Re: OUR ""Anonymous"" David Moore
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1fa36758-92ea-457f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> Because if you believed me, you'd have to worry that I was right about
> some
> other issues YOUR gonads are invested in. It's less painful to swallow
> Moore's bullshit that face the possibility I was right about Atheism being
> a
> bunch of punk bullies trying to cram their beliefs down the rest of the
> people's throats.
MOE> Like certain segments of Christianity want to do Kennie?
Yes there are people in Christianity who do that. They are a minority.
> Especially your HATED Christians.
MOE> And you, a supposed Roman Catholic, pretended to be a Mormon to fool
MOE> a client into giving you money
Not at all accurate Maureen and you know it. I clearly told Mr. Leuck
that I "had tried Mornmonism and dropped it." I told him I was Catholic and
NOT Mormon. I also gave him a longish explanation why I dropped it.
MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make him
excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
Again your embelishments are very graphic. I said that one of the people
MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list) was/is a Santeria high prist who
asked me about placing a curse on Moore, I also said I suggested he not do
it. But I lacked the power to stop him. Secretly, the though of Moore
reduces to a quivering mass of gelatenous goo does have a certain appeal to
it.
MOE> Christianity earned being hated, Kennie.
Which YOU as a WICCAN are so clearly UNBIASED about. <snicker>
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1fa36758-92ea-457f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Because if you believed me, you'd have to worry that I was right about
> > some
> > other issues YOUR gonads are invested in. It's less painful to swallow
> > Moore's bullshit that face the possibility I was right about Atheism being
> > a
> > bunch of punk bullies trying to cram their beliefs down the rest of the
> > people's throats.
>
> MOE> Like certain segments of Christianity want to do Kennie?
>
> Yes there are people in Christianity who do that. They are a minority.
>
> > Especially your HATED Christians.
>
> MOE> And you, a supposed Roman Catholic, pretended to be a Mormon to fool
> MOE> a client into giving you money
>
> Not at all accurate Maureen and you know it. I clearly told Mr. Leuck
> that I "had tried Mornmonism and dropped it." I told him I was Catholic and
> NOT Mormon. I also gave him a longish explanation why I dropped it.
According to your client;s OWN WORDS, you deliberately gave him the
impression you were in fact a fellow Mormon, until his check was
handed to you.
And its spelled " Mormonism", Kennie.
>
> MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make him
> excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
> MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
>
> Again your embelishments are very graphic.
Kennie , want me to post the URLs and the post YOU MADE? It was your
frigging description of what YOU hoped the " curse" would do to
Moore.
> I said that one of the people
> MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list) was/is a Santeria high rist
"rist"?
BTW this is the FIRST TIME you claimed one of the names was
specifically the name of a Santeria priest. Before, you claimed itw
as a few Hispanics who asked for your permission to cast a curse on
Moore.
Can't keep your lies straight Kennie?
I can post the sequence of your own posts proving my claims Kennie.
>who
> asked me about placing a curse on Moore, I also said I suggested he not do
> it
You never said that one before. You said " they" asked for your "
permission" to do it.
Amazing how the details of your story changes over time Kennie.
>. But I lacked the power to stop him.
You "lacked the power"? BWAHAHAHAAH!!!!
> Secretly, the though of Moore
> reduces to a quivering mass of gelatenous goo does have a certain appeal to
> it.
Judging from your current physical condition, you are getting to the
gelatinous stage yourself.
>
> MOE> Christianity earned being hated, Kennie.
>
> Which YOU as a WICCAN are so clearly UNBIASED about. <snicker>
I''ve seen and experienced the dark side of Christianity Kennie.
And I'm a PAGAN, not a Wiccan.
Google " Tempest Smith" sometime and see how nice Christians were to
her.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
raven1
wrote:
Kenny, Kenny, Kenny, you stupid fuckwad...
Have you ever considered that aside from your being caught in the act,
another reason that no one on alt.atheism credits your forgeries to
"David Moore" is that he seems rational in his posts on this NG, while
you come off as a frothing at the mouth loon most of the time? Your
post above is a good example.
I await your next forgery in my name.
womanGoddess
One wrote:
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1fa36758-92ea-457f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Because if you believed me, you'd have to worry that I was right about
> > some
> > other issues YOUR gonads are invested in. It's less painful to swallow
> > Moore's bullshit that face the possibility I was right about Atheism being
> > a
> > bunch of punk bullies trying to cram their beliefs down the rest of the
> > people's throats.
>
> MOE> Like certain segments of Christianity want to do Kennie?
>
> Yes there are people in Christianity who do that. They are a minority.
>
> > Especially your HATED Christians.
>
> MOE> And you, a supposed Roman Catholic, pretended to be a Mormon to fool
> MOE> a client into giving you money
>
> Not at all accurate Maureen and you know it. I clearly told Mr. Leuck
> that I "had tried Mornmonism and dropped it." I told him I was Catholic and
> NOT Mormon. I also gave him a longish explanation why I dropped it.
>
> excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
> MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
>
> MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list) was/is a Santeria high prist who
> asked me about placing a curse on Moore, I also said I suggested he not do
> reduces to a quivering mass of gelatenous goo does have a certain appeal to
> it.
>
>
> Which YOU as a WICCAN are so clearly UNBIASED about. <snicker>
Gee Kenniepoo, here's the link to your posts about the " curse":
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/b03bc724ba4ed93f?hl=en
Your own words Kennie.
Here's the thread:
You stupid sack of shite.
So what was that again about you telling them NOT to curse Moore?
And this post by you was what you IMAGINED the curse to be:
************************
MOE> They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me
Kennie, how
MOE> about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
They asked my "OPINION" Moe that is NOT asking my "PERMISSION" as
your
delusional mind interprets it. My responsibility, Moe, will be in
LAUGHING
MY ASS OFF at things like him giving a lecture about his computer
EXPERTISE
at work and then having massive involuntary ejaculation in front of
all
there. Or perhaps uncontrollable flatulence. Seeing a really HOT
woman and
exploding with the loudest FART in recorded history. Funny stuff like
that.
Maybe a whole pack of dogs coming and pissing on his legs.
**************************************************
And here's my response at the time to you:
krp
> > Because if you believed me, you'd have to worry that I was right about
> > some
> > other issues YOUR gonads are invested in. It's less painful to swallow
> > Moore's bullshit that face the possibility I was right about Atheism
> > being a
> > bunch of punk bullies trying to cram their beliefs down the rest of the
> > people's throats.
> MOE> Like certain segments of Christianity want to do Kennie?
> Yes there are people in Christianity who do that. They are a minority.
> > Especially your HATED Christians.
> MOE> And you, a supposed Roman Catholic, pretended to be a Mormon to fool
> MOE> a client into giving you money
> Not at all accurate Maureen and you know it. I clearly told Mr. Leuck
> that I "had tried Mornmonism and dropped it." I told him I was Catholic
> and
> NOT Mormon. I also gave him a longish explanation why I dropped it.
MOE> According to your client;s OWN WORDS, you deliberately gave him the
MOE> impression you were in fact a fellow Mormon, until his check was
MOE> handed to you. And its spelled " Mormonism", Kennie.
Oh God, the bitch found another TYPO.. BFD. If you read ALL the e-mails
between us you'd see that is not true. I was VERY CLEAR that I was NOT a
Mormon and while I "tried" it, I said it did not fit me. I can't help the
guy's later arguments. People tend to create their own reality. At one time
even Moore had almost all the exchanges between Leuck and I on his website,
and among them was it CLEAR that I never represented myself as being Mormon
to the guy. Quite the opposite.
> MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make him
> excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
> MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
> Again your embelishments are very graphic.
MOE> Kennie , want me to post the URLs and the post YOU MADE? It was your
MOE> frigging description of what YOU hoped the " curse" would do to
MOE> Moore.
Yes, post the URL on Google and not just an MID that leads nowhere like
Wills does.
> I said that one of the people MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list)
> was/is a Santeria high rist
MOE> "rist"?
Oh shit another TYPO. Gof you are right on top of your role as a
leading SPERLLKOP! "Priest."
MOE> BTW this is the FIRST TIME you claimed one of the names was
MOE> specifically the name of a Santeria priest. Before, you claimed itw
MOE> as a few Hispanics who asked for your permission to cast a curse on
MOE> Moore.
Itw? I never said FEW, I said ONE asked permission, which I didn't have
the right to grant or deny. I just expressed a preference that he NOT do it.
But quite frankly the thought of Moore getting a "curse" did have some cache
for my thinking.
MOE> I can post the sequence of your own posts proving my claims Kennie.
Complete with your distortions as you take snippets to misrepresent. AS
ALWAYS.
>. But I lacked the power to stop him.
MOE> You "lacked the power"? BWAHAHAHAAH!!!!
I am not the ALL POWERFULL OZ, like you think you are, Maureen!
> MOE> Christianity earned being hated, Kennie.
> Which YOU as a WICCAN are so clearly UNBIASED about. <snicker>
MOE> I''ve seen and experienced the dark side of Christianity Kennie.
MOE> And I'm a PAGAN, not a Wiccan.
You have claimed to be a WICCAN, Maureen, and soemtimes Pagan. Generally
the terms are interchangeable.
krp
>> MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make him
>> excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
>> MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
>>
>> Again your embelishments are very graphic. I said that one of the
>> people
>> MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list) was/is a Santeria high prist
>> who
>> asked me about placing a curse on Moore, I also said I suggested he not
>> do
>> it. But I lacked the power to stop him. Secretly, the though of Moore
>> reduces to a quivering mass of gelatenous goo does have a certain appeal
>> to
>> it.
What I actually said, which is FUNNY in its imagery.
-------------------
krp View profile
More options May 16, 12:27 pm
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal, soc.men,
alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, chi.general
From: "krp" <kr...@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:27:18 GMT
Local: Sat, May 16 2009 12:27 pm
Subject: Re: Kennie's curse
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report
this message | Find messages by this author
"whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9ebbd116-92cf-4ffc...@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
MOE> They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me Kennie, how
MOE> about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
They asked my "OPINION" Moe that is NOT asking my "PERMISSION" as your
delusional mind interprets it. My responsibility, Moe, will be in LAUGHING
MY ASS OFF at things like him giving a lecture about his computer EXPERTISE
at work and then having massive involuntary ejaculation in front of all
there. Or perhaps uncontrollable flatulence. Seeing a really HOT woman and
exploding with the loudest FART in recorded history. Funny stuff like that.
Maybe a whole pack of dogs coming and pissing on his legs.
==============
Not a statement of FACT, Maureen no matter how HYSTERICALLY you want to
claim that it was. It had lots of people falling on the floor laughing their
asses off. It wasn't even real world speculation, it was something well
past RIDICULE of Moore. I think it is hilarious to consider Moore making
his "MOVES" in on a really HOT woman and him breaking out in uncontrollable
flatulence, and letting one RIP that shatters windows in two states. You've
gotta admit that a horndog like Moore getting uncontrollable farts whenever
he makes his SLICK moves (blackmail) on a woman is a funny image. Try NOT to
think about STUD there (Moore) typing to HIT on a hot woman and just farting
incessantly the closer he gets the louder and stinkier they get. Oh what a
HOOT!
