Sad Bastard and Loving It!!
Mike Mc Coy
I would like to write to as many FEMALES as POSSIBLE!!!!!!
Whew!! I feel better now,.....
Another "sad bastard" comes out of the closet!!
Peace,
mike 8)
(...hey, this is grrrr-eat!! And then tommorrow,.. maybe I'll post to
one-legged hypochondriacs only!! Yeah! Thassit!!)
Mark Nowak
>I couldn't resist.
>
>I would like to write to as many FEMALES as POSSIBLE!!!!!!
>
>Whew!! I feel better now,.....
>
>Another "sad bastard" comes out of the closet!!
>
>Peace,
>
>mike 8)
How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
--
Mark Nowak | All things are not exactly
SWM, 26, seeking SF ... | what they appear to be,
Chicago, Illinois | but all things are exactly
INTERNET: ma...@ssd.comm.mot.com | what they are.
Rosemarie Scott
>
>mmc...@hpmwtheq.sr.hp.com
>
>(...hey, this is grrrr-eat!! And then tommorrow,.. maybe I'll post to
>one-legged hypochondriacs only!! Yeah! Thassit!!)
You rat bastard from hell. How dare you make fun of one-legged hypochondriacs.
You are the lowest form of life on the food chain.
Kisses,
Rosemarie
(who has BOTH legs, thank you very much)
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY:
"It's better to be pissed off than pissed on."
CNS-ksf-+Jordan T.J.
}from:
}}
}}mmc...@hpmwtheq.sr.hp.com
}
} THOUGHT FOR THE DAY:
}
}"It's better to be pissed off than pissed on."
But, if your pissed on and not pissed off then
what's the problem?
Tim
Rosemarie Scott
>
>How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
>
Kisses,
Rosemarie
Michael Tchou
>>
>Now THAT's the best idea I've heard all day (it's now 8:41 am EDT).
>
>Kisses,
>
>Rosemarie
>
soc.sad.bastards.ashamed.of.it
soc.sad.bastards.proud.and.wallowing
I'm rather happy about who/what I am...
- michaelt/M6
Rick Bryson
: In article <127...@netnews.upenn.edu> rsc...@pender.ee.upenn.edu (Rosemarie Scott) writes:
: >
: >>
: >>How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
: >>
: >Now THAT's the best idea I've heard all day (it's now 8:41 am EDT).
: >
: >Kisses,
: >
: >Rosemarie
: >
: Well, only if there are two distinct and polarized groups.
: soc.sad.bastards.ashamed.of.it
: soc.sad.bastards.proud.and.wallowing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: I'm rather happy about who/what I am...
: - michaelt/M6
How about: soc.sad.bastards.married.has to work for a living.and is tired of reading about someone's final exams for the millionth time.
8*\...8->...}:[...........whoose!!!!flame on....
Rick (Al Bundy is MY idol!!...)in Santa Rosa
Geoffrey Spear
.. Rosemarie Scott@pender.e (234)
> >
> >How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
> >
> Now THAT's the best idea I've heard all day (it's now 8:41 am EDT).
I doubt it would pass a CFV for a soc group. We could create it in
altnet, though. More sad bastards hang out there anyway.
Edward J. Gauss
former Palace Saloon can-can girls or any of my former U/Alaska students,
should reply to this quiry. This is hug an old man week!
--Ed
Er..notes from broadly interested young ladies will not be excluded.
Rosemarie Scott
>>>How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
>>>
>
> soc.sad.bastards.ashamed.of.it
> soc.sad.bastards.proud.and.wallowing
>
Okay, how do we start them? I'm serious....sounds like fun.
Anyone with me on this?
Kisses,
Rosemarie
Rosemarie Scott
>> >How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
>
>altnet, though. More sad bastards hang out there anyway.
Forgive me, I am a computer illiterate. What is a CFV? Can we really
create a group on altnet? You're right about the calibre of
people on altnet. Much sadder and crazier than most. That's why I like
it. (Has anyone ever read alt.is.too? My favorite group - it's
totally stupid.)
So, what is the procedure (for my general enlightenment, if nothing else)
Rosemarie
not feeling creative enough for a sig today
NJE Wijngaards
>>> >How about we start a new group called soc.sad.bastards?
