Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: AIN IT GREAT
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 9, 2018, 12:45:34 PM4/9/18
to
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:27:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <tbdkcdlih0hkpdh27...@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>
>> >Now about Miss Shitty... I realize most women can't stand you, but you
>> >really should be a little more particular about standing them.
>>
>> Miss Kitty is really pretty cool. As you can see,
>> she's smarter than you'd like to admit judging
>> from the way she's got turkey, you and a few
>> other Rubes all lathered up. Admit it, you pine
>> away for her when she's absent and when she
>> returns you go overboard expressing your hidden
>> admiration by hanging on her every post. LOL!
>>
>> Miss Kitty PWN3S you!
>>
>
>Miss Shitty is about as "sharp" as a wet rag. Notice how, when
>confronted by some of her previous vitriol, her response was she didn't
>remember posting it, or she was getting frogged a lot? That fat bitch
>doesn't even remember the shit that spews from her own mouth, then tries
>to deny it ever happened. She's nothing but a vicious, toxic, nasty
>cunt, and she got beat down pretty throughly... again. She'll still
>resurface in a couple of months and try to act like nothing ever
>happened, and it'll end the same way it always does. Misogynist that you
>are, she should be at the top of your list. She's going to get shit from
>me and others anytime she waddles her fat ass in here, I can assure you.
>
>Her little "outing" adventure sure blew up in her fat pie-face, didn't
>it? "Ken," "Jim," and "Rick" were laughing their asses off... even
>"Kensi" for fuck's sake. You don't even have to offer her outing-bait...
>she finds her own!
All girls are like that. They can't help it because
their hormones cloud their logic. As a man, you
should understand this simple fact and cut them
some slack. You don't have to agree with them,
but you should not sink to their level of catty
discourse in your rebuttals of their clouded thinking
by being mean-spirited and catty yourself. Rise
above it, man! Don't surrender to your inner fag!
Women are, in most ways, just bigger little girls.
They never really grow up and become adults. They
have a difficult time controlling their tempers. They
view the world in unrealistic ways (them at the very
center). Growing up requires logic and an even keel
and their hormones deny them both of these adult
attributes. Their brains remain childish. Women are
not so hard to get along with if you realize this and
act accordingly.
What I try to do with women is ignore the bad and
embrace the good. In this manner, very little time
is wasted as the bad far outweighs the good. Their
bodies represent the good, sometimes astonishingly,
spectacularly good so objectify them. That's a good
thing, a wonderful thing, a fun thing for a man.
Because of a man's reproductive desires, the female
body evolved, to be spectacularly desirable to him.
Irresistable even, but at the expense of her mind
which can be said to be devolved, ergo it only needs
to be tolerated. (As kensi and Nads sub par minds
are tolerated in these groups.)
So, it's a given their minds that are clearly
insufficient. Should they become sufficiently
inebriated, it allows their bodies to take over
for a time. Their minds welcome the release from
a workload and a world they never really evolved
to cope with - not in a fast-paced, modern
industrial society, at any rate.
What man really wants to fuck a very desirable
body with an insufficient mind running interference
and mucking up the works? Most men are pedophiles
when it comes to fucking a woman, anyhow. Just
ask the Colonel who is honest enough to admit it.
So, foster that little girl who wants out to come
out, dude. So what if she throws a temper
tantrum from time to time? Kiss it and make
it better. Or, if she's being real bratty, spank
her comely bottom red and give her just what she
asked for. That's fun, too if you're man enough
to understand, accept and handle it like a man.
HTH
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall
"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
> In article <tbdkcdlih0hkpdh27...@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>
>> >Now about Miss Shitty... I realize most women can't stand you, but you
>> >really should be a little more particular about standing them.
>>
>> Miss Kitty is really pretty cool. As you can see,
>> she's smarter than you'd like to admit judging
>> from the way she's got turkey, you and a few
>> other Rubes all lathered up. Admit it, you pine
>> away for her when she's absent and when she
>> returns you go overboard expressing your hidden
>> admiration by hanging on her every post. LOL!
>>
>> Miss Kitty PWN3S you!
>>
>
>Miss Shitty is about as "sharp" as a wet rag. Notice how, when
>confronted by some of her previous vitriol, her response was she didn't
>remember posting it, or she was getting frogged a lot? That fat bitch
>doesn't even remember the shit that spews from her own mouth, then tries
>to deny it ever happened. She's nothing but a vicious, toxic, nasty
>cunt, and she got beat down pretty throughly... again. She'll still
>resurface in a couple of months and try to act like nothing ever
>happened, and it'll end the same way it always does. Misogynist that you
>are, she should be at the top of your list. She's going to get shit from
>me and others anytime she waddles her fat ass in here, I can assure you.
>
>Her little "outing" adventure sure blew up in her fat pie-face, didn't
>it? "Ken," "Jim," and "Rick" were laughing their asses off... even
>"Kensi" for fuck's sake. You don't even have to offer her outing-bait...
>she finds her own!
All girls are like that. They can't help it because
their hormones cloud their logic. As a man, you
should understand this simple fact and cut them
some slack. You don't have to agree with them,
but you should not sink to their level of catty
discourse in your rebuttals of their clouded thinking
by being mean-spirited and catty yourself. Rise
above it, man! Don't surrender to your inner fag!
Women are, in most ways, just bigger little girls.
