The Two Pernicious Influences - Women and Jews
Andrew Usher
similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
Here are their similarities:
- Both women and Jews network and prefer others of the group
- Both women and Jews tend to subvert any group in which they gain
positions of power
- Both women and Jews are great whiners and are quite aggressive at
pursuing their interests
- Both women and Jews can never be trusted to agree with our
interests; they will betray us
- Both women and Jews have incredible amounts of self-deception
- Both women and Jews come up with unscientific, non-rational
'theories' which are nothing more than attacks on our society dressed
up in academic language
- Both women and Jews for the most part can't appreciate that Western
society is fundamentally white and hence have a destructive preference
for colored people
- Both women and Jews are biologically incapable of seeing the 'big
picture' philosophically and are blinded by self-interest
Conclusion: Neither women nor Jews can be allowed to gain any
significant power in any organisation representing our interests. And
indeed that's the way it was in European society until it started
breaking down in the 19th century.
Andrew Usher
DVH
"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c12169a1-e2e1-4c08...@c1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
Beyond parody.
By the way, what do think of tigers, ants and coots? Those bastards really
have no fucking appreciation of white culture, do they?
Uncle Al
>
> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> similar in their political style.
Would that make Russian-born Wisconsin grandma and Israeli Prime
Minister Golda Meir a two-fer or a squared? Kinda difficult to
rationalize socialist twit Golda Meir
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Golda_working_in_kibbutz_Merhavia1.jpg
with capitalist pig (as it were) mass Muslim slaughterer Golda Meir
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Golda_Meir_03265u.jpg>
Scratch a pacifist, find a gun nut.
Uncle Al's Hebrew School teacher "Prune Face" was a grandma who in her
youth was an Irgun member. She lured British soldiers up to her room
where her partner killed them - though the day she came in blasted on
cold meds she admitted to enjoying some wet work herself.
Haganah ("The Defense") talked, the Irgun ("National Military
Organization in the Land of Israel") walked. Good cop, bad cop.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/zerobama.jpg
The Man
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/zerobam2.jpg
The Plan
<http://www.recombinantrecords.net/docs/2009-05-Amusing-Ourselves-to-Death.html>
The Prospectus
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
eric gisse
> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews [...]
USENET sure does attract the "special" people.
hanson
>
"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote:
A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
>
Here are their similarities:
>
- Both women and Jews network and prefer others of the group
- Both women and Jews tend to subvert any group in which
they gain positions of power
- Both women and Jews are great whiners and are quite
aggressive at pursuing their interests
- Both women and Jews can never be trusted to agree with our
interests; they will betray us
- Both women and Jews have incredible amounts of self-deception
- Both women and Jews come up with unscientific, non-rational
'theories' which are nothing more than attacks on our society
- Both women and Jews for the most part can't appreciate that
Western society is fundamentally white and hence have a
- Both women and Jews are biologically incapable of seeing the
'big picture' philosophically and are blinded by self-interest
>
Conclusion: Neither women nor Jews can be allowed to gain any
significant power in any organisation representing our interests.
And indeed that's the way it was in European society until it started
breaking down in the 19th century.
Andrew Usher
>
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... Andy, did your profound revelations
occur to you after your cumbucket, a yenta, began to nosh on
your best friend's shlong?... ahahaha...
>
And now let's wait for the entrance of the gay black Zio-Nazi
Mitch Perkinsky <mitchsperkins()gmail.com> who hides and
denies his Jewishness, but is a fanatical apologist, defender,
supporter and promoter of Jewish criminality, in the wake of
his utter inability to distinguish between "1" & "many", & so
he still keeps asking: "is it a single Jew or the vast majority?"...
>
ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs guys... ahaha... ahahanson
The Sortov Institute
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:_Skim.2503$nh2....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> ----- AHAHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA -----
It /is/ funny in a way. It's as if, thanks to the internet, we can listen in
on the Judenhass of the alcoholic British rabble from the comfort of our own
homes.
