The motss picture archives
Mike Lane
/pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
the FTP site.
Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
By the way, I think there was an error. I believe Melinda's pic was
confused with one of the pics from someone's Save the Children
packets.
ftp://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.pix/m/melinda_shore.gif
Thanks,
--
ML
fight bigotry and affectation now
------
"You and your fucking puffy cheeks. Shut up already you moron."
--Will "on the" Brink
rich...@library.tmc.edu
Lane) wrote:
>Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
>
Yeep!
Surely that's Nicole Kidman?
I had dinner with Jojo Monday night. He does NOT look like Nicole
Kidman.
rpj
now in Houston
Chris Ambidge
<rich...@library.tmc.edu> wrote:
[stuff]
>rpj
>now in Houston
Okay, who had 25 August 99 in the RPJ pool?
Chris
winner of the last one, so it couldn't be me
--
Chris Ambidge =|= chemist by day, panda by night
chris....@utoronto.ca =|= amb...@ecf.utoronto.ca
http://www.chem-eng.utoronto.ca/~ambidge/panda.jpg
Mike McKinley
Chris Ambidge wrote:
> Chris
> winner of the last one, so it couldn't be me
I read that as wiener of the last one.
"They're writing songs of love, but it couldn't be
me-ee-ee..."
Mike McKinley
Jess Anderson wrote:
> I have nothing whatever to do with the picture archive. For a
> time I maintained an index to it but I haven't updated that in
> years.
Is there still a fuck chart?
(Not that I would even dream of making it.)
Michael Palmer
amb...@ecf.toronto.edu (Chris Ambidge) wrote:
>In article <37c44fb4...@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>,
> <rich...@library.tmc.edu> wrote:
>
> [stuff]
>
>>rpj
>>now in Houston
>
> Okay, who had 25 August 99 in the RPJ pool?
>
>Chris
>winner of the last one, so it couldn't be me
"It couldn't be me, it couldn't be ME!"
Sammy Davis III
---
Michael Palmer
Famous Bovines International
Claremont, California
mpa...@netcom.com
Brian Kane
>Mike McKinley:
>>Is there still a fuck chart? [...]
>[...]I think it has been withdrawn,
>probably as too incriminating
It's still being maintained and being passed
around in e-mail from time to time -- as
a sort of _rite_de_passage_.
And it's spelled with a Capital F and
Capital C.
Mike Lane
Anderson) wrote:
>Mike Lane:
>
>>Jess, would it be possible to separate the pictures into
>>/pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
>>very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
>>the FTP site.
>
>I have nothing whatever to do with the picture archive. For a
>time I maintained an index to it but I haven't updated that in
>years.
>
I noticed.
>I think what you propose is the quintessence of an unattractive
>idea, moreover.
>
Oh come on Big Daddy, you know it it a fine idea; it is just not
going to be considered a sensitive thing to do. Especially not around
here where tolerence of people's variations is celebrated.
--
ML
Clayton Colwell
: Mike Lane:
: >Jess, would it be possible to separate the pictures into
: >/pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
: >very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
: >the FTP site.
: I think what you propose is the quintessence of an unattractive
: idea, moreover.
As well as impossible to guarantee, anyway. Best that all those
inclined to doing so make their own /pub/attractive on their
own systems.
IOW, Mike, you can't stop "the horrors", so deal.
****** Clay Colwell (aka StealthTroll) ***** er...@bga.com ******
* "In the future, we will recognize software crashes as technologically *
* mandated ergonomic rest breaks - and we will pay extra for them." *
* -- Crazy Uncle Joe Hannibal *
Chris Ambidge
Yeah, why just last week or so someone mentioned M*tth*w M*lm*n,
and now look what's happened.
[we should have listened to this voice of caution, Tim, but nooooo]
[because that same day, Clay said:]
But T*mmy M*ll*g*n came by on his own, and barely stayed.
Let's put this theory to the *real* test:
<turning toward mirror>
EYEDRAMA!!! EYEDRAMA!!! EYEDRAMA!!!