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d980caff-f912-4223...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > > Because if you believed me, you'd have to worry that I was right about
> > > some
> > > other issues YOUR gonads are invested in. It's less painful to swallow
> > > Moore's bullshit that face the possibility I was right about Atheism
> > > being a
> > > bunch of punk bullies trying to cram their beliefs down the rest of the
> > > people's throats.
> > MOE> Like certain segments of Christianity want to do Kennie?
> > Yes there are people in Christianity who do that. They are a minority.
> > > Especially your HATED Christians.
> > MOE> And you, a supposed Roman Catholic, pretended to be a Mormon to fool
> > MOE> a client into giving you money
> > Not at all accurate Maureen and you know it. I clearly told Mr. Leuck
> > that I "had tried Mornmonism and dropped it." I told him I was Catholic
> > and
> > NOT Mormon. I also gave him a longish explanation why I dropped it.
>
> MOE> According to your client;s OWN WORDS, you deliberately gave him the
> MOE> impression you were in fact a fellow Mormon, until his check was
> MOE> handed to you. And its spelled " Mormonism", Kennie.
>
> Oh God, the bitch found another TYPO.. BFD
It isn't a big deal because you make many typos.
For the record I make typos as well. But unlike you I try to check my
spelling before I post. I don't get all pissy and bang out a response
and post like you do.
Also, considering your claim that you have TWO " cum laude" degrees,
your atrocious spelling errors make your educational credibility
doubtful.
>. If you read ALL the e-mails
> between us you'd see that is not true. I was VERY CLEAR that I was NOT a
> Mormon and while I "tried" it, I said it did not fit me.
I have no problem believing that you mislead the guy into thinking
you were a fellow Mormon. It fits your character. And I don't take
your word for anything Kennie. The word of a liar has no value with
me.
> I can't help the
> guy's later arguments. People tend to create their own reality.
"MASSIVE COALITION FORCE"-- Kenneth Pangborn.
> At one time
> even Moore had almost all the exchanges between Leuck and I on his website,
> and among them was it CLEAR that I never represented myself as being Mormon
> to the guy. Quite the opposite.
Your claim of being honest is crap Kennie. I've seen you be exactly
the opposite on usenet for too long to fall for that act.
>
> > MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make him
> > excrete out of his anus and cum in huge
> > MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
> > Again your embelishments are very graphic.
>
> MOE> Kennie , want me to post the URLs and the post YOU MADE? It was your
> MOE> frigging description of what YOU hoped the " curse" would do to
> MOE> Moore.
>
> Yes, post the URL on Google and not just an MID that leads nowhere like
> Wills does.
I did, Kennie. A number of posts in fact. Posts of YOUR OWN WORDS.
>
> > I said that one of the people MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list)
> > was/is a Santeria high rist
>
> MOE> "rist"?
>
> Oh shit another TYPO. Gof you are right on top of your role as a
> leading SPERLLKOP! "Priest."
Kennie, why so upset? We all make typos.
The fact is you changed your "Santeria curse" story here. Before you
claimed it was a few people, now you claim it was a Santeria HP.
RIIIGGGHHHTTT.
If you were telling the truth the detail wouldn't change Kennie.
You should keep better track of your lies Kenniepoo.
>
> MOE> BTW this is the FIRST TIME you claimed one of the names was
> MOE> specifically the name of a Santeria priest. Before, you claimed itw
> MOE> as a few Hispanics who asked for your permission to cast a curse on
> MOE> Moore.
>
> Itw? I never said FEW, I said ONE asked permission, which I didn't have
> the right to grant or deny. I just expressed a preference that he NOT do it.
> But quite frankly the thought of Moore getting a "curse" did have some cache
> for my thinking.
I posted the URL for when you said a few people asked for your
permission. Your own posts Kennie. Your own words.
>
> MOE> I can post the sequence of your own posts proving my claims Kennie.
>
> Complete with your distortions as you take snippets to misrepresent. AS
> ALWAYS.
Like Greg does Kennie?
No. I posted the URLs so anyone not so bored with this subject can
see for themselves what you wrote.
I don't need to " distort" or " misrepresent" like you are desperate
to do. Your own words about this are damning enough about you.
Damning in more than one way, may I add.
>
> >. But I lacked the power to stop him.
>
> MOE> You "lacked the power"? BWAHAHAHAAH!!!!
>
> I am not the ALL POWERFULL OZ, like you think you are, Maureen!
I never said I was Kennie.
You do know that even in your ALLEGED Catholicism there is the
concept called free will. You had the choice NOT to be involved in the
curse". You chose to be involved. You could have said " no' and that
would be that. You could have told THEM that according to your
religion putting a curse on someone was wrong.
But you didn't do that.
Assuming, OC, this even happened at all, which I doubt. It looks like
one of your fantasies rather than something in the real world
>
> > MOE> Christianity earned being hated, Kennie.
> > Which YOU as a WICCAN are so clearly UNBIASED about. <snicker>
>
> MOE> I''ve seen and experienced the dark side of Christianity Kennie.
> MOE> And I'm a PAGAN, not a Wiccan.
>
> You have claimed to be a WICCAN, Maureen, and soemtimes Pagan. Generally
> the terms are interchangeable.
Not exactly. Wicca is a specific Pagan religion. Not all Pagans are
Wiccans.
I've explained this before why I no longer consider myself a Wiccan
but more of a Neopagan. This is my personal journey to Deity and not
something I wish to share with a lying pissant like you and your
doggie Greg.
krp
> MOE> I recently cornered his lying ass on asCPS about his attempt to pass
> MOE> off a DD-245 for a DD214 as proof of his " honorable" service record.
> MOE> I left him only one way out , a way he didn't like, and that
> obviously
> MOE> made him mad. Like an OCD sufferer, his anonymous forged hate -filled
> MOE> posts is his little ego masturbation to make himself feel better.
> Can't keep your and Moore's lies straight. There is NO such form as a
> DD-245. I offered a JPEG of my DD-256AF as proof of an honorable
> discharge.
MOE> So I typed the number wrong, The point is you tried passing off a
MOE> certificate you admitted was a replacement as if it was the same as
MOE> the DD-214, which was the SPECIFIC document I've been arguing with you
MOE> about all these months. It was the 214 eleven years ago that you
MOE> claimed you wold send anyone who requested via email a jpeg of your
MOE> own 214 to prove your claims of an honorable discharge.
Let's get some REALITY in the room. First I *NEVER* misrepresented my
DD-256AF as my DD-214. YOU have TRIED to do that. Why? To support your
claims that I NEVER served, and Moore's claims I "ran to Canada." The
DD-256AF is PROOF of HONORABLE SERVICE. I know you fancy yourself as a
"MILITARY EXPERT:" with the only supporting claim is that your alleged
"DADDY" served in Viet Nam. YOU DID NOT! Yes, Maureen, my DD_256 is a
"replacement" because my ex-wife destroyed the original. I know you claim
that it is a FAKE. Anybody with any REAL military service can tell you it is
not. They can also tell you what HOOPS one must go through to get a
REPLACEMENT 256. They don't just HAND THEM OUT as YOU CLAIM they do.
What I said 11 years ago, Maureen was very NAIVE on my part. I had NO
concept of the PSYCHOPATHS like you and Moore that populated the net. There
is NO WAY I would post it today. I see how you LIE YOUR ASS OFF about my
DD-256. There is NO WAY that I'd feed a WHACKJOB like you and Moore today.
What I was dumb enough to say I'd do 11 years ago is NOT what I would do in
the face of TRULY INSANE people like you and David Moore today. I would,
however, be willing to show it to any VET (other than Moore) who wasn't nuts
who came to my place to see it. My DD-256 PROVES that I served contrary to
YOUR fabricated BULLSHIT, and that I served HONORABLY also contrary to your
insane BULLSHIT!
Oh and Maureen, I don't make fun of any REAL VET, only the BULLSHIT you
as a old bitch claims with NO proof of it being true about some mythical war
hero daddy that you have NEVER documented as being REAL. So I make fun of
the 293 Star General quadruple ACE in an observation plane. Mostly because
there is NO EVIDENCE that you really had a "DADDY" who served. I can bet
that *IF* your dad is a Vet as you claim, that if he read the SHIT you post
he'd give you a talking to. But judging from what we can see, I am sure it
would bounce off you like hail on a tin roof.
You speak like a person with a paper asshole.
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I considered the possibility that you've been lying all along about
this.
>. It had lots of people falling on the floor laughing their
> asses off.
Really? Who?
> It wasn't even real world speculation, it was something well
> past RIDICULE of Moore.
IOW you lied about the Santeria curse.
Got it.
>I think it is hilarious to consider Moore making
> his "MOVES" in on a really HOT woman and him breaking out in uncontrollable
> flatulence, and letting one RIP that shatters windows in two states. You've
> gotta admit that a horndog like Moore getting uncontrollable farts whenever
> he makes his SLICK moves (blackmail) on a woman is a funny image.
What proof is there that Moore is a " horndog"? Your word Kennie?
Your word has no value.
> Try NOT to
> think about STUD there (Moore) typing to HIT on a hot woman and just farting
> incessantly the closer he gets the louder and stinkier they get. Oh what a
> HOOT!
Childish juvenile humor seems to be your idea of what is funny. Not
surprising considering your immaturity.
So let me get this straight ( no pun intended). Are you saying now
that this so -called curse was just a joke, something you imagined up?
In that case you LIED about the Santeria High Priest and/or the
Cubans who asked for your permission.
But then you didn't know the difference between Santeria and Voodoo.
So which is it Kennie? " They" asked you or the whole thingw as just
your imagination?
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cbaa876f-f66d-4e92...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > MOE> I recently cornered his lying ass on asCPS about his attempt to pass
> > MOE> off a DD-245 for a DD214 as proof of his " honorable" service record.
> > MOE> I left him only one way out , a way he didn't like, and that
> > obviously
> > MOE> made him mad. Like an OCD sufferer, his anonymous forged hate -filled
> > MOE> posts is his little ego masturbation to make himself feel better.
> > Can't keep your and Moore's lies straight. There is NO such form as a
> > DD-245. I offered a JPEG of my DD-256AF as proof of an honorable
> > discharge.
>
> MOE> So I typed the number wrong, The point is you tried passing off a
> MOE> certificate you admitted was a replacement as if it was the same as
> MOE> the DD-214, which was the SPECIFIC document I've been arguing with you
> MOE> about all these months. It was the 214 eleven years ago that you
> MOE> claimed you wold send anyone who requested via email a jpeg of your
> MOE> own 214 to prove your claims of an honorable discharge.
>
> Let's get some REALITY in the room. First I *NEVER* misrepresented my
> DD-256AF as my DD-214.
Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
honorable discharge claims.
We can go around and around this as many times as you'd like Kennie.
The fact is you tried passing off the 256 as if it was the SAME as the
214.
All your hysterics are you just trying to cover your ass because I
saw through your trick
This whole subject of your alleged Air Force service record is about
your CLAIMS about yourself while you were in the Air Force.Claims I
pretty much dissected as not credible.
By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2 years
reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor", a would be Air
Force pilot, an " advisor", and whatever else bullshit you've claimed
about your service over the years.
A DD-214 would back up your claims about yourself. The 256 is at
best a presentation certificate.
Squirm and yammer all you want Kennie. The facts still remain the
same.
I admit I am enjoying your pissy act. Granted saying the same old
stuff over and over can get boring but I do enjoy pissing you off.
