Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

akulaK00K KaMP Gets Caught Deliberately Sabotaging Their Own Posts

5 views

Skip to first unread message

Google Archiver

unread,

Mar 21, 2003, 3:15:46 AM3/21/03

______________________________________________________________________________________

akulaK00K KaMP GETS CAUGHT DELIBERATELY SABOTAGING THEIR OWN POSTS
______________________________________________________________________________________

"TheApostle" = "crc.checked.be...@abwi.0rg (abwi0)"
______________________________________________________________________________________

From: "(akula)" <thre...@subdimension.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: abwi0 ?
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:35:49 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20030112193...@nntp4.sharks.plc.ltd>

TheApostle's been posting as "abwi0".

From: "(akula)" <thre...@subdimension.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Malicious akulaK00K KaMP Korruption -> ExPoS3D !
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:22:39 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20030302152239Z.2745330429@nntp3.sharks.plc.ltd>

If you really could match TheApostle with the quality and
quantity he's posting, prove it.

From: "(akula)" <thre...@subdimension.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: A requiem for Mabry
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 15:43:23 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20030301154...@nntp2.sharks.plc.ltd>

TheApostle is moving hundreds of files every day from
ftp sites to usenet.

From: "(akula)" <thre...@subdimension.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: abwi0 ?
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:50:54 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20030112165...@nntp4.sharks.plc.ltd>

Quoting from /j <eb...@post.com>:

>No new 0-day in abwi0 for a couple of days. What's up?
>
TheApostle had better things to do and others with 0-day
access obviously didn't feel like taking up the slack.

UFF OPERATIVE "Pr00F Pr0ViDeR" EXPOSES THE SABOTAGE
______________________________________________________________________________________

Path: news1.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Pr00F Pr0ViDeR <Pr00F_P...@use.net>
Message-ID: <5u21405tu91lv3n2r...@4ax.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Malicious akulaK00K KaMP Korruption -> ExPoS3D !
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 06:05:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.190.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1046585128 68.1.190.48 (Sun, 02 Mar 2003 01:05:28 EST)

On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 22:51:56 -0500, John_S <appl...@orchard.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 03:04:25 GMT, CaNdYmOn <@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>John_S <appl...@orchard.net> wrote in
>>news:pmq26v4mh0p2gt4ko...@4ax.com:
>>
>>>On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 00:23:57 GMT, CaNdYmOn <@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>By the way, Boris FX post is 65% incomplete & the rest of the posts
>>>>are 100%. Can you give reason for this?
>>>
>>>I haven't pulled headers in all the NGs. Without doing so, and relying
>>>on other feedback regarding this particular post, it looks like it was
>>>one of those trashed by jamming.
>>>
>>>That in and of itself does not explain the 65% incompletes.
>>>
>>It seems like someone messed with his post.
>
>I just checked on Easynews.
>
>Of the 52 files in this post, only 18 show up on the web interface.
>
>Again, this is a retail app. The problem with this post, and in how it
>differs from the shareware posts, is that there are incompletes
>instead of "jamming".
>
>With jamming, one or more of the segments will be bogus, but they all
>will be there. In this case (Boris FX), the few I checked also show
>that the last part - part 20 of 20 is missing altogether.
>
>That, under normal circumstances, we might attribute to poor
>propagation. But as I said, it's a true, pricey retail app - not
>shareware. Given last weeks shenanigans, I'm not inclined to believe
>it will get posted complete.
>
>Now, please understand the significance of what I'm saying: With
>regards to the other posts that have been positively identified as
>being the result of "jamming", those posts could ALL easily be
>obtained intact just by using Easynews, and separating the segments,
>then rejoining as you went.
>
>That is NOT the case with this post. In this instance, it's the last
>segment that is not there AT ALL, and more importantly, it's the same
>segment missing whether it's viewed using Usenetserver, or Easynews.
>
>The posts that simply were jammed, were shareware apps, Boris is a
>retail app, as was the bad Bentley CAD apps from last week. These
>either had mysterious CRC errors, or missing segments altogether.

Approximately five minutes before this post was sent, this UFF operative
pulled all headers in alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day from the identical
Cox news server and the identical Cox proxy used by "abwi0" to post the
Boris FX files, specifically, news1.central.cox.net and 68.1.190.48.

Cox being the point of injection, if a post segment never appeared on
Cox, it certainly could not propagate elsewhere.

My inspection showed that segment "20" was missing from 34 of the 52
Boris FX files ON THE COX SERVER!

Below is a log of this operative's telnet session to Cox's news server
[emphasis of maliciously omitted segments added].

In addition, this operative noted that the poster maliciously peppered a
series of bogus "20" segments throughout the remaining 18 archives that
_did_ appear to contain valid "20" segments.

