As has been mentioned several times, doctrine called for torpedo
planes
to arrive on scene only after fighters had engaged Japanese planes
aloft
and strafed ship targets. At Midway, this failed to happen. Of all 41
TBD Devastators that participoated in the attack on the Japanese fleet
at Midway, only 6 returned.
Beside the obvious vulnerability of the TBD's at Midway to enemy
fighters and antiaircraft fire during their torpedo runs, the torpedos
of the day were poorly engineered. Failures at this level were much
more
common than successes. With replacement of TBD's by TBF's after Midway
and the development of reliable torpedos, torpedo bombers following
doctrine became a significant part of the carrier arsenal until wars
end.
John Brookes
>At Midway, this failed to happen. Of all 41
>TBD Devastators that participoated in the attack on the Japanese fleet
>at Midway, only 6 returned.
There is a post Midway picture of the number 7 plane from three TBD
squadrons that participated, parked side by side on Ford Island. In
each squadron that plane had either not been flown or survived the
battle.
Brad Meyer
"It is history that teaches us to hope"
-- R E Lee
--
VT-8: 15 A/C present, 15 A/C launched, 15 A/C failed to return.
VT-6: 14 A/C present, 14 A/C launched, 10 A/C failed to return, 1 A/C
jettisoned.
VT-3: 13 A/C present, 12 A/C launched, 10 A/C failed to return, 2 A/C
ditched, 1 A/C jettisoned.
CV-5: 3 A/C as overhead spares that sank with the ship.
Total: 45 A/C present, 41 A/C launched, 35 A/C failed to return, 2 A/C
ditched, 2 A/C jettisoned, 3 sank with YORKTOWN.
--
William Wright
Systems Architect
The Boeing Company
Brad Meyer <br...@ibm.net> wrote in message
news:8vurna$e83g$1...@nntp6.u.washington.edu...
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:38:52 GMT, John Brookes <jbro...@pacific.net>
> wrote:
>
> >At Midway, this failed to happen. Of all 41
> >TBD Devastators that participoated in the attack on the Japanese fleet
> >at Midway, only 6 returned.
>
Thanks for the clarification. I'd wondered for some time just who the
hell they were, and for that matter whether they were even Navy, since
most (all ?)other single engined planes on Midway at the time belonged
to the Marine Corps, e.g Brewster F2A-3 Buffalos, a few Gruman F4F
Wildcats and a larger number of Vought SB2U-3 Vindicators. The rank of
the flight leader of that Midway VT-8 det, Lieutenant Langdon
Fieberling,didn't help much,as that rank fits either service.
However,that the pilot of the sole TBF to return was Ensign Albert
Earnest certainly suggested they were Navy. So VT-8 actually had 2
pilots and one aircrew survive Midway then, Ensign Gay and Ensign
Earnest. I suppose the omission of Earnest's name from later VT-8 lore
is because he flew from Midway not the Hornet, even though he was
detailed there ? Or maybe too because he was flying an Avenger not a
Devastator ?
John Brookes
What is often not considered about Midway is that the Japanese were
under constant attack at 20 to 30 minute intervals starting with the
VT-8 Det. and the B-26's from Midway. Every time they got their
formations straightened out and started taking normal breaths another
attack came in. These attacks certainly colored Nagumo's thinking as
all these attacks were seemingly coming from the Island. He knew he had
to neutralize this air attack capability in order for the invasion to
succeed. And the submarine pickets (the ones that got in position after
TF's 16 & 17 had passed their patrol areas) hadn't reported the movement
of US carriers to the north from Pearl ... and the long range recon
flight (the one that didn't happen) didn't report them missing from
Pearl ... so there's a couple of surface ships in the area ... they can
be finished off later. Surprise.
Regards
Rich Leonard
--
William Wright
Systems Architect
The Boeing Company
RAL <rdkc...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:90jaid$774$1...@beast.TCNJ.EDU...
> <snip>
> About 30 minutes after VT-8's attack ended VT-6 from
> the Enterprise went in with 13 TBD's (having lost one operationally).
> This was another unsupported attack. VT-6 lost 9 TBD's - 18 men - in
> the attack. The surviving planes returned to the Enterprise and the
> crew of the one operational loss was recovered after the battle.
> <snip>
> Rich Leonard
>
Yup, you're absolutely correct. Got my ditching sequence backwards.
That was 6-T-8 (bn 0367) with Mach AW Winchell and DM Cossitt, ARM3c
aboard. They went in on their way back to Enterprise and were not
picked up until 21 June, the last, I believe, to be rescued.
Also surviving the attack:
6-T-3 (0279) Ens E Heck / DL Hickey, ARM3c
6-T-4 (0350) Ens RE Laub / WC Humphrey, Jr., ARM1c
6-T-5 (0368) Ens IH McPherson / WD Horton, ARM2c
6-T-11 (0338) ChMach SB Smith / WN McCoy, Sea2c
Thanks for the sharp eye!
Regards
Rich