Origins of the subhuman negroid
Ronald C. Schoedel, III
We will present evidence why the Negroid is indeed not human, but
subhuman or prehuman. We will present evidence that we should look upon
the Negroid as simply another animal that God created.
1. All humans decent from Adam & Eve. Adam & Eve were white.
The book we call the Bible is a family His(S)tory of God's people-- the
generations of Adam and more specifically of his descendants through
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. All Scriptural evidence indicates Adam
was created a white man. The name "ADAM" (aw-dawm') in Hebrew means a
"ruddy human being" (Strong's O.T. #120). It is derived from Strong's
O.T. #119 - ADAM (aw-dam'), which means "to show blood (in the face),
i.e. flush or turn rosy." One geneticist describes the attributes of
skin color as follows:
"The color of normal human skin is due to the presence of three kinds of
colored chemicals, or pigments. The most important of these pigments is
melanin, a dark-brown substance... The second of the three pigments is
carotene. This is a yellow substance, which is present in carrots (from
which it gets its name) and egg yokes as well as human skin... The third
pigment is hemoglobin, which is the red coloring matter of blood...the
hemoglobin occurs in the blood vessels beneath the skin, so that very
little can show through. The presence of fair amounts of either melanin
or carotene in the skin covers it up completely. Hemoglobin does show up
however in the skin of white men, particularly in those of light
complexion. It is the hemoglobin that accounts for pink cheeks and the
ability to blush." -William C. Boyd, Ph.D. 'Races and People' (1955)
pp.43-45
Adam was fair and white which caused the hemoglobin (blood) to show in
his skin making him look "ruddy" or to give him a "flush" look. Thus the
word "ADAM" is a descriptive name but here indicates certain physical
characteristics that the man Adam possessed. It is a common practice in
both Hebrew and English languages to name something according to some
*outstanding feature* or characteristic. We thus call a bird a
"red-headed woodpecker" because it has a red head and pecks wood.
Adam was evidently called or named "ADAM" because he possessed 'aw-dam'
characteristics - that being of a ruddy or rosy complexion coming from
the blood (hemoglobin) showing through his non-pigmented skin. This is
what ADAM meant. People of a very fair complexion often appear as though
they are reddish or sun burnt since the hemoglobin readily shows through
their skin. This was the case with Adam and Eve.
It is argued that other racial types get rosy cheeked as well and
"blush". Two facts that they can't argue with is that other races just
don't show "blood in the face" as pronounced as the white race can and
secondly one never asks if these other races "who blush" have any white
mixed into their past generations. Regardless, the ability to "blush,
turn rosy" is an outstanding feature of the fair skinned white race. The
word "ADAM" was a descriptive term to describe this outstanding feature
of Adam & Eve over the other races.
That Adam and Eve were of the white race with this fair, ruddy or rosy
complexion is verified in the Bible by the descriptions of their
descendants. King David, who was one of Adam's direct descendants, was
described as being "ruddy, and have fair countenance." (I Samuel 16:12
and 17:42) David's daughter Tamar was "fair" (2 Samuel 13:1). Sarah and
Rebekah, who was both descendants from Adam, were both described as
being "very fair" (Genesis 12:11,14; Gen. 24:16; Gen. 26:7). The
daughters of Job, one of the Adamic patriarchs, were known as the
fairest women "in all the land" (Job 42:15). Solomon was described as
being "white and ruddy" (Song of Solomon 5:10). The Nazarites
(consecrated persons) of Judah were "whiter than milk" and "more ruddy
in body than rubies" (Lamentations 4:7).
2. Where do Negroids fit in?
They are prehuman or subhuman. The Bible suggests this. So does science.
The book of Genesis provides most of this evidence. For example, after
Cain killed Abel he was cursed and driven out of the land by God. In the
fourth chapter of Genesis, Cain makes the statement:
"I shall be a FUGITIVE and a vagabond in the earth: it shall come to
pass, that EVERY ONE that findeth me shall slay me."
If only Adam and Eve existed, then who was Cain afraid of that would
kill him? Who was it that he would be a fugitive from? It is quite clear
that the "every one" which Cain was referring to could not be Adam and
Eve. Who was Cain referring to? Cain was well aware that many subhumans
existed in the lands around them. God verifies this fact in His response
to Cain in verse 15. God told Cain that "whosoever" of the other
“people” that might slay you, vengeance shall be on that person. Why did
God have to give Cain an identifying mark (Cain was turned into a
Negroid) if the only other people that existed (Adam and Eve) knew Cain
perfectly well? This mark was not a signal so Adam and Eve could
recognize Cain, but rather so that "any" of the other subhumans then
living could recognize Cain upon their "finding him."
If Adam and Eve were the first and only people at this time, then from
where did Cain find a wife? Not only was he able to find a wife, but
there were obviously enough subhumans to be part of the city built by
Cain. Cain's marriage, the birth of his son Enoch, and his building of a
city all took place before the birth of Seth. All these circumstances
thus point to the existence of men independent of Adam. Cain therefore,
was the first person to practice bestiality.