Geopinion
Well, since women outnumber men, you lose, but then you already knew
you were a loser, hence blaming all your shortcomings on women and
Jews.
MLW
Moderator
Don’t feel bad Andrew. You just got trapped in someone else’s double
standard. Did you notice that groups are spoken of as a collective
everyday; Americans, Canadians, Liberals, New Conservatives and the
list goes on. Other groups however, can only be collectively spoken of
when they are victims seeking privileges, compensation, retribution or
government funding such as minorities, women and jews (white males are
an exception of course, are never victims and poor whites are
considered the same as rich ones). Another instance when the “special”
groups can be a collective is where something positive is discussed
such as “contributions to society” (white males are still an exception
of course). Your mistake is a common one and if it was not your
intention, it surely was someone else’s.
Lisa Lisa
Oh, God. Yet another self-hating halfling.
alien8er
> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
> I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
Ya know, in the early seventies I was rather annoyed by black men
who were so busy being black that they didn't have time to be men.
Then I noticed it wasn't exclusive to blacks.
Who's "us", white boy?
> Here are their similarities:
>
> - Both women and Jews network and prefer others of the group
> - Both women and Jews tend to subvert any group in which they gain
> positions of power
> - Both women and Jews are great whiners and are quite aggressive at
> pursuing their interests
> - Both women and Jews can never be trusted to agree with our
> interests; they will betray us
> - Both women and Jews have incredible amounts of self-deception
> - Both women and Jews come up with unscientific, non-rational
> 'theories' which are nothing more than attacks on our society dressed
> up in academic language
> - Both women and Jews for the most part can't appreciate that Western
> society is fundamentally white and hence have a destructive preference
> for colored people
> - Both women and Jews are biologically incapable of seeing the 'big
> picture' philosophically and are blinded by self-interest
>
> Conclusion: Neither women nor Jews can be allowed to gain any
> significant power in any organisation representing our interests. And
> indeed that's the way it was in European society until it started
> breaking down in the 19th century.
>
> Andrew Usher
The logical conclusion is that you desire an expansion of the Final
Solution, only not just for Jews, leaving your Eutopia populated
solely by gay white men.
Thanks for clarifying that.
Mark L. Fergerson
Andrew Usher
That's hardly possible. Women are needed for sex and reproduction, and
I'm not gay though I wish I were.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> Oh, God. Yet another self-hating halfling.
What?
Andrew Usher
jmfbahciv
> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
> I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
Sounds like you haven't met many women.
/BAH
jmfbahciv
Nope. Just extremely inexperienced.
/BAH
Andrew Usher
Idiot. Kevin MacDonald's book www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
is about Jews, not women. However, the same basic argument could be
applied to women - people that think feminism is a Jewish thing are
deluding themselves.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> Don’t feel bad Andrew. You just got trapped in someone else’s double
> standard. Did you notice that groups are spoken of as a collective
> everyday; Americans, Canadians, Liberals, New Conservatives and the
> list goes on. Other groups however, can only be collectively spoken of
> when they are victims seeking privileges, compensation, retribution or
> government funding such as minorities, women and jews (white males are
> an exception of course, are never victims and poor whites are
> considered the same as rich ones). Another instance when the “special”
> groups can be a collective is where something positive is discussed
> such as “contributions to society” (white males are still an exception
> of course). Your mistake is a common one and if it was not your
> intention, it surely was someone else’s.
What's my alleged mistake?
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> ahahaha... AHAHAHA... Andy, did your profound revelations
> occur to you after your cumbucket, a yenta, began to nosh on
> your best friend's shlong?... ahahaha...
They're too profound for you, I reckon.
Andrew Usher
Moderator
For instance, you had a mother or a grandmother? Do you include them
in your assessment of women? What about wives of second marriages
who’s husband is trapped in child or spousal support who sees first
hand the injustice in family court?
Despite the obvious domination of jews in particular positions, there
are jews who are also being trapped in family law. There are also jews
who are critical of Israel, although we may rarely hear of them.
So, if your condemnation of these two groups is inclusive of everyone
who belongs to them, your statement is an acceptable generalization.
