Is this your idea of a tough military man to go to authorities and
complain? Guess when you heard shots during some military engagement,
you went into some hiding hole and called police.
I would agree that it is not ethical to reveal personal information
about any poster, but this is unmoderated group, anything goes.
It all depends. If you are looking at these groups through a Google
account, be advised that Google does police the boards and information
beyond the name (addresses, etc), hateful and provocative speech can
and should be reported and Google would most likely intervene in not
allowing messages by this person into his servers. Outside Google,
other provisions may exist.
Chris Nally is back. Welcome.
On Dec 19, 7:58 am, chuteok <chut...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This tossser has gone and followed me {just to annoy me} and joined
> and pissed of thousands on the Site {not a google Site}, Of course his
> 4 messages have been copy/pasted to the Admin people there in the USA
> who he has also had a go at.
That's a lie. I only responded to you in that site. It's a public
site open to anyone, not a private club.
How brave of Chris; he gets some upsetting comments and runs to hide
under the admin's skirt.
Did he learn to confront adversity like that in the SAS?
> This is your so called expert Brain and not brawn man on ancient
> history trying to flex his muscles eh, . Think it is funny, well just
> wait and see what happens, by the way Google knows all about it as
> well,
Wow! he ran whining to Google as well. Well done. Such fortitude.
It's a pattern.
> plus I posted my messages to the the soc.ancient.history site
> this last week to them as well with an explanation. Seems they concur
> with me in an email from Google Admin . You are one fool on the hill.
> Hpe your and your mates get what is coming
Nally sent me two threatening emails today. Here are some
excerpts.
====================
Hey wanker [...] now we have your email you may find your computer
system may crash around you in the days to come ,"
I can have your entire history in my hands on paper if I wish in a
matter of hours. , Ever hear of Mil/SOCOM Intel, yes we all have to
know who and what and how in SIGINT< ELINT< HUMINT etc etc, and people
that can do things for you. very much like havina Police Detective as
a best friend or even better some FBI mates........
You think brains over brawn, ........pity I passed the Mesna Test
then., and even though it is a stupid thing this IQ Quotent they still
use reguarly, mine is 145+ you twit,
and in any course it has to be anyway as to join the SAS you need
130+ ,
you could not even begin to know what I know, and how to cause havoc
in any form I like.
God your life is going to be mysery from now on
signed: "your nightmare":-}
------------
Fuckbag, [...] enter my world and you will live in pain hahaha:-} your
time is near
==================================
Sterling, isn't it?
This fellow is so smart that thinks that sending threatening emails in
this day and age gives him some kind of high ground.
Unfuckingbelievable.
Astute readers will notice also that Chris is saying that to respond
to me adequately he needs the help of his friends in SIGINT, ELINT,
and HUMINT, obviously to make up for the lack of INT in his own head.
No surprise.
I wonder if announcing his intentions to his enemy in writing is a
tactic he learned in the SAS. What you do think, folks?
His superior computer skills have allowed him also to find the email
that goes out with my every post to Usenet.
Wow!
What kind of cyber attack can I expect from such a goober? The
Nitwit Virus, the Stoopido Worm? Curiouser and curiouser.
I've dealt with a lot of dumb fuckers in Usenet but this guy is in a
class of his own.
I am glad he is back, though, so we can have some more fun with him.
After all HE started this shit and earned all we say about him.
The man protesteth that he's high I.Q. signifies he is no dummy no
matter what his imbecilic behavior might suggest.
All that, and free. Gotta love the Nallys of this world...
Stay tuned.
ZAP!
Any information I reveal about anyone is in the public domain.
Complaints have only weight if you are blameless. The moment you
find in the archive a post in which you were disrespectful or
insulting, especially preceding any posts in the complaint, you
forfeit the right to sustain an grievance. It's not illegal to say
that someone who acts dumb is dumb either.
Check out the "Delphi and the Pythoness" thread - Aggy and Anas - two
dwarves slap fighting...
Hilarryous.
> Complaints have only weight if you are blameless.
Not true.
> The moment you
> find in the archive a post in which you were disrespectful or
> insulting, especially preceding any posts in the complaint, you
> forfeit the right to sustain an grievance. It's not illegal to say
> that someone who acts dumb is dumb either.
Whatever the "disrespect" (and it can only be verbal and usually goes
to the a persons intellectual capability), nothing excuses hate speak
(which is actually a crime), physical threats and the revelation of
any personal information beyond a name (and one should not do that at
all). One can "disrespect back" verbally all one wants, the Usenet is
full of flame wars. But if one crosses the line, one is open to
serious sanction and possible legal action as a recent case against
Google revealed.
Still way above you, I guess. I looked down and I could only see a
tiny spec of you.
Oh it won't come as an attack from me but my kind, dumb, dumb to piss
off a person who has links into the FBI, I will find out when you 1st
shat your pants and all other info up til today, just think what can
be done to a bank account, car licences, Credit Cards , oh you really
thing it is just brawn, the are calling you a head on a stick body at
my Site. Guess what your now banned from it>Love to spell bad for U
===Still way above you, I guess. I looked down and I could only see a
tiny spec of you.===
Sure.