EYEDRAMA!!! EYEDRAMA!!!
[and guess who, or a reasonable facsimilie thereof, showed up]
[As Ken Rudolph pointed out]
: > Whew. I was worried there for a sec****ULRK!!!***<thud>
: IT WAS YOU, CLAY!! Are you happy now?
[Clay doesn't seem to have any penitence whatever]
<sepulchrual voice>
Nooot yeeeeeet. You must be my victim! Share my pain. Share
the sweet agony of torture with me, and your name shall be
immortal.
<smurfy voice>
Just *kidding*! Tee hee! Anyway, you should be thinking
Phluffi or Brandi by now, anyway.
[now others have tried, viz FJ!!]
>This is fun. Now let me try:
>
>SEF!!! SEF!!! SEF!! SEF!!!
[Michael suggested]
This won't work: you need to repeat it *5* times.
[but I suspect that Clay has some kind of magic lamp that he rubs,
because of this separate incident on 23 August:]
[someone else]>
:: But then I discovered the combination of cock-sucking
:: (Hi, Charlie!) and poppers.
[to which Our Clay added:]
> You forgot the "(Hi, Richard!)".
and then, two days later, from Texas, GUESS WHO SHOWS UP.
All right, Clay, we're all impressed with your ability to invoke
Shades from the past. But Clay, dear, will you knock it off already?
I don't want to share either your pain or the sweet agony of torture
with you, generous though your offer has been.
Thank you ever so much
Chris
Alex Elliott
>>Mike Lane:
>>
>>>Jess, would it be possible to separate the pictures into
>>>/pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
>>>very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
>>>the FTP site.
>>
>>time I maintained an index to it but I haven't updated that in
>>years.
>
>I noticed.
This is largely because the picture archive dates from those days
before the WWW (yes, Virginia, the "internet" existed before the
web) allowed everyone and their cat to have their own webpage.
At the time when it was being actively maintained, it was really
the *only* source of pictures of motssers available.
You'll note that many of the newer motssers (me, for example) have
no picture there.
Alex.
Mike McKinley
Brian Kane wrote:
Er, actually, I *shoud* be on it...
And, you Cap'n Kane?
cor...@frogger.telerama.com
>You'll note that many of the newer motssers (me, for example) have
>no picture there.
Don't you worry your pretty little head dear Alex, I've already
scanned your picture from Pride (with shirt, darn!) and it will be
appearing on a webpage within the next few days.
Scott, lazier than Ellen <bow>
Brian Kane
>Er, actually, I *shoud* be on [the Fuck Chart]...
>And, you Cap'n Kane?
As if!
David Migicovsky
<37C4B4DF...@erols.com>...
> Jess Anderson:
> >Mike McKinley:
> >>Is there still a fuck chart? [...]
> >[...]I think it has been withdrawn,
> >probably as too incriminating
>
> It's still being maintained and being passed
> around in e-mail from time to time -- as
> a sort of _rite_de_passage_.
>
Well I've had no interest in passing since I came out, and no particular
desire to see the chart, but I would like to know what it is. Is it, as my
darker instincts insist, a list of motss'ers who have fucked (in the
informal manner) other motss'ers?
Tim Wilson
> > [The fuck chart's] still being maintained and being passed
> > around in e-mail from time to time -- as
> > a sort of _rite_de_passage_.
I read this as "I've got a copy if you want it".
> Well I've had no interest in passing since I came out, and no particular
> desire to see the chart, but I would like to know what it is. Is it, as my
> darker instincts insist, a list of motss'ers who have fucked (in the
> informal manner) other motss'ers?
Informal? Would that be opposed to, say, the kind of formal fucking
found in Eyes Wide Shut?
--
Tim Wilson http://www.ee.memphis.edu/~tim/ mailto:tawi...@memphis.edu
Motss.Con.99 (1-3 October): http://www.ee.memphis.edu/~tim/motss.con/home.html
Mike McKinley
Anthony J. Rzepela wrote:
> Tim Wilson (t...@banquo.csp.ee.memphis.edu) wrote:
> [Brian Kane]
> > > > [The fuck chart's] still being maintained and being passed
> > > > around in e-mail from time to time -- as
> > > > a sort of _rite_de_passage_.