However, if you have to qualify the statement such as all women except
your mother, then your generalization is flawed.
Earle Jones
<3a8e8715-63cb-487d...@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>,
Lisa Lisa <harryh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 17, 5:06�pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> > similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
> > I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
*
Who is 'us'?
White males?
earle
*
AgitProp
Amen!
hanson
>
For posting his < http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>, "Andrew Usher"
<k_over...@yahoo.com> got chastised & humbled, wrote:
>
hanson wrote:
< http://tinyurl.com/m5gc93 > wherein it says
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... Andy, did your profound revelations
occur to you after your cumbucket, a yenta, began to nosh on
your best friend's shlong?... ahahaha...
>
They're too profound for you, I reckon.
>
---------------- The Quickie ---------------
ahahahaha... Andy, you should "reckon" otherwise because
you got profoundly lost in that bigger picture you mentioned,
since you did NOT notice that uncle rect-Al Schwartz,...
>
### a Jew made your case for you & proved you right ###
>
Thanks for the laughs again, Andy... ahahaha...hahahanson
>
.
hanson wrote:
---------------- The Longie ---------------
Andy you were unfair to women but to the Jews you were not.
You simply posted your impression about women and Jews.
** Yet most posters attacked you for that, the whole sorry lot, **
except for a Jew, uncle rect-Al Schwartz who proudly made the
one-ups-manship and raised the ante & the stakes, him saying:
>
Uncle rect-Al proudly wrote:
||| UA |||: Uncle Al's Schwartz' Hebrew School teacher was an Israeli
||| UA |||: whore who pussy lured British soldiers & enjoyed killing them.
>
... and elsewhere Uncle anAl Alan Schwartz, the Jew, bragged:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/938103a696a254c4?hl=en>
||| UA |||: Jews don't work. Jews supervise and take their
||| UA |||: cut. Jews steal with a pencil and have the swag
||| UA |||: delivered by sweating goyim. No tipping!
||| UA |||: Uncle Al's ancestors, [the kikes] were kiting checks
||| UA |||: when yours [goyim] were still swinging through trees.
||| UA |||: You Goyim could study for your entire lifetime and
||| UA |||: not come close to what is hardwired at birth for
||| UA |||: Yahweh's Chosen.
>
... and elsewhere Uncle anAl Alan Schwartz, the Jew, said:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.org.mensa/msg/572674e5060b55a3?hl=en&
||| UA |||: "DEATH to the poor. -- DEATH to the sick. -- DEATH to
||| UA |||: every cripple. DEATH to every retard. -- DEATH to every
||| UA |||: addict. -- DEATH to the queer and infected. -- DEATH
||| UA |||: to every Welfare parasite. -- DEATH to every Social
||| UA |||: Security parasite. -- DEATH to every prisoner with
||| UA |||: 10 or more years' prison sentence. -- DEATH to Night
||| UA |||: Basketball. DEATH to every sniveling conniving goddamned
||| UA |||: money-sucking Officially Sad sonofabitch in the world.
||| UA |||: DEATH to the entire Third World. Kill them all".
>
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/d05517e7f4de883d?hl=en&
||| UA |||: "I have no problem with killing the now and future enemy.
||| UA |||: An Earth with 3 billion people would be a much nicer place
||| UA |||: to live."
>
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/657dbe27ce06ca8d?hl=en&
||| UA |||: Uncle Al especially enjoys earthquakes that collapse churches
||| UA |||: filled with worshippers.
>
and elsewhere still, ersatz rabbi Bob Kolker, the Jew said:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/82caaf5ff6e0038c?hl=en&
||| BK |||: "I advocate wide scale genocide on the Moslems", after,
||| BK |||: on Oct. 18, 04, in news:2tm3f7F...@uni-berlin.de
||| BK |||: he said "the obvious [final] solution is to kill them all" ...
&
||| BK |||: urges in news:2rfqqdF...@uni-berlin.de on 09-23-04,
||| BK |||: "to put all Xians into asylums for their belief in
Christianity".
