On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:28:48 PM UTC,
pss...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> On 20-Jan-23 5:23 PM, taf wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 9:14:27 PM UTC-8,
bbh...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am new to the group and very new to doing genealogical research and I would appreciate some help in researching my Taylor line.
> >>
> >> If I follow one line, it takes me from Hanger Taylifer to Guillaume William Frank de Borsale Taylifer which states that he is a son of Aymer, Count of Angouleme.
> >>
> >> The problems with that timeline are the following:
> >> 1) The various dob's not synching up with the ancestor or partner;
> >> 2) I can't find that Aymer had any other children other than Isabella who married King John of England.
> >>
> >> In the other line, it pretty much ends as Hanger's father having the name of William Tayilifer with a dob of 1200 and the trail ends there.
> >>
> >> If anyone could help me with this, I would appreciate it very much.
> >
> > Not sure this is what you had in mind by help, but the sorry truth is that it is all made up. All of it. Aymer existed, and he left a sole known child, Isabelle, wife successively of King John and of Hugh X de Lusignan. The name William Frank de Borsale Taylifer is an absurdity. He was probably first conjured into existence with a simpler name but then progressively elaborated to give a false sense of gentility. Even Hanger is not a normal name from the culture and period. It is seriously problematic, likely either invented or garbled, perhaps both.
> >
> > I strongly suspect that you need to look father down the pedigree before you come to the first authentic ancestor in this claimed tree. The overwhelming majority of Taylors descend from tradesmen, not nobility, and these tradesmen cannot be traced earlier than the 16th century. However, there is a long history of Taylor 'genealogists' letting their imagination run wild, and inventing ancestral lines to the Counts of Angouleme, because a few of them used a personal nickname (not a surname) that was superficially similar, and because nobody brags about descending from people who actually performed a skilled trade for a living.
> This is a case of false etymology anyway - the surname Taylor is, as you
> say, from the trade of the tailor, derived from the Anglo-Norman
> taillour (modern French tailleur) which simply means a non-specific
> cutter, e.g. usually of cloth, or sometimes of gemstones etc.
>
Unfortunately this false etymology is all over the net thanks to Burkes vol IV, p237-8,
where they specifically say that Hanger Taylefer was the descendant
of the Taillefer who fought with William at Hastings 1066 as recounted by Wace,
and that Hanger was the ancestor of a John Taylor under Edward III 1336,
whose descendants Burkes goes on to describe. Somehow somebody has
turned this into a Hanger Taylefer 1256-1336, but it seems he only appears
in this Ospringe reference 1256 and in the charter of Henry III [1265?].
Another geni site says he was the son of William Tailefer [1200-74] of Borlase in
Cornwall and Maria Montgomery. He was supposedly the son of Aylmer III of
Angouleme 1160-1202, so this descent falls down here, unless hes a bastard
son no one else has heard of.
The refs for this is "Royal Ancestry," Douglas Richardson, 2013 Vol. V. p. 310.
I havnt seen this book so I dont know if it comes from this, cos every instance
I've seen of this "ancestry" looks garbled. Nevertheless its very pervasive,
as it seems just about every taylor in USA claims descent from Hanger.
> There was an Anglo-Norman family surnamed Taillebois, from their
> original toponym (the place in Normandy was presumably named from a
> woodcutter).
>
> In the case of the first count of Angoulême to carry Taillefer (= iron
> cutter) as a byname, Guillem II in the first half of the 10th century,
> this allegedly came from his having cut with a single stroke through the
> iron breast-plate and chest of a Viking. He was succeeded by a bastard
> son, Arnaud Manzer, whose own son named after Guillem was also known as
> Taillefer presumably as a mark of continuity with the old high-born
> lineage. The epithet subsequently became hereditary.
>
> The uncommon forname Hanger also occurs in late-12th century charters
> for St Mary's abbey, Dublin, pp. 126 and 204 here:
>
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=vP4KAAAAYAAJ.
>
i thought it might have been a strange spelling of Henry but now you've
found this, i wonder if its a old danish/viking name introduced by the normans.
mike