> > I read this as "I've got a copy if you want it".
> So did I. Apparently, I was mistaken.
> Who do I have to screw to get a look at this thing?
*ME*ME*ME!!!
David Speakman
Mike Lane wrote:
> Jess, would it be possible to separate the pictures into
> /pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
> very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
> the FTP site.
>
> Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
>
> By the way, I think there was an error. I believe Melinda's pic was
> confused with one of the pics from someone's Save the Children
> packets.
>
> ftp://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.pix/m/melinda_shore.gif
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
Oh my gosh, check out this map of MOTSS posters from 1990...
http://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.map.na.gif
and this from 1983 - the first post???
http://140.186.80.3/pub/net.motss.1st.article
---------------------------------------------
Subject: Net.motss is born!
From: sd...@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer)
Path: bbncca!sdyer
Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma.
Date: Fri, 7-Oct-83 01:05:04 EDT
Net.motss is a forum for the discussion of gay-related issues of interest
to
all members of USENET. Its name is an acronym for "members of the same
sex",
coined by contributors to net.singles as an analogue to MOTOS--"member of
the
opposite sex." It is therefore, unfortunately, a euphemism of sorts--an
alternative to the preferred 'net.gay'. Nevertheless, the proponents of
the
group have gladly passed on this minor issue so that the group should be
swiftly formed.
It is designed to foster discussion on a wide variety of topics, such as
health problems, parenting, relationships, clearances, job security and
many others. Gay members of USENET will find this a supportive
environment
for the discussion of issues which have immediate impact on their
everyday
lives. Those who aren't gay have an opportunity to be informed by the
discussion, and are encouraged to read the news items and contribute
their
own questions and opinions.
Net.motss is emphatically NOT a newsgroup for the discussion of whether
homosexuality is good or bad, natural or unnatural. Not is it a place
where conduct unsuitable for the net will be allowed or condoned.
Rather, like every USENET news group, it is an opportunity for people
all across the world to express their opinions, exchange ideas, and
come to appreciate the diversity within the USENET membership.
/Steve Dyer
decvax!wivax!dyer
decvax!genrad!wjh12!bbncca!sdyer
...!ima!bbncca!sdyer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
priceless.
--
---
David Speakman
http://david.speakman.com
Robert S. Coren
David Speakman <dspe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>Oh my gosh, check out this map of MOTSS posters from 1990...
>
>http://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.map.na.gif
Don't have to... I've got the T-shirt (wore it yesterday, in fact).
--
-------Robert Coren (co...@spdcc.com)-------------------------
"I often postulate with high structural coherence."
--Jeffrey William Sandris
Stephanie Smith
(Alex Elliott) wrote:
> At the time when it was being actively maintained, it was really
> the *only* source of pictures of motssers available.
It still is being maintained, FSVO "actively". Steve Dyer
archived something there for me last month.
> You'll note that many of the newer motssers (me, for example)
> have no picture there.
Why not send one?
g...@panix.com
ml...@earthling.net (Mike Lane) wrote:
[...]
> Oh come on Big Daddy, you know it it a fine idea; it is just not
> going to be considered a sensitive thing to do. Especially not around
> here where tolerence of people's variations is celebrated.
Looking at those pictures is a strange, nostalgic experience.
I have a picture in there that was taken in early 1991, when I
was (obviously) 8 years younger and 45lbs lighter (I was so
skinny!) A very very interesting time of my life. The other
pictures are two years later, during a _mistake_ period of
my life.
Fascinating.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
gor...@my-deja.com
ml...@NOSPAMearthling.net (Mike Lane) wrote:
> Jess, would it be possible to separate the pictures into
> /pub/attractive and /pub/ directories? The /pub/attractive will be
> very small and will spare people the horrors of unguided surfing thru
> the FTP site.
>
> Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
Whatever, but those pictures aren't of Jojo.
