Re: Race-baiting Washington Post column asks whether Boston Tea Party was 'terrorism' committed by 'Blackfaced' White Men

[Harris Slut]

On 16 Dec 2023, "ELON X." <el...@protonmail.com> posted some
news:ullm41$2klg6$5...@dont-email.me:

>

A new column in the Washington Post offered a deconstruction of one of the
most iconic moments in America’s founding era, wondering if the Boston Tea
Party was really an act of "terrorism" done by "White men" wearing an
early form of Blackface.

Post contributing columnist Theodore Johnson speculated as to whether
Americans’ heroic mythologizing of the rebellious act in Boston Harbor in
response to the British Tea Act of 1773 is the correct interpretation of
the actual events that day.

Describing how it’s seen in Americans’ collective cultural view, Johnson
wrote, "The story of that night became lore — and the lore evolved into
national myth. The Boston Tea Party has come to symbolize the
revolutionary spirit that led to independence. It engraved the catchphrase
‘no taxation without representation’ on the country’s cornerstone and
signified the embrace of democracy."

However, he continued, offering another version of the events that he
claimed has been "swept under history’s rug to prevent the colonists from
being cast as common criminals hiding behind racist face paint."

"A horde of White men disguised themselves as Native Americans — coppering
their faces and donning headdresses in the same tradition that would lead
to blackfaced minstrel shows decades later — to commit seditious
conspiracy and destroy private property," he wrote.

"The riotous mob trespassed on three ships and destroyed goods worth
nearly $2 million in today’s money — all because they didn’t want to obey
a duly passed law," he added, couching the events of that as something
that many would see as punishable as a crime, or even terrorism today.

Johnson cited Benjamin Carp, the author of "Defiance of the Patriots: The
Boston Tea Party & the Making of America, writing that the author sees
that the incident all those years ago "now might be classified as an act
of terrorism."

The column itself is entitled, "Was the Boston Tea Party an act of
terrorism? It depends."

Further paraphrasing Carp, he added that the Tea Party "was principled and
nonviolent, carried out by common folk who believed virtue was on their
side. It was also criminal…"

Though Johnson’s column refrained from concluding that the classic
interpretation of the Boston is harmful, he did suggest it is less true
than his "White men" in Blackface view.

He wrote, "A nation’s myths — exaggerated or imagined as they might be —
shape its identity. Scholars claim these myths merge fiction and truth,
transform incidents into parables, become sacred and resilient in the face
of scrutiny, and influence personal and group behavior."

Johnson also added that the myth is not as relatable to today’s Americans,
appearing to suggest that people of color don’t see themselves represented
by those original White male founders.

"They are moving stories. But the heroes of these myths don’t look like
the majority of Americans today. Many of us descend from people labeled
threats or, at best, sidekicks and free riders. It leaves us wondering
when we’ll get to be the protagonists in a core national myth."

He added, "Being able to see yourself in a story validates both the person
and the example. Harriet Tubman and Rosa Parks and Thurgood Marshall, for
example, made the United States truer to its principles. They demonstrated
how a previously excluded people can be the fullest expression of — not a
threat to — the nation’s virtue."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/wapo-column-asks-whether-boston-tea-party-
act-terror-committed-blackfaced-white-men