>
hanson wrote:
Andy, NO complaints about this are heard from any Jew and
even worse, none from any of their brainwashed & intimidated
goyim serfs of the kikes which is why you, Andy, should have
"reckoned" that uncle rect-Al Schwartz, the Jew, made your case.
>
Schwartz, the Jew, is honest. He is not like the sorry & despicable,
sorry rest of your respondents who attacked you. Those spineless
& politically correct swine are the greatest threat to the world's
Jewry because these fanatical admirers are apologists, defenders,
supporters and promoters of Jewish criminality. Their condonance
& silence about the mentality of Jewish criminality is the ultimate
reason why Jews do have to endure & suffer from their collective
periodic and epic ass kickings and barbequing, 35 times so far:
--------------- < http://tinyurl.com/kvt867> --------------------
>
It never ceases to astound me why so many Jews do work so
incessant & persistent & so very, very hard to make
********* Hitler's Last Curse *********** turn into becoming
a self-fulfilling prophecy which Hitler broadcast just before
his demise in 1945, in which he said:
***** "in a 100 years from now, the world will be *******
******** grateful for what I, Hitler, have started".**********
----------- 64 down... 36 to go.... ------------
--------------------------------------
>>
Nu Bait: ------------- No body is born Anti-Semitic ------------
------- but Kikes are the sole teachers for it -------
Nu Bait: -------- No Jews --- No Anti-Semitism ------------
Nu Bait: ------ No Jews --- No Hitler -- No Israel -----------
Nu Bait: ---- 13,000,000 google hits for --[ jewish crime ]---
(Jewish world population: 13,000,002... ahahaha)
>
Thanks for the laugh, all you highly entertaining fanatics... ahahaha
ahahahaha... ahahahanson
hanson
Andrew Usher
Yes, white men and the civilisation only they make possible.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> For instance, you had a mother or a grandmother? Do you include them
> in your assessment of women?
Yes, I do. And my 'assessment of women' is based on MANY observations;
one counterexample would mean nothing.
> What about wives of second marriages
> who’s husband is trapped in child or spousal support who sees first
> hand the injustice in family court?
Seeing the injustice and understanding the cause of the injustice are
different things. Women are capable of seeing injustice but only as it
relates to themselves and those close to them.
> Despite the obvious domination of jews in particular positions, there
> are jews who are also being trapped in family law. There are also jews
> who are critical of Israel, although we may rarely hear of them.
So? Almost all Jews, consciously or not, use 'what's good for the
Jews?' in determining their political positions.
> So, if your condemnation of these two groups is inclusive of everyone
> who belongs to them, your statement is an acceptable generalization.
> However, if you have to qualify the statement such as all women except
> your mother, then your generalization is flawed.
First, I hate my mother and have said so before.
Second, generalisations almost always have exceptions. I do not need
to state than every woman or every Jew does these bad things in order
for prejudice against them to be more than justified. While some women
and some Jews may be our allies on some issues, they can not be
depended on in general.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
<snip>
You are mentally ill. You are incapable of posting anything other than
nonsense rambling.
Andrew Usher
hanson
AHAHAhaha... They got to Andy!.... AHAHAHAHAHA.....
for posting his < http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>, "Andrew Usher"and "they" really got to him and made Andy make a 180...
ahahahahaha.....
Scotius
<k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
>similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
>I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
>
>Here are their similarities:
I don't suppose you ever stopped to consider how similar you
are to the average woman-hating homo?
>
>- Both women and Jews network and prefer others of the group
>- Both women and Jews tend to subvert any group in which they gain
>positions of power
Cite an example?
>- Both women and Jews are great whiners and are quite aggressive at
>pursuing their interests
The same can be said of many men, and it isn't the fault of
women or Jews that that's true.
>- Both women and Jews can never be trusted to agree with our
>interests; they will betray us
The kind of assumption made by hitlerites.
>- Both women and Jews have incredible amounts of self-deception
Your opinion.