The Bible is quite clear about they’re being many subhumans on the earth
at the time of the story of Adam and Eve. The Bible does not support the
idea that Adam and Eve gave birth to all the different races on the
earth, but rather implies that Adam and Eve were a separate creation in
the midst of other people who existed prior to them. Since these
subhuman people existed before Adam, they are called "pre-Adamic."
Adam was a special creation who was called for God's own purpose. The
Bible, and Genesis specifically, is not a comprehensive account on all
of God's creation. What is covered is just the history God felt relevant
to include. The Bible simply does not detail the creation and origin of
any other people besides the Adamic family, though we read about these
other people later in the Bible. This understanding will eventually end
the false arguments over the two wrong concepts of Evolution vs.
Creation.
We could go into many more details and examples but space will not
permit. Again, we recommend Charles Weisman's excellent book "Origins of
Race and Civilization" for more details.
3. Wouldn’t the flood of killed out all the prehumans in the Bible?
No, because Adam and Eve would of included two of the Negroids, as well
as all the other animals.
4. Are we called to hate the Negroid?
No, they cannot help being born subhuman. It is like hating a dog for
being a dog. Negroids do commit crime at very high levels, but that is
because like all other animals, they have no soul and thus no
conscience.
5. What does science have to say about Negroids?
Evolution is a myth. However, we can also argue from their standpoint
that Negroids are subhuman or prehuman.
Scientific evidence also proves the Negroids are prehuman or subhuman.
Fossil evidence indicates that negroids have been around for at least 3
million years before the humans arrived. If you are into evolution, this
is a chart for you to examine
Ape>>Negroids>>Cave Man>>Humans.
It is clear by scientific evidence that the Negroids is at least two
steps behind the human in evolution. Clearly they are inferior.
6. What are differences between Negroids and humans?
Many…here are just a few
· Negroids have a smaller brain
· Negroids have 50 percent less brain cells in the frontal lobe. That is
the portion that controls rational and abstract though
· The Negroid skull is twice as thick as human skull
· The teeth of the Negroid is much larger
· The nose of the Negroid is flared at the nostrils, closely resembling
the ape
· The eyes of the Negroid are always brown, with quite often a tint of
yellow like the ape.
· The angle of the skull of the Negroid is 72 degrees vs. 82 degrees for
humans. Apes have a skull angle of 67 percent.
· The lips of the Negroid have lots more fatty tissue and are turned
inside out
· The Negroid has an awful smell that is repulsive to humans. There are
three reasons for this
o The Negroid has larger sweat glands. Sweat stinks
o The Negroid has a mating smell that in like animals is used to attract
a mate. It smells horrible to humans, but smells good to them.
o The Negroid has a lot more melanin in their cells. Melanin stinks,
ever smell cheap suntan lotion? That is melanin.
The tailbone of the Negroid is extended out, kind of looks a tail on an
x-ray. That is why Negroids appear to have larger rear ends.
The Negroid arms and legs are longer. This is what makes them faster
runners than humans.
The Negroid penis is actually smaller than the human penis on average.
They only appear to be larger because of all the fatty tissues that are
on the Negroid penis.
7. What should we do about Negroids?
Stay away from them, and only contact them when needed. Violence against
them only plays into their hands. Remember, it is not their fault for
being a Negroid, they were born that species
8. Should we witness Christ to Negroids?
No, Negroids have no soul, therefore, can never go into heaven or hell.
They are simply destroyed like the rest of God’s creatures.
Ronald C. Schoedel, III
Christian Identity
Stephen K. Gielda
says...
> Hey fuckwit, let's see how much fun you have when everyone starts responding
> to your real e-mail addy.
>
>
Why do you fall for this? Look at the crossposts. It is an obvious
attempt to begin a cross newsgroup fight and get people upset at the
poster. For that reason it is highly likely that Ron is NOT the poster
but rather someone is spoofing him to cause him trouble. Which you just
helped by digging up another e-mail. Think before responding to crap
like this...
/steve
--
Stephen K. Gielda
http://www.cotse.com
The Church of the Swimming Elephant
Have you gone to church today?
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <38989D1E...@arcticmail.com> in alt.revisionism, on Wed, 02
Feb 2000 16:09:50 -0500, "Ronald C. Schoedel, III"
<r...@arcticmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
What is your interest in smearing Ronald Schoedel who quite some ago
left the Christian Identity movement and repudiated racism?
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOJi0EpQgvG272fn9EQK4ZgCeI4zqMQOEataVeDAOEbGqZu4IxFYAoIlJ
+LkHPgFRU0oaq1n42SaKVsFu
=VLdI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
M.McGill
<r...@arcticmail.com> wrote:
> Origins & Facts about the subhuman Negroid
> < Big snip>
The Genuis and Jew Albert Einstein (see _Einstein's God : Albert
Einstein's Quest As a Scientist and As a Jew to Replace a Forsaken God_ by
Robert N. Goldman, Albert Einstein) who gave us the theory of Relativity
which replaced or rather expaned Newtonian physics had a comparitively
moderately small sized brain, while one of the largest brains on record
was that of an idiot.
Look at Rushton, "_Race Evolution and Behavior_". Rushton points out that
the average size of African-American brains is higher than that of Swedes.
