info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A string theory for WWN (updated)
2 views
Skip to first unread message
agc...@gmail.com
Feb 8, 2018, 3:33:39 AM2/8/18
to
The string theory (STforWWN) suggests a form of people interactions in the WWN (that was described at alt.global.chat YACAA4OA2pk).
If the number of persons in the every group is small enough, for example 256, it becomes possible to take into account social and personal preferences inside the group and between neighbouring groups.
Let's begin with the forming inside a group where everyone provides a list of ratings of own personal preferences. If someone not submits the list, his/her preferences are established randomly.
Having the lists, it become possible to determine the most preferred person(s), MPP, with the maximum social, i.e. total, rating (TR). The MPP (if there are several of them, then one is selected randomly) gets the right to choose someone for interaction. In this point, a conflict of his/her preference and social ones is possible. For example, if MPP has selected a person with minimal TR, then the person gets the right to choose from people with a higher TR, i.e. gets the right, which is the opposite of the right by which MPP was elected. So the MPP should choose a person with next TR (it is possible that several people have equal values of TR, so for MPP may be space for choosing).
After the MPP1 has made choice CH1, MPP1 should be excluded from consideration and the CH1 becomes MPP2. And so on. Such way it will form horizontal chain, string, of social and personal preferences.
Similarly vertical strings are formed.
It should be noted that we should allow a random choices in the cases of indifferent preferences and in the cases of equality of intellects when groups create. And that the groups and the strings should be created periodically.
If the number of persons in the every group is small enough, for example 256, it becomes possible to take into account social and personal preferences inside the group and between neighbouring groups.
Let's begin with the forming inside a group where everyone provides a list of ratings of own personal preferences. If someone not submits the list, his/her preferences are established randomly.
Having the lists, it become possible to determine the most preferred person(s), MPP, with the maximum social, i.e. total, rating (TR). The MPP (if there are several of them, then one is selected randomly) gets the right to choose someone for interaction. In this point, a conflict of his/her preference and social ones is possible. For example, if MPP has selected a person with minimal TR, then the person gets the right to choose from people with a higher TR, i.e. gets the right, which is the opposite of the right by which MPP was elected. So the MPP should choose a person with next TR (it is possible that several people have equal values of TR, so for MPP may be space for choosing).
After the MPP1 has made choice CH1, MPP1 should be excluded from consideration and the CH1 becomes MPP2. And so on. Such way it will form horizontal chain, string, of social and personal preferences.
Similarly vertical strings are formed.
It should be noted that we should allow a random choices in the cases of indifferent preferences and in the cases of equality of intellects when groups create. And that the groups and the strings should be created periodically.
0 new messages