Salacious GIFs
Bill Sinclair
Feverishly requesting FTP sites bubbling over with salacious
motssensational GIFs!
Seriously though, alt.sex.pictures is drying up, not that it ever
had much high-octane motss material anyways.
Any untapped GIF sites appreciated!
<Bill>
Henry Mensch
->Seriously though, alt.sex.pictures is drying up, not that it ever
->had much high-octane motss material anyways.
->Any untapped GIF sites appreciated!
there are no such places. every time someone announces one in a
public space, it dries up (the interested student can figure out why).
i'm going to post some GIFs in a.s.p this week; keep yer shorts on
until then ... :)
# Henry Mensch / <he...@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA
# <hme...@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <he...@tts.lth.se> / <men...@munnari.oz.au>
# via X.400: S=mensch; OU=informatik; P=tu-muenchen; A=dbp; C=de
Bad Bernardo
>Seriously though, alt.sex.pictures is drying up, not that it ever
>had much high-octane motss material anyways.
Maybe I'm missing something but I'm curious as to why what's there is
not motss material.
--
Rob Bernardo, Mt. Diablo Software Solutions _ /
email: r...@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US <_/><
phone: (415) 827-4301 /
"Better blatant than latent"
Henry Mensch
|> Maybe I'm missing something but I'm curious as to why what's there is
|> not motss material.
because i (and maybe one or two others) are the only people who've had the
balls to do anything about it ... problem is that i'm quite busy, and i do
spend a non-trivial part of my life doing things that don't involve gif files.
--
Jim Graham
r...@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US (Bad Bernardo) writes:
|> Maybe I'm missing something but I'm curious as to why what's there is
|> not motss material.
I haven't really looked at that newsgroup, but I would wager that it's
mostly erotic pictures of women. What the original poster was probably
asking for was material for "homosexual men", which would also be material
for "heterosexual women" and "bisexual members of either sex".
So, the answer is probably, "it IS *motss* material, but material for
motss of only one particular sex (which is probably not the sex of
the original poster)."
...jim
D. Daniel Sternbergh
>to give him a chance to explain it case my presumption was wrong.
>However, he never responded.
Not necessarily. I've noticed quite a difference between erotica and
pornography intended for straight women and that for gay men, although
the differences are usually slight enough to be ignored. I would
imagine that the differences between photos intended for straight men
and those intended for lesbian women would be significantly greater,
sufficiently so that many of the photos of scantily-clad women would
scarcely arouse a self-respecting dyke, and the photos of two or more
women generally outrage *my* feminist sensibility. I doubt women (or
wymmin) find them appealing in the least.
Nice try at finding latent androcentrism in the posting; it may have
been there, but let's not insult out lesbian sisters by likening their
tastes to those of many straight men.
Daniel
--
== Daniel == Daniel Sternbergh
dda...@lindy.stanford.edu
{decwrl|sun}!lindy.stanford.edu!ddaniel
BITNET: ddaniel%lindy@stanford
Klaus Ole Kristiansen
Yesterday alt.sex.pictures had a picture called SPANKED.GIF of
two women. The title says it all.
There have also recently been a GIF that was described as
all male. Not all the parts made it here, so I don`t know
what it looks like. It was called HUGESUCK.
Klaus Kristiansen
Tim Russell
> There have also recently been a GIF that was described as
> all male. Not all the parts made it here, so I don`t know
> what it looks like. It was called HUGESUCK.
All I know is, I don't want that thing anywhere near me!! :-)
Am I a reverse size queen?
--
Tim Russell Person at large rus...@ursa-major.spdcc.com
"...my moral standing is lying down.." - NIN