>YOU have TRIED to do that. Why? To support your
> claims that I NEVER served,
I never said you never served Kennie. I just question the details
ABOUT your service.
You can repeat your lies about me all you want. Your lies confirm
what I;'e been saying about you.
>and Moore's claims I "ran to Canada." The
> DD-256AF is PROOF of HONORABLE SERVICE. I know you fancy yourself as a
> "MILITARY EXPERT:
Liar. I never said I was.
>" with the only supporting claim is that your alleged
> "DADDY" served in Viet Nam. YOU DID NOT!
My "alleged" father is a real person Kennie and he did serve in Nam
while you did not.
And OC I was a baby then so I couldn't serve.
Any more hysterics Kennie?
Care to show more of your irrational outbursts?
> Yes, Maureen, my DD_256 is a
> "replacement" because my ex-wife destroyed the original. I know you claim
> that it is a FAKE.
Lie. I never claimed it was a fake. I have questions about it, yes but
I never claimed it was a fake, That is YOUR lie you wish to put in my
mouth.
>Anybody with any REAL military service can tell you it is
> not. They can also tell you what HOOPS one must go through to get a
> REPLACEMENT 256. They don't just HAND THEM OUT as YOU CLAIM they do.
Lie. I never said that.
>
> What I said 11 years ago, Maureen was very NAIVE on my part. I had NO
> concept of the PSYCHOPATHS like you and Moore that populated the net.
Like you Kennie?
BTW you claimed you have Moore's DD-214.
Pot, kettle....
>There
> is NO WAY I would post it today. I see how you LIE YOUR ASS OFF about my
> DD-256. There is NO WAY that I'd feed a WHACKJOB like you and Moore today.
Probably because Moore actually served in the military and we both
would know if your DD-214 was altered by you.
Again Kennie, if you never intend to release your DD-214, why the
fuss? Just say no and be done with it.
> What I was dumb enough to say I'd do 11 years ago is NOT what I would do in
> the face of TRULY INSANE people like you and David Moore today.
" Insane" like you and Greg, Kennie?
Ever actually read your posts Kennie and wonder if anyone reading
your rants thinks you are sane?
Here's something you seem to fail to consider. When I was first
exposed to you it was via crossposts to the Bob Larson newsgroup. Then
to me you were just another poster. After making some posts of my own
and you attacking me in your usual misogynistc way, I decided to read
some of your older posts and look through Moore's website about you. I
didn't take Moore's word for it about you. I looked for myself your
own words.
I don't know Moore personally but I've seen enough about you to know
what kind of scum you actually are. Your own words convinced me of
what you are.
Had you NOT been a usenet fukkup, your posts would have lead me to a
different conclusion about you.
You only have yourself to blame Kennieplop.
> I would,
> however, be willing to show it to any VET (other than Moore) who wasn't nuts
> who came to my place to see it. My DD-256 PROVES that I served contrary to
> YOUR fabricated BULLSHIT, and that I served HONORABLY also contrary to your
> insane BULLSHIT!
SSDD
>
> Oh and Maureen, I don't make fun of any REAL VET
You did with my father you goddamn liar.
>, only the BULLSHIT you
> as a old bitch claims with NO proof of it being true about some mythical war
> hero daddy that you have NEVER documented as being REAL. So I make fun of
> the 293 Star General quadruple ACE in an observation plane.
Prove I ever said those things about my father. Those are YOUR
claims, not mine.
And fukkboi, he wasn't in " observation planes."
>Mostly because
> there is NO EVIDENCE that you really had a "DADDY" who served.
Nice try Kennie but I'm not giving you and your doggie Greg stalking
material. If my father wishes to post anything, he can do so, but I've
exposed your posturing lies well enough that such a response is not
necessary.
It is sufficient enough that I know enough details to see your lies.
>I can bet
> that *IF* your dad is a Vet as you claim, that if he read the SHIT you post
> he'd give you a talking to.
Where did you think I got some of my information FROM Kennie?
BTW you don't speak for my father and never will. He is quite capable
of speaking for himself--and does so.
I'm actually surprised you haven't some some online research into the
A-37s. But then your doggie greg sucks at finding information online.
Anything else, you lying hypocrite?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>But judging from what we can see, I am sure it
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Your overreaction of laughter is irrational behavior Kennie.
Perhaps you are projecting your own neurotic behavior onto Moore.
I've seen your photo. You are hardly good looking.. And it is quite
likely that your "uncontrolled farts" while approaching a woman image
came from your own personal experience.
Your misogyny can be seen as a compensation for your inability to
connect with the female gender. As are your bad relationships with
your daughters.
I would even go so far as to say your ancestry may include someone
who was Polish and that makes you feel ashamed for some reason.
In an ironic way, I think you yourself are "cursed". It would explain
a lot about you.
Maybe your personality defect was one of the actual reasons for your
military discharge. Maybe you got a Section 8 for some sort of mental
illness which you so clearly suffer from.
And OC the massive cum description is plainly a premature
ejaculation reference, which combined with your uncontrolled farts,
would make you a lousy lover in bed for women or men.
Your behavior is so clearly not rational or normal behavior Kennie. I
honestly think you are mentally ill or suffer from a personality
defect.
Greegor
Moe > side of Christianity Kennie.
Moe > And I'm a PAGAN, not a Wiccan.
Oh thank the gods, I thought you were going
to say that you experienced the dark side of
Paganism or the dark side of Lesbianism.
krp
> > MOE> I recently cornered his lying ass on asCPS about his attempt to
> > pass
> > MOE> off a DD-245 for a DD214 as proof of his " honorable" service
> > record.
> > MOE> I left him only one way out , a way he didn't like, and that
> > obviously
> > MOE> made him mad. Like an OCD sufferer, his anonymous forged
> > hate -filled
> > MOE> posts is his little ego masturbation to make himself feel better.
> > Can't keep your and Moore's lies straight. There is NO such form as a
> > DD-245. I offered a JPEG of my DD-256AF as proof of an honorable
> > discharge.
>
> MOE> So I typed the number wrong, The point is you tried passing off a
> MOE> certificate you admitted was a replacement as if it was the same as
> MOE> the DD-214, which was the SPECIFIC document I've been arguing with
> you
> MOE> about all these months. It was the 214 eleven years ago that you
> MOE> claimed you wold send anyone who requested via email a jpeg of your
> MOE> own 214 to prove your claims of an honorable discharge.
>
> Let's get some REALITY in the room. First I *NEVER* misrepresented my
> DD-256AF as my DD-214.
MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
MOE> honorable discharge claims.
Not in ANY way, McAllister. Jusdt DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
NOT serve honorably!!
MOE> We can go around and around this as many times as you'd like Kennie.
MOE> The fact is you tried passing off the 256 as if it was the SAME as the
MOE> 214.
You are halucinating again, too much LSD. I NEVER said ANY such thing.
It's ALL in that twisted beanie of YOURS!
MOE> This whole subject of your alleged Air Force service record is about
MOE> your CLAIMS about yourself while you were in the Air Force.Claims I
MOE> pretty much dissected as not credible.
Keep telling yourself that. The DD-256 AF pretty well closes the door on
your KOOKDOM, McAllister!
MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2 years
MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
Greegor
years
MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:06214832-a34f-4ea6...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2years
MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
GH> She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS to learn which way to point a
gun, but then she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I can't help the
>> guy's later arguments. People tend to create their own reality.
>
>"MASSIVE COALITION FORCE"-- Kenneth Pangborn.
BURN!
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
Kent Wills
It's always wise to presume Pangborn has lied. He can be honest,
but it doesn't happen often.
>
>
>>. It had lots of people falling on the floor laughing their
>> asses off.
>
>Really? Who?
The voices in Pangborn's head, of course. He thinks they're real
people.
>
>>�It wasn't even real world speculation, it was something well
>> past RIDICULE of Moore. �
>
> IOW you lied about the Santeria curse.
>
> Got it.
What a shock, huh?
>
>>I think it is hilarious to consider Moore making
>> his "MOVES" in on a really HOT woman and him breaking out in uncontrollable
>> flatulence, and letting �one RIP that shatters windows in two states. You've
>> gotta admit that a horndog like Moore getting uncontrollable farts whenever
>> he makes his SLICK moves (blackmail) on a woman is a funny image.
>
> What proof is there that Moore is a " horndog"? Your word Kennie?
>Your word has no value.
David's wife could probably tell us, but I've never seen a post
from her.
It's not the sort of thing one discusses in most conversations, so
I've never mentioned the topic with her or David.
>
>
>> Try NOT to
>> think about STUD there (Moore) typing to HIT on a hot woman and just farting
>> incessantly the closer he gets the louder and stinkier they get. �Oh what a
>> HOOT!
>
> Childish juvenile humor seems to be your idea of what is funny. Not
>surprising considering your immaturity.
>
> So let me get this straight ( no pun intended). Are you saying now
>that this so -called curse was just a joke, something you imagined up?
Pangborn has claimed that the rape threat he issued against Stacy
was just a joke.
>
> In that case you LIED about the Santeria High Priest and/or the
>Cubans who asked for your permission.
>
> But then you didn't know the difference between Santeria and Voodoo.
If it isn't about alcoholic beverages, Kenneth Robert Pangborn
doesn't know much.
>
> So which is it Kennie? " They" asked you or the whole thingw as just
>your imagination?
>
I expect the truth will be that one of Pangborn's hallucinations
was more realistic that the norm. I don't expect to know if I'm
correct or not.
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team,
posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found
legally insane.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
> Your overreaction of laughter is irrational behavior Kennie.
>
> Perhaps you are projecting your own neurotic behavior onto Moore.
Ken does that a great deal.
When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
proved, Barbara is.
>
> I've seen your photo. You are hardly good looking.. And it is quite
>likely that your "uncontrolled farts" while approaching a woman image
>came from your own personal experience.
It would be consistent with Pangborn's projection.
>
> Your misogyny can be seen as a compensation for your inability to
>connect with the female gender. As are your bad relationships with
>your daughters.
Certainly with Megan. Her blog was written in such a way that
the only reasonable impression one could get was that she HATES her
dad.
>
> I would even go so far as to say your ancestry may include someone
>who was Polish and that makes you feel ashamed for some reason.
Ken's birth parents (I have proof that Ken Pangborn was adopted
and I'll make it available when he makes the proof he claims to have
that David was adopted available for review) were Polish.
>
> In an ironic way, I think you yourself are "cursed". It would explain
>a lot about you.
He may be cursed. Only Lar$on can KNOW :-)
>
> Maybe your personality defect was one of the actual reasons for your
>military discharge. Maybe you got a Section 8 for some sort of mental
>illness which you so clearly suffer from.
He has been very elusive.
There was a simple out for him. I even laid the ground work for
him.
When you mentioned the DD-214, he could have jumped on my post
about how he only sought to prove he got an honorable discharge.
Being the very STUPID (unable to learn) fool Kenneth Robert
Pangborn is, he went on a rant about how he's not going to post the
DD-214.
>
> And OC the massive cum description is plainly a premature
>ejaculation reference, which combined with your uncontrolled farts,
>would make you a lousy lover in bed for women or men.
Pangborn has NO use for women other than to hide his true sexual
orientation from potential clients.
>
> Your behavior is so clearly not rational or normal behavior Kennie. I
>honestly think you are mentally ill or suffer from a personality
>defect.