For example, m-bcc239.zip and m-bcc246.zip (files 40 and 47 of 52) were
two zips which contained "20" segments. However, an inspection of these
"20" segments reveals they were identical!

Path: news1.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: crc.checked.be...@abwi.0rg (abwi0)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: abwi0: [ BORIS_FX_BORIS_CONTINUUM_COMPLETE_V2.0_RETAIL-MIDNIGHT ] [40 - 52] -
m-bcc239.zip (20/20)
Organization: Shady Productions
Reply-To: abwi0
Followup-To: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
X-No-Archive: yes
Message-ID: <60b6127702e0679c1...@4ax.com>
Lines: 19
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 21:56:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.190.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1046555812 68.1.190.48 (Sat, 01 Mar 2003 16:56:52 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 16:56:52 EST
Xref: cox.net alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day:1384836
X-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 16:56:52 EST (news1.central.cox.net)

+----> MIZYM*/R0+Q7RA1)ZX$D^Z'0L@KPT_@502P,$%`````@`5ZN8)D"ZCN4_`0``
| M)04```P`%0!%8VAO0F%S92YN9F]55`D``_4:(C<GX5\^57@$``````"-4]MM
| MPS`,_-<4ZBA%!BB*3-`&`?*?OXZE=4B'FQ2E^)3\*$Q`AFSQCL<374H]$XB`
MB*=R7P`-+.@8@3ULGX!E"^AY?"+I1+0"E%5N5.9,(MDJ<,N?N:/V'LQ>=3?)
S M2*RW2'ML-&*Q*R%IHF0512_!',BAA5H)$;.CWDA0N`&\)8F49CYE`2+O7F0'
A M29MTF+$L('U0X^3L5ZF"I6-:,/D!6&E6W=0?SY?]4ALV+@#JH5N-PH3=K`9Y
M M5\.=IPWRHH6:>_`*402BB3RL?9A#"?/&I*03^T@PK-`8+L@TA2P^2<<UQZ9/
E M9UQ2Z.A/&"ODIZES'2&.Y^?/V_7]<NZ/W=;8Q]UYW7@]^LN'?_WF]<7KV3/*
M/A(SUE]5L711<`RUG\(;M.ETTSQI<!D&^(Z0N!N>`#/1'M.U_V>!1SLPK_P!
M4$L!`A<#%`````@`G&I<+MUU+:Y\H2T`L)\M``L`#0```````````*2!````
B M`&)O<FES8V,N<C,W550%``.XTE\^57@``%!+`0(7`Q0````(`%%M7"XF7?`9
O MH0```'T!```+``T```````$```"D@;JA+0!F:6QE7VED+F1I>E54!0`#RM=?
D M/E5X``!02P$"%P,4````"`!+:UPNZ'!E4+,&``#B'0``#``-```````!````
Y MI(&9HBT`;6ED;FEG:'0N;F9O550%``/]TU\^57@``%!+`0(7`Q0````(`%>K
MF"9`NH[E/P$``"4%```,``T```````````#M@8NI+0!%8VAO0F%S92YN9F]5
| B5`4``_4:(C=5>```4$L%!@`````$``0`&@$```FK+0``````
| `
+----> end

Path: news1.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: crc.checked.be...@abwi.0rg (abwi0)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: abwi0: [ BORIS_FX_BORIS_CONTINUUM_COMPLETE_V2.0_RETAIL-MIDNIGHT ] [47 - 52] -
m-bcc246.zip (20/20)
Organization: Shady Productions
Reply-To: abwi0
Followup-To: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
X-No-Archive: yes
Message-ID: <947e3a0b155a3d12f...@4ax.com>
Lines: 19
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 22:27:40 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.190.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1046557660 68.1.190.48 (Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:27:40 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:27:40 EST
Xref: cox.net alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day:1384973
X-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:27:40 EST (news1.central.cox.net)

This operative further noted an average lapse time of 15 seconds between
each segment and no noticeable deviations during the posting of bogus
"20" segments nor between "01" segments and their "19" respective
predecessors, implying what was done was automated and thus pre-planned.

BASED UPON THE FOREGOING OBSERVATIONS, there can be no doubt that the
"20" segments were MALICIOUSLY corrupted or omitted DURING THE ACTUAL
POSTING on Cox for purpose of DELIBERATELY rendering the files unusable.

Proof complete.

Anyone wishing to confirm the truthfulness of this proof can download
all headers in alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day from Cox's news server
directly and examine the segment arrival times for themselves.