The more primitive Homo sapiens neanderthalensis--"Neanderthal Man of Europe
had an average brain capacity of 1400-1500 cc, greater than modern humans.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.highnorth.no/br-si-bo.htm
Should we rank animals in order of
how large their brains are in relation to their body
weight, then the mouse would come out on top with its brain
comprising 3.2%, the dolphin's 0.9% and the sperm
whale's 0,021%. Neither absolute brain weight nor the relationship
between brain weight and body size provide us with
sensible criteria for comparing the intelligence of different species.
Species Brain weight Body weight Brain weight
(gram) (tonn) as % of
body weight
Man 1500 0,07 2,1
Bottlenose dolphin 1600 0,17 0,94
Dolphin 840 0,11 0,74
Asian elephant 7500 5,0 0,15
Killer whale 5620 6,0 0,094
Cow 500 0,5 0,1
Pilot whale 2670 3,5 0,076
Sperm whale 7820 37,0 0,021
Fin whale 6930 90,0 0,008
Mouse 0,4 0,000,012 3,2
------------------------------------------------------------------
If it can be shown conclusively by the most careful and painstaking
experimentation that the brain of the Negro is not as fully developed as
that of the Caucasian, it will be an important step, indeed, toward a
scientific disposition of the question. A number of experiments have been
made...I have selected...the one made by Dr. Franklin P. Mall...because
the method of approach and the conditions under which the experiments were
carried on were of such a nature as to lessen the possibility of error to
a greater degree than perhaps is the case of other studies. Dr. Mall's
experiments were made in the Anatomical Laboratories of John Hopkins
University with the very best instruments obtainable, and with extreme
caution against influences that might have affected the results in any
way. I understand that Dr. Mall did not know what race the brains
represented while the study was in progress; furthermore, human brains
were selected from heads of the same cephalic type. The details of the
method used and its results are too technical to treat at length in this
paper. His conclusions, however, entirely disprove the claims of some
earlier investigators that the Negro brain represents a more embryonic
type than that of the White man...There were individual differences in
both races of approximately equal extent, but no racial differences of
significance were discovered.**
Mall says concerning the anatomy of the Negro:
...We have made many thousands of records of nerve variations and find in
them NO racial peculiarities.
Source:
_American Journal Of Sociology_ Vol.33 1927-1928, Chapter "The Negro: Is
he a biological inferior?" pages 257-258 by James M. Reinhardt-Assistant
Professor of Sociology, University of North Dakota.
**Franklin P. Mall, _American Journal of Anatomy_, Vol.IX, No.1.
Selections reprinted in the _Atlanta University publications_, No. 20;
also in _Outlines of Sociology by C.M. Chase.
-------------------------
Long "Stork like" legs of some negroid types which are longer than
whites is opposite of apes. The shorter legs of whites is more like Apes.
The Caucasian Alpines have broad heads, whereas the Caucasian Nordics
have long heads. The negro is also long-headed, like the Nordic or North
European...The broad-headed Alpine white is most like the ape in respect
to head formation and the Negro and North European most un ape-like...
The kinky hair and the absence of hair on the body (of the negro) ..in
these traits the white man is more ape-like than the negro. The lips of
the ape (Chimpanzees, Gorillas and Orangutans) are also thin and
grayish, like those of the Nordic, in contrast to the thick red lips of
the negro.
Source:
_American Journal Of Sociology_ Vol.33 1927-1928, Chapter "The Negro: Is
he a biological inferior?" pages 252, 253, and 254 by James M.
Reinhardt-Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of North Dakota.
------------------------------
http://www.humanevolution.net/a/africanamerican.html
Thus, the human penis shows high species-specificity as an elaborated
genital structure. Penis size also varies moderately across populations,
being largest among African populations, smaller among European
populations, and smallest among East Asian populations, but with
substantial overlap (Rushton, 1987, 1988b, 1989b)
Whitey
<r...@arcticmail.com> wrote:
>Origins & Facts about the subhuman Negroid
>
>We will present evidence why the Negroid is indeed not human, but
>subhuman or prehuman. We will present evidence that we should look upon
>the Negroid as simply another animal that God created.
>
>1. All humans decent from Adam & Eve. Adam & Eve were white.
>
<snippage>
No need to go any further. Ron, I was correct - you really HAVEN'T
gotten any cleverer or more dangerous since you got your dumb ass
mercilessly spanked on alt.food.dennys. But, if you want to believe
allegory as literal fact then far be it from me to bust your little
bong bubble there, Forrest. But I will point out that if you are going
to bring God into the discussion you will have to bring it ALL in,
including the parts where we are admonished to love thy neighbor and
to leave the judging to God and not man. You cannot read the mind of
God, Ron, even with the word "Reverend" before your name. God does not
want you to hate, or to disrespect his creations. And I read the same
Bible you supposedly did, and I come to different conclusions. So now
the issue becomes why should we believe YOUR interpretation over
anyone else's? And after reading your whole tirade of bullshit and
blasphemy I noticed it was utterly devoid of the "facts" that the
opening line promised.
Byte Me.
GARRYOWEN!