He's admitted, in ADRU, that he was found to be insane, or he
lied about it.
As of my writing this, he's never claimed he was being less than
honest when he wrote, ""I am insane!" Since being ruled insane by a
court of proper jurisdiction isn't the sort of thing a person would
lie about, it's easy to accept that he was being honest when he posted
the claim.
> They don't use metaphors in Poland.
< That explains a lot.
I don't think they use toilets either.
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, insane drunken (by his own claims)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team expressing his
bigotry. In this instance it's against the people in Poland.
Message-ID: <M6Krj.1145$r03.503@trnddc08>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:cbaa876f-f66d-4e92...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
>> MOE> I recently cornered his lying ass on asCPS about his attempt to pass
>> MOE> off a DD-245 for a DD214 as proof of his " honorable" service record.
>> MOE> I left him only one way out , a way he didn't like, and that
>> obviously
>> MOE> made him mad. Like an OCD sufferer, his anonymous forged hate -filled
>> MOE> posts is his little ego masturbation to make himself feel better.
>
>> Can't keep your and Moore's lies straight. There is NO such form as a
>> DD-245. I offered a JPEG of my DD-256AF as proof of an honorable
>> discharge.
>
>MOE> So I typed the number wrong, The point is you tried passing off a
>MOE> certificate you admitted was a replacement as if it was the same as
>MOE> the DD-214, which was the SPECIFIC document I've been arguing with you
>MOE> about all these months. It was the 214 eleven years ago that you
>MOE> claimed you wold send anyone who requested via email a jpeg of your
>MOE> own 214 to prove your claims of an honorable discharge.
>
> Let's get some REALITY in the room. First
[...]
You'll be missed... NOT.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, expressing his
fondness for child porn in Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
>MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>
> Not in ANY way, McAllister. Jusdt DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
>NOT serve honorably!!
>
You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4t6pi5pmsi1j5vdsg...@4ax.com...
>>MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
>>MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>> Not in ANY way, McAllister. Just DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
>>NOT serve honorably!!
> You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
To "NORMAL PEOPLE" especially VETERANS, bunkie, the DD-256 IS "PROOF"
of HONORABLE SERVICE when it says "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" at the top. YOU and
GENERAL McAllister can try to claim otherwise all you like. It just more
solidly cements your reputation as a LAME ASSED TROLL. And it gives me one
more excuse to call you a "STUPID POLACK!"
krp
> Ken does that a great deal.
> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
> proved, Barbara is.
The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
Wills? I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary proof
there is always a LAME EXCUSE. Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
Lost the link? Figures!!!!
Greegor
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
WHY is it that Moe can't answer such a simple question?
WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
Is HE disabled or are YOU?
What has a 50 year old woman living with her Daddy?
Why is that such a sensitive subject, Maureen?
krp
> MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2years
> MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
>
> KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
>
> GH> She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
> Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS to learn which way to point a
> gun, but then she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
GH> WHY is it that Moe can't answer such a simple question?
GH> WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
Come on Greg. She DOES live in ARKANSAS! We all KNOW how they are there!
Greegor
MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
G > She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
KRP > Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS
KRP > to learn which way to point a gun, but then
KRP > she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
G > WHY is it that Moe can't answer such a simple question?
G > WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
KRP > Come on Greg. She DOES live in ARKANSAS!
KRP > We all KNOW how they are there!
Moe, Is THAT why you're so afraid to fess up?
G > Is HE disabled or are YOU?
G > What has a 50 year old woman living with her Daddy?
G > Why is that such a sensitive subject, Maureen?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>
>> Ken does that a great deal.
>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>> proved, Barbara is.
>
> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>Wills?
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
after I posted the link to them.
>I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
>some IMAGINARY PLACE.
Has your insanity (unless you lied) gotten so bad that you think
Photobucket is imaginary? Really?
>When it comes to actually showing your imaginary proof
>there is always a LAME EXCUSE.
It's sad that you see the truth as a lame excuse. It's not at
all surprising, but it is still very sad.
>Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
As I've mentioned a few times, I didn't keep the pictures. As
such, there is no longer a valid URL for me to post. Not that you've
asked for one before now. You've just whined that I've not really had
them.
>Lost the link?
No. The links (plural) are no longer valid, stupid. When one
removes pictures from Photobucket, the URLs that lead to them become
invalid.
How can you be so stupid and yet function in any capacity in
society? Serious question.
>Figures!!!!
I no longer have the pictures, as I've already stated the first
or second week of August. Since I didn't really care if they were of
her or not, I didn't have much of a need for them. It's not like
she's going to meet me at the airport requiring that I know what she
looks like.
I linked to them on my photobucket page back in July. You RAN
from the thread after that.
I put them on my photobucket page so that you could see them.
That was my sole motivations. If they were of her, as it turns out
they were, you would know someone had sent me pictures of Barbara. If
they weren't, you would know someone was trying to con me into
thinking they were of Barbara.
While that wasn't proof, your running like the coward you are
gave me, and I presume others, reason to believe the hefty gal in the
pictures was and is Barbara. Her Facebook page (now removed)
confirmed that they were of her.
I wish I had kept them. Oh well. I didn't and there isn't
anything I can do about it now.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4t6pi5pmsi1j5vdsg...@4ax.com...
>
>>>MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
>>>MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>
>>> Not in ANY way, McAllister. Just DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
>>>NOT serve honorably!!
>
>> You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
>
> To "NORMAL PEOPLE" especially VETERANS, bunkie,
Bunkie?
I'm not gay. As such, your addressing me with a cute pet name
won't get me to return your sexual interest.
>the DD-256 IS "PROOF"
>of HONORABLE SERVICE when it says "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" at the top.
That is proof of an honorable discharge only. It does given
reason to suspect you were honorable in your service, but suspicion is
not proof. As such, it doesn't support your claim.
>YOU and
>GENERAL McAllister
Outside of your alcohol induced insanity (unless you lied about
either or both) Moe is not a General.
>can try to claim otherwise all you like. It just more
>solidly cements your reputation as a LAME ASSED TROLL.
You're the one who came to misc.legal with the intent to disrupt.
Lie about this truth all your alcohol induced insanity (unless you
lied about either or both) demands. The truth remains the truth.
>And it gives me one
>more excuse to call you a "STUPID POLACK!"
>
That you're a bigot who needs NO excuse has been proved many,
many times. A very small sample of that proof can be seen at
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
I encourage everyone reading to visit the link and the rest of
the Kenneth Robert Pangborn TRUTH site, if you've not done so. Doing
so will show how much of a fraud and con man Kenneth Robert Pangborn,
of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team is. The bulk of the proof presented
on the site consists of Pangborn's own writing, with links to the
archive on Google whenever possible.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 19, 3:05�am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:06214832-a34f-4ea6...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2years
>> MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
>>
>> KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
>>
>> GH> She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
>>
>> � � Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS to learn which way to point a
>> gun, but then she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
>
>WHY is it that Moe can't answer such a simple question?
Both Moe and I have informed you that you have the wrong person.
As such, she can't be the person you claim lives with her dad.
You manage to ALWAYS get the wrong person. How can you be wrong
so often? Blind guessing should have gotten you one or two correct
hits in your life, but you've managed zero.
Do you intentionally list the wrong information? If so, what is
your motivation for doing such?
>
>WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
Ken and Moe are not the same person, stupid.
You're replying to Ken, not Moe.
IS your Fregoli acting up again?
>
>Is HE disabled or are YOU?
>
>What has a 50 year old woman living with her Daddy?
As you already KNOW, but can't be honest enough to admit, Moe
doesn't. You have the wrong person.
By your own standards you've admitted this with your inability to
prove Moe is the person you claim she is.
Of course, I KNOW Moe's address. No, I'm not going to post it.
You may believe me or not. The choice is yours.
>
>Why is that such a sensitive subject, Maureen?
Where do you see any sensitivity from Moe? I've not seen it. I
have seen her laughing at your incompetent stalking abilities. Many
people have done it over the years.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
krp
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:44:50 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Ken does that a great deal.
>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>>> proved, Barbara is.
>>
>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>Wills?
> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
> after I posted the link to them.
Bullshit! You always make that claim. "I've already provided it" when
you have NOT. Quite the POLACK bullshit artist. POST A LINK or stand
branded a LIAR again!
Greegor
KBW > that you have the wrong person.
Got a LINK to where Moe has denied
living in Dardanelle with Frank?
If she says that's not her, that would be fun!
Kind of like when YOU said you are NOT
the famous garage burglar Kent Bradley Wills!
It's worked out so well! LOL
KBW > As such, she can't
KBW > be the person you claim lives with her dad.
KBW > You manage to ALWAYS get the wrong
KBW > person. How can you be wrong so often?
KBW > Blind guessing should have gotten you one
KBW > or two correct hits in your life, but you've
KBW > managed zero. Do you intentionally list
KBW > the wrong information? If so, what is your
KBW > motivation for doing such?
G > WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
KBW > Ken and Moe are not the same person, stupid.
KBW > You're replying to Ken, not Moe.
KBW > IS your Fregoli acting up again?
G > Is HE disabled or are YOU?
G > What has a 50 year old woman living with her Daddy?
KBW > As you already KNOW, but can't be honest
KBW > enough to admit, Moe doesn't. You have
KBW > the wrong person.
KBW > By your own standards you've admitted this
KBW > with your inability to prove Moe is the
KBW > person you claim she is.
Moe hasn't even denied she lives with her
daddy Frank in Dardanelle Arkansas.
KBW > Of course, I KNOW Moe's address.
KBW > No, I'm not going to post it.
KBW > You may believe me or not.
KBW > The choice is yours.
You are Kent Bradley Wills.
G > Why is that such a sensitive subject, Maureen?
KBW > Where do you see any sensitivity from Moe?
KBW > I've not seen it. I have seen her laughing
KBW > at your incompetent stalking abilities.
KBW > Many people have done it over the years.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9j0si5hpsnijdguum...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:44:50 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> Ken does that a great deal.
>>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>>>> proved, Barbara is.
>>>
>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>>Wills?
>
>> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
>> after I posted the link to them.
>
> Bullshit! You always make that claim.
I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
if you count this post). How is that "always mak[ing] that claim?"
Be specific, unless you've been caught in yet ANOTHER of your
MANY drunken pathological lies.
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting and The A-team,
raven1
wrote:
>Quite the POLACK bullshit artist.
Nice display of bigotry there, dipshit. And you wonder why no one
believes you when you protest that you aren't the author of the
endless racist forgeries.
womanGoddess
Had you actually been knowledgable about the subject of Paganism
instead of being a dumbass troll, you would know about the Crone
aspect of the Goddess.
You attempt to twist my statement about the dark side of Christianity
noted.
And I never was a lesbian.
What's your excuse, loser?
womanGoddess
> AMERICA'S MOST DECORATED VETERAN MAUREEN MCALLISTER!!!!!"womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Ad homs noted.
So we're going to do this same old crap over again Kennie? My answers
to your claims still remain the same. You can bitch and holler all you
want, you know damn well I figured out your deception and caught you
at it.
As far as " twisted" minds are concerned, Kennie, you're one to
talk. I find it worth noting that by your own words your term of
service was 4 years active, 2 years reserve.
I suspect your REAL discharge reason was due to your personality
defect, not anything actually " honorable".