Ken Rudolph
>
> In article <37c43a31...@news.newsguy.com>,
> ml...@NOSPAMearthling.net (Mike Lane) wrote:
> > Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
>
> Whatever, but those pictures aren't of Jojo.
Um, Greg, are you referring to
ftp://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.pix/j/jojo_drag.gif ?
If so, I beg to differ.
--Ken Rudolph
gor...@my-deja.com
I know it looks like it could be, but from JoJo's lips
(and fingers), he has repeatedly stated that it is not.
Knowing JoJo, there's no reason for him not to tell the
truth.
Did he tell you differently?
Greg
Alex Elliott
David Speakman <dspe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>Oh my gosh, check out this map of MOTSS posters from 1990...
>
>http://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.map.na.gif
Who on earth was posting from *Hartford*!?
>/Steve Dyer
>decvax!wivax!dyer
>decvax!genrad!wjh12!bbncca!sdyer
>...!ima!bbncca!sdyer
Eeek! Bang paths!
Alex.
rich...@library.tmc.edu
>In article <37CA28D8...@thegrid.net>,
>
>I know it looks like it could be, but from JoJo's lips
>(and fingers), he has repeatedly stated that it is not.
>Knowing JoJo, there's no reason for him not to tell the
>truth.
>
>Did he tell you differently?
>
>Greg
I still think it's Nicole Kidman. And when I asked him about it on
Saturday he said "No," that was not him.
rpj
Robert S. Coren
Robert Cumming <robe...@bahnhof.se> wrote:
>In article <mspompom-ya0240800...@news.vcn.bc.ca>,
You tried that once already, I believe.
--
"You ain't seen from animus." --Ken Rudolph
Ken Rudolph
> > gor...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <37c43a31...@news.newsguy.com>,
> > > ml...@NOSPAMearthling.net (Mike Lane) wrote:
> >
> > > > Whoever JoJo is he does a great drag.
> > >
> > > Whatever, but those pictures aren't of Jojo.
> >
> > Um, Greg, are you referring to
> > ftp://140.186.80.3/pub/motss.pix/j/jojo_drag.gif ?
> >
> > If so, I beg to differ.
>
> (and fingers), he has repeatedly stated that it is not.
> Knowing JoJo, there's no reason for him not to tell the
> truth.
>
> Did he tell you differently?
Nope. Wishful thinking, I guess. I do know that Max & Howard did a
mutual drag thing (I have great pix); and I thought that Max said
she had done a similar thing with JoJo.
--Ken Rudolph
XAOS
news:37c68...@feed1.realtime.net...
> Chris Ambidge (amb...@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>
> : All right, Clay, we're all impressed with your ability to invoke
> : Shades from the past. But Clay, dear, will you knock it off already?
>
> Quick! Send me to Professor Xavier's school!
Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men movie? Do
you hear me? You have to!
- Steve
Michael Palmer
Coren) wrote:
The Swedish accent was a nice touch, though.
Ellen Evans
XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
[]
>Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men movie? Do
>you hear me? You have to!
Would that I could - I'd love to work with Halle Berry again.
--
Ellen Evans 17 Across: The "her" of "Leave Her to Heaven"
je...@panix.com New York Times, 7/14/96
Clayton Colwell
: In article <7qek85$ahs$1...@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>,
: XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
: []
: >Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men movie? Do
: >you hear me? You have to!
: Would that I could - I'd love to work with Halle Berry again.
Ooooo! Will she play Ororo/Storm?
XAOS
> Ellen Evans (je...@panix.com) wrote:
> : In article <7qek85$ahs$1...@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>,
> : XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> : []
> : >Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men movie?
Do
> : >you hear me? You have to!
>
> : Would that I could - I'd love to work with Halle Berry again.
>
> Ooooo! Will she play Ororo/Storm?
Ian McKellan - Magneto
Patrick Stewart - Professor X
Halle Berry - Storm
Dougray Scott - Wolverine
Famke Jannsen - Jean Grey
Anna Paquin - Rogue
Ray Park - Toad
Rebecca Romijn-Stamos - Mystique
Tyler Mane - Sabertooth
Bruce Davison - Senator Kelly
Cyclops is currently uncast though an announcement is expected this week or
next.