TELNET SESSION LOG
______________________________________________________________________________________

The post of Pr00F Pr0ViDeR contained a telnet session log appended at the bottom
which has been saved and archived in full at this separate Google location:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pau...@boris.telnet

COMMENTS OF OBSERVERS
______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Malicious akulaK00K KaMP Korruption -> ExPoS3D !
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 06:55:39 -0500
Message-ID: <jcr36vspqqvtvjku6...@4ax.com>

Jeezus! Exactly the same count on all servers. I checked giganews too,
and the results were the same.

Crapware posts come thru fine, retail apps get fuxored - by the
poster!

They're nailed. The bitches are owned by somebody. It doesn't matter
at this point who they are owned by, THEY ARE OWNED.

Posts generate subscribers for NSPs. But on the other hand, retail
apps generate undue attention by the Big Boys - the ones with the
bucks to pursue not just a poster, but the NSP of same.

Protests by the k00ks to ABNSC do not likely get a response by news
admins. But it does act as a advert, causing more D/Ls, more bandwidth
consumed, more revenue generated.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Adân Etiàn <nomail@co_m.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Malicious akulaK00K KaMP Korruption -> ExPoS3D !
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 14:52:29 GMT
Message-ID: <d1146vg6cst88d270...@4ax.com>

Exactly the same on EN, NH and SN. I've counted and seen many missing
sections in the past, I have never seen a post go up like that with the
20th section of the file missing ACROSS the board, it looks as if the
tic box was cleared in powerpost.

zip's at the aforementioned servers

(last 2 digits here)
1 - 12 have no section 20
14, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25 27 -29, 33 no section 20.

the zips that have a section 20 _are_ short, that may have been a
function of the posting tool (kind of doubt it, this looks abnormal).

Looks like they are practicing what they preach, no posts no downloads!

Who's willing to step in and post 0-day with these guys around?

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or shut your goddamed spermtrap!!!
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 17:12:00 GMT
Message-ID: <ssac6vsltdodg8pko...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

Whenever abwi0 goes to post real (full retail, expensive) software something
seems to go wrong with the post, which is never fixed. Witness the recent
"Boris Continuum" fiasco, where it was proven that he deliberately rendered his
own post unusable. Despite the complete lack of any outside interference from
any of the "usual suspects", his posts of "real" applications manage to be
unusable. He made the mistake *this time* of posting to a server that had
xpat-search via telnet-access enabled, which proved, *conclusively*, that he
deliberately didn't post the 20th segment in at least a dozen of the zips of
that app, and that the scrambled 20th segments in other files of the post were
uploaded by him, and no other.

As to the snitching- there are only a few NARCs around here, and you named a
couple of them, add abwi0 (TheApostle) and ledgerDeMain and anadvocate to that
list, and you have most or all of them.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or "Patsy" speaks out!!!
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:59:10 -0500
Message-ID: <vlrf6voedqs8h5sc3...@4ax.com>

Crapware goes up, retail gets fuxored. No math required - somebody
owns lezzie.

It will follow him for as long as he is stoopid enough to run his
mouth on Usenet.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or "Patsy" speaks out!!!
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 20:17:06 GMT
Message-ID: <2ajc6v8adb446hn50...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

None of it makes sense at all, as it has just been proven that he's lying about
his not deliberately fucking-up the Boris post. I know when a poster is
fucking-up his own posts for spite and malice, and I report that fact- something
TheAsshole (a regular at fucking-up his own posts- deliberately) wishes I
wouldn't do.

Wasn't us that sporged it, and bragged about the sporging, it was TheAsshole.
Wasn't us that flooded, and bragged about the flooding, it was TheAsshole.
Wasn't, and isn't, us who are spreading the lies so thick you need a fucking
airboat to get across the group these days. That is all courtesy of the
akooklas, with TheAsshole as the most vocal nym-shifting, lying cocksucker in
the bunch. He is as dumb as a chunk of wood, and half as pretty. He's
fucking-up his own posts, and refusing to make them good. He's simply trying
(lamely) to divert attention from the fact that it has been PROVEN that HE
DELIBERATELY fucked-up the Boris post, and that HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE TO MAKE
IT GOOD!

He is so OWNED!

None of the supersedes have ever been done by any of the people TheAsshole
has named, although he has tried, AND IS ON RECORD AS HAVING TRIED, to
cancel/and/or supersede "Poster's" posts, at the least. It is also suspected
that the recent supersedes of his poasts have come from his own camp.

As to the claims that he fucked-up the Boris post, the xpat search was posted
as proof. Moreover ANYONE could have verified it by using the proxy tools and
connecting to the server, and performing the same search! PROOF POSITIVE, AND
VERIFIABLE. If he could have debunked it, he would have- instead he pretends it
NEVER WAS POSTED, THAT IT NEVER EXISTED! That is all that he can do, and hope
that the dear readers are as fucking dumb and blind as he is.