> MOE> This whole subject of your alleged Air Force service record is about
> MOE> your CLAIMS about yourself while you were in the Air Force.Claims I
> MOE> pretty much dissected as not credible.
>
> Keep telling yourself that. The DD-256 AF pretty well closes the door on
> your KOOKDOM, McAllister!
And yet you keep on opening the " door" again....
>
> MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2 years
> MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
>
> How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
Your DD-214. Kennie.
womanGoddess
At the time of your " service" Kennie, the total tour was about six
years, mainly because the AF was overmanned and was letting guys loose
from service left and right.
But the term of YOUR " service" comapred with what you CLAIM you were
in the Air Force doesn't jive. For example the command would NEVER
have a young recruit be an "advisor". Advisors were usually an offcier
level position. YOu never were an officer, though you would love to
claim otherwise.
Your " weapons instructor" claim I've discounted numerous times
before.
Your would be Air Force pilot claim was an obvious lie as the first
thing you would have had to be to qualify for the tests was an
officer.
And your claim of being sharpshooter level in field tests you quickly
abandoned when you found out that my father also participated in the
same type competitions and won a few awards, some of which he still
has.
Simply put, I have repeatedly exposed you for the liar you are. And
you don't like it.
womanGoddess
Not so much since he's a habitual liar.
The changing in details of his story pretty much confirm he lied all
along.
>
>
>
> >>I think it is hilarious to consider Moore making
> >> his "MOVES" in on a really HOT woman and him breaking out in uncontrollable
> >> flatulence, and letting one RIP that shatters windows in two states. You've
> >> gotta admit that a horndog like Moore getting uncontrollable farts whenever
> >> he makes his SLICK moves (blackmail) on a woman is a funny image.
>
> > What proof is there that Moore is a " horndog"? Your word Kennie?
> >Your word has no value.
>
> David's wife could probably tell us, but I've never seen a post
> from her.
> It's not the sort of thing one discusses in most conversations, so
> I've never mentioned the topic with her or David.
>
>
>
> >> Try NOT to
> >> think about STUD there (Moore) typing to HIT on a hot woman and just farting
> >> incessantly the closer he gets the louder and stinkier they get. Oh what a
> >> HOOT!
>
> > Childish juvenile humor seems to be your idea of what is funny. Not
> >surprising considering your immaturity.
>
> > So let me get this straight ( no pun intended). Are you saying now
> >that this so -called curse was just a joke, something you imagined up?
>
> Pangborn has claimed that the rape threat he issued against Stacy
> was just a joke.
He also claimed the posts about hitting Betty's head with a baseball
bat and a jackhammer was a joke.
It would be his mentality to think of rape as funny.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
>
>
womanGoddess
> wrote:
>
> >MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
> >MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>
> > Not in ANY way, McAllister. Jusdt DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
> >NOT serve honorably!!
>
> You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
Agreed. All he's been doing is trying to present a wall certificate,
a piece of paper he admits was a replacement for the original, as "
proof".
The 256 is not considered sufficient proof in many groups, inlcuding
the VFW.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4t6pi5pmsi1j5vdsg...@4ax.com...
>
> >>MOE> Not specifically no, but the discussion was proving your AF service
> >>MOE> honorable discharge claims.
> >> Not in ANY way, McAllister. Just DISPROVING - YOURE claims that I did
> >>NOT serve honorably!!
> > You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
>
> To "NORMAL PEOPLE" especially VETERANS, bunkie, the DD-256 IS "PROOF"
> of HONORABLE SERVICE when it says "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" at the top.
Not the VFW. And your photo doesn't have that phrase " at the top"
Kennie.
BTW why all the caps ( indicating shouting)?
Seems to me the more you yell about this the more its obvious youare
hiding the details of your actual service record.
You made the claim of honorable discharge and other claims. the
DD-214 would prove your claims. You user to offer jpegs of your 214
years ago as proof, yet now you make ad hom excuses to not want your
DD-214 released LEGALLY to anyone.
Clear signs you are hiding something.
YOU and
> GENERAL McAllister can try to claim otherwise all you like. It just more
> solidly cements your reputation as a LAME ASSED TROLL. And it gives me one
> more excuse to call you a "STUPID POLACK!"
Projection noted.
So the parents that put you up for adoption were Polish.
You should be thankful for them for allowing you to be born.
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
Quit the act.
womanGoddess
(( YAWNS))
Say again, stalker?
womanGoddess
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:06214832-a34f-4ea6...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2years
> > MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
>
> > KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
>
> > GH> She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
>
> > Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS to learn which way to point a
> > gun, but then she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
>
> WHY is it that Moe can't answer such a simple question?
I choose not to answer asinine questions, particularly when posted by
an asshole.
>
> WHY do you live with your daddy Frank, Maureen?
Am I Greg? I live in a different residence than my father.
>
> Is HE disabled or are YOU?
Either way, what does it say about you to be stalking someone
disabled? Or more accurately TRYING to stalk disabled people.
>
> What has a 50 year old woman living with her Daddy?
" What has"?
>
> Why is that such a sensitive subject, Maureen?
Is it when I don't answer your question right away it's sensitive to
you?
Consider this asked and answered greg. Try again and you will get the
A&A notation.
BTW you pulling this crap is a sure sign you are in desperation.
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9j0si5hpsnijdguum...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:44:50 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>
> >>> Ken does that a great deal.
> >>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
> >>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
> >>> proved, Barbara is.
>
> >> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
> >>Wills?
> > You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
> > after I posted the link to them.
>
> Bullshit! You always make that claim. "I've already provided it" when
> you have NOT. Quite the POLACK bullshit artist. POST A LINK or stand
> branded a LIAR again!
Projection noted.
Irony noted.
krp
>>>>> Ken does that a great deal.
>>>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>>>>> proved, Barbara is.
>>>>
>>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>>>Wills?
>>
>>> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
>>> after I posted the link to them.
>>
>> Bullshit! You always make that claim.
>
> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
> if you count this post
Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt. Just because you SAID
something 5 times or 52,555 times is meaningless when you NEVER posted a
public LINK to it.
YOU'RE LYING again Wills. Just a stupid Polack who thinks he can get away
with "I posted it last July" is PROOF.
krp
"raven1" <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:dj8ti5p7kcqkis2pk...@4ax.com...
Did you miss the caveat that the word does NOT apply to 99.9% of the Polish
population???
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:def06e68-fdef-4a68...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 19, 3:44 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>
> > Ken does that a great deal.
> > When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
> > doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
> > proved, Barbara is.
>
> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
> Wills? I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
> some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary
> proof
> there is always a LAME EXCUSE. Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
> Lost the link? Figures!!!!
MOE> He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
NOW there are conditions. He said he ALREADY posted the URL. NOW there
are 'CONDITIONS" and you see NO contradiction in that.
krp
MOE> As far as " twisted" minds are concerned, Kennie, you're one to
MOE> talk. I find it worth noting that by your own words your term of
MOE> service was 4 years active, 2 years reserve.
Those were the OFFICIAL terms of enlistment, Maureen. That's what you
did.
MOE> I suspect your REAL discharge reason was due to your personality
MOE> defect, not anything actually " honorable".
Sorry Maureen I know you KNOW as THE Chief of Staff for the Air Force at
that time not just how long enlistment period were in 1959, BUT that
according to LAW at the time I served, IF the INSANE CLAIMS YOU MAKE were
true - the best I could have gotten was a "GENERAL DISCHARGE" not an
HONORABLE one. The changes came in under the peanut farmer 10 years later.
But with all YOUR personal military experience and COMMAND status, you KNOW
that, right?
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Dec 19, 3:44�am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>>
>> > � � Ken does that a great deal.
>> > � � When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>> > doing so. �Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>> > proved, Barbara is.
>>
>> � � The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>> Wills? �I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
>> some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary proof
>> there is always a LAME EXCUSE. �Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
>> Lost the link? �Figures!!!!
>
> He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
>
> Quit the act.
>
I no longer have them. After it was clear Pangborn wasn't going
to comment on them, I removed them from Photobucket and deleted the
copies I had.
I expect Google has them archived, since they were sent to my
Gmail account. However, I am no longer in possession of them.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team claiming in misc.legal
that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:pp2ti5dsm9e3sav13...@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Ken does that a great deal.
>>>>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>>>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>>>>>> proved, Barbara is.
>>>>>
>>>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>>>>Wills?
>>>
>>>> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
>>>> after I posted the link to them.
>>>
>>> Bullshit! You always make that claim.
>>
>> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
>> if you count this post
>
> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
I would expect a trial consultant to be able to understand. Once
again you allow me to show how incredibly STUPID (unable to learn) you
are and why you've FAILED as a trial consultant.
>Just because you SAID
>something 5 times or 52,555 times is meaningless when you NEVER posted a
>public LINK to it.
I did. Back in July. You're just taking advantage of the fact
that I was using X-No-Archive: Yes at the time to LIE and claim I
didn't make the pictures available.
It's possible someone is buying your LIE, but I doubt it.
>YOU'RE LYING again Wills. Just a stupid Polack who thinks he can get away
>with "I posted it last July" is PROOF.
If I'm lying, prove it. If my claim is 100% accurate, as you
KNOW it to be, you'll not be able to prove your claim that I am lying.
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>AIR FORCE CHIEF OF STAFF GENERAL (AF BRAT)
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:27572af4-2d85-468d...@v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>MOE> As far as " twisted" minds are concerned, Kennie, you're one to
>MOE> talk. I find it worth noting that by your own words your term of
>MOE> service was 4 years active, 2 years reserve.
>
> Those were the OFFICIAL terms of enlistment, Maureen. That's what you
>did.
>
I wasn't aware Moe had served. Is your claim that she did
another of your drunken pathological lies?
>MOE> I suspect your REAL discharge reason was due to your personality
>MOE> defect, not anything actually " honorable".
>
> Sorry Maureen I know you KNOW as THE Chief of Staff for the Air Force at
Outside of your continued PROOF that you only post when you're
drunk, Moe wasn't the Chief of Staff for the Air Force. Really.
I understand that your constant boozing (unless you lied) forces
you to believe she was, but the truth will forever remain that she was
not. You'll need to come to terms with this truth.
>that time not just how long enlistment period were in 1959, BUT that
>according to LAW at the time I served, IF the INSANE CLAIMS YOU MAKE were
>true - the best I could have gotten was a "GENERAL DISCHARGE" not an
>HONORABLE one. The changes came in under the peanut farmer 10 years later.
>But with all YOUR personal military experience and COMMAND status, you KNOW
>that, right?
I think everyone can KNOW you need to cease the consumption of
alcoholic beverages, unless you LIED when you claimed alcoholism was
the cause of your being found legally insane.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team accidentally admitting
he alters the context of posts when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> >>It wasn't even real world speculation, it was something well
>> >> past RIDICULE of Moore.
>>
>> > IOW you lied about the Santeria curse.
>>
>> > Got it.
>>
>> What a shock, huh?
>
> Not so much since he's a habitual liar.
>
> The changing in details of his story pretty much confirm he lied all
>along.
>
I, and others, have tried to explain to Pangborn that if he would
just be honest, he wouldn't have to remember all of his lies. Barring
that, he should make notes of the lies he posts so that he can
reference the notes when he's commenting about his lies.
Sadly, he's not willing to be honest, and, it appears, not
willing/able to make any notes about his lies.
