Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fanny - short for??

3,370 views
Skip to first unread message

Maldini

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 6:48:12 AM8/24/01
to
Hi

I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as 'Fanny', is
this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.


liz.davidson

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 7:01:31 AM8/24/01
to
I have lots of Fanny's in my history, ( ;0)) ) on the birth certificates
it is recorded as Fanny !! So I think it stood alone as a name in its own
right.
Liz Davidson
Maldini <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

nifty

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 8:47:46 AM8/24/01
to
Fanny is short for Frances


Singhals

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 12:30:06 PM8/24/01
to

The four women called Fanny/Fannie/Fan that I've known have all
had the official name Frances.

I do remember once on s.g.misc someone saying they had a
Sophronia who was called Fannie, though.

Cheryl

Peter Budgen

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 10:08:47 AM8/24/01
to
"Maldini" <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:<9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com>...
> Hi
>
> I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as 'Fanny', is
> this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.

As far as I know the usual original name for Fanny is Frances,
assuming the person you are referring to was female.

Peter

Nan

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 11:47:31 AM8/24/01
to
"Maldini" <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:<9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com>...
> Hi
>
> I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as 'Fanny', is
> this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.

Hi - My guess would be Frances. - N

John Burns

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 1:01:32 PM8/24/01
to
I had an aunt Frances who was called Fanny. I have a publication with some
English nicknames in it. It says Fanny was short for Frances except in
"Hants"where Fanny was short for Sarah.
John in Vancouver

"Maldini" <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

mikelongworth

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 3:03:39 PM8/24/01
to
Maldini wrote:
>
> I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as
> 'Fanny', is this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.
>

FANNY (f): Pet form of Frances. In use as an independent name in the
17th c. but had almost faded from sight by 1725. Then began to come
back in favour, until by 1850 was one of the top twenty names in
Britain, more popular temporarily than Frances itself. Then went into
decline, thought still to be found in great numbers in all
English-speaking countries in 1900.

Since about 1910 virtually extinct, the victim of slang meanings which
have turned a name that THACKERY was able to describe in 1850 as "a very
pretty little name" into one which is almost impossible to use. It was
been suggested that John CLELAND's notorious novel, 'Memories of Fanny
Hill' may ultimately have been responsible for the British slang usage.
The milder use of 'fanny' for the buttocks, also said to derive from the
name, awaits an explanation.

In its heyday Fannie and Fanney frequently occurred as alternative
spellings. In France Fanny is sometimes used as per form of Stephanie.

Source: 'Dictionary of First Names' by Leslie DUNKLING & William
GOSLING

= Mike
--
Mike LONGWORTH, Yateley, Hampshire, UK

Marion L

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 10:38:35 PM8/24/01
to
I have 8 individuals named Fanny in my family tree, from several different
counties, and in all cases that was the name used on official certificates
and documents. None were, for instance, originally Frances. It seems to
have been a very popular name 1850-1900

Marion in Wiltshire,UK


APAIRATEEF

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 10:30:22 PM8/24/01
to
Oddly enough I have a Helen listed as Fanny and not Ellen nor Nellie!!

But yes, the other ones i have it is short for Frances and have one who was
baptised just Fanny

Cheers

Sarndra
Christchurch, New Zealand
www.angelfire.com/ok/nafamily

Maldini <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

jeffrey.ellis

unread,
Sep 4, 2001, 5:07:29 PM9/4/01
to
My auntie was know as Fanny but her proper name was Frances

"Maldini" <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

Brian Watson

unread,
Sep 22, 2001, 1:32:03 PM9/22/01
to

"Maldini" <mal...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9m5bbf$avb$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

Vanessa (sometimes).

--
Brian


Carole McAndrew

unread,
Sep 22, 2001, 1:48:09 PM9/22/01
to
Frances is sometimes shortened to Fanny!

Carole

"Brian Watson" <br...@spheroid.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9oii0i$da5ec$1...@ID-107392.news.dfncis.de...

nifty

unread,
Sep 22, 2001, 8:26:30 PM9/22/01
to
Believe me -Fanny is short for Frances -a female name !Anne on Ireland


Charles Sullivan

unread,
Sep 22, 2001, 9:47:57 PM9/22/01
to
In article <e_9r7.1410$w5....@news.indigo.ie>, "nifty"
<phel...@indigo.ie> wrote:

> Believe me -Fanny is short for Frances -a female name !Anne on Ireland

You can believe Anne. However that doesn't mean that somewhere,
sometime, somebody didn't attach the name Fanny to a woman named Penelope,
Margaret, Zenobia, Belinda, or any other name you can think of.