HTH
- Steve
Ellen Evans
Clayton Colwell <er...@bga.com> wrote:
>Ellen Evans (je...@panix.com) wrote:
>: In article <7qek85$ahs$1...@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>,
>: XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>: []
>: >Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men movie? Do
>: >you hear me? You have to!
>
>: Would that I could - I'd love to work with Halle Berry again.
>
>Ooooo! Will she play Ororo/Storm?
Yup.
Leith Chu
Ellen Evans wrote:
> XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men
> >movie? Do you hear me? You have to!
> Would that I could - I'd love to work with Halle Berry again.
She's playing Storm, right? Is she bleaching her hair, or wearing a
wig?
Leith
Daniel Chase Edmonds
: xa...@mindspring.com (XAOS) wrote in
: Hey!!!! Wnen did this happen?
:
: Clay, can you invoke someone for me? Pretty please?
Oh, Steve just did it to prove me wrong in my prognostications.
David W. Fenton
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!!!!!!!!!
<7qek85$ahs$1...@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>:
>Clayton Colwell <er...@bga.com> wrote in message
>news:37c68...@feed1.realtime.net...
>> Chris Ambidge (amb...@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>>
>> : All right, Clay, we're all impressed with your ability to
>> : invoke Shades from the past. But Clay, dear, will you knock
>> : it off already?
>>
>> It's a mutant talent I have no control over! Augggghhhhhhhhh!
>> Quick! Send me to Professor Xavier's school!
>
>Speaking of, Ellen, you just have to be involved with the X-Men
>movie? Do you hear me? You have to!
Hey!!!! Wnen did this happen?
Clay, can you invoke someone for me? Pretty please?
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net
http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
David Speakman
XAOS wrote:
>
> Dougray Scott - Wolverine
Cute, but not hairy enough... or maybe he just went wax-happy for his other
films.
From what I can tell in the mainstream press, this character and his
introduction are pivotal to the plot of the movie.
FJ!!
XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>Magneto - Professor X - Storm - Wolverine - Jean Grey
>Toad - Mystique - Sabertooth - Senator Kelly
>Cyclops
>Anna Paquin - Rogue
Good lord, of all its current and previous members, what a... 'safe'
line-up. What about Angel, or Iceman? Shadowcat, Jubilee, Nightcrawler?
And of all she's been through, they take this current bland Jean Grey
incanrantion? Couldn't find anyone big enough for Colossus?
And what's with Rogue being, like 19?
FJ!!
"The cow is her own mistress." - Marina Muilwijk
XAOS
news:30az3.243$PF3....@ndnws01.ne.mediaone.net...> >Anna Paquin - Rogue
>
> And what's with Rogue being, like 19?
> FJ!!
Well, in all fairness, she was supposed to be, like, 14 when she joined up.
- Steve, purveyor of arcane x-knowledge
Clayton Colwell
: FJ!! <f...@spdcc.com> wrote in message
: news:30az3.243$PF3....@ndnws01.ne.mediaone.net...
: > In article <7qernn$7u1$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>,
: > XAOS <xa...@mindspring.com> wrote:
: > >Anna Paquin - Rogue
: >
: > And what's with Rogue being, like 19?
: > FJ!!
: Well, in all fairness, she was supposed to be, like, 14 when she joined up.
You have *got* to be fuckin' kidding me. She was with, what,
the Sisterhood of Evil Mutants (Mystique and Destiny), getting
all pissed off at Dazzler for getting in her way, in her *early*
*teens*? She was off siphoning Carol Danvers' power as a *child*?
She was getting her clock cleaned by Carol Danvers (now Binary)
as a *kiddie*?
-- Clay, probably the only person in the world with a full collection
of Dazzler comic books
FJ!!
Clayton Colwell <er...@bga.com> wrote:
>XAOS (xa...@mindspring.com) wrote:
>: Well, in all fairness, she was supposed to be, like, 14 when she joined up.