[...]
>>
>> > Childish juvenile humor seems to be your idea of what is funny. Not
>> >surprising considering your immaturity.
>>
>> > So let me get this straight ( no pun intended). Are you saying now
>> >that this so -called curse was just a joke, something you imagined up?
>>
>> Pangborn has claimed that the rape threat he issued against Stacy
>> was just a joke.
>
> He also claimed the posts about hitting Betty's head with a baseball
>bat and a jackhammer was a joke.
>
> It would be his mentality to think of rape as funny.
There's NOTHING funny about rape or assault. But then, Kenneth
Robert Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting has a very LOW opinion of women.
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Dec 19, 3:23�am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:51:54 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >MOE> �Not specifically no, but �the discussion was proving your AF service
>> >MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>>
>> > � �Not in ANY way, McAllister. Jusdt DISPROVING �- YOURE claims that I did
>> >NOT serve honorably!!
>>
>> � � �You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
>
> Agreed. All he's been doing is trying to present a wall certificate,
>a piece of paper he admits was a replacement for the original, as "
>proof".
That only serves as evidence that he was honorably discharged,
nothing more.
>
> The 256 is not considered sufficient proof in many groups, inlcuding
>the VFW.
>
But Pangborn has been stomping up and down, screaming that it is
accepted by every one.
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, accidentally
admitting in misc.legal that he alters posts when he replies.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Dec 19, 3:40�am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:4t6pi5pmsi1j5vdsg...@4ax.com...
>>
>> >>MOE> �Not specifically no, but �the discussion was proving your AF service
>> >>MOE> honorable discharge claims.
>> >> � �Not in ANY way, McAllister. Just DISPROVING �- YOURE claims that I did
>> >>NOT serve honorably!!
>> > � � You've offered NOTHING to support the claim you did.
>>
>> � � To "NORMAL PEOPLE" �especially VETERANS, bunkie, the DD-256 IS "PROOF"
>> of HONORABLE SERVICE �when it says "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" at the top.
>
> Not the VFW. And your photo doesn't have that phrase " at the top"
>Kennie.
And what is he hiding with the censoring of parts?
>
> BTW why all the caps ( indicating shouting)?
Probably emphasis.
>
> Seems to me the more you yell about this the more its obvious youare
>hiding the details of your actual service record.
He does that sort of thing frequently.
>
> You made the claim of honorable discharge and other claims. the
>DD-214 would prove your claims. You user to offer jpegs of your 214
>years ago as proof, yet now you make ad hom excuses to not want your
>DD-214 released LEGALLY to anyone.
>
> Clear signs you are hiding something.
>
It certainly gives reason to suspect there is something he
doesn't want known.
>
> YOU and
>> GENERAL McAllister can try to claim otherwise all you like. It just more
>> solidly cements your reputation as a LAME ASSED TROLL. And it gives me one
>> more excuse to call you a "STUPID POLACK!"
>
> Projection noted.
Actually, Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting and The
A-Team, has once again offered absolute PROOF that he's a bigot.
Further, he's offered absolute PROOF that he's very proud of his
bigotry.
Neither truth requires more proof, but it is nice that he's so
willing to continue to offer it.
>
> So the parents that put you up for adoption were Polish.
There is reason to believe this is the case.
It would explain a great deal, if it were proved to be true.
krp
>>>>>>> Ken does that a great deal.
>>>>>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>>>>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the
>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>> proved, Barbara is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy
>>>>>> world,
>>>>>>Wills?
>>>>
>>>>> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
>>>>> after I posted the link to them.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit! You always make that claim.
>>>
>>> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
>>> if you count this post
>>
>> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
> I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
> be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
> Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed. However
since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
>>Just because you SAID something 5 times or 52,555 times is meaningless
>>when you NEVER posted a
>>public LINK to it.
> I did. Back in July.
NO, you did NOT!!!
> You're just taking advantage of the fact that I was using X-No-Archive:
> Yes at the time to LIE and claim I
> didn't make the pictures available.
A no archive command would NOT make it invisible. It would merely mean
that it would not be in the Google archive. However it WOULD have appeared
to be read at the time. Now, HOWEVER, ikf you did a David Moore and made a
"disappear" command it wouldn't appear. It could be made to vaporize at any
time, from a few minutes to a few days. But it WOULD have appeareed in the
stack. TRY AGAIN, weenie! In ANY event IF you REALLY had the photos and aree
not LYING YOUR ASS OFF, Photobucket is still there.
>>YOU'RE LYING again Wills. Just a stupid Polack who thinks he can get away
>>with "I posted it last July" is PROOF.
> If I'm lying, prove it. If my claim is 100% accurate, as you
> KNOW it to be, you'll not be able to prove your claim that I am lying.
Prove the negative? Prove what? YOU made the affirmative claim that you
HAVE several photos of my wife, and 2 that you DID in point of FACT post a
link to a Photobucket page. The BURDEN OF PROOF, Wills is 100% ON YOU, but
being the oily weasel you ARE you'll demand that I prove you didn't post it.
That you are TAP DANCING so hard stands as PROOF that you are LYING.
Everyone knows at this point, Wills, that ***IF*** you had them you'd be
posting the shit out of the link to them. That you are NOT and all you have
is LAME BULLSHIT like "I already did that" establishes the LIES, POLACK!
krp
>>> > Ken does that a great deal.
>>> > When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
>>> > doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
>>> > proved, Barbara is.
>>>
>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>> Wills? I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
>>> some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary
>>> proof
>>> there is always a LAME EXCUSE. Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
>>> Lost the link? Figures!!!!
>>
>> He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
>>
>> Quit the act.
> I no longer have them.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! LIE CONFIRMED. ROFLMAO.
Of course you don't have them. YOU NEVER DID. You're just a slimy Polack
LIAR, Wills.
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
As opposed to what yoo and greg do Kennie?
womanGoddess
> AIR FORCE CHIEF OF STAFF GENERAL (AF BRAT)"womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Kennie, you do realize, don't you , that your exaggerations and
hysterical rantings don't give you credibility on the subject at hand.
You're just doing your usual. SSDD
You can clear this up once and for all by making your DFD-214
available for viewing.
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:98gui5dcnlv9ct1lk...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> Ken does that a great deal.
> >>>>>>> When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
> >>>>>>> doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the
> >>>>>>> pictures
> >>>>>>> proved, Barbara is.
>
> >>>>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy
> >>>>>> world,
> >>>>>>Wills?
>
> >>>>> You certainly saw them back in July. You RAN from the thread
> >>>>> after I posted the link to them.
>
> >>>> Bullshit! You always make that claim.
>
> >>> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
> >>> if you count this post
>
> >> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
> > I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
> > be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
> > Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
>
> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed. However
> since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
> discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
As to your discharge , actually you DIDN'T put it back up, You snuck
in the 256 and pretended it was the same as the 214. And Kent showed
that you posted it for only a few hours, then when he revealed PB can
send emails of an user's changes, you made your account private.
You're a lot of bluster but you are really a chickenshit.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Projection noted.
You and your claim of having Moore's DD-214.
Greg's claim of having a photo of Moore in a Nazi uniform.
Same shit Kennie.
Quit your hypocrisy.
womanGoddess
> On Dec 20, 5:40 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:def06e68-fdef-4a68...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 19, 3:44 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:7s6pi55528o6v4q7s...@4ax.com...
>
> > > > Ken does that a great deal.
> > > > When Pangborn was declaring bankruptcy, he claimed David was
> > > > doing so. Pangborn has claimed Lindsay is obese when, as the pictures
> > > > proved, Barbara is.
>
> > > The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
> > > Wills? I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
> > > some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary
> > > proof
> > > there is always a LAME EXCUSE. Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
> > > Lost the link? Figures!!!!
>
> > MOE> He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
>
> > NOW there are conditions. He said he ALREADY posted the URL. NOW there
> > are 'CONDITIONS" and you see NO contradiction in that.
>
> Moe
> Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> " A vampire cop? REALLY?"
> "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
> Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Typo corrected.
womanGoddess
> On Dec 20, 5:46 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > AIR FORCE CHIEF OF STAFF GENERAL (AF BRAT)"womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:27572af4-2d85-468d...@v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > MOE> As far as " twisted" minds are concerned, Kennie, you're one to
> > MOE> talk. I find it worth noting that by your own words your term of
> > MOE> service was 4 years active, 2 years reserve.
>
> > Those were the OFFICIAL terms of enlistment, Maureen. That's what you
> > did.
>
> > MOE> I suspect your REAL discharge reason was due to your personality
> > MOE> defect, not anything actually " honorable".
>
> > Sorry Maureen I know you KNOW as THE Chief of Staff for the Air Force at
> > that time not just how long enlistment period were in 1959, BUT that
> > according to LAW at the time I served, IF the INSANE CLAIMS YOU MAKE were
> > true - the best I could have gotten was a "GENERAL DISCHARGE" not an
> > HONORABLE one. The changes came in under the peanut farmer 10 years later.
> > But with all YOUR personal military experience and COMMAND status, you KNOW
> > that, right?
>
> Kennie, you do realize, don't you , that your exaggerations and
> hysterical rantings don't give you credibility on the subject at hand.
>
> You're just doing your usual. SSDD
>
> available for viewing.
>
> Moe
> Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> " A vampire cop? REALLY?"
> "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
> Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Typo corrected.
krp
> MOE> As far as " twisted" minds are concerned, Kennie, you're one to
> MOE> talk. I find it worth noting that by your own words your term of
> MOE> service was 4 years active, 2 years reserve.
>
> Those were the OFFICIAL terms of enlistment, Maureen. That's what you
> did.
>
> MOE> I suspect your REAL discharge reason was due to your personality
> MOE> defect, not anything actually " honorable".
>
> Sorry Maureen I know you KNOW as THE Chief of Staff for the Air Force at
> that time not just how long enlistment period were in 1959, BUT that
> according to LAW at the time I served, IF the INSANE CLAIMS YOU MAKE were
> true - the best I could have gotten was a "GENERAL DISCHARGE" not an
> HONORABLE one. The changes came in under the peanut farmer 10 years later.
> But with all YOUR personal military experience and COMMAND status, you
> KNOW
> that, right?
MOE> Kennie, you do realize, don't you , that your exaggerations and
MOE> hysterical rantings don't give you credibility on the subject at hand.
Mine? Does it occur to you my point that AIR FORCE REGULATIONS at the
time specified the period of enlistment and its terms? Ask your DADDY the
"ACE OF ACES" what an AFR is. As to my hyperbole - Maureen - it is richly
deserved by you for your IDIOTIC claims regarding military service. In 1959
Air Force regs covered enlistments as 4 years active (Regular AF) and 2
years READY RESERVE. YOU desperately want them to be something else. But you
can't issue an "ORDER" changing Air Force Regs 50 years later. Blather on
McAllister.
freedom
>On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:51:30 -0800 (PST), womanGoddess
><fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 18, 6:26=A0am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>
.
>>>
>>> >> MOE> and you boasted that a Santeria curse was put on Moore to make =
him
>>> >> excrete out of his anus =A0and cum in huge
>>> >> MOE> buckets ( a homoerotic imagery, BTW).