Do you remember a few days ago, when you claimed you hadn't posted anything
regarding the Russian Revolution, and I immediately quoted back to you some
(subpar as usual) "material" in which you had done just that, a day or two
before?
HiLarryous...
You and Aggy - desparate in your flailings - it should be on Jerry
Springer...
how sad.
You mean after making yourself look totally silly with the winter's
significance in the battle of Moscow? I remember. Yes, you were
right, I did post this little blurb about the Russian revolution but
it was not at all about the Russian revolution. I only attempted to
say that the Bolshevik group that took over was as multiethnic as the
empire of the Czars. Nothing in comparison to the voluminous postings
on the Russian revolution arguing against reason for your definition
of "conquer".
> HiLarryous...
>
> You and Aggy - desparate in your flailings - it should be on Jerry
> Springer...
Whatever you say. Make the booking for me, would you?
yep, he got his behind spanked by several posters here...his
intelligence is on par or even bellow of that crippled parachute guy.
Stirling work, {your words} as you would not last 5 mins in the real
HUMAN WORLD WITH ME {or outside of a book}, , NO I USED WHAT BRAIN YOU
SAID I DID NOT HAVE AN APPLIED IT THROUGH ANOTHER FORCE,
Continue you high and mighty worded missives, they only shroud how
gutless you are to personally meet and sort the matter out 'as in
times of old" you would probably suggest chess, you simpering little
weed, you have not known also what a Cyber atack is until you have
been hit with one, or have you?
You have never known adverstiy have you, your are one with no courage
except at shooting his mouth off, I would love to put you in a Patrol
in Sierra Leonne even now and see how long before you cry "Mummy I
wanna go home" my pack hurts, and my rifle is too heavy and I cannot
wash for a month, oh such is the privations , A head on a stick. You
now have a nickname at the other Site.
Quote the statue by which divulging personal information already in
the public domain is unlawful.
The line is a threat of physical violence, or stalking. Replying to
posts is never stalking.
The law is quite specific in that their must be an "unsolicited"
element in the complaint to be considered stalking, and one must FIRST
tell the sender of unsolicited emails to stop emailing, only then
after repeated offensive or threatening messages, the line is
crossed.
The situation is very different in newsgroups, where by the mere fact
of submitting a post one tacitly solicits replies.
There is also a clear difference between what a particular ISP or host
will permit, which is pretty much at their discretion, and what is
unlawful. A particularly nasty poster may have his membership
rescinded and still be in the lawful side.
Law enforcement will not get involved unless there is a clear specific
threat of violence, and the threat must have a modicum of
credibility.
Thanks for the warning, nitwit.
Is that a tactic you learn in the SAS? Announcing your attack plan
to the enemy in writing?
This guy is hilarious.
Nally,
You are STILL too dumb to realize that what you are saying is in fact
that your mind is so grossly inadequate to deal with a verbal attack,
as your gross overreaction to wish to use the FBI to deal with it.
Not to mention, to mention it again, how easy would be for law
enforcement in the U.S. to clue in law enforcement in Perth, as to who
it is that is engaging in illegal behavior -- were the threat
credible, that is, instead of the revenge fantasies of a sorry goober
with the brain of a seven-year-old.
Nally, you are the sorry victim of a most acute and completely
justified inferiority complex, and you continue to parade it to the
utter enjoyment of your readers.
Keep it up
> you have not known also what a Cyber atack is until you have
> been hit with one, or have you?
Let me give you some information to make your job easier.
I run Window XP. The system you need to reach is behind a firewall
running Zonealarm. It also runs an IPS-1 engine, which is a
combination of intrusion prevention system (IPS) and data loss
prevention (DLP) software which I adapted to run on Ubuntu Linux.
To knock me out completely you will also have to corrupt all my backup
drives which are used in a round-robin fashion and connected to the
system only during the backup. If you leave any of those drives
intact, I can restore my whole system in about 12 minutes, a minor
inconvenience at worst.
Other than that I am wide open to attack.
I hope that helps.
Three virtual workstations, two virtual servers here, each one with a
separate google account, each one can be replaced and restored with a
single file, who is this guy kidding?
Oddly enough, "Igor" the Inept, and "Gog", have the same ISP addresses.
gog 76.173.243.189
igor 76.173.243.189
Maybe they're just little "buddies", posting from the room they share...
He is a deluded moron who dreams of powers he does not possess.
Who in the FBI will jeopardize his job to run a check for some cripple
in Australia on a pitiful Internet vendetta?
Who with profound networking experience will go on a limb and break
the law for said cripple?
He sent me email with a "Gotcha" after he figured out what email goes
attached to each of my NNTP posts. Sheer genius.
Nally is very upset that I posted his excrementitious email and posts
where his bodybuilder friends could see them, and that he made such a
giant ass of himself in such a short time. He is quite an irascible
fellow who still thinks he can use the sword when the pen fails him.
Most entertaining.
> you have not known also what a Cyber atack is until you have
> been hit with one, or have you?