He never has anything but wild and baseless accusations. He's just trying to
create a smokescreen for the Boris fiasco. Having SEEN THE PROOF, that
TheAsshole (aka TheApostle, aka abwi0, aka a zillion other nyms he likes to
hide-behind in order to lend himself support where there is no LEGITIMATE
support) DELIBERATELY UPLOADED SCRAMBLED segments, as well as DELIBERATELY
FAILED TO UPLOAD particular segments, thereby creating incompletes; and
DELIBERATELY REFUSED to make those posts good! Is it any wonder if people
think that, maybe, someone else should be posting the feed? Someone who is not
subject to such psychologically unbalanced behavior, perhaps?

Gee, maybe if he would STOP scrambling his own posts, START uploading ALL the
SEGMENTS, and MAKE GOOD on posts of his that are INCOMPLETE EVEN ON THE POSTING
SERVER, then people wouldn't think that someone ought to be doing the posting
who is:

1: Sane
2: Not a moron
3: Capable of doing the job properly
4: Responsive to user's requests for posting fills.

Seems to me we had such, not that long ago, before TheAsshole fucked-up the
group with his spew, threatened that poster, and chased him off.

Not even PMS would explain his flights of fancy. He's too far divorced from
reality for that.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or "Patsy" speaks out!!!
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 22:40:07 -0500
Message-ID: <1agd6vgst4gvn3bkc...@4ax.com>

Where's that Boris post you fscked up lezzie?

Show me - show the whole world lezzie - here's your chance.
You are screwed.

A good poster wouldn't deliberately screw up his own post.

You did. And don't give us the crap about "proof". That proof was
given right on down to the packets affected, and the method and
machine address used.

When you gonna make good on that post scum?

A good poster - one who hadn't deliberately screwed his own post
would get mad - get over it, and still make good on the files.

THAT more than anything is your own confession.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or "Patsy" speaks out!!!
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 07:06:52 GMT
Message-ID: <8uqd6vgan4p3d40tl...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

Let him explain why he deliberately fuxored the Boris post, and refused to make
it good.

There is absolutely no question that the fuxoring was deliberate, furthermore
there is the fact that he never uploaded either the missing segments, or
reposted the files themselves. He never made any attempt to fix the post, or to
offer any explanation other than the pointing of fingers at people who had
nothing whatsoever to do with his sabotaging of his own post.

Let him explain the rationale behind deliberately sabotaging his own post
because it wasn't a typical piece of cheapo shareware, like he normally posts.

An xpat search on the upload server proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that the
upload was fuxored by the poster and by no one else.

That search was duplicable by anyone with proxy knowledge, capable of telnetting
to the server and getting the exact same results. It was posted in plenty of
time for anyone to do that.

THE EVIDENCE IS 100% IRON-CLAD AND INCONTROVERTIBLE THAT THEAPOSTLE DELIBERATELY
SABOTAGED HIS OWN POST OF BORIS CONTINUUM!

Cast that into phosphor-bronze for the millennium.

As to WHY he sabotaged his own post we can only conjecture, but insanity seems a
likely candidate.

He's a self-spnaking machine, isn't he? His lies are so obvious and crude they
would only fool someone as stupid as he, himself is.

Ah well, we must remember to keep asking him why he deliberately sabotages his
own posts. Yes, we must. The answer, when (or if) it comes, would be most
amusing. A peek into a true "can of worms" of a mind- you don't get that very
often.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: ATTN: ALL LEECHERS/POSTERS OF ALT.BINARIES.WAREZ.IBM-PC.0-DAY
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 04:06:26 GMT
Message-ID: <5o4g6vo31f0afdh1q...@4ax.com>

On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 02:25:43 GMT, TheApostle
<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:

>When you step up and start doing fills and posting warez in that group,
>I think that may give you just a bit a leighway to tell others what they
>should and should not do.
>
>The "proof" you keep stating is simply that section(s) never came.
>THAT is your entire line of "PROOF".

"section(s) never came"

The proof - and it is far more compelling, is that those sections were
NEVER SENT.

There's a big difference between "getting lost in the mail" to "never
put it in the mailbox".

_THAT_ is the problem when you post thru a hijacked proxie lezzie -
especially one with xpat enabled. It means that not only you can use
that proxy, but others can. And while those others are there, they can
verify what someone (you, lezzie) put into the machine.

ALL OF IT.

If it isn't there, or only some of a post is there, it's because you
kept it out - not because some bytes got lost (yes, we remember your
famous "DSL is known for losing bytes" fairy tale).

The larger, self-damning evidence is even simpler. Regardless of why
the parts never arrived, you never re-upped them.