>>>
>>> >> =A0 =A0 Again your embelishments are very graphic. I said that one o=
f the
>>> >> people
>>> >> MOORE was harassing (see his keyword list) was/is a Santeria high pr=
ist
>>> >> who
>>> >> asked me about placing a curse on Moore, I also said I suggested he =
not
>>> >> do
>>> >> it. But I lacked the power to stop him. Secretly, the though of Moor=
e
>>> >> reduces to a quivering mass of gelatenous goo does have a certain ap=
peal
>>> >> to
>>> >> it.
>>>
>>> What I actually said, which is FUNNY in its imagery.
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>> krp =A0 =A0View profile
>>> =A0 More options May 16, 12:27 pm
>>>
>>> Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal, soc.men,=
>>> alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, chi.general
>>> From: "krp" <kr...@verizon.net>
>>> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:27:18 GMT
>>> Local: Sat, May 16 2009 12:27 pm
>>> Subject: Re: Kennie's curse
>>> Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Repor=
t
>>> this message | Find messages by this author
>>>
>>> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:9ebbd116-92cf-4ffc...@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com..=
.
>>>
>>> MOE> =A0They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me Kenni=
e, how
>>> MOE> about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0 They asked my "OPINION" Moe that is NOT asking my "PERMISSION" =
as your
>>> delusional mind interprets it. My responsibility, Moe, will be in LAUGH=
ING
>>> MY ASS OFF at things like him giving a lecture about his computer EXPER=
TISE
>>> at work and then having massive involuntary ejaculation in front of all=
>>> there. Or perhaps uncontrollable flatulence. =A0Seeing a really HOT wom=
an and
>>> exploding with the loudest FART in recorded history. =A0Funny stuff lik=
e that.
>>> Maybe a whole pack of dogs coming and pissing on his legs.
>>>
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0 Not a statement of FACT, Maureen no matter how HYSTERICALLY you=
want to
>>> claim that it was
>>
>> I considered the possibility that you've been lying all along about
>>this.
>
> It's always wise to presume Pangborn has lied. He can be honest,
>but it doesn't happen often.
If it helps, I did find a couple of posts in rec.arts.sf.tv in which he
only posts an opinion. Usually it's rather retarded, but technically he's
not lying.
>
>>
>>
>>>. It had lots of people falling on the floor laughing their
>>> asses off.
>>
>>Really? Who?
>
> The voices in Pangborn's head, of course. He thinks they're real
>people.
Maybe it was one of the following:
Porkey Newton
John Gault
Free at Last
Volks Polezei
Clark Kent
Reality Test
Zelda Gilroy
Wotan's advisor
No Hostile Intent
Guess Who???
Advanced Interceptor
Buckwheat
die gedanken sin frei
SECRET IDENTITY
Sleeping Dogs
Alpha Omega
Positive Outlook
General Outlook
Happy Holidays
MOORZADILDO
Giant Schwantz
Publius Maximus
Mark Propensity
Free Speech
The Real Deal with Bill McNeil
Bun Inspector
Max Devlin
Phineas Fogg
The Jupiter Project
Jimmy James
Commissioner Yoda
Buffalo Bob
Frank N. Stein
Nemesis
Happy Wanderer
Nurse Plonkitt
John Spartan
Mr. Goodbar
The repairman
Creative Impressions
False Identity
The Null Hypothesis
Patrick Henry
Mr. Worf
Purple Rose
Video Ranger
The Justice Minister
Simba The Great
La Mont Cranston
The Cable Guy
Served With Honor
Sleeping with Dogs
Jumping Conclusions
Law & Disorder
Taco Supreme
Warden Smithens
La Neena Huxley
Plonk You David Moore
A Giant Among Men
Cool Running
Major Pain
Construction Zone
Wolfman Jack
Fearless Fosdick
The Jedi Knight
John Connor=20
These were all nicks which he used with his "Judge...@ij.net" account.
He shifted the nickname portion of the address on a daily basis, and
actually thought people wouldn't notice that they all came from the same
e-mail address.
>
>>
>>>=A0It wasn't even real world speculation, it was something well
>>> past RIDICULE of Moore. =A0
>>
>> IOW you lied about the Santeria curse.
>>
>> Got it.
>
> What a shock, huh?
I was never worried. Two of the criteria Ken posted, apparently, involved
writing the victim's name on a piece of paper, and placing certain trinkets=
near his house. As we're all aware, Ken neither knows my name nor where my=
house is.
>
>>
>>>I think it is hilarious to consider Moore making
>>> his "MOVES" in on a really HOT woman and him breaking out in uncontroll=
able
>>> flatulence, and letting =A0one RIP that shatters windows in two states.=
You've
>>> gotta admit that a horndog like Moore getting uncontrollable farts when=
ever
>>> he makes his SLICK moves (blackmail) on a woman is a funny image.
>>
>> What proof is there that Moore is a " horndog"? Your word Kennie?
>>Your word has no value.
>
> David's wife could probably tell us, but I've never seen a post
>from her.
> It's not the sort of thing one discusses in most conversations, so
>I've never mentioned the topic with her or David.
Didn't he just make a post claiming that I suffered from erectile
dysfunction? Before that, he claimed I routinely beat up gays....before
that, he claimed I WAS gay....and, prior to that, he claimed that I've been=
engaged to four different women. So hard to keep track of the various
storylines Ken invents for me....
>
>>
>>
>>> Try NOT to
>>> think about STUD there (Moore) typing to HIT on a hot woman and just fa=
rting
>>> incessantly the closer he gets the louder and stinkier they get. =A0Oh =
what a
>>> HOOT!
>>
>> Childish juvenile humor seems to be your idea of what is funny. Not
>>surprising considering your immaturity.
>>
>> So let me get this straight ( no pun intended). Are you saying now
>>that this so -called curse was just a joke, something you imagined up?
>
> Pangborn has claimed that the rape threat he issued against Stacy
>was just a joke.
He did....and then, shortly thereafter, he changed his story to claim that
he'd never made the threat.
>
>>
>> In that case you LIED about the Santeria High Priest and/or the
>>Cubans who asked for your permission.
>>
>> But then you didn't know the difference between Santeria and Voodoo.
>
> If it isn't about alcoholic beverages, Kenneth Robert Pangborn
>doesn't know much.
He's even ignorant on that subject. If you listen to that press conference=
recording, he was astounded that Coors Light contains less calories than
the leading brand.
>
>>
>> So which is it Kennie? " They" asked you or the whole thingw as just
>>your imagination?
>>
>
> I expect the truth will be that one of Pangborn's hallucinations
>was more realistic that the norm. I don't expect to know if I'm
>correct or not.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
"Carol Ann you don't KNOW shit! Youy are LYING! ...... Jesus Christ you are=
one DESPICABLE CUNT!!!! ....Bitch you are GUTTER SLIME!"
--Kenneth Pangborn, from a usenet argument with a female debator,
highlighting his typical views on women
"Rumors about ken are true, he is a bad man. That is why both my mother and=
I ran out of there as fast as we could back in the late summer of 2002. He
ruined my life and my moms life....His business is a scam, as he is in the
rest of his life. He enjoys child pornography and was investigated for that=
as well....he'll call my mom 20 times a day until she answers...[Ken's
sister-in-law Rebecca Reilly] wouldnt come over to our house anymore
because of how he would talk to her and come on to her....and he had over
180 pictures of her on his computer"
--Ken Pangborn's daughter Megan
"Blood, breath or urine?"
--question to Ken Pangborn from a Florida police officer in November 2008,
during a traffic stop from which Pangborn was subsequently charged with
DUI**
"...beating [some kids] into a bloody pulp is the ONLY thing=20
that would get through to them."=20
--Ken Pangborn on child rearing
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
--Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles, thinking
about hiring ken pangborn,florida trial consulting,florida false
allegations,child abuse,brianna bragg
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell, Ahmed
Gomez,Alejandro Querejeta Barcel=F3,Alina Gil,Ana Hern=E1ndez Chi,Aniely
Fernandez Torres,Anna Ruetten,Ariella Ochoa,Armando Gomez Pe=F1a,Camilo
Carbonell,Camilo Castro,Carlos Dorta,Carlos Manuel Gonzalez
Iglesias,Cathelijne Janssen,Chris Castellan,Cody Kuchirka,Di Addario
Sabrina,Diana Rosa,Elizabeth Perez Tamayo,Elsa M Pena,Elsa Mora,Eric Blanco=
Sancipri=E1n,Ernesto Ferriol,Frans Stamm'ler,George Riveron,Gigi
Tsang,Gioconda Carralero Dominicis,Glexis Novoa,Hayd=E9e Mar=EDa
Mart=EDnez,Jimini Hignett,Joan Hatten,Johan Martinez,Jorge Ferret
Vincench,Jorge Luis,Jose M. Cimarro,Jos=E9 Miguel Ricardo Tamayo,Juan Carlo=
s
P=E9rez Berb=E9n,Juan E. Mauriz-Gomez,Julio Cesar Guerrero,Julio Cesar
Rodriguez Aguilar,Julio Hernandez,Julio Quevedo,Katiuska Saavedra,Leandis
Diaz,Leticia Gallego Cruz,Leyda Rodriguez Ag=FCero,Lixandro Cordero,Lorver
Lores de Verdecia,Lourdes Castro Fuentes,Lourdes Gonzalez Herrero,Luis
Betancourt,Luis Castillo,Madelyn Tamayo,Magalys Reyes,Manuel Toledo,Marie
Louise Pepin,Max Schrems,Michael H. Miranda,Nani Garcia,Nestor Arenas,Nor
Gutiez,Norge Pazo Sanciprian,Oscar Fuentes Labrada,Osiris Aviles,Pupi
Pupito,Rafael Paneca Cano,Raimundo Cabrera,Reinaldo Rodriguez,Ricardo
Ponce,Ricardo Silveira Miro,Roger Castillejo,Ronald Guill=E9n=20
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:752a1f4b89fd5527...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
BULLSHIT Moore you RETARD. By the way the words are "die gedanken sind frie"
which comes from a German folk song by that name, which was popular in Nazi
Germany in the anti-Nazi underground. It means approximately; "at least our
THOUGHTS are free!" No Davey I never had an IJ account. Nice try.
womanGoddess
> AIR FORCE CHIEF OF STAFF GENERAL (AF BRAT)"womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
(( YAWN))
And your credibility is down the crapper yet again.
SSDD
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>>> The IMAGINARY photos you CLAIM to have in your POLACK fantasy world,
>>>> Wills? I love how yolu claim you have proved this or that PREVIOUSLY in
>>>> some IMAGINARY PLACE. When it comes to actually showing your imaginary
>>>> proof
>>>> there is always a LAME EXCUSE. Can't post the URL to the photos, Polack?
>>>> Lost the link? Figures!!!!
>>>
>>> He told you the conditions for him releasing the photos Kennie.
>>>
>>> Quit the act.
>
>> I no longer have them.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! LIE CONFIRMED. ROFLMAO.
>
> Of course you don't have them. YOU NEVER DID. You're just a slimy Polack
>LIAR, Wills.
If I'm lying, prove it. I double dog dare ya.
If my claim of having had them is a lie, you should be able to
prove it. If you can't prove I lied, you will, but Gregborn Logic�
standards, be admitting that my claim was 100% true.
The choice is yours. Prove your claim that I was lying (a win
for you) or admit I was in possession and someone was sending me
pictures of you and Barbara (another of your MANY losses).