===Let me give you some information to make your job easier.
I run Window XP. The system you need to reach is behind a firewall
running Zonealarm. It also runs an IPS-1 engine, which is a
combination of intrusion prevention system (IPS) and data loss
prevention (DLP) software which I adapted to run on Ubuntu Linux.
To knock me out completely you will also have to corrupt all my backup
drives which are used in a round-robin fashion and connected to the
system only during the backup. If you leave any of those drives
intact, I can restore my whole system in about 12 minutes, a minor
inconvenience at worst.
Other than that I am wide open to attack.
I hope that helps.===
And of course, if he does actually get somebody to try to mess up your
system, then he is breaking international laws (no doubt felony level),
which will be easy to enforce since he's anounced his intentions and will
probably leave a trail that looks like a well lit interstate.
==You mean after making yourself look totally silly with the winter's
significance in the battle of Moscow? ===
Only the stupidest, most clueless of nitwits, with no business posting in a
history discussion group, would think that in modern warfare, the
malfunction of heavy and
light weapons, tanks and trucks being largely inoperative, loss of air
cover, having only light
clothing and gear when temperatures dropped into the -20s, -30s, and below,
would not have had a crippling effect on an army's ability to fight.
Only the stupidest, most clueless of nitwits, with no business posting in a
history discussion group - Anas and company...
And of course, this is hardly the first time you have been shown to be a
clueless dimwit - you have a history behind you - ancient battles, needing
Einsteinian physics to describe planetary movements in the solar system -
the list could go on.
But the real issue goes way beyond you're inability to get anything right -
more importantly, you don't *care* that you're wrong - you just want to keep
babbling away, and make usenet discussion good only for comedic relief by
those who recognize your type.
== I remember. Yes, you were right, I did post this little blurb about the
Russian revolution===
A poster toying with you, is more aware of what you have written than you
are...
And by the way, your "blurb" was fairly lengthy, with your usual
convolutions and loopisms.
See a doctor -if you already are, then see another doctor.
==but it was not at all about the Russian revolution. ===
Anas: "Yes, you were right, I did post this little blurb about the Russian
revolution but it was not at all about the Russian revolution".
When you see your doctor, take this sentence with you and present it to
him/her/it - it may provide clinical insights...
Make your own reservations for the Springer show - you'll need to talk to
them personally to indicate that you are indeed suitable.
<snip further rambling idiocy>
you will never know. address cycles randomly.
======
From: Chris Nally [mailto:chu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 8:41 AM
To: te...@tiglath.net
Subject: Fwd: [#560445284] Getting hate mail
Google are on you watching even now idiot
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Google Team <mail-s...@google.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [#560445284] Getting hate mail
To: chu...@gmail.com
[Google "flea letter" elided]
=====
The unmitigated moron has complained to Goggle about getting hate mail
from me.
It just doesn't get better than this, folks.
Being Nally, naturally, he overlooked two small details.
1. I do not use Gmail, or my email goes through Google otherwise.
2. Nally sent me unsolicited and offensive email FIRST, to which I
responded in kind, as warranted.
What is he going to give Google when they ask for the evidence of
"hate email," I wonder.
That is the kind of cyber mastermind plotting a cyber attack.
It's hard to believe this guy's brain has enough power to allow him to
type.
Someone must have told him how stupid he is making those kind of
threats, and in his latest email he writes:
"my message was smart! [...] my email was vetted for any implications
of overt danger to you"
It has all the beauty of contemplating an idiot regret making idle
threats. Like getting a foot infection after shootin his own
toes.
This is some fun I am having...
If I was to report his email to Google, he would likely get a caution
or perhaps worse. I won't because if he lost his Gmail account it
would take him a lot time to figure out that he can just open another
one with a different name, and I'd miss on some good Nally Nuggets.
Hilarious, apparently chute was not ok when our boogie man landed on
his head. Hope he keeps posting:)
Google is mis-formatting on of my posts above.
I repeat.
The unmitigated moron has complained to Goggle about getting hate mail
from me.
It just doesn't get better than this, folks.
Being Nally, naturally, he overlooked two small details.
1. I do not use Gmail, or my email goes through Google otherwise.
2. Nally sent me unsolicited and offensive email FIRST, to which I
responded in kind, as warranted.
What is he going to give Google when they ask for the evidence of
"hate email," I wonder.
That is the kind of cyber mastermind plotting a cyber attack.
It's hard to believe this guy's brain has enough power to allow him to
type.
I am going to call him Nelly because it becomes a shrinking violet
like him who runs with his hurt feelings to Mr. Google and other site
admins, hoping for sanctuary.
Who wants to discuss anything with super-dull Agammenon "all ancient,
Renaissance, and modern historians agree Romulus existed...," when one
can talk to Nutty Nelly?
This guy is a jewel, Martin.
Great potential, but at the moment a bit shy. He is terrified to
post here because he is mentally handicapped, nothing physical, just a
crippling lack of education, and associated acute inferiority
complex.
With a bit of luck he'll start to babble on Sparta any day now, and
then the real fun will start.
Stay tuned.