first m/m marriage in argentina
ailuropoda melanoleuca torontonensis
america - initially planning to get married in buenos aires on world
aids day, they were blocked; but gummint officials in tierra del fuego
used a grey area in law to let them marry there.
the beeb has the full story here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8433240.stm
manly always a bridesmaid panda
kimxiii
A Catholic bishop called this "an attack on human survival." Because
gays don't reproduce.
Of course, Catholic bishops - if they're following Church rules -
don't reproduce either. Aren't the celibacy/chastity rules for
Catholic priests and nuns also an attack on human survival?
Of course, gays do manage to reproduce all the time. But even if they
didn't, there are enough straight couples having kids to keep the
human race going, going, going.... The bishop seems to be thinking: if
we let one couple have a same-sex marriage, then EVERYONE will want to
do it. But that doesn't seem likeley to me.
JTEM
kimxiii <tirh...@aol.com> wrote:
> Of course, gays do manage to reproduce all the time.
> But even if they didn't, there are enough straight
> couples having kids to keep the human race going,
> going, going.... The bishop seems to be thinking:
> if we let one couple have a same-sex marriage,
> then EVERYONE will want to do it. But that doesn't
> seem likeley to me.
I'm not so sure about that. I mean, men, yeah -- men
aren't going to be swayed by a few homos marrying. But,
what about the women?
I suspect that just one look at a gay couple and most
women will want to marry each other, or their pets...
household furniture items... old clocks.
You know how women are. They're slaves to fashion, at
the mercy of every trend. As soon as they get used to
seeing gay marriages they'll be demanding gay "Mixed
race" marriages, and then gay "Starter marriages," just
like they did in the case of real marriage.
Mark my words, the feminist won't rest until they've
destroyed the institution of the family, and marriage
is in their way.
ailuropoda melanoleuca torontonensis
> > a gay couple have become the first same-sex married couple in latin
> > america - initially planning to get married in buenos aires on world
> > aids day, they were blocked; but gummint officials in tierra del fuego
> > used a grey area in law to let them marry there.
to which kimxii responded:
> A Catholic bishop called this "an attack on human survival." Because
> gays don't reproduce.
>
> Of course, Catholic bishops - if they're following Church rules -
> don't reproduce either. Aren't the celibacy/chastity rules for
> Catholic priests and nuns also an attack on human survival?
> we let one couple have a same-sex marriage, then EVERYONE will want to
> do it. But that doesn't seem likeley to me.
well, speaking of ruining the institution of marriage -- I think this
one should actually be filed under "end of year humour news", but I
have no reason to believe the facts are incorrect.
The Beeb is reporting that a 50yr old man from Jerusalem has set an
Israeli record by getting his *eleventh* divorce. That is not a typo,
we're talking one-less-than-a-dozen.
but apparently (and this is my correlation, and probably the good
bishop's, not the Beeb's) it's *homos* who are damaging the
institution of marriage.
read all about it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8433657.stm
(he's married *11* times? isn't one definition of insanity, doing the
same thing over and over expecting different results?)
pardon moi while I go off and endanger the fabric of western
civilisation, laughing the while
ailuropoda melanoleuca torontonensis
David Horne
[]
> The Beeb is reporting that a 50yr old man from Jerusalem has set an
> Israeli record by getting his *eleventh* divorce. That is not a typo,
> we're talking one-less-than-a-dozen.
That defender of traditional values, Karl Rove, had his 2nd divorce
announced today.
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
www.davidhorne.net (email address on website)
"[Do you think the world learned anything from the first
world war?] No. They never learn." -Harry Patch (1898-2009)
JTEM
> isn't one definition of insanity, doing the
> same thing over and over expecting different results?)
Could you repeat that?
Frank McQuarry
[..]
> we're talking one-less-than-a-dozen.
Writing "one less than a baker's dozen" would have been more fun.
Robert S. Coren
>one should actually be filed under "end of year humour news", but I
>have no reason to believe the facts are incorrect.
>
>The Beeb is reporting that a 50yr old man from Jerusalem has set an
>Israeli record by getting his *eleventh* divorce. That is not a typo,
>we're talking one-less-than-a-dozen.
>
>but apparently (and this is my correlation, and probably the good
>bishop's, not the Beeb's) it's *homos* who are damaging the
>institution of marriage.
You can't claim that this guy is damaging the institution of marriage;
after all, he's increased the total number of marriages by at least
11. (Unless you want to argue that the institution suffers wear and
tear by overuse.)
--
---Robert Coren (co...@panix.com)------------------------------------
"Compared to my lover, toilet paper looks trivial, but I have
no intention of giving it up."
--John Whiteside
ailuropoda melanoleuca torontonensis
> > we're talking one-less-than-a-dozen.
> [knarf]
> Writing "one less than a baker's dozen" would have been more fun.
it would, but that'll have to wait until he's had divorce number 12.
At the rate he's going, that should be sometime around late summer,
2011.
manly how about "half-a-score-plus-one" panda
Dennis Lewis
>
>That defender of traditional values, Karl Rove, had his 2nd divorce
>announced today.
Now that *is* shocking -- that there's not just one, but *two* women
who'd marry him.
GnosticLady
They now have their freedom. What more would a couple want before
having kids if they want kids? Christ calls us all in mysterious ways.
Tim McDaniel
<60932eaa-9c68-4dc8...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Maybe I should lay off the webpr0n. I read that as
>
>Congratulations to the newly wads!!
(Well, presumably they're that too.)
--
Tim McDaniel, tm...@panix.com
Arne Adolfsen
Congrads to you, too, GnosticLady! Afhmoos ago
afrime. Bitch.
Arne
JTEM
Arne Adolfsen <adolf...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Congrads to you, too, GnosticLady! Afhmoos ago
> afrime. Bitch.
"The Gnostic Gnashed the Gnarly Gnat."
....kinda makes you want a gnaw, huh?
Anyway, are Gnostics related to Gnomes? You can't
deny the similarity. Well, except for the hats.
Gnomes wear those funky hats.
I have this theory that the hats are more than
symbolic here. That, the two cultures were once
one, but over time many drifted from the mostly
agrarian (Gnostic) lifestyle to the urban trades,
primary haberdashery (Gnomes). Eventually these
two groups diverged to the point where they
"Evolved" their own unique ethnic identity.
Jed Davis
> Anyway, are Gnostics related to Gnomes? You can't deny the
> similarity. Well, except for the hats.
>
> Gnomes wear those funky hats.
http://www.xlerb.net/misc/cheese/oh-the-huge.jpeg
--Jed
Merrick Baldelli
What is Babylon 5 Hindenberg for $200, Alex.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ Who are these folks and why have they
/ / stopped taking their medication?
- Captain Infinity