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
>>>> if you count this post
>>>
>>> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
>
>> I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
>> be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
>> Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
>
> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed. However
>since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
>discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
Cute. After I mentioned I didn't keep them, you DEMAND that I put
them up.
It's possible you're so drunk you think such a thing can be done,
but in the real world, where Coors Light, or whatever your alcohol of
choice is, isn't a food staple, this isn't the case.
>
>>>Just because you SAID something 5 times or 52,555 times is meaningless
>>>when you NEVER posted a
>>>public LINK to it.
>
>> I did. Back in July.
>
> NO, you did NOT!!!
If I'm lying, prove it. If my claim is true, you won't be able
to offer anything to prove your possition.
Oh wait, below you make the tactile admission, by Gregborn Logic�
standards, that I was 100% honest.
>
>> You're just taking advantage of the fact that I was using X-No-Archive:
>> Yes at the time to LIE and claim I
>> didn't make the pictures available.
>
> A no archive command would NOT make it invisible. It would merely mean
>that it would not be in the Google archive. However it WOULD have appeared
>to be read at the time.
I'm sure the server you used shows it having been downloaded to
your machine. I doubt it can show whether the article was read or
not.
Contact Verizon, the server and ISP you used at the time, and ask
them to send me their logs of your downloads for the second and third
week of July. I could make the request myself, but it's very unlikely
they would send it to me without your permission or a court order.
The odds of getting a court order for something like this are so
remote as to be safely called impossible, so you'll need to issue the
request. Unless, of course, you fear the truth that I did post the
images and you were aware of it coming out.
The metaphorical ball is in your court, Ken.
>Now, HOWEVER, ikf you did a David Moore and made a
>"disappear" command it wouldn't appear.
I'm not familiar with the "disappear" command. Could you explain
this?
>It could be made to vaporize at any
>time, from a few minutes to a few days. But it WOULD have appeareed in the
>stack. TRY AGAIN, weenie! In ANY event IF you REALLY had the photos and aree
>not LYING YOUR ASS OFF, Photobucket is still there.
As I've mentioned a few times, I didn't keep them. When you RAN
from the thread, that was enough to give me reason to believe the
pictures of the hefty woman were of Barbara. Whether they actually
were or not didn't really matter.
I was able to confirm from her Facebook page (now deleted) that
they were of her. Now I wish I had kept them.
>
>
>>>YOU'RE LYING again Wills. Just a stupid Polack who thinks he can get away
>>>with "I posted it last July" is PROOF.
>
>> If I'm lying, prove it. If my claim is 100% accurate, as you
>> KNOW it to be, you'll not be able to prove your claim that I am lying.
>
> Prove the negative?
Prove your claim to be true. That's proving a positive, unless
your claim was a lie.
Are you admitting to the readers that you were lying?
>Prove what? YOU made the affirmative claim that you
>HAVE several photos of my wife, and 2 that you DID in point of FACT post a
>link to a Photobucket page. The BURDEN OF PROOF, Wills is 100% ON YOU
You're the one who made the FACT CLAIM that I lied. The burden to
prove your FACT CLAIM lies solely with you.
Either prove your claim (a win for you) or admit that I was being
honest (another of your MANY losses). You have no other options.
>, but
>being the oily weasel you ARE you'll demand that I prove you didn't post it.
I've already made the request, and you're doing your best to try
and distract from it.
By Gregborn Logic� standards, you've already admitted I was being
honest. Of course, I would prefer something more solid than the
mentally impaired logic you and Greg share.
>That you are TAP DANCING so hard stands as PROOF that you are LYING.
How, outside of your drunken stupors, is asking you to prove your
claim tap dancing? Be specific.
>Everyone knows at this point, Wills, that ***IF*** you had them you'd be
>posting the shit out of the link to them.
If I were still in possession, yes.
I openly admitted I didn't keep them. You're dishonest attempt to
imply I still have them, while comical, only serves to further PROVE
you are a drunken pathological liar.
> That you are NOT and all you have
>is LAME BULLSHIT like "I already did that" establishes the LIES, POLACK!
I did post them.
Tell ya what, *IF* I'm sent more (hint to the original sender)
I'll post them. Is that OK with you?
BTW, it's accepted that you're a bigot. The massive amount of
PROOF that you're a bigot you've offered can't be honestly countered.
As such, you don't really NEED to continue to offer proof.
Note to anyone new: If you need more proof that Kenneth Robert
Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, is a bigot please visit
the TRUTH site. The specific URL for Pangborn's bigotry is
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html Note the proof consists of
Kenneth Robert Pangborn's own writings.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> >> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
>> > I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
>> > be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
>> > Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
>>
>> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed. However
>> since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
>> discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
>
> As to your discharge , actually you DIDN'T put it back up, You snuck
>in the 256 and pretended it was the same as the 214. And Kent showed
>that you posted it for only a few hours, then when he revealed PB can
>send emails of an user's changes, you made your account private.
>
>You're a lot of bluster but you are really a chickenshit.
I'm still waiting for Pangborn to honor his word that he would
make the proof he claims to posses that David was adopted available.
Note to Ken: *IF* I am sent more pictures of Barbara (hint to
original sender), I will make them available to the public via my
Photobucket page AFTER you honor your word and post the proof you
claim to posses that David was adopted. Since you gave your word that
you would do so once he admitted from where he got the names, and he
did so, you will need to make the proof you claim to have available.
I'll let you know if I'm ever sent pictures so that you can make
the proof you claim to posses available to anyone who visits your
Photobucket page.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>
>> These were all nicks which he used with his "Judge...@ij.net" account.
>
>BULLSHIT Moore you RETARD. By the way the words are "die gedanken sind frie"
>which comes from a German folk song by that name, which was popular in Nazi
>Germany in the anti-Nazi underground. It means approximately; "at least our
>THOUGHTS are free!" No Davey I never had an IJ account. Nice try.
>
>
It was already PROVED that you did.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/judgedredd.html contains the PROOF
that you once had an account with IJ.
If you're going to lie, and you are, try to lie about that which
can't be proved.
krp
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:00:13 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> I have mentioned the post from July a total of four times (five
>>>>> if you count this post
>>>>
>>>> Yet NEVER a "URL" for this claimed evidence Kunt.
>>
>>> I realize you're so drunk you can't understand, but the URL won't
>>> be valid. This is the way it is when a picture is removed from
>>> Photobucket. The URL that lead to it becomes invalid.
>>
>> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed.
>> However
>>since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
>>discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
>
> Cute. After I mentioned I didn't keep them, you DEMAND that I put
> them up.
> It's possible you're so drunk you think such a thing can be done,
> but in the real world, where Coors Light, or whatever your alcohol of
> choice is, isn't a food staple, this isn't the case.
Actually I have been demanding you post them again for 2 weeks, DIPSHIT!
BTW, your BEST BUDDY, David Moore claims HE has them, perhaps he'll share
them with his FRONT MAN TROLL (YOU). See if he can give you HIS copies.
UNLESS, of course, HE also accidentally erased his too! <guffaw>
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed.
>>> However
>>>since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
>>>discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
>>
>> Cute. After I mentioned I didn't keep them, you DEMAND that I put
>> them up.
>> It's possible you're so drunk you think such a thing can be done,
>> but in the real world, where Coors Light, or whatever your alcohol of
>> choice is, isn't a food staple, this isn't the case.
>
>
>Actually I have been demanding you post them again for 2 weeks, DIPSHIT!
Admission that you've been making the demand after KNOWING I
didn't keep them accepted.
>BTW, your BEST BUDDY, David Moore claims HE has them,
I've seen no such claim from him.
Unless you've been caught in another of your MANY alcoholic
(unless you lied) inspired lies, you'll post the MID and/or Google
link to at least one post from him where he makes the claim.
>perhaps he'll share
>them with his FRONT MAN TROLL (YOU). See if he can give you HIS copies.
>UNLESS, of course, HE also accidentally erased his too! <guffaw>
Your comment implies my deleting them was accidental. I've
offered nothing to support such a possition.
Is there a specific reason why you're deceptively presenting that
my deleting of the pictures was an accident? If it's because your
MASSIVE consumption of booze forced you to be deceptive, you need not
give an answer.
> They don't use metaphors in Poland.
< That explains a lot.
I don't think they use toilets either.
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, insane drunken (by his own claims)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team expressing his
bigotry. In this instance it's against the people in Poland.
Message-ID: <M6Krj.1145$r03.503@trnddc08>
krp
>
>>>> Sure everyone knows that when they are removed they are removed.
>>>> However
>>>>since you CLAIM to have the photos, PUT THEM BACK UP like I did with my
>>>>discharge. BUT since you are LYING you won't.
>>>
>>> Cute. After I mentioned I didn't keep them, you DEMAND that I put
>>> them up.
>>> It's possible you're so drunk you think such a thing can be done,
>>> but in the real world, where Coors Light, or whatever your alcohol of
>>> choice is, isn't a food staple, this isn't the case.
>>
>>
>>Actually I have been demanding you post them again for 2 weeks, DIPSHIT!
>
> Admission that you've been making the demand after KNOWING I
> didn't keep them accepted.
No, Kunt, you only announced that you did NOT have them after I shoved
you into the corner about them. You NEVER had them. Your BEST BUDDY AND PAL,
Moore claims that he HAS them, you could ask HIM to share his copies with
you and you could post THEM - of course not IF he was lying too. Or maybe HE
just accidentally LOST his copies of the photos of my wife too. I guess
accidents can happen, and IDENTICAL ACCIDENTS can happen at the same time to
two allied miscreants like you and ANONYMOUS DAVEY MOORE.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>>> Cute. After I mentioned I didn't keep them, you DEMAND that I put
>>>> them up.
>>>> It's possible you're so drunk you think such a thing can be done,
>>>> but in the real world, where Coors Light, or whatever your alcohol of
>>>> choice is, isn't a food staple, this isn't the case.
>>>
>>>
>>>Actually I have been demanding you post them again for 2 weeks, DIPSHIT!
>>
>> Admission that you've been making the demand after KNOWING I
>> didn't keep them accepted.
>
>
> No, Kunt, you only announced that you did NOT have them after I shoved
>you into the corner about them.
If you wish to believe that, it does me no harm.
>You NEVER had them.
By your own standards, you've already admitted I did.
>Your BEST BUDDY AND PAL,
>Moore claims that he HAS them,
I've seen no such claim from him. By your standards (said
standards make up in part what I call Gregborn Logic�), you admitted
your claim is was, and is, a lie when you refused to offer the MID
and/or Google link to just one post where he claims he does.
>you could ask HIM to share his copies with
>you and you could post THEM - of course not IF he was lying too. Or maybe HE
>just accidentally LOST his copies of the photos of my wife too.
Has anyone claimed to have accidentally lost them? Anyone at all?
I openly stated I deleted the ones I had. Whereas I've not seen
anyone else claim to have them, it appears as if your boozing has
forced you to lie again.
>I guess
>accidents can happen, and IDENTICAL ACCIDENTS can happen at the same time to
>two allied miscreants like you and ANONYMOUS DAVEY MOORE.
The problem is that your drunken lie will never become reality. I
intentionally deleted the pictures, as I openly admitted weeks ago.
You admitted that you started DEMANDING I post them after I stated I
no longer have them.
Add some more LIES, Ken. You and I, and everyone reading, KNOW
you can't stop yourself.