On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:01:05 +0100, Michael Kuettner
Of course.
>
>> Nor does their failure to
>> mention something mean that it didn't happen.
>>
>Those sagas don't mention little green men from outer space so the
>aliens were here ?
>Sloppy thinking ...
So is the argument you have just made.
>
>> There are artifacts in North America which do appear to be Norse in
>> origin. The well known supposed 'mooring holes' are consistent with
>> being a thousand year old Norse technique used for marking land
>> boundaries. I understand this technique is still in use in Iceland
>> today. The holes are triangular in section as a result of them having
>> been drilled with a flat chisel. (I know this sounds counter-intuitive
>> but its easy to demonstrate).
>>
>We've been over those holes before. Forget it.
They have been measured, mapped, photographed and, in some cases, have
had their contents analyzed. I'm not sure about dating. It's nonsense
to claim that they are 'mooring holes' but their geographical pattern
is consistent with them having a purpose. They have been shown to be
consistent with quite recent Icelandic land marking techniques which
have been in use almost from the beginning of the arrival of the Norse
in that country.
>
>> Some of the holes are associated with carved inscriptions such as the
>> Tyngsboro Map Stone. There is a deeply incised carving of a drinking
>> horn and another of a knife, both associated with tri-holes in South
>> Dakota.
>>
>A carving of a drinking horn or a knife is an inscription ?
>Were there also carvings of mooring holes ?
>Btw, "inscription" means some letters ("scribere" means writing), not
>some carvings.
It is argued that the carvings have a symbolic meaning consistent with
them recording the formalisation of a land agreement.
>
>
>> Then there are the numerous findings of Norse artifacts at and around
>> Sops Arm by Arlington Mallory.
>>
>Yep. Trade would be an explanation. Occam's razor and all that ...
>
>
>> K�re Prytz argues that Boston was the original site of Vinland and
>> that Norse works confirming this were found and destroyed in the
>> expansion of the city.
>>
>Nice argument. Austria was founded by 300000 year old aliens, but the
>artifacts proving that were destroyed.
How do you think K�re Prytz knows this? The considerable artifacts
(stone fish traps, remains of stone buildings and asociated works)
were recorded at the time.
>
>
>> More tenuous, the Sioux tribe have long established legends and
>> traditions about 'black robes' which appear to refer to members of the
>> clergy. Some of these can be interpreted as telling of their having
>> been visited by a pre-Columbian Bishop.
>>
>I'll give you a little hint : The ornate of a bishop isn't black.
>But don't let facts get in the way of a nice theory.
Seven or eight hundred years ago the robes of clergy were not
necessaril black, either. But in this case the legends do speak of
'black robes'. I don't know what, if any description, they give of the
bishop.
>There should be some coverage now about the election of a new pope.
>Watch it. Those clothes remained the same for 2000 years ...
That last claim is a nonsense. See
http://www.lookandlearn.com/if?search=papal+robes&bool=phrase for a
start.
>
>
>> When you take all of this and similar other material into account it
>> _is_ fairly safe to assume that the Norse had a far greater presence
>> in North America than is evidenced by L'Anse aux Meadows.
>>
>Yeah, sure.
>All that evidence, which disappears like fairy gold in the harsh light
>of the morning.
>Show me some solid evidence, like traces of buildings somewhere on the
>continent. Heck, I'll even settle for some buffalo hides in a grave in
>Scandinavia. Or foodstuffs from the new world.
>Or even some loan words in Indian languages.
>But there's nothing there ...
Why don't you don't mention the possibility of there being direct
evidence of a norse presence in North America?
--
Regards,
Eric Stevens