I only say that because I'm
not religious. Socrates might have seen through sex, but
he had a shrew (Xantippe) for a wife which certainly
wouldn't have hurt his ability to see through the madness
that is "sexual desire". He was Greek though, so he had
Alcibiades.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthippe

[El Castor]

It could make it more. An afterlife becomes entirely possible.

[El Castor]

Einstein believed that gravity is a product of the curvature of space.
In a way that's nothing. As for the existence of a God, the universe
is almost certainly infinite in age and dimensions. The Big Bang was
almost certainly not the origin of the universe -- just the origin of
our tiny fly spec corner. People like Rumple are fools to presume to
have all the answers.

[wolfbat359]

Comes from the Big Daddy syndrome!

[mg]

Mother nature certainly did a great job with the creation of the sex
drive in males. As I always say, in regard to young males, they
would screw a knot hole in a fence if they had to.

As an interesting aside on the phenomenon of unintended
consequences, I once read an article that claimed that the
birth-control pill actually resulted in an explosion of illegitimate
births because men considered unwanted pregnancies their
responsibility before The Pill came along, but considered it the
women's responsibility afterwards.

[mg]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 00:20:15 -0700, El Castor

As I understand it, physicists, or at least some of them, with their
mathematical formulas consider it to be nothing. However, I don't
think it would be called nothing by the dictionary definition.
George Orwell, in his book "1984", once said, "It's a beautiful
thing, the destruction of words.

>
>
>As for the existence of a God, the universe
>is almost certainly infinite in age and dimensions. The Big Bang was
>almost certainly not the origin of the universe -- just the origin of
>our tiny fly spec corner. People like Rumple are fools to presume to
>have all the answers.
>

Even back in the days when I was a young kid, the scientists'
definition of the universe didn't make sense to me. My comment used
to be, "Okay, if that's the case, what happens if I go to the edge
of the universe and leave one leg inside of it and put the other leg
outside of it?". The answer I used to get, as I recall, was, "That's
undefined and it's not a valid question".

[mg]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:07:08 -0700 (PDT), wolfbat359
<wolfb...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-6, GLOBALIST wrote:
>> http://ageac.org/en/multimedia/scientist-says-he-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists-2/
>> =======================
>>
>> One of the most respected scientists of today says he has found evidence of the action of a force "that governs everything."
>>
>> The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God.
>>
>> The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.
>>

>> To come to his conclusions, the physicist made ??use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.

>>
>> Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.
>>
>> After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.
>>
>> “I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”
>
>Sounds off base there! The presence of physical realities does not require intelligence. That is an old mistake!
>

Whenever someone tells me that reality doesn't make sense, I wonder
if they've been smoking something, or they're trying to sell me
something.

[rumpelstiltskin]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:17:24 -0600, mg <no...@none.nl> wrote:
<El Castor wrote
<snip>

>As I understand it, physicists, or at least some of them, with their
>mathematical formulas consider it to be nothing. However, I don't
>think it would be called nothing by the dictionary definition.
>George Orwell, in his book "1984", once said, "It's a beautiful
>thing, the destruction of words.

People used to believe the planets moved because
angels were pushing them around. That worked for
a long time, but then Newton's gravity came along.
Then Einstein's General Relativity came along though
Newton's theory is still used because it does work
well enough to describe interactions between bodies
where the conditions are not too extreme, as they
are around black holes for example, but it's very
unusual to encounter black holes when one goes
shopping, and Newtonian calculations are much
easier to do.

If cavemen had to take into consideration all the
physical aspects of jumping across a stream, our
ancestors would all have been eaten by tigers
and we wouldn't be here. Sometimes you just
have to go with what's "good enough", as far as
you can see and as long as it serves you well.

>>
>>
>>As for the existence of a God, the universe
>>is almost certainly infinite in age and dimensions.

Wrong

>>The Big Bang was >>almost certainly not the
>>origin of the universe -- just the origin of
>>our tiny fly spec corner.

That fly-speck corner is "our universe".

>People like Rumple are fools to presume to
>>have all the answers.

I don't have all the answers, in fact I'm sure
that "Why is there something instead of nothing"
can ever be answered, no matter how much we
come to know, because understanding is not, and
can never be, an adequate tool to answer such
a question. Understanding can figure out how
one thing came from another, but existence
itself cannot be the consequence of anything
else, because that "anything else" would be
part of existence. Turtles, and all that.

The ancients felt that the world was supported
ultimately by a chain of turtles all standing on
each other's back, but they knew they couldn't
account for a "first" turtle. Even the ancients
understood the enigma of "existence" better
than El Castor.

When it comes to understanding "existence",
El Castor never made it out of kindergarten,
and apparently never could, although maybe
he became a skilled banker - that's a different
thing, and something I could never have been.

>>
>Even back in the days when I was a young kid, the scientists'
>definition of the universe didn't make sense to me. My comment used
>to be, "Okay, if that's the case, what happens if I go to the edge
>of the universe and leave one leg inside of it and put the other leg
>outside of it?". The answer I used to get, as I recall, was, "That's
>undefined and it's not a valid question".
>

That's 17th century stuff: "Here be
dragons" on the maps and all that.

[rumpelstiltskin]

I have been smoking something, though not often
lately, and I do say that "reality doesn't make sense."
I even "proved" that in another post today, in a
response to the abominable and subhuman-in-
understanding El Castor, although I deleted all his
verbiage in my reply.