They never really grow up and become adults. They
have a difficult time controlling their tempers. They
view the world in unrealistic ways (them at the very
center). Growing up requires logic and an even keel
and their hormones deny them both of these adult
attributes. Their brains remain childish. Women are
not so hard to get along with if you realize this and
act accordingly.
What I try to do with women is ignore the bad and
embrace the good. In this manner, very little time
is wasted as the bad far outweighs the good. Their
bodies represent the good, sometimes astonishingly,
spectacularly good so objectify them. That's a good
thing, a wonderful thing, a fun thing for a man.
Because of a man's reproductive desires, the female
body evolved, to be spectacularly desirable to him.
Irresistable even, but at the expense of her mind
which can be said to be devolved, ergo it only needs
to be tolerated. (As kensi and Nads sub par minds
are tolerated in these groups.)
So, it's a given their minds that are clearly
insufficient. Should they become sufficiently
inebriated, it allows their bodies to take over
for a time. Their minds welcome the release from
a workload and a world they never really evolved
to cope with - not in a fast-paced, modern
industrial society, at any rate.
What man really wants to fuck a very desirable
body with an insufficient mind running interference
and mucking up the works? Most men are pedophiles
when it comes to fucking a woman, anyhow. Just
ask the Colonel who is honest enough to admit it.
So, foster that little girl who wants out to come
out, dude. So what if she throws a temper
tantrum from time to time? Kiss it and make
it better. Or, if she's being real bratty, spank
her comely bottom red and give her just what she
asked for. That's fun, too if you're man enough
to understand, accept and handle it like a man.
HTH
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall
"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Jeff-Relf.Me
Apr 9, 2018, 1:41:33 PM4/9/18
to
Speaking of Hillary and/or a donkey, Gregory Hall wrote:
> spank her comely bottom red and
> give her just what she asked for.
Do you like it when she honks " Hee... Haw.. " ? !
> spank her comely bottom red and
> give her just what she asked for.
U.S. tax records show that 50% of adults were married in 2015,
down from 72% in 1960. Today: - Men won't be cash machines.
- Women won't humor InLaws. and - NoseyNancy MatchMakers are scorned.
Marriage is a bad bet, here in the U.S.;
still, there's no shortage of "gamblers"
who'd destroy themselves and others because
they "enjoy the ride" -- math isn't their friend.
"The house" ( the government ) always wins;
so they promote it ( babies, gambling ).
Checkmate
Apr 9, 2018, 2:44:42 PM4/9/18
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <9k4ncdp43efod7d0v...@4ax.com>,
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
Yeah, but she's just not good enough for me. She's certainly not the
type you'd take home to mother, and she'd throw a scene in a crowd at the
drop of a hat. It wouldn't even matter if she was hot (which she's not).
I have zero tolerance for that type of fee-male.
--
Checkmate ®
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
"There are many here among us,
who feel that life is but a joke."
Checkmate! In article <9k4ncdp43efod7d0v...@4ax.com>,
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
type you'd take home to mother, and she'd throw a scene in a crowd at the
drop of a hat. It wouldn't even matter if she was hot (which she's not).
I have zero tolerance for that type of fee-male.
--
Checkmate ®
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
"There are many here among us,
who feel that life is but a joke."
%
Apr 9, 2018, 2:47:09 PM4/9/18
to
benj
Apr 9, 2018, 5:26:59 PM4/9/18
to
you go same sex or interspecies marriage...
Colonel Edmund J. Burke
Apr 9, 2018, 10:38:30 PM4/9/18
to
You mean turd key.
LOL
%
Apr 9, 2018, 10:40:33 PM4/9/18
to
Nadegda
Apr 12, 2018, 1:14:28 AM4/12/18
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
That's right, kook, keep showing your kooky devotion to us.
<snicker>
> So, it's a given their minds that are clearly insufficient. Should they
> become sufficiently inebriated, it allows their bodies to take over for
> a time. Their minds welcome the release from a workload and a world they
> never really evolved to cope with - not in a fast-paced, modern
> industrial society, at any rate.
>
> What man really wants to fuck a very desirable body with an insufficient
> mind running interference and mucking up the works? Most men are
> pedophiles when it comes to fucking a woman, anyhow. Just ask the
> Colonel who is honest enough to admit it.
I suspect you're speaking only for yourself here, Pedophile.
> So, foster that little girl who wants out to come out, dude. So what if
> she throws a temper tantrum from time to time? Kiss it and make it
> better.
Why don't you kiss this instead? (points loaded bazooka at glurgzlz)
> Or, if she's being real bratty, spank her comely bottom red and
> give her just what she asked for. That's fun, too if you're man enough
> to understand, accept and handle it like a man.
>
> HTH
Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
start again.
[FU2: dropped sci.physics]
--
FNVWe Nadegda
Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
<snicker>
> So, it's a given their minds that are clearly insufficient. Should they
> become sufficiently inebriated, it allows their bodies to take over for
> a time. Their minds welcome the release from a workload and a world they
> never really evolved to cope with - not in a fast-paced, modern
> industrial society, at any rate.
>
> What man really wants to fuck a very desirable body with an insufficient
> mind running interference and mucking up the works? Most men are
> pedophiles when it comes to fucking a woman, anyhow. Just ask the
> Colonel who is honest enough to admit it.
> So, foster that little girl who wants out to come out, dude. So what if
> she throws a temper tantrum from time to time? Kiss it and make it
> better.