Charles Ellson

unread,
Sep 23, 2001, 12:55:22 AM9/23/01
to
On Sunday, in article
<pan.2001.09.22.2...@triad.rr.com>
cwsu...@triad.rr.com "Charles Sullivan" wrote:

But you'll probably find that for each of those there will be a lot more
called Frances. Perhaps you can enlarge on the reasons for attaching the
name Fanny to the examples above; apart from Penelope (Penelope > Penny >
Fanny [as mispronounced by a younger sibling] ) the reasons would seem to
be more related to random choice than to any usual associations of the
names to Fanny.
--
_______
+---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //|
| Charles Ellson:E-mail charlesATellson.demon.co.uk | | \\ // |
+---------------------------------------------------+ | > < |
| // \\ |
Alba gu brath |//___\\|

nifty

unread,
Sep 23, 2001, 5:55:06 AM9/23/01
to
But Penelope is Penny, m gt is Meg,or Peg or Peggy .There arent many
Zenobias around here !Anne -I know several ladies called Fanny es but they
are all officially Frances


Singhals

unread,
Sep 23, 2001, 3:27:53 PM9/23/01
to
Charles Ellson wrote:
>
> On Sunday, in article
> <pan.2001.09.22.2...@triad.rr.com>
> cwsu...@triad.rr.com "Charles Sullivan" wrote:
>
> > In article <e_9r7.1410$w5....@news.indigo.ie>, "nifty"
> > <phel...@indigo.ie> wrote:
> >
> > > Believe me -Fanny is short for Frances -a female name !Anne on Ireland
> >
> > You can believe Anne. However that doesn't mean that somewhere,
> > sometime, somebody didn't attach the name Fanny to a woman named Penelope,
> > Margaret, Zenobia, Belinda, or any other name you can think of.
> >
> But you'll probably find that for each of those there will be a lot more
> called Frances. Perhaps you can enlarge on the reasons for attaching the
> name Fanny to the examples above; apart from Penelope (Penelope > Penny >
> Fanny [as mispronounced by a younger sibling] ) the reasons would seem to
> be more related to random choice than to any usual associations of the
> names to Fanny.
> --

Well, it isn't exactly PC, but one of the reasons a gal could be
called Fanny would have to do with size of rear-end as seen from
the rear. (g)

A friend had a friend who was called Fanny because as a baby
Fanny had needed to *be* fanned constantly, 'far's I know no one
except her mamma remembered Fanny's real name!

And a matron of the early 19th century was referred to by her
detractors as Fanny because of the way she used her fan which was
at that time a ladies' accessory.

There must be dozens of other reasons that would seem odd to us.

Cheryl

Charles Sullivan

unread,
Sep 23, 2001, 8:31:17 PM9/23/01
to
In article <100122...@ellson.demon.co.uk>, "Charles Ellson"
<Cha...@ellson.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On Sunday, in article
> <pan.2001.09.22.2...@triad.rr.com>
> cwsu...@triad.rr.com "Charles Sullivan" wrote:
>
>> In article <e_9r7.1410$w5....@news.indigo.ie>, "nifty"
>> <phel...@indigo.ie> wrote:
>>
>> > Believe me -Fanny is short for Frances -a female name !Anne on
>> > Ireland
>>
>> You can believe Anne. However that doesn't mean that somewhere,
>> sometime, somebody didn't attach the name Fanny to a woman named
>> Penelope, Margaret, Zenobia, Belinda, or any other name you can think
>> of.
>>
> But you'll probably find that for each of those there will be a lot more
> called Frances. Perhaps you can enlarge on the reasons for attaching the
> name Fanny to the examples above; apart from Penelope (Penelope > Penny
> > Fanny [as mispronounced by a younger sibling] ) the reasons would seem
> to be more related to random choice than to any usual associations of
> the names to Fanny.

What I implied by agreeing with Anne is that Fanny is most likely a
familiar name for Frances. But what I further implied is that we may
never know why a child is given a nickname or familiar name which is never
commonly associated with that child's birthname.

The _route_ by which you've described Penelope => Fanny, i.e.,
mispronunciation by a younger sibling, is quite common. Another is that a
child is named after a relative due to family pressure, but the parents
really don't like the name and actually call the child by a name they
favor. Or if the child has the same name as another member of the
immediate household, they have to call the child by at least a variant to
avoid confusion in everyday speech.

In some cultures it is common for all the children to have the same first
name and be familiarly known by their middle name. (The first name is
usually that of a saint.) And something the middle name gets omitted from
early records.

To be clear, I don't know of any women named Penelope, Margaret, Zenobia,
or Belinda who are called Fanny, nor do I even personally know or have in
my family tree anyone called Fanny. However I have examples of familiar
names from all the above _routes_ in my extended family tree.