>- Both women and Jews come up with unscientific, non-rational
>'theories' which are nothing more than attacks on our society dressed
>up in academic language
No way! Pot, meet kettle...
>- Both women and Jews for the most part can't appreciate that Western
>society is fundamentally white and hence have a destructive preference
>for colored people
Oh, you lost your girlfriend to a black guy. Well, geez...
that's no reason for all this. Why don't you just go get even and get
a black girlfriend?
>- Both women and Jews are biologically incapable of seeing the 'big
>picture' philosophically and are blinded by self-interest
Bull.
Geopinion
> Moderator wrote:
> > For instance, you had a mother or a grandmother? Do you include them
> > in your assessment of women?
>
> Yes, I do. And my 'assessment of women' is based on MANY observations;
> one counterexample would mean nothing.
Then you know a sufficient number of women to make a statistically
valid correlation?
>
> > What about wives of second marriages
> > who’s husband is trapped in child or spousal support who sees first
> > hand the injustice in family court?
>
> Seeing the injustice and understanding the cause of the injustice are
> different things. Women are capable of seeing injustice but only as it
> relates to themselves and those close to them.
Women are capable of seeing injustice as it relates to themselves,
those close to them, and others such as their friends, extended
family, workplace, city, county, other nations; males - especially
young males - are often incapable of seeing injustice except as it
relates to them, period. And that's why males are more inclined to
blame others for their failures, while women tend to focus blame on
themselves. That's why frustrated, unhinged males blow up their
college professors, shoot their co-workers en masse, beat their wives
and children and drink themselves into oblivion, while frustrated,
unhinged women might just hoard cats.
>
> > Despite the obvious domination of jews in particular positions, there
> > are jews who are also being trapped in family law. There are also jews
> > who are critical of Israel, although we may rarely hear of them.
>
> So? Almost all Jews, consciously or not, use 'what's good for the
> Jews?' in determining their political positions.
And you appear to be conconcentrating on what's good for you and
others like you. Everyone identifies most easily with their own
"group," whether that's a kinship group, a religious affiliation, or a
national identity. The problems arise when those "us vs. them" ideas
are taken to the extreme and cause people to exclude or harm those
outside their group.
>
> > So, if your condemnation of these two groups is inclusive of everyone
> > who belongs to them, your statement is an acceptable generalization.
> > However, if you have to qualify the statement such as all women except
> > your mother, then your generalization is flawed.
>
> First, I hate my mother and have said so before.
Maybe you should deal with that issue first, and then when you're a
little more mentally healthy, come back and try having a reasonable
discussion.
>
> Second, generalisations almost always have exceptions. I do not need
> to state than every woman or every Jew does these bad things in order
> for prejudice against them to be more than justified. While some women
> and some Jews may be our allies on some issues, they can not be
> depended on in general.
You mean they can't be depended on to look after YOUR interests, in
particular. And just how enthusiastically do you look after anyone
else's interests? Is that the crux of the problem: not enough
attention focused on you by, um, your mother? Better get used to it,
son, because everyone else - not just Jews and women - has better
things to do than to look after a black hole of need like you. Part
of becoming a well-adjusted adult is achieving that simple
understanding.
MLW
>
> Andrew Usher
jmfbahciv
> jmfbahciv wrote:
>> Andrew Usher wrote:
>>> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
>>> similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
>>> I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
>> Sounds like you haven't met many women.
>
> Idiot.
It is you who made the equivalence.
>Kevin MacDonald's book www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
> is about Jews, not women. However, the same basic argument could be
> applied to women - people that think feminism is a Jewish thing are
> deluding themselves.
>
/BAH
Herman Jurjus
Ladies and gentlemen,
Would you please remove sci.math and sci.physics from subsequent posts?
Thank you!
--
Cheers,
Herman Jurjus
Andrew Usher
<snip>
The same crap for a third time? Does hanson have any point at all?
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Usher
> <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> >similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
> >I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
> >
> >Here are their similarities:
>
> I don't suppose you ever stopped to consider how similar you
> are to the average woman-hating homo?