> Or, if she's being real bratty, spank her comely bottom red and
> give her just what she asked for. That's fun, too if you're man enough
> to understand, accept and handle it like a man.
>
> HTH
the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
start again.
[FU2: dropped sci.physics]
--
FNVWe Nadegda
Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 12, 2018, 4:47:44 PM4/12/18
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:14:25 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:44:53 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Pedophile wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:27:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <tbdkcdlih0hkpdh27...@4ax.com>,greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:44:53 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Pedophile wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:27:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, it's a given their minds that are clearly insufficient. Should they
>> become sufficiently inebriated, it allows their bodies to take over for
>> a time. Their minds welcome the release from a workload and a world they
>> never really evolved to cope with - not in a fast-paced, modern
>> industrial society, at any rate.
>>
>> What man really wants to fuck a very desirable body with an insufficient
>> mind running interference and mucking up the works? Most men are
>> pedophiles when it comes to fucking a woman, anyhow. Just ask the
>> Colonel who is honest enough to admit it.
>
>I suspect you're speaking only for yourself here, Pedophile.
>> So, foster that little girl who wants out to come out, dude. So what if
>> she throws a temper tantrum from time to time? Kiss it and make it
>> better.
>
>Why don't you kiss this instead? (points loaded bazooka at glurgzlz)
>> Or, if she's being real bratty, spank her comely bottom red and
>> give her just what she asked for. That's fun, too if you're man enough
>> to understand, accept and handle it like a man.
>>
>> HTH
>
>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>start again.
to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
copulate with his wife.
Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
the rabid feminist's florid imagination. LOL. A woman really
has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
than not.
dolf
Apr 12, 2018, 4:55:00 PM4/12/18
to
WE STAND WITH ISRAEL': CURTIS RONA THROWS SUPPORT BEHIND ISRAEL FOLAU:
Waratahs and Wallabies winger Curtis Rona has thrown his support behind
Israel Folau on a day where the dual international posted another defiant,
cryptic message on his Instagram account more than a week after he came
under attack for a controversial remark about gay people.
Rona posted an Instagram story on Thursday morning to profess his support
for Folau, quoting a passage from the Bible and saying "We stand with
#IsraelFolau".
The biblical passage was taken from the Gospel of John in the New
Testament: "Jesus answered, 'I am the way the truth and the life no one
comes to the father except through me'".
The three-Test Wallaby, who joined the Waratahs this season, is also a
devout Christian and looks up to the team's decorated fullback. They share
a history in rugby league, with Rona playing for the Cowboys and Bulldogs
before returning to rugby with the Western Force last year.”
<https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/we-stand-with-israel-curtis-rona-throws-support-behind-israel-folau-20180412-p4z97w.html>
“And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye
that work iniquity.” [Matthew 7:23 (KJV)]
I would suggest that we are dealing with persons whom are psycho-sexually
immature or have a retarded development and since the entire Categories of
Understanding of the trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon are
embedded within the Bible as HEBREW / GREEK lexicon due to this
cosmological observation:
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTS*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
For this logical reason, then the quoting of a grab bag Biblical texts is
often observed as sympathetic or symptomatic of a psychological disordered
or a delusional state of mind—but nevertheless may give clues as to the
locus of the psychiatric condition by its self referencing Categories of
Understanding as which is in acute distress by its disordered state of
being and is in need of medical intervention.
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21
March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with SEPTET #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die Natali,
claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as preceeding
PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the Pythagorean
doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of 364 and a half
days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE-220CE)
understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them. [Pythagorean
Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the ternary
(tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 - ACCUMULATION, which is
mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of necessity some are repeated)
as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE,
GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL
ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into #81
sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD
will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7
(KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE* {9 x 9 x 9 =
#729 / 2 = 364.5}: It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400
years in the Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when
made divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of
the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year
into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic
square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for
the equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
#YOD = 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is the Mind of
Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +
#MEM = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran (Chinese) / COURSE-trochos
(Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +
#TAU = 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +
#ALEPH = 23 SEPTEMBER 2001 {23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}
WITH REGARD TO THIS: “That given such habitual travesty of an uncaring
culture as administration of justice, I will be seeking consultation with
the Community Mental Health Service to review my circumstance of
"hyper-arousal of the central nervous system and stress of the startle
reflex" which although previously required "no further follow-up and the
referral was closed", I now feel has after 30 years relapsed to a
circumstance requiring acute and perhaps lengthy (ie. 5 year duration)
care.”
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION OF
A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”
[John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Most readers would realise that our Y-M-T-A model applies equally to the
New York / Pentagon TERRORIST EVENT of 11 September 2001:
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY IN SOVEREIGNTY AS OUR PRIME MINISTER JOHN
HOWARD IN NEW YORK ON 10 SEPTEMBER
2001
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE CUSTODIAL SEIZURE
OF #41 - CENTRE {#6000 % 22 = 13} ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2001
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT AS EQUINOX @ 2305 HOURS
(GMT) UPON 22 SEPTEMBER 2001
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:23.5>
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE #REPRISE OF THE WEEK UPON SUNDAY
<https://www.hebcal.com/hebcal/?v=1&maj=on&min=on&nx=on&mod=on&o=on&i=off&year=2001&month=x&yt=G&lg=a&d=on&c=off&geo=geoname&zip=&city=&geonameid=&b=18&m=50&.s=Create+Calendar#cal-2001-09>
“Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer
thou me.
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou
hast understanding.
Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched
the line upon it?
Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner
stone thereof;
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for
joy?
Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued
out of the womb?
When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a
swaddlingband for it,
And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,
And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy
proud waves be stayed?
Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to
know his place;
That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be
shaken out of it?
It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment.
And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the high arm shall be
broken.
Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the
search of the depth?
Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors
of the shadow of death?
Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it
all.
Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the
place thereof,
That thou shouldest take it to the bound thereof, and that thou shouldest
know the paths to the house thereof?
Knowest thou it, because thou wast then born? or because the number of thy
days is great?
Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the
treasures of the hail,
Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of
battle and war?
By what way is the light parted, which scattereth the east wind upon the
earth?
Who hath divided a watercourse for the overflowing of waters, or a way for
the lightning of thunder;
To cause it to rain on the earth, where no man [is; on] the wilderness,
wherein there is no man;
To satisfy the desolate and waste ground; and to cause the bud of the
tender herb to spring forth?
Hath the rain a father? or who hath begotten the drops of dew?
Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who hath
gendered it?
The waters are hid as with a stone, and the face of the deep is frozen.
Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of
Orion?
Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide
Arcturus with his sons?
Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof
in the earth?
Canst thou lift up thy voice to the clouds, that abundance of waters may
cover thee?
Canst thou send lightnings, that they may go, and say unto thee, Here we
are?
Who hath put wisdom in the inward parts? or who hath given understanding to
the heart?
Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven,
When the dust groweth into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together?
Wilt thou hunt the prey for the lion? or fill the appetite of the young
lions,
When they couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait?
41 Who provideth for the raven his food? when his young ones cry unto God,
they wander for lack of meat.” [Job 36:1-41 (KJV)]
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized within
The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was published by
1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial accomplishment.
Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of 23
December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the presiding
spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels of Friday:
Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of the
underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
Anael: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “Open ye the gates, that the righteous nation which
keepeth the truth may enter in.
Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because
he trusteth in thee.
Trust ye in the LORD for ever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting
strength:
For he bringeth down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, he layeth it
low; he layeth it low, even to the ground; he bringeth it even to the
dust.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
Thusly I wish to obtain advice on eliminating extraneous Categories of
Understanding associated to the BOMB BLAST EVENT and which have been
systematically and unwillingly imposed upon me and its consequence is then
"hyper-arousal of the central nervous system and stress of the startle
reflex"
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension is
impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing of any word's
entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car exhaust blow
back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier experience of a
bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final comprehension
by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as Category of
Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD / #MEM
amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that the
apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC pharmaceutical which whilst not
impeding either the apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the
“central nervous system and destressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking their advice of how best to resolve the injury
given they do not have any substantial practical clinical and case study
expertise with instances of bomb blasts experience.
———-
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as elimination--is
the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring knowledge and
explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness is an intrinsic phonetic correspondence
and functional cognitive characteristic of mind.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, Cambridge University researchers suggest:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc conrecoednprse
and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And in a similar manner, the mind's phonetic apprehension as the knowing of
any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car
exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier
experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final
comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as
Category of Understanding.
Confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and habitually refuses
to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself, can then be considered
delusional.'
Here is an another description of Autonomy of Will which is then an
Adam/Eve original sin scenario: 'That it is then, manifestly the
substantial cause as my impetus for the claim that you have departed from
all sense of decency as decorum being a stable characteristic, in having
lost a total semblance of rationality, as any connectivity with the
temporal as sensibility and coherence of reality--manifestly an insanity as
narcissist personality disordered.
You after all, are young and whimsical in being entirely driven as governed
by a daemonic circumstantial desire as inclusive of your sexual
appetite--it can no more make a justifiable claim of a substantial
rationality, coherence and integrity of being because you are entirely
unable to keep your intention, the utterance of your words and any
consequential action within concord as the ethereal quality and the
affirmation of the legitimacy of existence, which separates the mind of a
man from the impertinence, impudence and the inconsequential amorality of
the boy as possessing a deficiency and having a questionable and an
illegitimacy as only a pretentious claim to humanity.
The fragile, pathetic, frightened and circumstantial condition which is
your existence is clearly conveyed by the deprivation of language, which
isn't really sufficient as a quality or quantity to even authenticate your
humanity.
A cockatoo would have a larger vocabulary!
Your manner of speech is a testimony to the ineffectual, circumstantial
manner of your life, which is driven by a contrary desire as feigned reason
(ie. the real and substantiating human dynamic) being the cause for
preference as fickle and inconsequential values. Other than to utter some
idiosyncratic preferences as wants, you are incapable of engaging within a
rational process of negotiation in order to resolve the dynamics of any
sexual opportunism, overcome any impediments to the whimsical
determination, that it might possibly occur--raising the significant
question as to whether you are even capable of showing any accountability
for harm reduction within your inter-personal interaction as your sexual
conduct. As being, something more than happenstance and thereby it's only
claim to virtue.
- dolf
Initial Post: 12 April 2018
YOUTUBE: “Teddy Bear’s PIcnic”
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YDndFOtBy-E>
Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
PETER HOWARD @ 1218 HOURS ON 2 APRIL 2018: "Dolf Boek you are crazy, which
everyone already knows anyway. Wayne Feenstra and John Douglas Ritchie
didn't even mention that you are a Dutch Jewish Fag Lunatic and there's no
evidence that they even know that you are the first three of those things.
