Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

+akulaK00K "Degaussed": TOP POSTING & CROSSPOSTING

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Google Archiver

unread,
Jul 26, 2002, 5:56:17 PM7/26/02
to

________________________________________________________________________________

+akulaK00K "Degaussed": TOP POSTING & CROSSPOSTING
________________________________________________________________________________

From: degaussed <dega...@bcrenznvy.pbz>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.ipl.messages
Subject: Re: CrackFAQ update
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:05:58 -0600
Message-ID: <3cada59e....@news.oslo.net>

Looks like somebody had a bit too much coffee today?

Maybe tommorrow, you'll go off and rant how sporging is good, and
healthy for these groups, and follow that up "anonymously" by an
explanation of how it is that your contributing these small colorful
rants, and sporge flurries are of value to the whole of the warez
community? (I know you have answers).

Carry on....

On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:53:25 -0600, Anonymous
<rema...@remailer.xganon.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:07:27 -0000, thre...@subdimension.com ((ak00Kla))
>wrote:
>
>>>
>>Quoting from "nn" <Noplac...@mixmaster.com> in
>><uam8pen...@corp.supernews.com>:
>>
>>>2 things I don't quite understand -
>>>
>>>1. Subject : REQ: Crack for SuperNeato 2.0.3 by NeatoSoft
>>>: (many crackers filter on "REQ:" - use "Re:" ONLY for REPLIES)
>>>
>>>my question - How do we request something, if REQ is being filtered out by
>>>others? Because I have always know a "Re" to be a follow up message to a
>>>prior original post.
>>>
>>I'll make sure to clarify that in the new draft.
>>
>Nobody EVER [F]requently [A]sked the [Q]uestion 'How do I request
>something'.....Remind us again why it's in the CrockFAQ, Ethan Allen?
>It's not a [F]requently [A]sked [Q]uestion.
>
>Fuck off, Leona Helmsly. You're a washed up, lying, narcing, snitching,
>forging, sockpuppeting, word twisting hazz.bin just like 340 said.
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3...@UFF.edu

--
*degaussed*

It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning
to others.


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


From: Anonymous <rema...@remailer.xganon.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.ipl.messages
Subject: Re: CrackFAQ update
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 19:38:25 -0600
Message-ID: <059de939bad33199...@remailer.xganon.com>

On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:05:58 -0600, degaussed <Xtrm...@operamail.com>
wrote:

>Looks like somebody had a bit too much coffee today?
>
>Maybe tommorrow, you'll go off and rant how sporging is good, and
>healthy for these groups, and follow that up "anonymously" by an
>explanation of how it is that your contributing these small colorful
>rants, and sporge flurries are of value to the whole of the warez
>community? (I know you have answers).
>
>Then you will follow that and explain how it is of value, that you
>find corrupting posts "benefits" the downloaders, your ranting about
>here? These should be entertaining - if not quite humourous!
>
>Carry on....
>
>
>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:53:25 -0600, Anonymous
><rema...@remailer.xganon.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:07:27 -0000, thre...@subdimension.com ((ak00Kla))
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>Quoting from "nn" <Noplac...@mixmaster.com> in
>>><uam8pen...@corp.supernews.com>:
>>>
>>>


From: Mjølnër <mjo...@ragnarok.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.tools.d
Subject: Re: 0-day posters take note
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:45:18 GMT
Message-ID: <9m519tgucao6ijvqo...@4ax.com>

When you top-post, it becomes difficult to see what, specifically you
are responding to. Just a word to the wise. All the experienced people
bottom-post, with comments interspersed with the quoted text.


From: george <plain_o...@nym.alias.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Newbie - Help please
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:02:30 -0400
Message-ID: <dejprtchk0mp8pm6j...@4ax.com>

Top posting is considered to be a sign of a second class mentality
among Usenet veterans.


From: Beretta <hairy....@wookie.bush.is.scary>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: NOBODY CAN CRACK THIS PROGRAM
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:54:45 GMT
Message-ID: <eur2jt48bl4kjn4qv...@4ax.com>

You are a top posting moron.


From: W.Y.L.T.K. <WY...@Phreaker.net>
Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp
Subject: Re: Forte Agent
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:42:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <8dc7e88fec83991b...@remailer.segfault.net>

Aarg! Top posting! Do some more reading.


From: Vrodok the Troll <vro...@culvert.waadi.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: who is AKULA anyway
Date: 17 May 2001 00:16:03 -0500
Message-ID: <h9n6gtcph5b4e52r8...@4ax.com>

"Top posting" is a *sure* sign of the un-"initiated" (newbie).
Go back to the womb. You quite obviously have a *great* deal to learn
about existance.


From: anadv...@large.com (anadvocate)
Subject: Re: Miracle Bro...
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001
Message-ID: <3b03819c...@news.alt.net>

On 18 May 2001 03:01:48 GMT,
in alt.stories.incest
Richard Foster <spo...@concentric.net>
wrote the following ( seriously... ):

Richard, this is the problem with "top-posting". I do not know who
you are talking to. I made no comment about anyone in a wheelchair.


From: TiGGa <noh...@thishive.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: who is AKULA anyway
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 04:07:49 GMT
Message-ID: qfk6gt0hgvdc309ro...@4ax.com

i love when they retort they've been around for years while they're
top-posting the reply.
*chuckle*


From: sre...@subdimension.com (tiburón)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.tools.d
Subject: Re: abcdi0: Reminder - UFF posting HALT in effect
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:14:37 GMT
Message-ID: <3f3a8b2968...@news.sharks.plc.ltd>

"Top posting" replies is a sign that you are new around here.
If so, you don't have any background upon which to base any
opinion on what is going on.