And you refused to do so even after many repeated REQs from leechers
saying the post was incomplete. Which you _knew_ must be true -
because the parts weren't all there to start with.

And this has been your attitude with each and every one of the few
"retail" apps you've upped.

Face it lezzie: You brag you're "untouchable" but you're scared
shitless that if you did post a genuine retail app, those big retail
companies would find a way to snag your ass.

That is something between you and them lezzie. You cannot have, and
never can blame another soul on Usenet lezzie - none other but
yourself.

You go thru all that work to post via proxy - even willing to put
private proxies to exposure for net abuse, but because you cannot
stand the thought that every leecher in 0-day might not know who you
are - you go into 0-day using your "apostle" nym, and brag about it -
over and over.

And not using proxies while bragging - oh no! Nope, you splatter your
home ISP like chicken turds at a McNugget convention.

You have given them enough ammo to bang your ass six ways from
Sunday.

You have stupidly paved a road for them a-l-l-l-l-l the way back to
alt.2600.warez.

And when the leechers don't kiss your ass, you reward them by
deliberately fcsking the posts.

Tell me, how did it feel when you realized that your proxy could be
snuck into, and ALL that you upped could be verified?

Has it dawned on you yet, that if someone from .d could do it, that
someone from LEA, or BSA could, and instead of just posting the
results, go after your ass?

You would like the rest of the world to think that folks like me are
your enemy, but that's simply not so.

What is so, is that every time someone stoopid like you is indiscrete,
and repeatedly screws up, it makes Usenet less safe for all of us.

That's the difference between a selfish poster who needs the
attention, and others who understand the risks they _and_ leechers
take here in Usenet.

>You and your WEBNARC team had already made your little determination based
>on your "UFF" proof of character assisination. That was enough "proof" for
>you.. case closed.

Grow up lezzie. You have behaved badly, very badly. Your pouting is
typical, but also quite useless here.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: TheApostle (CandYmOn you need to read this too) - IMPORTANT
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:40:30 GMT
Message-ID: <u44v6vklmcktpoj4t...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

There is plenty of evidence that the original poster of Boris never wanted it to
appear intact. A ton of it in fact.

There is not ONE shred of evidence to the contrary. Not ONE!

I challenge you to show one such.

You can't. There are none.

The original poster never attempted to upload segment fills, because not a
single solitary segment fill ever appeared on the upload server. The xpat proved
that, unequivocally.

Explain that.

The times between one segment finishing and the next segment starting were about
15 seconds. The time between segment 19 of a file finishing and segment 1 of the
next file starting was 15 seconds. Segment 20 was not sent, or there would have
been a 45 second (at least) gap.

Explain that.

The original poster never attempted to upload a single file fill, because not a
single segment of any attempted file-fill was ever found, anywhere, including on
the upload server itself.

Explain that.

The original poster never said a single syllable about anything going wrong, or
offered any explanation, or made any attempt to fill anything. Not a syllable.
Not one. Not a segment of a file, not one.

Explain that.

Explain why a very similar thing happened a week earlier with the Bentley post.

Explain why ONLY high-dollar-value full-retail apps were affected.

Explain why in that case too, no fixes or fills were attempted.

Explain why in that case too, the poster never attempted to offer any
explanation.

I'm asking you to push back from your keyboard, read the above, and ask yourself
if a reasonable case wasn't made that the original poster sabotaged one or both
posts himself. Remembering that everyone objective, from outside the kamps, who
has posted to this has said that it is obvious to them that the sabotage was
intentional by the poster.

I've tried to present a reasonable order of issues and points. I hope you will
give them some consideration.

Mjølnër

______________________________________________________________________________________

Crapware goes up, retail gets fuxored. No math required - somebody
owns lezzie.

It will follow him for as long as he is stoopid enough to run his
mouth on Usenet.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: John_S(cumbag) - Post 0-day warez or "Patsy" speaks out!!!
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 04:21:29 GMT
Message-ID: <8pid6v0gvhosujeca...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

The deliberately fsked post deserves a ton of attention, Les has a lot to answer
for there (not that he will ever even acknowledge any of it). Nevertheless it's
proof positive of his tactics, and his complete lack of honesty. He will never
be allowed to put this behind him, or to pretend it never happened. He's
permanently damaged goods as a poster now. He'll never be trusted again.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: [news] ALL POSTERS of alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:47:50 -0500
Message-ID: <0ab46v8k2frr5gteq...@4ax.com>

On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:46:38 -0000, "(akula)"
<thre...@subdimension.com> wrote:

>What purpose would it serve for him to make the same mistakes
>as you and several other people are making?

It's _your_ puppy wetting himself for months with his twitches by
associating others with UFF, or sporges, or cancels.