They do know that you are a lunatic and you have no grounds for complaint
to Facebook about that because it is also true."
<https://m.facebook.com/peter.howard.96930>
DOLF: “Peter Howard, your newly created and anonymous Facebook Profile has
been reported for jingoistic derived racial hatred and anti Semitic
prejudice.
No doubt you have to justify a church wedding and vows made to #351 -
BELIAL.
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>
PETER HOWARD’s post was subsequently deleted by Facebook as Breaching
Community Standards by expressing vitriol as racialism, psycho-sexual
slander and anti-semitism.
Has it got something to do with the Fuhrer’s birthday and you need some
sacrifice for the memorial altar which you intend to dance naked around in
the forest at midnight mass.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/FACEBOOK%20DEATH%20THREAT%2020180401%200541%20HRS.pdf>
- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Waratahs and Wallabies winger Curtis Rona has thrown his support behind
Israel Folau on a day where the dual international posted another defiant,
cryptic message on his Instagram account more than a week after he came
under attack for a controversial remark about gay people.
Rona posted an Instagram story on Thursday morning to profess his support
for Folau, quoting a passage from the Bible and saying "We stand with
#IsraelFolau".
The biblical passage was taken from the Gospel of John in the New
Testament: "Jesus answered, 'I am the way the truth and the life no one
comes to the father except through me'".
The three-Test Wallaby, who joined the Waratahs this season, is also a
devout Christian and looks up to the team's decorated fullback. They share
a history in rugby league, with Rona playing for the Cowboys and Bulldogs
before returning to rugby with the Western Force last year.”
<https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/we-stand-with-israel-curtis-rona-throws-support-behind-israel-folau-20180412-p4z97w.html>
“And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye
that work iniquity.” [Matthew 7:23 (KJV)]
I would suggest that we are dealing with persons whom are psycho-sexually
immature or have a retarded development and since the entire Categories of
Understanding of the trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon are
embedded within the Bible as HEBREW / GREEK lexicon due to this
cosmological observation:
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTS*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
For this logical reason, then the quoting of a grab bag Biblical texts is
often observed as sympathetic or symptomatic of a psychological disordered
or a delusional state of mind—but nevertheless may give clues as to the
locus of the psychiatric condition by its self referencing Categories of
Understanding as which is in acute distress by its disordered state of
being and is in need of medical intervention.
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21
March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with SEPTET #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die Natali,
claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as preceeding
PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the Pythagorean
doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of 364 and a half
days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE-220CE)
understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them. [Pythagorean
Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the ternary
(tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 - ACCUMULATION, which is
mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of necessity some are repeated)
as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE,
GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL
ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into #81
sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD
will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7
(KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE* {9 x 9 x 9 =
#729 / 2 = 364.5}: It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400
years in the Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when
made divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of
the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year
into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic
square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for
the equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
#YOD = 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is the Mind of
Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +
#MEM = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran (Chinese) / COURSE-trochos
(Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +
#TAU = 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +
#ALEPH = 23 SEPTEMBER 2001 {23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}
WITH REGARD TO THIS: “That given such habitual travesty of an uncaring
culture as administration of justice, I will be seeking consultation with
the Community Mental Health Service to review my circumstance of
"hyper-arousal of the central nervous system and stress of the startle
reflex" which although previously required "no further follow-up and the
referral was closed", I now feel has after 30 years relapsed to a
circumstance requiring acute and perhaps lengthy (ie. 5 year duration)
care.”
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION OF
A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”
[John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Most readers would realise that our Y-M-T-A model applies equally to the
New York / Pentagon TERRORIST EVENT of 11 September 2001:
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY IN SOVEREIGNTY AS OUR PRIME MINISTER JOHN
HOWARD IN NEW YORK ON 10 SEPTEMBER
2001
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE CUSTODIAL SEIZURE
OF #41 - CENTRE {#6000 % 22 = 13} ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2001
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT AS EQUINOX @ 2305 HOURS
(GMT) UPON 22 SEPTEMBER 2001
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:23.5>
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE #REPRISE OF THE WEEK UPON SUNDAY
<https://www.hebcal.com/hebcal/?v=1&maj=on&min=on&nx=on&mod=on&o=on&i=off&year=2001&month=x&yt=G&lg=a&d=on&c=off&geo=geoname&zip=&city=&geonameid=&b=18&m=50&.s=Create+Calendar#cal-2001-09>
“Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer
thou me.
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou
hast understanding.
Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched
the line upon it?
Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner
stone thereof;
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for
joy?
Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued
out of the womb?
When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a
swaddlingband for it,
And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,
And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy
proud waves be stayed?
Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to
know his place;
That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be
shaken out of it?
It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment.
And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the high arm shall be
broken.
Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the
search of the depth?
Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors
of the shadow of death?
Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it
all.
Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the
place thereof,
That thou shouldest take it to the bound thereof, and that thou shouldest
know the paths to the house thereof?
Knowest thou it, because thou wast then born? or because the number of thy
days is great?
Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the
treasures of the hail,
Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of
battle and war?
By what way is the light parted, which scattereth the east wind upon the
earth?
Who hath divided a watercourse for the overflowing of waters, or a way for
the lightning of thunder;
To cause it to rain on the earth, where no man [is; on] the wilderness,
wherein there is no man;
To satisfy the desolate and waste ground; and to cause the bud of the
tender herb to spring forth?
Hath the rain a father? or who hath begotten the drops of dew?
Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who hath
gendered it?
The waters are hid as with a stone, and the face of the deep is frozen.
Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of
Orion?
Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide
Arcturus with his sons?
Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof
in the earth?
Canst thou lift up thy voice to the clouds, that abundance of waters may
cover thee?
Canst thou send lightnings, that they may go, and say unto thee, Here we
are?
Who hath put wisdom in the inward parts? or who hath given understanding to
the heart?
Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven,
When the dust groweth into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together?
Wilt thou hunt the prey for the lion? or fill the appetite of the young
lions,
When they couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait?
41 Who provideth for the raven his food? when his young ones cry unto God,
they wander for lack of meat.” [Job 36:1-41 (KJV)]
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized within
The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was published by
1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial accomplishment.
Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of 23
December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the presiding
spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels of Friday:
Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of the
underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
Anael: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “Open ye the gates, that the righteous nation which
keepeth the truth may enter in.
Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because
he trusteth in thee.
Trust ye in the LORD for ever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting
strength:
For he bringeth down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, he layeth it
low; he layeth it low, even to the ground; he bringeth it even to the
dust.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
Thusly I wish to obtain advice on eliminating extraneous Categories of
Understanding associated to the BOMB BLAST EVENT and which have been
systematically and unwillingly imposed upon me and its consequence is then
"hyper-arousal of the central nervous system and stress of the startle
reflex"
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension is
impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing of any word's
entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car exhaust blow
back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier experience of a
bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final comprehension
by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as Category of
Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD / #MEM
amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that the
apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC pharmaceutical which whilst not
impeding either the apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the
“central nervous system and destressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking their advice of how best to resolve the injury
given they do not have any substantial practical clinical and case study
expertise with instances of bomb blasts experience.
———-
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as elimination--is
the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring knowledge and
explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness is an intrinsic phonetic correspondence
and functional cognitive characteristic of mind.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, Cambridge University researchers suggest:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc conrecoednprse
and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And in a similar manner, the mind's phonetic apprehension as the knowing of
any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car
exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier
experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final
comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as
Category of Understanding.
Confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and habitually refuses
to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself, can then be considered
delusional.'
Here is an another description of Autonomy of Will which is then an
Adam/Eve original sin scenario: 'That it is then, manifestly the
substantial cause as my impetus for the claim that you have departed from
all sense of decency as decorum being a stable characteristic, in having
lost a total semblance of rationality, as any connectivity with the
temporal as sensibility and coherence of reality--manifestly an insanity as
narcissist personality disordered.
You after all, are young and whimsical in being entirely driven as governed
by a daemonic circumstantial desire as inclusive of your sexual
appetite--it can no more make a justifiable claim of a substantial
rationality, coherence and integrity of being because you are entirely
unable to keep your intention, the utterance of your words and any
consequential action within concord as the ethereal quality and the
affirmation of the legitimacy of existence, which separates the mind of a
man from the impertinence, impudence and the inconsequential amorality of
the boy as possessing a deficiency and having a questionable and an
illegitimacy as only a pretentious claim to humanity.
The fragile, pathetic, frightened and circumstantial condition which is
your existence is clearly conveyed by the deprivation of language, which
isn't really sufficient as a quality or quantity to even authenticate your
humanity.
A cockatoo would have a larger vocabulary!
Your manner of speech is a testimony to the ineffectual, circumstantial
manner of your life, which is driven by a contrary desire as feigned reason
(ie. the real and substantiating human dynamic) being the cause for
preference as fickle and inconsequential values. Other than to utter some
idiosyncratic preferences as wants, you are incapable of engaging within a
rational process of negotiation in order to resolve the dynamics of any
sexual opportunism, overcome any impediments to the whimsical
determination, that it might possibly occur--raising the significant
question as to whether you are even capable of showing any accountability
for harm reduction within your inter-personal interaction as your sexual
conduct. As being, something more than happenstance and thereby it's only
claim to virtue.
- dolf
Initial Post: 12 April 2018
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YDndFOtBy-E>
Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
PETER HOWARD @ 1218 HOURS ON 2 APRIL 2018: "Dolf Boek you are crazy, which
everyone already knows anyway. Wayne Feenstra and John Douglas Ritchie
didn't even mention that you are a Dutch Jewish Fag Lunatic and there's no
evidence that they even know that you are the first three of those things.
They do know that you are a lunatic and you have no grounds for complaint
to Facebook about that because it is also true."
<https://m.facebook.com/peter.howard.96930>
DOLF: “Peter Howard, your newly created and anonymous Facebook Profile has
been reported for jingoistic derived racial hatred and anti Semitic
prejudice.
No doubt you have to justify a church wedding and vows made to #351 -
BELIAL.
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>
PETER HOWARD’s post was subsequently deleted by Facebook as Breaching
Community Standards by expressing vitriol as racialism, psycho-sexual
slander and anti-semitism.
Has it got something to do with the Fuhrer’s birthday and you need some
sacrifice for the memorial altar which you intend to dance naked around in
the forest at midnight mass.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/FACEBOOK%20DEATH%20THREAT%2020180401%200541%20HRS.pdf>
- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
Apr 12, 2018, 6:14:47 PM4/12/18
to
They don’t call HIM
5 1/4 INCHES
FOR NO REASON
Wader of Doom <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [xpost: ac; auk; -sm; +aa]
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>
5 1/4 INCHES
FOR NO REASON
Wader of Doom <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [xpost: ac; auk; -sm; +aa]
>
> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
> [...]
> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
>
>> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>> to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>> in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>> copulate with his wife.
>>
>> Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>> the rabid feminist's florid imagination. LOL. A woman really
>> has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>> Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>>
>> As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>> woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>> and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>> woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>> after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>> later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>> than not.
>>
>
> Don't you like women, Gerg?
>> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>> to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>> in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>> copulate with his wife.
>>
>> Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>> the rabid feminist's florid imagination. LOL. A woman really
>> has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>> Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>>
>> As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>> woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>> and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>> woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>> after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>> later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>> than not.
>>
>
>
YOUTUBE: “Teddy Bear’s PIcnic”
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YDndFOtBy-E>
Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
YOUTUBE: “Teddy Bear’s PIcnic”
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YDndFOtBy-E>
Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
No doubt you have to justify a church wedding and vows made to #351 -
BELIAL.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
BELIAL.
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>
Nadegda
Apr 12, 2018, 7:29:22 PM4/12/18
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female to be a
> "helpmate" to a man.
Or, maybe that's what he *told* men, to avoid bruising their fragile
> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female to be a
> "helpmate" to a man.
egos ...
<snicker>
> There is no such thing as rape in a marriage, at least.
[more misogyny and rape apologia deleted]
KWills Shill #3
Apr 13, 2018, 5:13:25 AM4/13/18
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
[...]
>>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>start again.
>
>FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>copulate with his wife.
>
>Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>the rabid feminist's florid imagination.
in a marriage.
>LOL. A woman really
>has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
evidence of the existence of one or more, there can be no such god
given right. However, a woman, and a man if one is so inclined, can be
raped. Even in marriage.
>
>As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>than not.
present for your claim. Lest you offer the default admission that you
lied.
--
You need only two tools: WD-40 and duct tape.
If it doesn't move and it should, use WD-40.
If it moves and shouldn't, use the duct tape.
dolf
Apr 13, 2018, 5:23:04 AM4/13/18
to
KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
> <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>> the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>> unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>> mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>> up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>> Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>> start again.
>>
>> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>> to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>> in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>> copulate with his wife.
>>
>
> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
I put forward the proposition that any sexual act by
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
> <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>> the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>> unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>> mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>> up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>> Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>> start again.
>>
>> FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>> to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>> in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>> copulate with his wife.
>>
>
> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
MR 5 1/4 INCHES
would be undignified act and a depravation of one’s being—rape requires the
insertion of an object into the person of another.
So what are you suggesting if the wife is morbidly rotund and there is an
incapability for any insertion which is just wishful thinking?
>
>> Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>> the rabid feminist's florid imagination.
>
> Some things, like "stare rape" is fictional. But one can be raped
> in a marriage.
>
>> LOL. A woman really
>> has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>> Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>
> Whereas there is no god, feel free to provide VALID, VERIFIABLE
> evidence of the existence of one or more, there can be no such god
> given right. However, a woman, and a man if one is so inclined, can be
> raped. Even in marriage.
>
>>
>> As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>> woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>> and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>> woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>> after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>> later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>> than not.
>
> I will enjoy reviewing the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence you will
> present for your claim. Lest you offer the default admission that you
> lied.
>
--
Nadegda
Apr 13, 2018, 4:43:55 PM4/13/18
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 13, 2018, 6:31:00 PM4/13/18
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>>start again.
>>
>>FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>>to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>>in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>>copulate with his wife.
>>
>
> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>>start again.
>>
>>FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>>to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>>in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>>copulate with his wife.
>>
>
> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
otherwise.
>>Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>>the rabid feminist's florid imagination.
>
> Some things, like "stare rape" is fictional. But one can be raped
>in a marriage.
>>LOL. A woman really
>>has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>>Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>
> Whereas there is no god, feel free to provide VALID, VERIFIABLE
>evidence of the existence of one or more, there can be no such god
>given right. However, a woman, and a man if one is so inclined, can be
>raped. Even in marriage.
>
>>
>>As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>>woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>>and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>>woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>>after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>>later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>>than not.
>
> I will enjoy reviewing the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence you will
>present for your claim. Lest you offer the default admission that you
>lied.
proof of why my claims are wrong. It is not my duty to
prove my claim to each and every knucklehead who asks.
%
Apr 13, 2018, 6:36:13 PM4/13/18
to
KWills Shill #3
Apr 14, 2018, 5:42:35 AM4/14/18
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:30:07 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
>>>Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>>>the rabid feminist's florid imagination.
>>
>> Some things, like "stare rape" is fictional. But one can be raped
>>in a marriage.
>
>Only from the standpoint of civil law.
>
No, It's criminal law. Although it is possible to file suit
against a rapist, so civil law does has some relevance. Just not in
the way you present.
>>>LOL. A woman really
>>>has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>>>Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>>
>> Whereas there is no god, feel free to provide VALID, VERIFIABLE
>>evidence of the existence of one or more, there can be no such god
>>given right. However, a woman, and a man if one is so inclined, can be
>>raped. Even in marriage.
>>
>>>As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>>>woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>>>and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>>>woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>>>after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>>>later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>>>than not.
>>
>> I will enjoy reviewing the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence you will
>>present for your claim. Lest you offer the default admission that you
>>lied.
>
>It is up to the person who disputes my claims to provide
>proof of why my claims are wrong. It is not my duty to
>prove my claim to each and every knucklehead who asks.
