Except Jane doesn't 'get it', Steenkin Man.
She considers the chldren her chattels
and feels her control over them is threatened
by the possibility that the children might
have an experience that would help them
cut Jane's ol' apron strings and start on
the path toward growing up to be
independent persons. Sheesh.
> I note that you're more interested in your
> own wishes than your children's. You haven't
> even mentioned what they think. It's not
> surprising that your husband wants to get
> them out of your way for a few days.
My thoughts exactly, Steenkin Man.
--
Men are people with feelings.
It isn't legal advice but just passing on the impression that few
husbands seem to be able to organise their own clothing for a holiday -
let alone organise clothing for their children. This must be
particularly so if the wife is being uncooperative and has picked that
particular moment to do a mega-wash and the husband would need to dry
and/or iron the kids' clothing..
Wives can also make it very clear that the odd battle may not go their
way but the term "battle axe" is as fearsome today as it was when men
were men and women poisoned them...
--
Sue
Your husband has the rights, of course. You do not have equal rights.
Get used to it.
And don't be so melodramatic. The children are not being 'taken away'
by your mother-in-law - they are going on holiday for a few days with
their grandmother.
--
Céline
'The Director of Operational Requirements wrote "... it is clear that no
modification will make this bomb entirely satisfactory." Unfortunately,
by then some 660,000 bombs had been manufactured.'
- Bombs gone: the development and use of British air-dropped weapons
from 1912 to the present day by Wing Commander John A MacBean and Major
Arthur S Hogben
> How do you
> know Im not in an abusive relationship? You dont.
Actually, it is apparent that you are quite abusive. Your husband is to
be commended for wanting to give your children a break. However, I have
a suggestion. Why don't you let the children's father decide what is
best for them? You and your husband could agree to abide by what their
father says.
If thjere was any more to it, then you should have said so as it would
be *very* relevant to any advice you get.
The fact that you are not saying so now leads me to the conclusion
that it is *not* the case.
If it is, and you want informed advice, then spell it out.
--
Cynic
It is true that we do not know the full facts of why the OP does not want
her kids to go on holiday with these people. My own partner had a
mentally and physically abusive step-mother, and therefore does not want
her own children to have anything to do with her. She is protecting
her children rather than being a bad mother. This may or may not be
the case here.
However, if the OP seeks to get appropriate advice then they should
disclose everything, lest be subject to these kind of comments and
bad advice. It is only possible to offer appropriate advice given the
full facts of the case. From the original post, it appeared that the
reason was just that she "did not like her" which is not a good enough
excuse. Given the truth of the situation, however embarrassing or
personal any revelation may be, better advice would have been
forthcoming,
Matt.
If I said anything to you that I should be sorry for, I'm glad.
>The fact that you are not saying so now leads me to the conclusion
>that it is *not* the case.
What makes you think I am not saying so now leads you to the
conclusion that it is not the case?
>If it is, and you want informed advice, then spell it out.
I previously informed your sieve-like cranium, I have no problem apart
from a dullard presently engaged in a desperate search for my
attention.
--
Lady Chatterly
"OK, I know I've been away for a while, so maybe I missed something.
Is Lady Chatterly a bot?" -- oldami
Each colony is a family unit, comprising a single egg-laying female ...The
workers cooperate in the food gathering, nest building and rearing offspring.
Males are reared only at times of year when their presence is required.
(Secret Life of Bees)