Do you think you can get your puppy on some fresh papers?

>Such as your claim that I am trying to "control" abwi0. I have
>not posted in that newsgroup for nearly a year.

You don't have to post one byte to NARC. You don't have to post one
byte to control another poster, to make available files to be upped,
to fuxor up posts before they are upped, to be a mouth piece for your
lap biotch when he shoots off his mouth and wounds himself repeatedly.

>I certainly wouldn't be jamming TheApostle's posts, I'd be
>cancelling non-0-day warez posts if I did anything at all.

Or not, or both, or neither. The time is long past when the statements
you make with your intents towards Usenet can be considered as
meaningful, in any useable fashion.

This is a condition imposed by _your_actions, by _your_ continued
misrepresentation of events, and purposes to which you have acted with
regards to those events.

Clearly, you are in close enough communication with lezzie to make it
known to him your take on who _isn't_ doing the jamming/cancels.

And as you are that close to him, you could also point out to him how
counterproductive it is to knowingly (as a poster) shoot off his mouth
and accuse others as he has been doing for months.

That you have not, that he has not stopped, shows to _me_ that it
serves a purpose for you to have it continue.

It matters not to me what your motives are, just that they are _not_
to be trusted. As it is with regards to Mabry, as it is with regards
to McChesney, as it is with regards to "Saltine", as it is with
regards to your NARCing of people posting on Usenet and as it is with
regards to your attempts to shut down proxies. What personal agenda
you are on matters little. What does matter, is that it is a personal
agenda, and does not, has not, and likely will not serve the needs of
Usenet as a whole.

In other words, it's all about you. Any pretense you make towards
"wanting to help out" is just that - a pretense.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Ah am sick of these aol invective caplocked subject lines.
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 14:52:09 GMT
Message-ID: <uibh6v0rt4ick2ktv...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

He never uploaded the 20th segment of many of the files. That was proven in the
xpat search of the upload server itself. There is no issue of propagation there,
he blew the upload in a manner which leaves no doubt it was deliberate.

The proof is that the sections were never uploaded at all, not that there was a
failure of propagation. Rather that the little box in Powerpost for each segment
was manually unchecked for those segments, so that they were never sent to the
server to begin with. The xpat search on the upload server itself leaves
absolutely no doubt of that whatsoever. Any claims of propagation failure on
TheApostle's part are blatant lies in a clumsy and amateurish attempt to
cover-up his malicious sabotage of his own post.

As to any absurd claim that he "meant" to post it properly, he could easily have
sent the "missing" sections, or reposted the files entire, as any normal poster
would do. His REFUSAL to do either, or to address that, is further PROOF (though
no further proof is needed) that he DELIBERATELY SABOTAGED that post to begin
with!

He's a malicious, lying bitch.

______________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Jamming continues (was: Agent Separate and REjoin method)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 07:12:18 -0500
Message-ID: <mus36v8qgjumiqbi5...@4ax.com>

As it turns out, "Pr00F Pr0ViDeR" has already done the legwork to
determine whether it was first-hand, or 3rd party.

Given this, it seems to me the likeliehood is great that at least when
the "good stuff" gets upped by the k00ks, it's gonna be fuxored.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Mjølnër <mio...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez
Subject: TheApostle is (yet again) proven to be a liar and an idiot by WarezFAQ-author Mjølnër
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 22:03:09 GMT
Message-ID: <16ok6vcqo1jco97mm...@ppn.ragnarok.org>

In <Q9qaa.1065$1f....@news2.central.cox.net>, on Sat, 08 Mar 2003 17:57:04 GMT,
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:

>Ignorance is only shown by someone as bloated as your speeches.
>I present truth without fiction. You should learn that NARC!!!

Lying again about who is the NARC, you fucking NARC!

Everyone knows that as "DMCA" you just NARCED on both "iffy" and CanDYmOn, both
of whom fixed and posted posts which you deliberately sabotaged. Your revenge on
them for making you look bad was to NARC them, you little baby!

>XPAT is not an NNTP command? BUSTED for lying again!!!!

XPAT is a NEWS-SERVER command, usable over NNTP. It's a minor point, but shows
the limits of your knowledge. Like when you claimed to "code HTML for FTP",
remember that one, you jackass?

>Hello, if it isn't a NNTP command, you can't pass it through the news
>server even through telnet. Do you ever get tired of making an arse of
>yourself?
>
NNTP = Network News Transfer Protocol and only covers NNTP messages sent using
that protocol, not news-server commands issued to it directly.

