Thiering Pesher of the Parable of the Sower - hidden historical facts for those who knew the technical terms
crunch
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1549
-----
Official Thiering website
http://www.pesherofchrist.infinitesoulutions.com/index_WFW_verse.html
Mark 4:3
Mark 4:4
Mark 4:5
Mark 4:6
----
Mark 4:14
20 BC
"Jacob-Heli appointed his son Joseph to act as his representative in
the Diaspora, using the title the Word. Joseph was to teach Gentiles
on the Tiber Island in Rome."
Mark 4:15
Mark 4:16
Mark 4:17
-----
My hope is that interested historians will go
thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
-----
David Christainsen
Matt Giwer
> The Jubilee of the Sower
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1549
> -----
> Official Thiering website
> http://www.pesherofchrist.infinitesoulutions.com/index_WFW_verse.html
I stuck the voodoo doll in the throat last night. Are you having
trouble talking yet?
--
A biblical archaeologist is like an astrological astronomer
or an alchemical chemist. None are scientists.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4199
http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/is-seg.phtml a14
Thu Nov 12 22:15:47 EST 2009
Sir David
(<<Kelly>>)
> My hope is that interested historians will go
> thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
Your hope is that people will sit at your feet and look to you as a
Thiering Pesher expert just on your say-so.
(Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!) As if *that* will ever happen.
crunch
> On Nov 12, 2:39 pm, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > My hope is that interested historians will go
> > thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
>
> Your hope is that people will sit at your feet and look to you as a
> Thiering Pesher expert just on your say-so.
I don't give a damn about that.
(<<Kelly>>)
> On Nov 13, 11:01 am, "(<<Kelly>>)" <rosie_be...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 12, 2:39 pm, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > My hope is that interested historians will go
> > > thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
> > Your hope is that people will sit at your feet and look to you as a
> > Thiering Pesher expert just on your say-so.
> I don't give a damn about that.
Of course you do. You have demanded frequently in SRQ that people
believe you just on your say-so when it comes to Thiering. You natter
on about being a "teacher" and a "scholar" who is the only one of few
in the world who understand's Thiering's theories. Yet, when
challenged to give your own opinion and/or understanding of Thiering's
theories, you balk and lie, and dodge and weave and put up mirrors and
blow smoke. IOW, you are unable to back up your grandiose claims.
Your intent is obvious, Soggy.
crunch
> On Nov 14, 6:42 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 13, 11:01 am, "(<<Kelly>>)" <rosie_be...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 12, 2:39 pm, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > My hope is that interested historians will go
> > > > thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
> > > Your hope is that people will sit at your feet and look to you as a
> > > Thiering Pesher expert just on your say-so.
> > I don't give a damn about that.
>
> Of course you do.
Of course I do not.
> You have demanded frequently in SRQ that people
> believe you just on your say-so when it comes to Thiering.
I have never done this in my life.
> You natter
> on about being a "teacher" and a "scholar" who is the only one of few
> in the world who understand's Thiering's theories.
I do not.
> Yet, when
> challenged to give your own opinion and/or understanding of Thiering's
> theories, you balk and lie, and dodge and weave and put up mirrors and
> blow smoke. IOW, you are unable to back up your grandiose claims.
You are deeply ignorant of reality. For example, I
support the Thiering derivation of Christian apocalyptic
timetable from sectarian solar schemes of history
because the ingredients show a mathematical fit.
Further, the similarity between sectarian language
and NT language is impresssive. I support the
conclusion that the First Christians are ultimately
derived from the Essenes.
Yet, the sectarians show us a path for modern people
not to follow, if only because of their harsh legalism.
> Your intent is obvious, Soggy.
You misread my intent from the very beginning
and never corrected yourself. That's on you.
David Christainsen
(<<Kelly>>)
> > > > > My hope is that interested historians will go
> > > > > thru Thiering pesher with a fine-tooth comb.
> > > > Your hope is that people will sit at your feet and look to you as a
> > > > Thiering Pesher expert just on your say-so.
> > > I don't give a damn about that.
> > Of course you do.
> Of course I do not.
Yep - you sure do.
> > You have demanded frequently in SRQ that people
> > believe you just on your say-so when it comes to Thiering.
> I have never done this in my life.
Have so.
> > You natter
> > on about being a "teacher" and a "scholar" who is the only one of few
> > in the world who understand's Thiering's theories.
> I do not.
Do too.
> > Yet, when
> > challenged to give your own opinion and/or understanding of Thiering's
> > theories, you balk and lie, and dodge and weave and put up mirrors and
> > blow smoke. IOW, you are unable to back up your grandiose claims.
> You are deeply ignorant of reality.
LOL! And *you* are projecting again.
> For example, I
> support the Thiering derivation of Christian apocalyptic
> timetable from sectarian solar schemes of history
> because the ingredients show a mathematical fit.
> Further, the similarity between sectarian language
> and NT language is impresssive. I support the
> conclusion that the First Christians are ultimately
> derived from the Essenes.
You're saying a lot of stuff here, but give no real reasons why you
feel that way. IOW, you're just parroting again without any real
personal knowledge.
Soggy wanna cracker?
> Yet, the sectarians show us a path for modern people
> not to follow, if only because of their harsh legalism.
You can't possibly know it's "only because of their harsh legalism".
And who is "us"? You and Thiering and the voices in your head?
> You misread my intent from the very beginning
> and never corrected yourself. That's on you.
I've read your intent the same as everyone one else here who has been
critical of your Usenet behavior. Are we *all* wrong and you the only
one who is right?
The long and the short of the Soggy-stuff above: just more dancing,
dodging, and liar-liar-pants-on-fire crapola.
crunch
Your mind is ruined with delusion; you lash out
with mockery and delusion. You should stop and
take stock.
Further, I am fully capable, for example, of talking
about the harsh legalism of the Essenes with competence.
(<<Kelly>>)
> Your mind is ruined with delusion; you lash out
> with mockery and delusion. You should stop and
> take stock.
More projection from Soggy.
You also dodged my questions. How very Soggyish of you.
> Further, I am fully capable, for example, of talking
> about the harsh legalism of the Essenes with competence.
Non-sequitur.
crunch
> On Nov 14, 11:16 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Your mind is ruined with delusion; you lash out
> > with mockery and delusion. You should stop and
> > take stock.
>
> More projection from Soggy.
Not projection; you should think it over.
> You also dodged my questions. How very Soggyish of you.
You see dodge at the drop of a hat because of your
unsound mentality. Further, you are not productive.
As is the common parlance, I was not interested in
your questions.
> > Further, I am fully capable, for example, of talking
> > about the harsh legalism of the Essenes with competence.
>
> Non-sequitur.
More distortion from Kelly. You challenged my
competence but you had no basis for it.
Further, you are not challenging here that the Essenes
were harshly legalistic.
Why does it matter? According to Thiering investigation,
the NT Pharisees were a lower-grade Essene. This is
highly interesting to me and I believe it to be correct.
(<<Kelly>>)
Can you say Hobby-Horse 5 times fast?
crunch
>
> - Show quoted text -
Can you say Tell-the-Truth 5 times fast?
(<<Kelly>>)
> > > Why does it matter? According to Thiering investigation,
> > > the NT Pharisees were a lower-grade Essene. This is
> > > highly interesting to me and I believe it to be correct.
> > Can you say Hobby-Horse 5 times fast?- Hide quoted text -
> Can you say Tell-the-Truth 5 times fast?
Easily.