Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Book Question

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Art Layton

unread,
Oct 8, 2003, 7:51:44 PM10/8/03
to
I have an opportunity to purchase THIS IS VIETNAM: THE DEFINITIVE
DOCUMENTATION OF HUMAN DECISIONS edited by Gareth Porter and
Stuart Loory. Looking for feedback about this book for someone who
collects fiction and non-fiction about Vietnam. Ed Moise, any
thoughts?

Art Layton
Stamford CT
-----
[Moderator Note: All SHWV messages, FAQs And related files are archived at
http://www.vwip.org/vwiphome.html. The posting of an article
by the moderators of SHWV only indicates the article is within the Charter
and does not imply agreement with, nor the correctness of, the article.]

The e-mail submission address for SHWV is Vietnam...@newsguy.com.

Ted Gittinger

unread,
Oct 9, 2003, 6:21:16 AM10/9/03
to

"Art Layton" <sheb...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:6m89ovgj221sj90qe...@4ax.com...

> I have an opportunity to purchase THIS IS VIETNAM: THE DEFINITIVE
> DOCUMENTATION OF HUMAN DECISIONS edited by Gareth Porter and
> Stuart Loory. Looking for feedback about this book for someone who
> collects fiction and non-fiction about Vietnam. Ed Moise, any
> thoughts?

I am not Ed Moise by a long shot, but my view is that the book
indeed has collector value, but little else. Gareth Porter is not
a first choice for objective scholarship. Maybe not even a
second choice.

ted

Dai Uy

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 9:02:05 PM10/11/03
to
"Ted Gittinger" <tgitting...@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<shdaov8gbgnk6idg2...@4ax.com>...

> Gareth Porter is not
> a first choice for objective scholarship. Maybe not even a
> second choice.
>
> ted

"The Khmer Rouge Canon 1975-1979: The Standard Total Academic
View on Cambodia" http://jim.com/canon.htm by Sophal Ear describes
Gareth Porter's academic credibility. Scroll down to footnote
[65] and read the next several paragraphs. I don't believe that
Mr. Porter has ever publicly acknowledged his erroneous analysis
or his Maoist bias.

-Dai Uy

Art Layton

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 8:22:56 PM10/13/03
to
Thanks for the input and link. Didn't Porter later admit his
mistakes with that book?

Art Layton
Stamford CT

0 new messages