>>
>>I doubt it would pass a CFV for a soc group. We could create it in
>>altnet, though. More sad bastards hang out there anyway.
>Forgive me, I am a computer illiterate. What is a CFV? Can we really
>create a group on altnet? You're right about the calibre of
>people on altnet. Much sadder and crazier than most. That's why I like
Hmmm. This is interesting - does anyone know about the amount of
people that read this newsgroup (so-called `non-posters' (or lurkers))?
I'm wondering about that - most people (esp. women) don't post but
read, and the people who post might give the wrong impression to you.
Or is it because of all the finals.... :-)
>it. (Has anyone ever read alt.is.too? My favorite group - it's
>totally stupid.)
Sorry - my mail server doesn't have the articles you are referring
too... :-D
>So, what is the procedure (for my general enlightenment, if nothing else)
A CFV = Call For Votes. I believe there is a FAQ in the
news.announce.newsgroups, which outlines the process of creating a new
newsgroup.
If I remember well a CFV is issued for about a month, people can vote
_for_ or _against_ the new newsgroup, and then there has to be a
majority of 100 votes (at least) or two third (or so) to get the new
newsgroup created. In the CFV the goal for the newsgroup needs to be
outlined.
>Rosemarie
>not feeling creative enough for a sig today
Just make a standard one !
I hope this helps,
Niek
--
Niek J.E. Wijngaards ni...@cs.vu.nl room: T3.10 phone: +31 20 548 4149
|\ \ | | Section Artificial Intelligence @ Department of Computer
| \|\/ \/ Science and Mathematics @ Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Clarence Barlow: "Artificial Intelligence is better than Human Stupidity"
Geoffrey Spear
heirarchies (comp.*, soc.*, sci.*, etc.), you first must have an official
RFD (request for discussion), followed by at least 30 days of discussion
in news.groups, followed by a formal vote. On altnet, you merely post
a RFD on alt.config, wait a while to determine the general consensus on
the group, then if the response is positive (which is ambiguous... you
decide if it was positive enough), you send a newgroup message and hope
a majority of newsadmins decide to carry the group.
You *can* create a newsgroup in the alt.* heirarchy without the
discussion, but it's usually a Bad Idea, since most admins will kill
it immediately at their own sites, and someone will always post a global
rmgroup message... Of course, this can happen even if there is a
discussion, which will lead to a "newgroup war"...
Just a comment... I seriously doubt alt.sad.bastards would get very
good acceptence, for a variety of reasons... But if you really want it,
go ahead and post an RFD.
------------------------------------------------
This .sig is $hareware. If you use it for more than a
month, send me all of your money, then see a
psychologist. Or kill me.
Rosemarie Scott
I guess that leaves me out....in both cases.
Your loss!
Kisses,
Rosemarie
Johan Conroy (572391)
>Hmmm. This is interesting - does anyone know about the amount of
>people that read this newsgroup (so-called `non-posters' (or lurkers))?
>I'm wondering about that - most people (esp. women) don't post but
>read, and the people who post might give the wrong impression to you.
Quite a lot!
>Or is it because of all the finals.... :-)
Probably that as well.
Johan Conroy
waw...@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
>totally stupid.)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
?????
Rosemarie Scott
>(Has anyone ever read alt.is.too? My favorite group - it's
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>totally stupid.)
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>?????
So what are you trying to say??????
Sorry, it's Tuesday and your point is eluding me.
Rosemarie
Charles Lort
>
>Sorry, it's Tuesday and your point is eluding me.
>
That doesn't sound like you. And here I figured that nothing ever eluded
you. :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Lort cl...@sfu.ca
"Nothing could have been so fine, so brisk, so brilliant, so well-drilled as
the two armies. The trumpets, the fifes, the oboes, the drums, and the
cannon produced such a harmony as was never heard in hell. ... then volleys
of musket fire removed from the best of worlds about nine or ten thousand
rascals who were cluttering up its surface." Voltaire
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosemarie Scott
>That doesn't sound like you. And here I figured that nothing ever eluded
>you. :-)
You're so right.
What I MEANT to say is "your point is DELUDING me".
Much better.
Kisses,
Rosemarie
Thought for Yesterday:
It's better to be deluded than eluded (or even denuded)