No I didn't. Why? Because the truth of an argument doesn't depend on
who makes it.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> On Aug 18, 1:50 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Moderator wrote:
> > > For instance, you had a mother or a grandmother? Do you include them
> > > in your assessment of women?
> >
> > Yes, I do. And my 'assessment of women' is based on MANY observations;
> > one counterexample would mean nothing.
>
> Then you know a sufficient number of women to make a statistically
> valid correlation?
No statistics are necessary here, just thinking.
> > Seeing the injustice and understanding the cause of the injustice are
> > different things. Women are capable of seeing injustice but only as it
> > relates to themselves and those close to them.
>
> Women are capable of seeing injustice as it relates to themselves,
> those close to them, and others such as their friends, extended
> family, workplace, city, county, other nations; males - especially
> young males - are often incapable of seeing injustice except as it
> relates to them, period. And that's why males are more inclined to
> blame others for their failures, while women tend to focus blame on
> themselves.
This is a bald faced lie of course.
> That's why frustrated, unhinged males blow up their
> college professors, shoot their co-workers en masse, beat their wives
> and children and drink themselves into oblivion, while frustrated,
> unhinged women might just hoard cats.
No this is because men in general are more likely to act on their
problems and not just whine or feel bad.
> And you appear to be conconcentrating on what's good for you and
> others like you. Everyone identifies most easily with their own
> "group," whether that's a kinship group, a religious affiliation, or a
> national identity.
True. But white men have more than anyone else been generous to other
groups also, and only they have ever been persuaded to engage in a
mass scale in programs that hurt their own group. So I think there is
a difference.
> The problems arise when those "us vs. them" ideas
> are taken to the extreme and cause people to exclude or harm those
> outside their group.
This is exactly what Jews do.
> > First, I hate my mother and have said so before.
>
> Maybe you should deal with that issue first, and then when you're a
> little more mentally healthy, come back and try having a reasonable
> discussion.
I'm quite sane, thank you.
> > Second, generalisations almost always have exceptions. I do not need
> > to state than every woman or every Jew does these bad things in order
> > for prejudice against them to be more than justified. While some women
> > and some Jews may be our allies on some issues, they can not be
> > depended on in general.
>
> You mean they can't be depended on to look after YOUR interests, in
> particular.
Of course I mean all white men, not just me.
> Better get used to it,
> son, because everyone else - not just Jews and women - has better
> things to do than to look after a black hole of need like you. Part
> of becoming a well-adjusted adult is achieving that simple
> understanding.
More ad hominem.
Andrew Usher
Meldon
Andrew Usher wrote:
>>....
> > The problems arise when those "us vs. them" ideas
> > are taken to the extreme and cause people to exclude or harm those
> > outside their group.
>
> This is exactly what Jews do.
>
Only identified groups under the Human Rights Act can be "us vs.
them". That would include all minorities, women, homosexuals, trans-
genders and cross-dressers. If you don't belong to any of those
groups, stating a position of us vs. them will result in any number of
epithets and possible legal action against you. No wonder white males
are fed up.
Jesse F. Hughes
> Yes, white men and the civilisation only they make possible.
Why not take this crap somewhere else? It has fuck-all to do with
math or physics.
How about alt.Im.a.disgusting.slimebucket?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"If mathematics doesn't recognize its social dependencies, then
perpetual slavery is just around the corner."
-- Han de Bruijn, on why set theory is a capitalist tool
hanson
>
"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> posted
his < http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>, wherein misogynous Andy
cowardly equates women with Jews. It got him into deep shit.
>
"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The same crap for a third time? Does hanson have any point
>
hanson wrote:
When it was pointed to Andy (below) that Jews themselves
have posted what Andy REALLY wanted to accuse the JEWS of,
Andy called it, and hence his very own tripe, "crap".... ahahaha...
>
Andy by labeling his very own post < http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>
as crap, Andy saw a chance to use reverse psychology to hear
over and over what he, Usher, really meant to says, but could
NOT.... because in the UK they throw folks like Usher in jail for
repeating what Jews themselves have said about themselves.