>You have *got* to be fuckin' kidding me. She was with, what,
>the Sisterhood of Evil Mutants (Mystique and Destiny), getting
>all pissed off at Dazzler for getting in her way, in her *early*
>*teens*? She was off siphoning Carol Danvers' power as a *child*?
>She was getting her clock cleaned by Carol Danvers (now Binary)
>as a *kiddie*?
She had those tits at 14? She was as tall as Binary at 14?
Is this a Shazam The Comic/Shazam The Series thing?
FJ!! (Jubilee.
Sprite/Ariel/Shadowcat.
The Fallen
Angels. Those
were 14.)
"Should we be saving our dryer lint for you?" -- Robert Coren
XAOS
> XAOS (xa...@mindspring.com) wrote:
> : Well, in all fairness, she was supposed to be, like, 14 when she joined
up.
>
> You have *got* to be fuckin' kidding me. She was with, what,
> the Sisterhood of Evil Mutants (Mystique and Destiny), getting
> all pissed off at Dazzler for getting in her way, in her *early*
> *teens*? She was off siphoning Carol Danvers' power as a *child*?
> She was getting her clock cleaned by Carol Danvers (now Binary)
> as a *kiddie*?
So sayeth the Claremont, so mote it be.
> -- Clay, probably the only person in the world with a full collection
> of Dazzler comic books
The first step is admitting there's a problem =P
- Steve
Clayton Colwell
: Clayton Colwell <er...@bga.com> wrote in message
: news:37cd6...@feed1.realtime.net...
: > XAOS (xa...@mindspring.com) wrote:
: > : Well, in all fairness, she was supposed to be, like, 14 when she joined
: up.
: >
: > You have *got* to be fuckin' kidding me. She was with, what,
: > the Sisterhood of Evil Mutants (Mystique and Destiny), getting
: > all pissed off at Dazzler for getting in her way, in her *early*
: > *teens*? She was off siphoning Carol Danvers' power as a *child*?
: > She was getting her clock cleaned by Carol Danvers (now Binary)
: > as a *kiddie*?
: So sayeth the Claremont, so mote it be.
Piffles. It doesn't add up that a Rogue of 14 would look so
much older than a Dazzler of 20. (Find a Dazzler comic and
just *look* at Rogue -- she's a bleedin' double for Mary Worth!)
(Or did the Siege Perilous just recreate her whole-sale?)
: > -- Clay, probably the only person in the world with a full collection
: > of Dazzler comic books
: The first step is admitting there's a problem =P
Unfortunately, one of the cats expressed its opinion of the
_Beauty and the Beast_ mini-series with a steady stream. :-(
(Can't say I blame it much -- both art and story lacked in
that one.)
-- Clay, who got a letter published in a Dazzler comic, but
whose letter was gutted down to exactly one sentence
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Piffles. It doesn't add up that a Rogue of 14 would look so
> much older than a Dazzler of 20. (Find a Dazzler comic and
> just *look* at Rogue -- she's a bleedin' double for Mary Worth!)
Yah. But I seem to remember reading summink about a miscommunication
between Claremont (or who(m)ever) and the artist on Dazzler (which I,
too, have a complete run of (somewhere), scarily enough). She was
designed with two white streaks of hair (which were supposed to be all
punk! and wild!), and the artist though "Hey, she's got gray hair; she
must be ooold. Like, real old. Man." and went all Aunt May for her.
So there!
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
la...@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
John Dorrance
> Looking at those pictures is a strange, nostalgic experience.
> I have a picture in there that was taken in early 1991, when I
> was (obviously) 8 years younger and 45lbs lighter (I was so
> skinny!)
Fer sher. I have trouble believing I was as scrawny as those
pictures show. Looking at them makes me feel a lot better about
being a bit overweight now.
John
Mike Lane
My 275 lb ass agrees.
--
ML
fight bigotry and affectation now
------
"You and your fucking puffy cheeks. Shut up already you moron."
--Will "on the" Brink