[mg]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 00:04:13 -0700, El Castor

That's what I was thinking also, and hopefully you would have some
input into chosing whose life you wanted to live next.

[mg]

I have a former SIL who is an electrical technician on an Intel
assembly line. Somehow, over the years he got into the habit of
saying, "There's one thing about computers that I don't understand".
Whenever he said that, I would try to come up with a new and
innovative way of always saying the same thing, but in a different
way, which was, "Only one?". One of my typical replies, for
instance, was, "Only one? You could fill an entire library with
things that I don't know about computers". I eventually managed to
cure him of saying that.

For some reason, most people just hate to admit they don't
understand something. So, they go to great lengths to minimize, or
camouflage their perceived failure. For some reason, I usually wear
my failure to understand things like a badge of honor. I don't
understand why other people are like they are and I don't understand
why I'm like I am.

[rumpelstiltskin]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:12:44 -0600, mg <no...@none.nl> wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:01:19 -0700, rumpelstiltskin<x...@y.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:20:45 -0600, mg <no...@none.nl> wrote:

<snip>

>>>Whenever someone tells me that reality doesn't make sense, I wonder
>>>if they've been smoking something, or they're trying to sell me
>>>something.
>>
>>
>> I have been smoking something, though not often
>>lately, and I do say that "reality doesn't make sense."
>>I even "proved" that in another post today, in a
>>response to the abominable and subhuman-in-
>>understanding El Castor, although I deleted all his
>>verbiage in my reply.
>>
>I have a former SIL who is an electrical technician on an Intel
>assembly line. Somehow, over the years he got into the habit of
>saying, "There's one thing about computers that I don't understand".
>Whenever he said that, I would try to come up with a new and
>innovative way of always saying the same thing, but in a different
>way, which was, "Only one?". One of my typical replies, for
>instance, was, "Only one? You could fill an entire library with
>things that I don't know about computers". I eventually managed to
>cure him of saying that.

One thing not understood about computers might
be where their "souls" go when they die.

[rumpelstiltskin]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:41:19 -0600, mg <no...@none.nl> wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 00:04:13 -0700, El Castor

<snip>

>>It could make it more. An afterlife becomes entirely possible.
>>
>That's what I was thinking also, and hopefully you would have some
>input into chosing whose life you wanted to live next.

Don't tell me you're dreaming of an"afterlife"!

[mg]

I suppose that I've been dreaming of an afterlife since the day I
was born. Some of them have about a dozen virgins in them, totally
disrobed and bent over, and my challenge is to see how far done the
line I can get. However, I do make an effort to separate my dreams
from reality. :-)

[mg]

I once had a psychology class where the instructor said that if we
had to consciously make a decision about every single thing we did,
and that, of course, would include all the muscle and nerve
movements, etc., to go into the kitchen and get a donut, for
example, we would go nuts.

Writing and speaking, though, is a different sort of thing and those
activities do require, or at least they should require, a conscious
effort, with the final product depending on who we are, and what we
are, and what we know and what we don't know, and our ability to
tell the difference, and avoid logical fallicies in some cases, and
to wallow freely in them in others, depending on the situation.

I've decided that I am going to wait until my next life to try to
understand existance . . . . . . . . . . . . just kidding. :-)

>
>>>
>>Even back in the days when I was a young kid, the scientists'
>>definition of the universe didn't make sense to me. My comment used
>>to be, "Okay, if that's the case, what happens if I go to the edge
>>of the universe and leave one leg inside of it and put the other leg
>>outside of it?". The answer I used to get, as I recall, was, "That's
>>undefined and it's not a valid question".
>>
>
> That's 17th century stuff: "Here be
>dragons" on the maps and all that.
>

I don't think that's 17th century stuff. I think that represented
science's understanding of the universe in the middle of the last
century, or possibly even later. In any case, I'm still wondering
what would happen if I put one leg outside the universe and one leg
inside the universe. Would I be fined, for example, by the universe
police for trespassing? :-)

[mg]

My guess is that they go the same place that ours do, but because of
the energy stored in their flux capacitors, they get there quicker.

[rumpelstiltskin]

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today... Aha-ah...

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace... You,..


-- John Lennon


Great song, but rather pollyanna-ish.
We'd still be killing other creatures, for
food and because they're invading "our"
turf and because their very survival is
disease for us. The human dream of
perfection is only that - just a dream.

In one of Vonnegut's novels, there's
a plague called "The Red Death". A
vaccine was found for it, so people
could get rid of it once they caught it.
It turned out though, that the Red
Chinese had solved their population
problem by making themselves
smaller and smaller, until they
could no longer be seen by original-
sized humans. Whenever any
original-sized human took the
vaccine to save his life, he was
wiping out whole civilizations and
advanced artistic cultures of Red
Chinese who had invaded his body
without even realizing that their
world was another person's living
body.



Perhaps that's how we humans
seem to Jehovah, invading and
polluting His world. Perhaps His
doctor is preparing another
asteroid to cure His affliction.



"Do not pray to the gods.
Their concerns are not ours.
Love your children, and tend
to your fields, for these are
the affairs of men."

-- The ghost of Enkidu,
speaking to Gilgamesh

[rumpelstiltskin]

Tell me what it was like after you succeed in doing it!

[GLOBALIST]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/16/1416123956951_wps_26_Russian_President_Vladimi.jpg

[wolfbat359]

Your just hoping you can slide yours into his open mouth some day!