On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 3:16:35 PM UTC-5, Paul J Gans wrote:
> >> Your vote would have made no difference Tiggers! Don't beat yourself up about it old chum...
>
> You are falling for the "one more thing doesn't add to the total"
> fallacy. Think about it.
It's not a fallacy.
When the choices are all bad and the system is rotten to the core, and
election winners are beholden to the donor class, a vote becomes complicity.
If more people did not contribute to campaigns or vote, elections' turnout
would be so low that eventually something would have to be done about it.
And that is not a fallacy.
I would have voted for Bernie, though. And I voted on the local issues, but
the president section I left blank -- Not interested. It's called. taking a stand.
You vote for Hillary and she owes you nothing, you are a patsy. She owes
her donors and lobbyist, as per usual. You just got used to enable the
continuation of long time, evident political corruption.
Donald's message was a lot more attractive, "draining the swamp" sounds great.
He owes less to donors and has few ties with lobbyist, I imagine. But,
unfortunately, the man makes his own facts and rules and is simply not
qualified for the job, with his proud ignorance and raw ego.
You are not better than me just because you voted for Hillary.