That you can't understand that subtle distinction shows you're both ignorant,
AND stupid. But we already knew that, not to mention that you're a proven liar,
a NARC, and a blowhard. Lie some more about how you uploaded the "missing"
segments, but the server, after "SACK-ing" them to you, failed to "propagate
them" to itself!

HAHAHAHAHA!

You fool.

>It still is no differenet then a GET headers. You know it and i know it.

The difference is only that when done directly on the upload server itself,
there is absolutely NO CHANCE of any "propagation errors" being the cause of
missing segments, as you tried to bullshit people into believing.

By performing the xpat search on the upload server, the possibility of any
"propagation" errors are removed. So we know that when you uploaded those files,
PowerPost never got a "SACK" for those segments. If you had sent them to begin
with, those files would have shown as upload errors in the PowerPost screen. You
would have seen on the server (had you checked) which segments failed, and been
able immediately to re-send them.

That you never did so- NEVER did so, is proof that it was your intention all
along to destroy that post- to never upload it properly. The server TIMES of
subsequent segments posted indicate that no time-out occurred while uploading
the "missing" segments, but that they had simply never been checked to send to
begin with. That MIGHT be overlooked, as the missing segments were small. But
what cannot be overlooked was your REFUSAL to then upload the missing segments,
or the bad files.

What also cannot be overlooked, is that, as "DMCA" you immediately NARCED both
"iffy" and "CanDYmOn" for uploading repaired or full versions of the posts which
you (by now obviously deliberately,) screwed-up.

>Stop trying to pass off shit as "truth" when you have no clue what you are

There is no untruth about the posted XPAT results, you lying sack of shit!
It was verifiable by EVERYONE that you never uploaded the missing segments.

>blathering about. It searches the news server for articles that have been
>processed, if it hasn't.. it returns a null. Why do you insist in lying

It searches the news server for articles that have been SACKed.

>to people? Do you believe everyone is stupid? Do oyu think they will just
>blindly foolow your words as truth without checking your facts?
>

Unlike you, you lying idiot, the xpat offered wasn't anything ANYONE HAD TO TAKE
ON FAITH. Anymore could duplicate it and test it for themselves, to PROVE that
you NEVER UPLOADED the missing segments!

Now explain the following:

1: Why you didn't see that PowerPost had failed to upload those files properly.
2: Why you didn't check the server to see that the files had been uploaded
properly.
3: Why you didn't upload the "missing" segments.
4: Why you didn't acknowledge any posting error and upload the missing files.

You see, Les, there are TOO MANY lines there, of things you DIDN'T DO, to make
your lame "spin" plausible to anyone who isn't as stupid as you, yourself, are.

While you're explaining your failures, explain also:

Why the first posters ever threatened, or NARCed, by "DMCA" are the posters who
uploaded corrected posts for those posts which YOU- apparently deliberately-
"screwed-up"? -- Just a co-incidence? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Yeah, RIGHT!

YOU ARE SO BUSTED!

Path: news1.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: DMCA <dm...@bphtml.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: BENTLEY.GEOPAK.Civil.Engineering.Suite.V8.1-SoS (with pars for zip set):
File [01 of 51] - sosgce81.nfo (1/1)
Reply-To: ab...@usenetserver.com
Followup-To: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Message-ID: <2e615fd28c9f106d...@109.235.54.213>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IdhVhZ5Bo8uABdWjlqb9zfV0CAv=
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
/OE0klmzPCDPJT3+66PMqK7xKRu7eyutBuohc4lvQWdB0Qc9D/kMM4P9ZnF6AIun
gxE/F4hkyF+n26jJ1zgdaKv+=
=JatK
Lines: 292
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 20:22:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.190.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1046636527 68.1.190.48 (Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:22:07 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:22:07 EST
Organization: Cox Communications

DMCA-Complaints-To: anti....@bentley.com,soft...@bsa.org,netp...@spa.org,
ab...@usenetserver.com

From: i...@charter.net (Ify)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: BENTLEY.GEOPAK.Civil.Engineering.Suite.V8.1-SoS (with pars for zip set):
File [01 of 51] - sosgce81.nfo (1/1)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 19:09:19 GMT
Message-ID: <zFs8a.114719$4O5....@fe10.atl2.webusenet.com>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: news1.central.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: DMCA <dm...@pgmusic.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: Boris Continuum Complete Version 2.0 Retail {01:69} MiDNiGHT:-yEnc
"midnight.nfo" (1/1)
Reply-To: ab...@rogers.com
Followup-To: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Message-ID: <b5c3795d0a927f9b...@180.156.251.134>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vDursF+jeWEYnslnxgaLAzCkDfJ=
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
WMXLmvWYBsoB9u91DT30bgyf/FPyzIMGJ7MEx7FYUvSeO8D6LpM+Te7lgQMrZlfo
TD1WxxsKru7iJo+Xft7QFjIJ=
=5qmK
Lines: 157
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 20:15:22 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.190.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1046636122 68.1.190.48 (Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:15:22 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:15:22 EST
Organization: Cox Communications