>
=The Zios have killed off free speech in much of Europe. =
<http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/victims/index.html>
< http://tinyurl.com/kvt867> & <http://tinyurl.com/lyl897>
>
OTOH, in the USA, the Kikes & Zios have NOT done so, cuz
the jerUSAlem cockroaches in the US need free speech to
advance and maintain their own Zio agenda.... AHAHAHAHA...
>
So, Andy, don't be so cowardly phony when others expose your
dirty work, you schmuck!.. Have some fucking spine, dude!
Usher you Dreidel, thanks for the laughs though... ahahahanson
>
>
hanson wrote:
========================================
=== What made Usher crank himself, but is afraid to admit ===
========================================
AHAHAhaha... They got to Andy!.... AHAHAHAHAHA.....
for posting his < http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>, "Andrew Usher"
<k_over...@yahoo.com> got chastised & humbled,
and "they" really got to him and made Andy make a 180...
ahahahahaha.....
>
hanson wrote:
< http://tinyurl.com/m5gc93 > wherein it says
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... Andy, did your profound revelations
occur to you after your cumbucket, a yenta, began to nosh on
your best friend's shlong?... ahahaha...
>
Andrew Usher wrote:
They're too profound for you, I reckon.
>
========================================
=== What Usher really wants to hear, but is afraid to say ===
========================================
>
hanson wrote:
---------------- The Quickie ---------------
ahahahaha... Andy, you should "reckon" otherwise because
you got profoundly lost in that bigger picture you mentioned,
since you did NOT notice that uncle rect-Al Schwartz,...
>
### a Jew made your case for you & proved you right ###
>
Thanks for the laughs again, Andy... ahahaha...hahahanson
>
>
M.M.M.
> AHAHAhaha... They got to Andy good!.... AHAHAHAHA.....
>
> his <http://tinyurl.com/kldn5h>, wherein misogynous Andy
> cowardly equates women with Jews. It got him into deep shit.
>
> ||| BK |||: he said "the obvious [final] solution is to kill them all" ...
> &
... deck of 3 cards, labeled A, B, C. There are six possible orderings
of the cards: ... pick a card from the unshuffled section and add it
to the top of the ...what they publish anyway.
>
> JSH found one, I'm sure you can too.
>
> - Tim
Proof. ... more " By Musatov - 10:08am - 1 new of 1 message. n = p +
q^2 with n even and p, q being primes ... Y value till infinity is
exactly \...]... more " ...
cornholio
> A long time ago I first concluded that women and Jews were very
> similar in their political style. Now, recently, I read MacDonald, and
> I once again started to think about how they threaten us.
>
> Here are their similarities:
>
> - Both women and Jews tend to subvert any group in which they gain
> positions of power
> pursuing their interests
> interests; they will betray us
> 'theories' which are nothing more than attacks on our society dressed
> up in academic language
> society is fundamentally white and hence have a destructive preference
> for colored people
> picture' philosophically and are blinded by self-interest
>
> significant power in any organisation representing our interests. And
> indeed that's the way it was in European society until it started
> breaking down in the 19th century.
>
> Andrew Usher
Wow, I'll bet you get a lot of dates with women don't you?
Andrew Usher
> > Conclusion: Neither women nor Jews can be allowed to gain any
> > significant power in any organisation representing our interests. And
> > indeed that's the way it was in European society until it started
> > breaking down in the 19th century.
> >
> Wow, I'll bet you get a lot of dates with women don't you?
Wow, I knew that one was coming. A common response by self-hating men
to the truth about women: "you just can't/don't get laid!". No logical
connection of course but these men imitate women by discarding logic.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
> Andrew Usher <k_over...@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > Yes, white men and the civilisation only they make possible.
>
> Why not take this crap somewhere else? It has fuck-all to do with
> math or physics.
I am enlightening the world.
> How about alt.Im.a.disgusting.slimebucket?
Yeah, I'm really a 'disgusting slimebucket' for raising the big issues
about our future. It's much better to just stick one's head in the
sand ...
Andrew Usher