On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 12:44:15 PM UTC-7, Carl-Henry Geschwind wrote:
> Now you've got me curious. I take it that De Obsessione Dunelmi (probably written
> as you say in the 1070s but per Wikipedia possibly not compiled until around 1120)
> does not identify the Cospatric son of Maldred as the earl Gospatric. But it seems to
> me that Symeon of Durham, writing in the 1120s, does identify exactly this Cospatric,
> with the same genealogy back to king Ethelred and with the same three sons, as the
> earl of Northumbria.
The relevant text of De Obsessione is very brief (translation from Stapleton, 1855, p. 766 with text of original ms in brackets):
"Afterwards, when Uchtred hade additional progress in military affairs, king Ethelred gave him his own daughter Elfgiva [Ælfgiua] in marriage ; by whom he had Algitha [Aldgitham], whom her father wedded to Maldred, the son of Crinan the thane [Maldredo filio Crinan, tein] ; by whom Maldred became father of Cospatric, who begat Dolphin [dolfini], and Waltheof [Walteofi], and Cospatric [cospat'ci]."
(The original is Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, ms. 139, beginning at the very bottom of the second column, f. 50r -
https://parker.stanford.edu/parker/catalog/canvas-9203a788f503dec316552b0d9c300e71 - with the relevant text about a third of the way down col. 2 of the next page, 50v.)
There is no further mention of this branch, so as you can see, nothing but the names.
This compares with Simeon of Durham:
At [Osulf's] death, Cospatric the son of Maldred, the son of Crinan, going to king William, obtained the earldom of the Northumbrians, which he purchased for a great sum; for the dignity of that earldom belonged to him by his mother's blood. His mother was Algitha the daughter of earl Uchtred, whom he had of Algiva, daughter of king Agelred. This Algitha her father gave in marriage to Maldred the son of Crinan. He then held the earldom, until the king, for the causes above named, took it from him. Flying therefore to Malcolm, he not long after made a voyage to Flanders; returning after a little time to Scotland, the aforesaid king bestowed upon him Dunbar, with the lands adjacent in Lothian, that out of these he might provide for himself and his friends until more prosperous times should come. This Cospatric was the father of Dolfin, Walthev, and Cospatric. After Cospatric the earldom was given to Walthev, the son of earl Siward;
. . .
Cospatric being cast down from his dignity, Waltheov was raised to the earldom, which was his right by his father's and mother's descent; for he was the son of earl Siward, by Elfleda, daughter of earl Aldred."
(This is also from CCCC ms. 139, but I have not bothered to fish out the precise page in the original.)
So yes, Simeon is explicit in the identification, and it also seems apparent that he used De Obsessione as a source but also had access to further information.
> So on what basis do the "minority" suggest a need for an
> alternative identification? Is there evidence that Symeon
> is not trustworthy?
Unfortunately, I have been misled by Wikipedia (article on Gospatric), which says "Alternatively, some suggest Gospatric may have been the youngest son of Earl Uhtred the Bold (died 1016) or the grandson of Uhtred's discarded first wife, Ecgfritha, daughter of Aldhun, Bishop of Durham, through Sigrida, her daughter with Kilvert, son of Ligulf." I was unable to follow up on this because it cites Forte, Oram and Pederson, Viking Empires, p. 204, which Google Books won't let me see. However, with some creative string searching, I learn that this book repeats verbatim the text of Oram, The Lordship of Galloway, p. 32, and again some creative searching there gives me the following,
"A key figure in the political structure of Cumberland in the mid eleventh century was a nobleman named Cospatric, who issued a writ in favour of one Thorfinn mac Thore concerning land in Allerdale.[171] The identity of this Cospatric is a matter of some controversy , the two main arguments naming him either as youngest son of Earl Uhtred, or the son of Maldred, who was to become earl of Northumbria briefly between 1068 and 1072, and who subsequently became earl of Dunbar.[172] Alternatively he may have been the grandson of Bishop Aldhun's daughter, Ecgfrytha, through Sigrida, the daughter of her second marriage to Kilvert, son of Ligulf."
So this is saying that the Cospatric who granted Allerdale may be Cospatric, son of Uhtred, or he may be earl Cospatric, son of Maldred (with a cite I can't see), or (in what appears to be the author's own speculation) he may be Cospatric son of Arkil. The author is not questioning that earl Gospatric was the son of Maldred, only whether he was the Allerdale grantor and Cumberland notable, or whether the Cumberland notable and Allerdale grantor Cospatric was distinct from the earl and instead one of these other people also named Cospatric.
(The son of Uchtred is not named in De Obsessione, but is given brief notice by Simeon: "But earl Uchtred had left three sons, Aldred, Eadulf, and Cospatric, of whom the first two were successively earls of the Northumbrians."; the grandson of Kilvert is named in De Obsessione immediately after the other Cospatric, but again, nothing but genealogical information is given - "The daughter of bishop Aldun, whom earl Ucthred had sent away, became the wife of a certain thane in Yorkshire, namely, Kilvert, the son of Ligulf; their daughter, Sigrida, became the wife of Arkil, the son of Ecgfrid, and she bore him a son named Cospatric. This Cospatric took to wife the daughter of Dolfin, the son of Torfin, by whom he begot Cospatric, who of late ought to have fought with Waltheof, the son of Eilaf.")
Oram's footnote 172 may provide further information, but this looks like a Wikipedia editor has misunderstood the source, confusing the nature of the controversy. Thus I am unaware of any scholar questioning Simeon on the identity of earl Gospatric with Maldred's son.
taf