It befalls the one with the greater claim to prove it. As such,
it befalls you to prove your claim. I am not obligated to disprove it.
I do appreciate your default admission that you lied.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>>>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>>>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>>>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>>>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>>>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>>>start again.
>>>
>>>FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>>>to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>>>in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>>>copulate with his wife.
>>
>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>
>That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
>otherwise.
>
There is no lord. Or Lord.
>On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>Rape apologia noted, you nasty piece of work. It's a shame Irma didn't do
>>>>the job right; that supposed Creator you're so enamored of, in the
>>>>unlikely event that he actually exists, obviously decided he'd made a
>>>>mistake and you belonged in Davy Jones's Locker, like an artist crumpling
>>>>up an ugly, failed effort at a painting and chucking it out a fourth-floor
>>>>Milan window while floridly cursing before digging out a fresh canvas to
>>>>start again.
>>>
>>>FYI, the Creator, aka God Almighty, created the female
>>>to be a "helpmate" to a man. There is no such thing as rape
>>>in a marriage, at least. Marriage give man a license to
>>>copulate with his wife.
>>
>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>
>That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
>otherwise.
>
>>>Marriage rape and many other kinds of rape is a figment of
>>>the rabid feminist's florid imagination.
>>
>> Some things, like "stare rape" is fictional. But one can be raped
>>in a marriage.
>
>Only from the standpoint of civil law.
>
against a rapist, so civil law does has some relevance. Just not in
the way you present.
>>>LOL. A woman really
>>>has no God-given right to deny her body to her husband.
>>>Her body exists for the reproductive purposes of the man.
>>
>> Whereas there is no god, feel free to provide VALID, VERIFIABLE
>>evidence of the existence of one or more, there can be no such god
>>given right. However, a woman, and a man if one is so inclined, can be
>>raped. Even in marriage.
>>
>>>As for unmarried individuals, rape exists. But, not in some
>>>woman's imagination. It has to be a real forcible rape
>>>and those are pretty rare. Most so-called rapes are just
>>>woman pointing the finger at a man for vindictive reasons
>>>after she initiated the encounter and had second thoughts
>>>later. Women cry rape for revenge purposes more often
>>>than not.
>>
>> I will enjoy reviewing the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence you will
>>present for your claim. Lest you offer the default admission that you
>>lied.
>
>It is up to the person who disputes my claims to provide
>proof of why my claims are wrong. It is not my duty to
>prove my claim to each and every knucklehead who asks.
it befalls you to prove your claim. I am not obligated to disprove it.
I do appreciate your default admission that you lied.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
kensi
Apr 14, 2018, 12:30:28 PM4/14/18
to
On 4/13/2018 6:30 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>
> That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
> otherwise.
You're sounding more and more like one of those terrorists who want to
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>
> That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
> otherwise.
impose Sharia law on everyone. Which is strange, because I thought that
was your reason for hating and wanting to banish Muslims?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 14, 2018, 6:25:14 PM4/14/18
to
<...>
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 14, 2018, 6:25:14 PM4/14/18
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:30:18 -0400, kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 4/13/2018 6:30 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>>
>> That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
>> otherwise.
>
>You're sounding more and more like one of those terrorists who want to
>impose Sharia law on everyone. Which is strange, because I thought that
>was your reason for hating and wanting to banish Muslims?
Sharia is spot on when it comes to the status of
>On 4/13/2018 6:30 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:15:59 -0500, KWills Shill #3 <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If the wife says, "No." and is then forced, it's rape.
>>
>> That would be civil law. The Lord's law (religious law) says
>> otherwise.
>
>You're sounding more and more like one of those terrorists who want to
>impose Sharia law on everyone. Which is strange, because I thought that
>was your reason for hating and wanting to banish Muslims?
females but, otherwise, it's a crock of shit.
vallor
Apr 14, 2018, 11:44:38 PM4/14/18
to
ITYM _secular_ law.
HTH.
--
-v
Checkmate
Apr 15, 2018, 1:02:49 AM4/15/18
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <meu4ddl8lbkbhrv6r...@4ax.com>,
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
KWills Shill #3
Apr 15, 2018, 7:41:53 AM4/15/18
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:24:28 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
Your ignorance is impressive.
If you're going to use "Esq." with your nym, it would benefit you
to know a bit about legal matters. Criminal law is not a subset of
civil law.
But you will provide the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence it is. If
your claim is a lie, you will not offer the requested evidence as
there will be none to offer.
If you're going to use "Esq." with your nym, it would benefit you
to know a bit about legal matters. Criminal law is not a subset of
civil law.
But you will provide the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence it is. If
your claim is a lie, you will not offer the requested evidence as
there will be none to offer.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Apr 16, 2018, 10:13:20 AM4/16/18
to
a Ph.D. in journalism. I know of which I speak.
There are only TWO main categories of law:
1) religious law as in Sharia and in the Old Testament,
2) civil law as in civilizations aka nations.
Criminal law is a subset of civil law.
civil law
_________________|__________________
| | | |
traffic law criminal law tort law various state and municipal ordinances
HTH
KWills Shill #3
Apr 17, 2018, 5:24:41 AM4/17/18
to
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:12:38 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
Your delusions are not evidence.
Your default admission that you lied is noted, accepted and
appreciated.
Your default admission that you lied is noted, accepted and
appreciated.
0 new messages