Regards,
Charles Sullivan

Charles Ellson

unread,
Sep 24, 2001, 12:02:38 AM9/24/01
to
On Sunday, in article <3BAE37B9...@erols.com>
sing...@erols.com "Singhals" wrote:

<snip>

> Well, it isn't exactly PC, but one of the reasons a gal could be
> called Fanny would have to do with size of rear-end as seen from
> the rear. (g)
>

Not on this side of the pond. You've picked another classic example of
"two nations separated by a common language".
<snip>

Henry F. Brownlee

unread,
Sep 24, 2001, 1:48:27 AM9/24/01
to
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:31:17 GMT, "Charles Sullivan" <cwsu...@triad.rr.com>
wrote:


>What I implied by agreeing with Anne is that Fanny is most likely a
>familiar name for Frances. But what I further implied is that we may
>never know why a child is given a nickname or familiar name which is never
>commonly associated with that child's birthname.
>
>The _route_ by which you've described Penelope => Fanny, i.e.,
>mispronunciation by a younger sibling, is quite common. Another is that a
>child is named after a relative due to family pressure, but the parents
>really don't like the name and actually call the child by a name they
>favor. Or if the child has the same name as another member of the
>immediate household, they have to call the child by at least a variant to
>avoid confusion in everyday speech.
>
>In some cultures it is common for all the children to have the same first
>name and be familiarly known by their middle name. (The first name is
>usually that of a saint.) And something the middle name gets omitted from
>early records.

FWIW, in my wife's ancestry, there was a Veronica who became known as Vany,
then Fanny. To each his own. <g>

Henry F. Brownlee
South Louisiana

Alison Causton

unread,
Sep 24, 2001, 7:48:08 AM9/24/01
to
Charles Ellson wrote:
>
> On Sunday, in article <3BAE37B9...@erols.com>
> sing...@erols.com "Singhals" wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Well, it isn't exactly PC, but one of the reasons a gal could be
> > called Fanny would have to do with size of rear-end as seen from
> > the rear. (g)
> >
> Not on this side of the pond. You've picked another classic example of
> "two nations separated by a common language".
> <snip>

Neither on this side of the pond, truthfully.

Alison
Ontario, Canada

Eve McLaughlin

unread,
Sep 23, 2001, 10:21:09 PM9/23/01
to

>> I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as 'Fanny',
>is
>> this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.
>
>Vanessa (sometimes).
Never heard that - Frances is the normal name. However, a few girls were
actually named Fanny itslef.

--
Eve McLaughlin

Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society

Sammy Millar

unread,
Sep 24, 2001, 6:13:07 PM9/24/01
to
"Alison Causton" wrote 24 Sept.

>
> Neither on this side of the pond, truthfully.
> Alison
> Ontario, Canada

I agree.
As a hot-blooded Irishman, the "yanks" have got it "back to front" (or
is it "front to back" ? )

Regards
SammyM
Ireland


Henry F. Brownlee

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 1:30:19 AM9/25/01
to
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 23:13:07 +0100, "Sammy Millar"
<sammy....@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>I agree.
>As a hot-blooded Irishman, the "yanks" have got it "back to front" (or
>is it "front to back" ? )
>
>Regards
>SammyM
>Ireland

How about bass-ackwards?

Brian Watson

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 2:44:26 AM9/25/01
to

"Eve McLaughlin" <e...@varneys.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:q3XAVKEV...@varneys.demon.co.uk...

>
> >> I have come across a possible relative who was commonly known as
'Fanny',
> >is
> >> this short for something? eg. Bob for Robert etc.
> >
> >Vanessa (sometimes).

> Never heard that

Well I have, which is why I submitted it<g>.

> - Frances is the normal name.

So it seems.

I still don't know why some nitwit felt obliged to e-mail me direct telling
me (in an "I'm right, you are wrong" kind of way) that Frances is THE name
that is contracted to Fanny.

> However, a few girls were
> actually named Fanny itslef.

This, too, seems to be true.

--
Brian

Don Kirkman

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 5:50:52 PM9/25/01
to
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Brian Watson wrote in article
<9op90b$e8vdm$1...@ID-107392.news.dfncis.de>:

>> >Vanessa (sometimes).

>> Never heard that

>So it seems.

Fannie Merritt Farmer (1857 - 1915) compiled the Boston Cooking School
Cook Book (1896) and introduced standard measurements into US cooking.

Fanny Brice starred in US vaudeville and early radio.

One persistent memory from my pre-school days was a joke we neighborhood
kids thought was hilarious (and I think it has Chaplin's silent movie
fingerprints on it):

A couple are strolling and the lady takes a pratfall. He: "Did it hurt
ya, Fanny?" She: "No, it hurt my elbow."
--
Don
don...@covad.net

Dennis Stoker

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 3:43:11 PM9/25/01
to
In article <9oii0i$da5ec$1...@ID-107392.news.dfncis.de>, Brian Watson
<br...@spheroid.demon.co.uk> writes
Fanny is short for Frances.

Dennis
--
Dennis Stoker at Henley on Thames. Oxfordshire. UK
"For every complex problem, there is an answer ... and it's wrong."
H.L. Mencken.

malcolm.brunsdon

unread,
Oct 2, 2001, 2:22:56 PM10/2/01
to

"Carole McAndrew" <car...@mcandrew1.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9oiiot$vgh$1...@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...

> Frances is sometimes shortened to Fanny!
>
> Carole

And I have one who was actually christened Fanny

Malcolm


0 new messages