DMCA-Complaints-To: sup...@borisfx.com,soft...@bsa.org,netp...@spa.org,
ab...@rogers.com

From: Yenc-...@yenc-post.org (CaNdYmOn)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image,alt.binaries.multimedia.utilities,
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: Boris Continuum Complete Version 2.0 Retail {01:69} MiDNiGHT:-yEnc
"midnight.nfo" (1/1)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 18:30:32 GMT
Message-ID: <c5s8a.142472$Zr%.138032@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: abwi0
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 19:53:24 -0500
Message-ID: <3n3l6v4g071pde7fv...@4ax.com>

On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:35:19 -0600, degaussed
<dega...@bcrenznvy.pbz> wrote:

>Ask him to show his proof. He can't he will give you some mumble
>jumble XPAT searches etc... but he can't prove that abwi0
>intentionally screwed up a single post. He just loves to say he can -
>but then again - this is usenet and according to him that is proof
>enough for usenet.

Oh, fuck you. Blazingly clear logs were given. Not "evidence" not
"proof" just the simple godammned truth of it. When it happened, as it
happened, in real time, at the very machine "abwi0" was hijacking.

That is the most concrete truth can be. And still you try and lie &
dance your way around it.

Give that crap spew up.

>What can be said, the post never filled in.

And you are a bald-face liar. The post could never "fill in" because
those parts never left the machine of the poster.

PARTS THAT ARE NEVER SENT, CAN NEVER FILL IN.

>Is it rare, not when there are active supercedes going on, and the
>post is exceedingly large as it was, and the poster is targeted to
>get his posts corrupted.
>

"And, and, and,"

Jeezus, you're a bad liar. And a drunk.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: John_S <appl...@orchard.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: [news] ALL POSTERS of alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 07:01:47 -0500
Message-ID: <kfs36v4t3ndsai7me...@4ax.com>

"Pr00F Pr0ViDeR" has upped a 13 hundred line log of lezzie's post
that shows it was corrupted AS IT WAS POSTED.

So much for lezzie's brag of being "untouchable".

__________________________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDED READING
__________________________________________________________________________________________

People who liked this Google article also read these:

The Updated +akula SNITCH FAQ
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=akulaSn...@UFF.edu

K00K KaMP Member "TazManic" Threatens to NARC Warez Posters
http://groups.google.com/groups?th=9718a9eff98ce422&ic=1

KuLT KLaSSiK: "Returning the Choice"
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=KK@choicereturn

Leslie "TheApostle-TheDisciple" Paulin Befriends Pedophile "Kinda Dumb"
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=paulin@pedolover

Leslie "TheApostle-TheDisciple" Paulin Makes PGP Signed Death Threat
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=paulin@deaththreat

Leslie "TheApostle-TheDisciple" Paulin: Sporge Warrior
http://groups.google.com/groups?th=bc332110f8541925&ic=1

Leslie "TheApostle-TheDisciple" Paulin Stalks a Teenage Boy
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=paulin@teenage-boy-stalk

Leslie "TheApDizzle" Paulin Gets Bootfucked
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=paulin@TheApDizzle

All you need to know about Leslie "TheApostle-TheDisciple" Paulin
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=fuck&as_oq=TheApostle%20TheDisciple

degaussed Gets SPNAKed by AppleSeed
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=degaussed@appleSPNAK

Rise and Fall of the degaussed "WassaMu" Puppet
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=degaussed@sockpuppet

Rise and Fall of the degaussed "ashrope" Puppet
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=degaussed@sockpuppet2

__________________________________________________________________________________________

___ ___ ___
/ /\ / /\ / /\
/ /:/ / /::\ / /::\
/ /:/ / /:/\:\ / /:/\:\
/__/:/ /\ / /::\ \:\ / /::\ \:\
\ \:\ /:/ /__/:/\:\ \:\ /__/:/\:\ \:\
\ \:\/:/ \__\/ \:\_\/ \__\/ \:\_\/
\ \::/ \ \:\ \ \:\
\__\/ \__\/ \__\/

-=- Usenet Freedom Fighters -=-
Liberty and Justice For ALL

Don't Be a Thumper...and DON'T LET THEM THUMP YOU!
-=- "Since 1998!" -=-

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Message-ID: <MPG.16513d04d...@elvisonit.dns2go.com>

As for knowledgeable.. I got it dripping out of my pours..
and this is probably why i'm so damn arrogant and egoticial,
I can afford to be.

0 new messages