___ ___ ___
/ /\ / /\ / /\
/ /:/ / /::\ / /::\
/ /:/ / /:/\:\ / /:/\:\
/__/:/ /\ / /::\ \:\ / /::\ \:\
\ \:\ /:/ /__/:/\:\ \:\ /__/:/\:\ \:\
\ \:\/:/ \__\/ \:\_\/ \__\/ \:\_\/
\ \::/ \ \:\ \ \:\
\__\/ \__\/ \__\/

-=- Usenet Freedom Fighters -=-
Liberty and Justice For ALL

Please read
http://groups.google.com/groups?th=af968b8ffa6cd870&safe=off&ic=1
Don't Be a Thumper...and DON'T LET THEM THUMP YOU!

-=- "Since 1998!" -=-


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


From: degaussed <dega...@bcrenznvy.pbz>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.ipl.messages
Subject: Re: CrackFAQ update
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:22:06 -0600
Message-ID: <3cacb8b6...@news.oslo.net>

Like I give a shit what those quotes mean... with your spews.


On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 19:38:25 -0600, Anonymous
<rema...@remailer.xganon.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:05:58 -0600, degaussed <Xtrm...@operamail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Looks like somebody had a bit too much coffee today?
>>
>>Maybe tommorrow, you'll go off and rant how sporging is good, and
>>healthy for these groups, and follow that up "anonymously" by an
>>explanation of how it is that your contributing these small colorful
>>rants, and sporge flurries are of value to the whole of the warez
>>community? (I know you have answers).
>>
>>Then you will follow that and explain how it is of value, that you
>>find corrupting posts "benefits" the downloaders, your ranting about
>>here? These should be entertaining - if not quite humourous!
>>
>>Carry on....
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:53:25 -0600, Anonymous
>><rema...@remailer.xganon.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:07:27 -0000, thre...@subdimension.com ((ak00Kla))
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Quoting from "nn" <Noplac...@mixmaster.com> in
>>>><uam8pen...@corp.supernews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>From: Mjølnër <mjo...@ragnarok.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.tools.d
>Subject: Re: 0-day posters take note
>Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:45:18 GMT
>Message-ID: <9m519tgucao6ijvqo...@4ax.com>
>
>When you top-post, it becomes difficult to see what, specifically you
>are responding to. Just a word to the wise. All the experienced people
>bottom-post, with comments interspersed with the quoted text.
>
>
>
>
>From: george <plain_o...@nym.alias.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>Subject: Re: Newbie - Help please
>Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:02:30 -0400
>Message-ID: <dejprtchk0mp8pm6j...@4ax.com>
>
>Top posting is considered to be a sign of a second class mentality
>among Usenet veterans.
>
>
>
>
>From: Beretta <hairy....@wookie.bush.is.scary>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
>Subject: Re: NOBODY CAN CRACK THIS PROGRAM
>Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:54:45 GMT
>Message-ID: <eur2jt48bl4kjn4qv...@4ax.com>
>
>You are a top posting moron.
>
>
>
>
>From: W.Y.L.T.K. <WY...@Phreaker.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp
>Subject: Re: Forte Agent
>Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:42:32 +0100 (CET)
>Message-ID: <8dc7e88fec83991b...@remailer.segfault.net>
>
>Aarg! Top posting! Do some more reading.
>
>
>
>
>From: Vrodok the Troll <vro...@culvert.waadi.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
>Subject: Re: who is AKULA anyway
>Date: 17 May 2001 00:16:03 -0500
>Message-ID: <h9n6gtcph5b4e52r8...@4ax.com>
>
> "Top posting" is a *sure* sign of the un-"initiated" (newbie).
> Go back to the womb. You quite obviously have a *great* deal to learn
>about existance.
>
>
>
>
>From: anadv...@large.com (anadvocate)
>Subject: Re: Miracle Bro...
>Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001
>Message-ID: <3b03819c...@news.alt.net>
>
> On 18 May 2001 03:01:48 GMT,
> in alt.stories.incest
> Richard Foster <spo...@concentric.net>
> wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>
>Richard, this is the problem with "top-posting". I do not know who
>you are talking to. I made no comment about anyone in a wheelchair.
>
>
>
>
>From: TiGGa <noh...@thishive.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
>Subject: Re: who is AKULA anyway
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 04:07:49 GMT
>Message-ID: qfk6gt0hgvdc309ro...@4ax.com
>
>i love when they retort they've been around for years while they're
>top-posting the reply.
>*chuckle*
>
>
>
>
>From: sre...@subdimension.com (tiburón)
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.tools.d
>Subject: Re: abcdi0: Reminder - UFF posting HALT in effect
>Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:14:37 GMT
>Message-ID: <3f3a8b2968...@news.sharks.plc.ltd>
>
>"Top posting" replies is a sign that you are new around here.
>If so, you don't have any background upon which to base any
>opinion on what is going on.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___ ___ ___
> / /\ / /\ / /\
> / /:/ / /::\ / /::\
> / /:/ / /:/\:\ / /:/\:\
> /__/:/ /\ / /::\ \:\ / /::\ \:\
> \ \:\ /:/ /__/:/\:\ \:\ /__/:/\:\ \:\
> \ \:\/:/ \__\/ \:\_\/ \__\/ \:\_\/
> \ \::/ \ \:\ \ \:\
> \__\/ \__\/ \__\/
>
> -=- Usenet Freedom Fighters -=-
> Liberty and Justice For ALL
>
> Please read
> http://groups.google.com/groups?th=af968b8ffa6cd870&safe=off&ic=1
> Don't Be a Thumper...and DON'T LET THEM THUMP YOU!
>
> -=- "Since 1998!" -=-

--
*degaussed*

It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning
to others.

0 new messages